l Visitors News & Views – Week 2, March 2008 | Pakistan Politics
{ 371 comments... read them below or add one }

  • AMagsi said:

    Asif Zardari interview with Jang and the news.

    http://www.vidpk.com/view_video.php?vid=9998

  • ayan said:

    I would like to add a link to the interview of Dr. Shahid Masood. This interview was taken by a Pakistani radio channel in Chicago. I find this interview very thought provoking. Specially as he described about his first program “views on News” as there is continuously flow of news from west to east and side by side they are also expressing their point of view what they want east to do for west so in this context there is a need of a program to express what people of Pakistan and specially muslims think about west. This interview was taken when GEO was closed down from Dubai. Admin please check that this link is working or if not I have the file downloaded with me you can contact me for the interview file.

    http://teeth.com.pk/blog/wp-content/audio/Shahid_Masood_Interview.mp3

  • Asif said:

    The next poll should be:
    The decision of NS not to be an active partner in the current govt is good for democracy?
    1) Yes
    2) No
    3) Don’t know

  • nota said:

    Blundering Idiots:
    Kashmir Singh’s spy confessions create ripples
    “…The confession turned what was meant to be a humanitarian gesture to reduce tensions and further bolster the India-Pakistan peace process into an international embarrassment for Islamabad that could endanger hundreds of prisoners on both sides held in similar circumstances….”

  • nota said:

    Oath under PCO in 2000 was different: deposed CJ
    “…Justice Iftikhar said that what made the present lot of the PCO judges different from the previous ones was the fact that this time the judges took oath under the PCO despite a Nov 3 Supreme Court seven-member bench’s decision, which had not only suspended the PCO but had also restrained the judges of the Supreme Court and all the high courts from taking fresh oath under the PCO….”

  • nota said:

    PM nomination: PPP may seek secret ballot to prevent rift
    “…Zardari, they claimed, read Fahim’s interview with a sense of ”disbelief”’…”
    “…To a question whether Zardari might agree to this kind of proposal that actually undermined his own powers which he was now enjoying, the party sources said keeping the new approach of Zardari in view, it was difficult to predict how he would react to this proposal.

    Meanwhile, Amin Fahim met Asif Zardari after he returned from Karachi on Saturday evening and reportedly his explosive interview with The News dominated the discussion between the two leaders. However, the details of the meeting could not be obtained.”

  • nota said:

    Regarding Amin Fahim’s statements. Certainly is odd that he would come our so strongly (‘I am being humiliated, betrayed’). Now he is always described as a “seasoned politician” and this kind of talk throws that belief out of the window. This is the kind of statement from which there is no going back — seems he is looking for a fight. And I won’t buy that this was just an outburst. Guys like him are very thick-skinned and impossible for them loose control like that. So who’s the puppet-master? Who’s pulling the string to make the birdie sing this song?

  • pakismine said:

    11 demands put by the Us in front of Pakistan:

    sharam ham ko magar nahi aati

    http://thepost.com.pk/EditorialNews.aspx?dtlid=148861&catid=10

  • nota said:

    @pakismine
    eing covered here

  • pakismine said:

    thanks nota for the link. Appreciate it.

  • nota said:

    Blundering Idi*ts:
    Kashmir Singh’s spy confessions create ripples
    “…The confession turned what was meant to be a humanitarian gesture to reduce tensions and further bolster the India-Pakistan peace process into an international embarrassment for Islamabad that could endanger hundreds of prisoners on both sides held in similar circumstances….”

    India’s ‘Thank You’ Sp*t on Burney’s Face:
    India’s Gift on Release of Kashmir Singh: The Body of Dead Pakistani Killed By Torture

  • nota said:

    Mush’s Lies Exposed…
    What a letter, indeed!
    We have heard a lot said about My Lord, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry by Gen (retd) Musharraf and his minions in the one year that he has been dismissed/sent on leave/sent on forced leave/reinstated/dismissed/deposed/put under house arrest alongside his family including children, one as young as nine.

    Most of this has been insane nonsense. But you have to see to believe the letter sent to the president of the American Bar Association (ABA) by the ‘president’ of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on Dec 26, 2007….

  • nota said:

    @Admin
    Moderators off for the weekend???

  • nota said:

    For those who believe US torturing / water-boarding is some recent phenomenon (and something that will go away with Bush), here’s a flashback to the last century:
    The Water Cure
    Debating torture and counterinsurgency—a century ago.

