<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Center for National Policy discusses Pakistan Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/</link>
	<description>pkpolitics.com</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 13:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pak.nukes</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-73093</link>
		<dc:creator>pak.nukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-73093</guid>
		<description>Whoever has to know what Haqqani is,should visit this website. 
http://pkdemocrat.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever has to know what Haqqani is,should visit this website.<br />
<a href="http://pkdemocrat.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://pkdemocrat.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterpan773</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33554</link>
		<dc:creator>peterpan773</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33554</guid>
		<description>I agree with Aqil Khan's opinion. HH is no doubt an opportunist. But he is not only an intelligent person but a well read man.
What we have to see is, what this person is talking about. If his talks make sense. I have to admit it does.
I believe he is right in pointing out the problems Pakistan is facing today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Aqil Khan&#8217;s opinion. HH is no doubt an opportunist. But he is not only an intelligent person but a well read man.<br />
What we have to see is, what this person is talking about. If his talks make sense. I have to admit it does.<br />
I believe he is right in pointing out the problems Pakistan is facing today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aqil khan</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33542</link>
		<dc:creator>aqil khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33542</guid>
		<description>hello commemtators and fellow reader:

         the biggest issue that we face as a pakistani at all levels is lack of listening to others and already made up personel or collective perceptions abt people,, things and issues.

         as we noticed above in few of the comments that commentators have their minds already made up abt MR HAQQANI regardless of what he was saying in that press conference was productive,, true or not.

         i personally dont know MR HAQQANI and his achievments in pakistani politics but what i know is that if he have served boht NAWAZ SHARIF AND BENAZIR BHUTTO then he is not the one to blaim,, y either of these prime minister of pakistan acquired his services when he already served the opposing political leader, it surely does put his reputation as a loyal party worker online but what abt our prime ministers ? y did they couldnt find anyone else to serve them.

       i personally believe that he pointed out the problems that pakistan is facing today very correctly and to the point although this press confernce was suppose to be acknowledging problems that USA is facing because of the current political turmoil in pakistan.

        may ALLAH bless pakitan with strength success and progress,,,, ALLAH HAFIZ O NASIR ho aap sab ka,, pakistan zindabad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello commemtators and fellow reader:</p>
<p>         the biggest issue that we face as a pakistani at all levels is lack of listening to others and already made up personel or collective perceptions abt people,, things and issues.</p>
<p>         as we noticed above in few of the comments that commentators have their minds already made up abt MR HAQQANI regardless of what he was saying in that press conference was productive,, true or not.</p>
<p>         i personally dont know MR HAQQANI and his achievments in pakistani politics but what i know is that if he have served boht NAWAZ SHARIF AND BENAZIR BHUTTO then he is not the one to blaim,, y either of these prime minister of pakistan acquired his services when he already served the opposing political leader, it surely does put his reputation as a loyal party worker online but what abt our prime ministers ? y did they couldnt find anyone else to serve them.</p>
<p>       i personally believe that he pointed out the problems that pakistan is facing today very correctly and to the point although this press confernce was suppose to be acknowledging problems that USA is facing because of the current political turmoil in pakistan.</p>
<p>        may ALLAH bless pakitan with strength success and progress,,,, ALLAH HAFIZ O NASIR ho aap sab ka,, pakistan zindabad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nota</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33402</link>
		<dc:creator>nota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33402</guid>
		<description>@Hozein Haqqini
Thank you for putting it all together so nicely. Just one thing I have a minor isssue with:

&lt;i&gt;"Itâ€™s all ugly politics. No loyalties."&lt;/i&gt;

Pure politics is ugly. No loyalties, no morals, no qualms. It is a sibling of &lt;a href="http://pkpolitics.com/2007/12/03/visitors%e2%80%99-news-views-on-emergency-12-dec/#comment-33097" rel="nofollow"&gt;Capitalism which is just as ugly.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hozein Haqqini<br />
Thank you for putting it all together so nicely. Just one thing I have a minor isssue with:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Itâ€™s all ugly politics. No loyalties.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Pure politics is ugly. No loyalties, no morals, no qualms. It is a sibling of <a href="http://pkpolitics.com/2007/12/03/visitors%e2%80%99-news-views-on-emergency-12-dec/#comment-33097" rel="nofollow">Capitalism which is just as ugly.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hozein Huggani</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33373</link>
		<dc:creator>Hozein Huggani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33373</guid>
		<description>The major problem with Husain Haqqani is that he is as intelligent as he is evil.

I am convinced he has no soul.  He is a deft political operator, capable of outsmarting even Benazir Bhutto.  Yet, he has never used his skills for the good of the country.

As you see, he's sitting safely in the U.S., away from his tons of enemies in Pakistan.

The unfortunate thing about Pakistan is that we have too many Husain Haqqanis.  He speaks of democracy, but when Musharraf came to power, he went to him begging for a position.  When Musharraf told him he had enough lotay, Haqqani went to the U.S. and kissed up to the yahud.

