one suggesion i want to share with you regarding polling vote. There is one problem in this line
Who presents the most unbiased objective journalism?
i think there are more than one Journalists who are not bised, if i ll select Talat then why not ayaz mir, if ayaz mir then why not hamid mir. So if there are more then 2 options then there should be check list.
2nd thing is that , it is not necessary that i am satisified with available options, like last time you gave 3 names of differents women for presidental election. i was not satisified with them so i didnt give my openion because i was bound not to cast my vote, so there should be one option like “none of them”
keep it up nice effort
Regards
Abid
It seems that Government still have the people in legislature who speak their hearts and are not worried of the dictaors wand. May be the anchors questions performed the magic to open up this old mans conscience.
Great interview. Besides the obvious scholarship and level headedness of the guest, the host was not interrupting frequently,like Talat, to push his/her anti-Musharraf agenda.
Also, there was no overtalking and interruptions and the B.S. because there was no one from the many third rate opposition spokespersons who are full of hot air, and nothing else.
The most enlightened programme we watch on your site is of PJ Mir, he is somebody who gives you deep meaningful debate and highlights issues as they ought to be, however if he was to criticise President musharraf a bit more would be great, but only in an objective manner, his interview of Pervez elahi was good.
Email This Article - News - Video
September 19th, 2007 at 8:28 pm
finally a voice of sanity from the govt camp
September 19th, 2007 at 10:09 pm
Asalamo alikum ADMIN
one suggesion i want to share with you regarding polling vote. There is one problem in this line
Who presents the most unbiased objective journalism?
i think there are more than one Journalists who are not bised, if i ll select Talat then why not ayaz mir, if ayaz mir then why not hamid mir. So if there are more then 2 options then there should be check list.
2nd thing is that , it is not necessary that i am satisified with available options, like last time you gave 3 names of differents women for presidental election. i was not satisified with them so i didnt give my openion because i was bound not to cast my vote, so there should be one option like “none of them”
keep it up nice effort
Regards
Abid
September 20th, 2007 at 4:33 am
i agree with Adil. SM Zafar was really cool. and what he predicted as the possible court decision regarding dual offices of Gen Mush is worth noting.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:40 am
Nasir is right. It is also mentioned in The Daily Times editorial today. Anyway the way anchor keep the flow of constitutional debate was marvolous
September 20th, 2007 at 4:59 am
It seems that Government still have the people in legislature who speak their hearts and are not worried of the dictaors wand. May be the anchors questions performed the magic to open up this old mans conscience.
September 20th, 2007 at 6:42 pm
Great interview. Besides the obvious scholarship and level headedness of the guest, the host was not interrupting frequently,like Talat, to push his/her anti-Musharraf agenda.
Also, there was no overtalking and interruptions and the B.S. because there was no one from the many third rate opposition spokespersons who are full of hot air, and nothing else.
s
October 29th, 2007 at 9:23 am
The most enlightened programme we watch on your site is of PJ Mir, he is somebody who gives you deep meaningful debate and highlights issues as they ought to be, however if he was to criticise President musharraf a bit more would be great, but only in an objective manner, his interview of Pervez elahi was good.