  • Revivalist said:

    @optimist

    Bro even if I copy things I copy to defeat the thoughts and ideas of secularism and Demon-Crazy. You are also copying things from the secular thinkers and coming up with same old outdated and false points about the system of khilafah and Islam. Are you the inventor of Demon-Crazy, secularism or freedoms??? Come up with some idea and let’s discuss it.

    I have already replied to your inane questions regarding Mr. Atizaz and Mr. Iftikhar so please stop repeating it again and again because you can’t malign Islamic thoughts using these arguments which are way below the standard of discussion.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @ Hamaradeen

    Bro I agree with you and let me tell you the background of the discussion started about plagiarism. I post a small analysis and the admin stopped it and said that this section is for new and views, if anyone wants to post an article or analysis he should give the link. I was not aware of this so Mr. Optimists felt happy and was waiting to attack me, Islam and Islamists. I said I was honestly not aware of it and even I feel no problem islamically to share thoughts, Ideas and analysis with my brothers and sisters, even if I copy it from some one. My aim as a Muslims Dawah carrier is to carry the massage of Islam forward and whenever I will come across some good analysis and thoughts I will carry it forward. But MR. Optimist does not agree with this.

    Islam encourages research work but does not prohibit copying good thoughts and ideas and a person who has done that research and understand Islam will not mind it because he will be aware of the fact that as a true believer we don’t try to showoff and take credit of everything. Anybody who will copy my work and carry it forward is a SADQA JARIYA FOR ME but how would a secular person understand this concept because he sees everything wearing the glasses of interest and benefit.

    Moreover copyrights are also forbidden in Islam.

  • Revivalist said:

    @awais

    I agree with most of the reply given by Bro Shimatoree and its enough to rebut your post and clarify your misconceptions regarding the system of khilafah.

    However I believe that khilafah remained there till 3rd march 1924 when a traitor Mustafa kaamal with the help of Britain officially declared Turkey as secular state and abolished khilafah. Even if I agree with you for the sake of argument that the Islamic state did not exist after the death of our beloved prophet (saw) I would still say that read Quran and hadith the system prescribed by Allah (swt) and his last prophet Muhammad (Saw) is nothing but khilafah. So as a Muslim it is obligatory upon us to establish the rule of Allah (swt) and the method to establish that rule is khilafah and khilafah alone. There are numerous ayats of Quran and numerous Ahadith as well as quotes of the classical scholars about the issue of khilafah which makes it obligatory and leaves not a shade of doubt in it.

    Bro Islam gives us a complete socio-economic and political system and as long as Muslims were stick to there ideology they were ruling the world and when they abandon it they have reached to this stage. The method to implement Islam in our socio-economic, collective and state affairs is khilafah because khilafah is the ruling system in Islam they way democracy is the ruling system in secularism.

    Regards

  • Ashraf said:

    Question About Pakistan Day, March 23rd 2008, Parade

    Can anyone correct me in assuming that Dictator Musharraf did not conduct a Pakistan Day parade since 2002 due to terrorism threat? If so, why the current government is getting ready to celebrate March 23rd this year in the open sky in Islamabad?

  • nota said:

    For Mush Lovers:
    Pakistan among 10 most unpopular countries in US: poll
    “Pakistan is 6th on the list with 72 per cent respondents saying they see it unfavourably while 22 per cent viewed it favourably.”

    Would Mush take credit for the 22 percent of the 72 percent?

  • nota said:

    On a lighter(?) note:
    Indian doctor in biggest US malpractice scandal
    NEW YORK, March 9: As many as 40,000 people may have been infected with the deadly hepatitis C virus or HIV from a Las Vegas clinic, owned by Dr Dipak Desai, an Indian American, in what is emerging as one of the biggest malpractice scandals in the US history….

    Well does that not qualify him to be the Punjab Health Minister? See
    Punjab health minister on trial in Nebraska
    WASHINGTON: The first public trial of Punjab Health Minister Dr Tahir Ali Javed will start in Nebraska next week, charged as he is with causing 99 hepatitis C infections when he was practising medicine in this country….