He joined the South Asia program of the anti-Pakistan Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.  One of their fellows, Ashley Tellis, helped create the U.S.-India nuclear partnership.  Another of their fellows, Frederic Grare, is resoundingly anti-Pakistan.  He's a Frenchman who worked at an Indian research institute.

Haqqani has since joined the Hudson Institite, one of the most right-wing think tanks in America.  After 9/11, one of its scholars wrote an op-ed proposing that the U.S. nuke Mecca.  Haqqani's boss, Hillel Fradkin, frequently writes of the need to "reform" Islam.  They've invited individuals over who seek to eliminate the Hadith from the Islamic corpus.  Hudson is a heavily pro-Zionist organization.

It should also be noted that Benazir Bhutto's public relations firm, Burson-Marsteller, has had clients such as Ahmad Chalabi (of Iraq) and many anti-Iran, Zionist organizations.

Musharraf has done the same with his courting of the head of the American Jewish Congress.

This is not to say these people are Zionists.  It's all ugly politics.  No loyalties.  

Haqqani was a Jamaati.  Kissed up to Zia.  Worked for Nawaz against BB.  Worked for BB against Nawaz.  Then he kissed up to Musharraf.  Now he's anti-Islamist and pro-democracy.  

He is a creep.  He is behind all of Benazir's statements on AQ Khan, the IAEA, etc.  Watch out for him.  He is trying to control Pakistan's politics from Boston.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major problem with Husain Haqqani is that he is as intelligent as he is evil.</p>
<p>I am convinced he has no soul.  He is a deft political operator, capable of outsmarting even Benazir Bhutto.  Yet, he has never used his skills for the good of the country.</p>
<p>As you see, he&#8217;s sitting safely in the U.S., away from his tons of enemies in Pakistan.</p>
<p>The unfortunate thing about Pakistan is that we have too many Husain Haqqanis.  He speaks of democracy, but when Musharraf came to power, he went to him begging for a position.  When Musharraf told him he had enough lotay, Haqqani went to the U.S. and kissed up to the yahud.</p>
<p>He joined the South Asia program of the anti-Pakistan Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.  One of their fellows, Ashley Tellis, helped create the U.S.-India nuclear partnership.  Another of their fellows, Frederic Grare, is resoundingly anti-Pakistan.  He&#8217;s a Frenchman who worked at an Indian research institute.</p>
<p>Haqqani has since joined the Hudson Institite, one of the most right-wing think tanks in America.  After 9/11, one of its scholars wrote an op-ed proposing that the U.S. nuke Mecca.  Haqqani&#8217;s boss, Hillel Fradkin, frequently writes of the need to &#8220;reform&#8221; Islam.  They&#8217;ve invited individuals over who seek to eliminate the Hadith from the Islamic corpus.  Hudson is a heavily pro-Zionist organization.</p>
<p>It should also be noted that Benazir Bhutto&#8217;s public relations firm, Burson-Marsteller, has had clients such as Ahmad Chalabi (of Iraq) and many anti-Iran, Zionist organizations.</p>
<p>Musharraf has done the same with his courting of the head of the American Jewish Congress.</p>
<p>This is not to say these people are Zionists.  It&#8217;s all ugly politics.  No loyalties.  </p>
<p>Haqqani was a Jamaati.  Kissed up to Zia.  Worked for Nawaz against BB.  Worked for BB against Nawaz.  Then he kissed up to Musharraf.  Now he&#8217;s anti-Islamist and pro-democracy.  </p>
<p>He is a creep.  He is behind all of Benazir&#8217;s statements on AQ Khan, the IAEA, etc.  Watch out for him.  He is trying to control Pakistan&#8217;s politics from Boston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33349</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33349</guid>
		<description>I understand each and everyone's opinion but one thing I don't understand is that why we don't realize that Pakistan is a Soverign country and any thing that need to be discussed about Pakistan situation should be done in Pakistan by Pakistani and not by a foreign country or foreigners who are only minapulating our people like HH and the crisis of our country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand each and everyone&#8217;s opinion but one thing I don&#8217;t understand is that why we don&#8217;t realize that Pakistan is a Soverign country and any thing that need to be discussed about Pakistan situation should be done in Pakistan by Pakistani and not by a foreign country or foreigners who are only minapulating our people like HH and the crisis of our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aijaz Alamdar</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33134</link>
		<dc:creator>Aijaz Alamdar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33134</guid>
		<description>HH is smart,opportunist &#38; excellent speaker.
He is a kind of speaker when they talk it looks like this is the only truth--They smartly craft the subject to their likings &#38; shrewdly disregards the different angel of truth which does not suit their agenda.
Almost everything he said was truth but with his angel--Theres nothing wrong with his 7 paradox but the point is are they the only paradox of our nation.
He is wrong to say terrorism is Pakistani problem--Yes it was Pakistani problem when its main course was sectarianism--When he was adviser of BB he did not think that terrorism is a major Pakistani problem--As long as shia are killing sunni &#38; sunni are killing shia--no big deal because Pakistanis are killing Pakistanis but when terrorism changed its course towards US invaders in Afghanistan &#38; pakistan, He thinks &#38; BB thinks this is biggest pakistani problem thats hight of hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HH is smart,opportunist &amp; excellent speaker.<br />
He is a kind of speaker when they talk it looks like this is the only truth&#8211;They smartly craft the subject to their likings &amp; shrewdly disregards the different angel of truth which does not suit their agenda.<br />
Almost everything he said was truth but with his angel&#8211;Theres nothing wrong with his 7 paradox but the point is are they the only paradox of our nation.<br />
He is wrong to say terrorism is Pakistani problem&#8211;Yes it was Pakistani problem when its main course was sectarianism&#8211;When he was adviser of BB he did not think that terrorism is a major Pakistani problem&#8211;As long as shia are killing sunni &amp; sunni are killing shia&#8211;no big deal because Pakistanis are killing Pakistanis but when terrorism changed its course towards US invaders in Afghanistan &amp; pakistan, He thinks &amp; BB thinks this is biggest pakistani problem thats hight of hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nota</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33042</link>
		<dc:creator>nota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33042</guid>
		<description>@Ahmedhat
The following are certainly nice words and seem worth consideration. But knowing they are coming from the mouth of "The Butcher" it would be stupid for anyone to believe it and history has shown that to be true. 
"And my last call, now to our hosts, and the leaders of the Arab countries of this area: Let us hold hands, let us get together and bring about a new atmosphere of openness and tolerance. Today, we can stem the flood of radicals who could otherwise allow us all to be swept away in a whirlpool of bloodletting and violence. I do hope that we are able to say to the peoples of the Middle East there are the initial, the first glows of light of hope here. I hope for all of us that we will be able to live in liberty, in hope, prosperity and peace." -- Ariel Sharon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ahmedhat<br />
The following are certainly nice words and seem worth consideration. But knowing they are coming from the mouth of &#8220;The Butcher&#8221; it would be stupid for anyone to believe it and history has shown that to be true.<br />
&#8220;And my last call, now to our hosts, and the leaders of the Arab countries of this area: Let us hold hands, let us get together and bring about a new atmosphere of openness and tolerance. Today, we can stem the flood of radicals who could otherwise allow us all to be swept away in a whirlpool of bloodletting and violence. I do hope that we are able to say to the peoples of the Middle East there are the initial, the first glows of light of hope here. I hope for all of us that we will be able to live in liberty, in hope, prosperity and peace.&#8221; &#8212; Ariel Sharon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nota</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33039</link>
		<dc:creator>nota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33039</guid>
		<description>@Omer
"It can be true at times but more important is to judge a person based on his/her political veiws on a particural stance...If we recall, Quaid-Jinnah himself was part of Congress once."

