Comments on: PMLN Workers Take Oath for Restoration of Judiciary

By: ManzarWaheed

ManzarWaheed — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:40:17 +0000

The Greatest Leader Quaid Nawaz Sharif

By: Saqibt

Saqibt — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:53:59 +0000

@Democrat

“What is done in the past is gone by the wind , look ahead to future.”

Then we should also let go MQM, PML-Q and Mush and his supporters from the army . This is a ridicolous idea.

NS has got it all wrong and IK has it right. If NS had been sincere he would not participate in the elections.

Contrary to IK NS does not have a vision a for Pakistan. His part consists of turn coats, and they cannot be trusted.

/Saqib

By: Democrat Pakistani

Democrat Pakistani — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:26:42 +0000

Correction
NS and IK are doing good things

By: Democrat Pakistani

Democrat Pakistani — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:24:09 +0000

I think nobody is comparing IK and NS.
At the moment NS is doing right things , so we should appreciate that.
No one is questioning the siccerity of APDM.
But JI is always B team of DICTATORS.
If you are so much agianst t past actons of NS , then no one needs to convince you.
What is done in the past is gone by the wind , look ahead to future.
Ns AND ik are doing god things in different ways, let them do.
If now on , any one of them do any wrong they should be severly criticized

But if some one has so much NS phobia, he or she has no cure, but to be left alone.

By: Asif

Asif — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:34 +0000

Long story short, NS’s political career spans from 1981 to 2007 and IK’s political career spans from 1996 to 2007.

One cannot rewrite history, you can go back to the history books that how both of them got the public recognition, which factor was responsible for their uplift in Pakistan & abroad as well and compare their lives before & after jumping into the politics.

Why & when they entered into the politics, their objectives, goals, etc.

By: Saqibt

Saqibt — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:43:44 +0000

@Atif
They stand for principles. If they were the ones who supported Mush then they are aslo the most vocal protestors against his dictatorial rule. As something new in PAK politics IK also admitted that PTI made a wrong judgement about Mush. They were misled by Mush’s promise i.e. 7 point agenda (that was what they actually supported and not Mush in person). They (wrongly) thought that he was a man who could bring real democracy in Pakistan. PPP and PML was not able to do that in spite two periods to each of them. They just continued the game with the establishment and was more than content with filling their own pockets by comitting crimes.

In APDM and especially PTI you have a coalition/party which truly believes in REAL democracy and an independant judiciary.

/Saqib

By: Atif

Atif — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:36:44 +0000

Best Lines of actions have been adapted by Nawaz Sharif ,No body lnows how much sincere he is or wil be in future.But this question of sincerity applies to all parties including PPP,APDM (except PMLQ as it is an antonym to sincerity)

PPP all going fine except not much active (the higher ups) for the Judiciary.
Why Aitezaz is kept aside by the higher ups of PPP?(The only Question Mark for the PPP’s role…),else no doubt about the sincerity of this party.

APDM? Not really convincing , although the sincerity can’ be challenged for them at all? But unfortunately, it seems to be working like a horse with “khopas” around its head.Just like a suicider who may be right ideologically,but implementing its ideas through bomb blasts (as MMA did in 2004).

PMLQ, …..; Quaid e Azam ka naam badnaa kernay per he in per tow case hona chaaye.

By: Atif

Atif — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:20:48 +0000

What APDM is standing for ?
Imran and Qazi company were involved in the crime of protecting the UNIFORM.
On What Grounds they did so ?

By: Saqibt

Saqibt — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:44:15 +0000

@KHAN

The same old “nare baazi”. Don’t you people have the guts to debate with arguments? For me it seems that you people have changed very little over the years. Unfortunately there will be no change in your style of rule, if you are “granted” power. The same old tactics and excuses will be used again i.e. our hands are tied, we “have to” make these actions because of pressure from certain people/ groups etc.

Unless yuo people show real guts i.e. sticking to just issues then the “crowd” is not going to believe you.

/Saqib

By: Asif

Asif — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:30:29 +0000

I too can use the same language that you have acquired in order to differntiate yourself from the “crowd”

But I don’t want to differentiate myself from the crowd But to raise the level of the crowd by keeping myself to be a part of crowd.

Anyways thanks for reminding us that you are not from us(crowd).