    Remember Dr. Tahir was made the Punjab Health Minister knowing he was thus accused and that being the reason for him having left US…

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    New York Times Article on the Anti Musharraf Alliance :

    Pakistan Rivals Join to Fight Musharraf

    The language is certainly bellicose and indicative of an eventual Article 6 hammertime :

    The draft resolution has been approved by senior members of both parties, Mr. Ali said. It refers to the dismissal of the judges and says in part that it “resolves to undo all illegal and unconstitutional and immoral acts of the usurper and calls upon the chief executive to take all necessary measures for redeeming the honor of the judges and reversing extra-constitutional measures.”

    The “usurper,” Mr. Ali said, was a reference to Mr. Musharraf. The chief executive was a reference to the prime minister.

  • hamaradeen said:

    Lets hope people understand the actual face of “jamhoriyat”. Our leader have failed create a stable system and stand up understand against the establishment. Only these people are to be blame who idealize democracy in a place where majority are Muslims and an ideal system would be the system of Islam. Before it was islami jamhoriyat ( which was also wrong) now its left to jamhoriyat.
    As far as the issue of plagiarism is concerned i am ashamed to say when someone is trying to speak the truth he is being stopped by our own Muslim brothers.
    Talking about the current situation in Pakistan let me tell u all one thing, no matter what face of the government u see, their policies are NEVER going to change. Issues regarding war on terror, Taking loans from imf, Banking system based on interest etc etc.

  • hamaradeen said:

    Oh yes and the ppl are to blamed as well

  • Optimist said:

    We should push for a new law where foreign nationals cannot hold prominent positions in political parties. They should not be allowed to address political rallies (either directly or on phone).

    These people should have Pakistani residency and leave their foreign passport if they wish to pursue Pakistani politics.

    People like Altaf Hussain should not be allowed to address people unless they shift to Pakistan (for at least 270 days a year) and leave their foreign nationality.

    This trend is very dangerous because foreign elements are hijacking people of Pakistan with the help of Generals and their dirty agents.

  • Saqib said:

    @Optimist

    Good suggestions. I don’t believe this MQM “trend” is practised anywhere else in the world.

    /Saqib

  • hamaradeen said:

    Yes this would finish off one of the thousand issues we have in our country.

  • geog47 said:

    War between presidency and parliament to be catastrophic: Musharraf

    ISLAMABAD: President Pervez Musharraf said in an interview that political stability is his top priority and that a war between the presidency and the newly elected parliament would be catastrophic.

    “I’m looking forward to working with this government for the full five years,” Mr. Musharraf said. “Even my harshest critics have agreed that the recent elections were free and fair. Now, I want to build on that.”

    The atmosphere was informal, at times interrupted with light banter and laughter as Mr. Musharraf sat with several aides during interview.

    Casually dressed in an open-collar shirt, Mr. Musharraf scoffed at speculation in the press that he would attempt to derail the results of Feb. 18 elections by using his constitutional powers to dismiss parliament, or not call parliament into session.

    “You think someone who has spent his entire adult life defending Pakistan and the past eight years trying to put democracy back on track wants to see the government fail and the country return to political anarchy?

    “No. I’m committed to making this work.”

    Mr. Musharraf’s political future looked uncertain when PPP and PML-N, the two leading parties agreed to form a coalition government that would reinstate dozens of judges, who were ousted by Mr. Musharraf under a Nov. 3 declaration of emergency rule.

  • geog47 said:

    This Marzai Son of a b***** will not leave pakistan alone . The dog should be made example for futur na mard jarnails.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    If he is mirzai, then how come JI and JUI didn’t protest at him being one or his wife and other friends being mirzai? They created such a stink at Imran Khan’s wife being an ex-jew …

  • geog47 said:

    Musharraf trying to rise from the Bunker

    http://dictatorshipwatch.com/Article4347.html

  • admin pkpolitics said:

    4 Man Show with Ansar Barni coming shortly on pkpolitics.

    Admin

  • chooran vali sarkaar said:

    Operation Good Night — busharraf’s plan to break Amin Fahim from PPP and form govt with Q

    http://www.pakspectator.com/operation-goodnight-plan/

    ne 1 know if true? maybe mqm will finally get some ministery, itni khasia bardari kar li ham nay kuch to milay bhai!

    chooooooooooooooran khaaaaaaaaaaaaa layoooooooooooooooo

  • ayan said:

    @ geog47

    I would like to add the reporter should ask the question that if it would be the requirement of the situation that either Musharaf should quit or the assembly should be dissolved then would he give up presidency just for the sake of Pakistan as he has spent his whole adult life for defending Pakistan. I am sure he will not give up his presidency the most selfish self centered Head of Pakistan ever has. But the question should be asked as ” Jhootay ko ghar tak pohnchana chahiyay”