But one must also judge if the stance is an honest one or just a self-serving one. You can say "La ilaha..." and Fazlu can say "La ilaha..." Now both of you are taking the same but say you are saying it cause you really  believe in it and Fazlu is saying it cause it gets him more votes. Now if I tell Fazlu to go take it somewhere else, am I disagreeing with his stance? Does that mean I am rejecting "La ilaha..."?

Yes Quaid was in Congress as that was the major party of the time. Muslim League was only formed in 1906 and Quaid joined it in 1913 when it changed its platform to one of Indian independence which it was against earlier. Did Quaid do it for personal gain or for principle? Did he ever switch back to Congress???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Omer<br />
&#8220;It can be true at times but more important is to judge a person based on his/her political veiws on a particural stance&#8230;If we recall, Quaid-Jinnah himself was part of Congress once.&#8221;</p>
<p>But one must also judge if the stance is an honest one or just a self-serving one. You can say &#8220;La ilaha&#8230;&#8221; and Fazlu can say &#8220;La ilaha&#8230;&#8221; Now both of you are taking the same but say you are saying it cause you really  believe in it and Fazlu is saying it cause it gets him more votes. Now if I tell Fazlu to go take it somewhere else, am I disagreeing with his stance? Does that mean I am rejecting &#8220;La ilaha&#8230;&#8221;?</p>
<p>Yes Quaid was in Congress as that was the major party of the time. Muslim League was only formed in 1906 and Quaid joined it in 1913 when it changed its platform to one of Indian independence which it was against earlier. Did Quaid do it for personal gain or for principle? Did he ever switch back to Congress???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nota</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33038</link>
		<dc:creator>nota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/2007/11/27/us-center-for-national-policy-discusses-pakistan-crisis/#comment-33038</guid>
		<description>@Ahmedhat on December 2nd, 2007 8:51 pm
"I am not too sure why Hussain Haqqani is being given such a harsh treatment by so many of you."

If you have to ask "why" then you need to find out don't you? At least put the effort of going through last few days of posts and you will find your answer. To see the light, first thing one needs to do is get their heads out of their a** (ars* if you are British :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ahmedhat on December 2nd, 2007 8:51 pm<br />
&#8220;I am not too sure why Hussain Haqqani is being given such a harsh treatment by so many of you.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you have to ask &#8220;why&#8221; then you need to find out don&#8217;t you? At least put the effort of going through last few days of posts and you will find your answer. To see the light, first thing one needs to do is get their heads out of their a** (ars* if you are British :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