  • Optimist said:

    Lota Nazir Naji is changing again. He has written against Mush. He has realised that new rulers are gonna throw Mush out.

    http://jang.com.pk/jang/mar2008-daily/11-03-2008/col3.htm

  • nota said:

    @chooran
    “busharraf’s plan to break Amin Fahim from PPP and form govt with Q”

    Well if that is Mush’s plan then PML(N) is certainly helping him out. Today’s Dawn’s Headline is :
    PML(N) Vetoes Candidature of Fahim

  • nota said:

    Here is the link to the above story now that it is online.
    Fahim certainly has proven himself to be Mush’s puppet (If it is a “conspiracy” against him by Zardari, well it has suceeded in convincing me). What is more likely is that PML(N) coming out now against Fahim is to help PPP deal Fahim out of the picture and help Zardari not take all the heat for it.

  • nota said:

    Mush and Shauki’s Economic Miracle:
    Trade deficit soars to $12.43bn in 8 months

    So let’s see: at this rate for the year it will be $18.65bn.

    Much touted foreign exchange reserves of $17bn (actually $14bn)

    So you do the math. By the way keep in mind this $12.43bn figure does not include debt servicing costs, etc. This is what you owe for the last eight months of things you have bought.

  • nota said:

    Two Explosions heard in Lahore
    Just now heard one very loud one followed 30 seconds later by a smaller one. Don’t know where and don’t see any smoke on the horizon from here (DHA) yet.

  • nota said:

    Geo is reporting it was near the High Court. Well I heard this one LOUD ( I never heard the Navy War College one a few days ago which is closer). …

  • nota said:

    Confirmation:
    One explosion certainly was in Nawaz Sharif Park. (My brother lives about 500 yards from there and he confirmed it)

  • nota said:

    Confirmation:
    Another one was on Temple Road according to Geo.

  • nota said:

    Now Geo says it was “FIA Office on Mall Road”

  • nota said:

    The building where the big explosion happened (FIA Ofice) is reported to have almost completely collapsed. Portions of two buildings close to it have collapsed as well..

    Model Town blast was in F-Block. I heard mentioned “Close to Bilawal House”

  • nota said:

    Will they call this “Suicide Bombing” too? This sh*t was BIG!

  • nota said:

    P.S. It was a 9-story (FIA) building that has collapsed

  • Adonis said:

    FIA building on temple road, near mall. Casualties feared.

  • nota said:

    The Model Town explosion was at some Barrister Ijaz Batalvi’s house. It is being reported it was carried out by an explosive-laden pickup drive into the gate. That house too has completely been destroyed. Any one know whio this guy is and why he would be targetted?

  • Adonis said:

    Ijaz Batalvi was a very eminent lawyer of Lahore who died sometime back. He was also the prosecution lawyer in the ZA Bhutto case.

  • Revivalist said:

    @ All Bro & sis,

    A discussion on the treatment of women under the shariah following comments by Dr Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury.

    http://www.hizb.org.uk/hizb/press-centre/press-appearances/dr-nazreen-nawaz-htb-&-joan-bakewell-on-women-and-shariah.html

    Regards

  • nota said:

    Well, seems Ijaz Batalvi has been dead for some time. Wonder who lives their now.
    Here is the last mention of him I found in a news story (July 2007):
    “…Ch. Pervaiz Elahi further said that after having been removed from power in 1999 Sharif brothers left the country. He said that Barrister Ejaz Batalvi told me that these people were about to leave the country. He said that Ejaz Batalvi quoted the examples of Ch Zahoor Elahi and Nelson Mandela who suffered imprisonment and asked them not to leave the country. The Chief Minister said that he also visited these people and they requested me to get their release on bail with the help of Tariq Aziz. He said that Ejaz Batalvi had also shown me copies of their deal for leaving the country….”

  • Adonis said:

    The Model town blast may not be a suicide attack. It is being claimed at some channels that it was actually at the offices of some advertising agency.

  • nota said:

    Important Cases of Ijaz Batalvi:
    http://www.ijazbatalvi.com/cases&trials.html

    Posting the link as it is an Interesting list!

  • asim said:

    Are people going to wake up or still just blame Mush and the establishmnet for planning the blame and not these wrethched murderers.
    Some body should go gas Baitullah and these damn taliban , they deserve nothing but destruction

  • nota said:

    5 People dead at Batalvi House, including 2 children ages 6 and 8…

  • nota said:

    Batalvi House Bombing seems to be make no sense. Case of wrong address?

  • asim said:

    nota seems like it

  • nota said:

    Now that makes sense: Appears Batalvi house is right next to SP Sahiwal’s house so I might have been right above…

  • asim said:

    But what do people here care Just worry about get ting the Freaking Justice in the court room he will solve every thing

  • zenith said:

    This is what we get for following american policies; this goes to show how bleak the situation has been made by Mush. Lahore seems to be on fire. If they had to do it , should have done it where mostly military officials live.

  • asim said:

    Zenuth you can blame Mush all you want but these animals dont give a hoot about Mush it ishappeing becaus ethey are are twochicken shit to go fight against face to face and like to hide an kill innicent people

  • asim said:

    IT time to do what Rusiia did in checnya gas these animals out no more paying nice , they understand only one thing extreme voilence they kill one of our kids we should kill ten of theirs

  • pakismine said:

    asim:

    SHUT UP!

  • pakismine said:

    asim:

    You don’t test my temper now. Just close the hole in your face else I’ll GAS you Allah ki kasam.

  • asim said:

    Why dont you shut up you Pakis mine or Pak killer, Not any more guys dont deserve any any thing, ask the kid who died what was his fault bloody cowards

  • asim said:

    leave my country and peole alone and go back to Afganistan or the god infested arab country you are from

  • asim said:

    two small kid died how do you defend pakismine I hope nothing like this ever happens to you family no matter who you are

  • pakismine said:

    I will gas you along with Musharaf if you try to overshadow what he did. WHAT A STUPID PERSON YOU ARE? What was the fault of THOSE kids who died in the Lal Masjid, who died in FATA.

  • Adonis said:

    People who are taking revenge isn this abhoring manner are not any better than the perpetrators of original atrocities. Both deserve to be hanged.

  • pakismine said:

    THEY ARE NOT FROM KABUL GOD DAMN IT!. THEY ARE OUR OWN PEOPLE. THEY ARE THE BROTHERS, FATHERS OR HUSBANDS OF THE ONES KILLED BY THE OPERATIONS.

    JUST restrict your GAS inside yourself for some minutes please.

  • asim said:

    Lal masjid people were taking the law on to there own hands they were given 4 day notice to get out if a person like you does not understand then then what do i need to say any thing

    PS your argument shows your own character enough said

  • asim said:

    NY the way this stupid person has a dctorate form Harvard ,

  • asim said:

    They are not my peolple these are anims, what do you call a person that target kids , may be they are your brothers not mine, by the way I am a pashtun

  • pakismine said:

    Point is: When you condemn one bad action, we should also condemn the other bad action as well. I SWEAR TO GOD; ALL THESE CASUALTIES UP TILL NOW IN EACH AND EVERY BOMB BLAST OR ATTACK WHATSOEVER GOES TO THE ACCOUNT OF PERVEZ MUSHARRAF.

    I PRAY TO GOD THAT GOD MAKES JUSTICE WITH HIM IN THIS LIFE FIRST.

    HE MAY DIE THE WORST DEATH EVER TO ANYBODY.
    AMEEN

  • pakismine said:

    asim:

    I WOULD HAVE ASKED THIS QUESTION FROM YOU BACHAY WHEN YOUR MOTHER AND FATHER AND SISTER AND BROTHER HAD BEEN KILLED AND YOU HAD NOTHING TO EAT AND NO ONE TO HELD YOUR HAND. YOU WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN COMING HERE AND PROTESTING LIKE THIS.

    What a biased person we are!

  • asim said:

    No way, If aguy in the Tribal areas stops girls form studying, allows susicide attcks by indoctring 15 years old, in Islamabad kidnapping people how do you comapre that to Musharaff , he is weful yes but you can not comapare that to these people and FYI people in the tribal areas would kill these people themselves if they could, tell me one islamic thing these animals and these animals have done, whats Islamic or patritoic or humane about these people, are these people miuslim or pure evil. Where are they getting money from and who are they listening to a Pakistani or a coward form Arabia

  • nota said:

    @asim
    “They are not my peolple these are anims, what do you call a person that target kids ”
    Israelis/Zionists. Mush LOVES them…

  • asim said:

    nota I dont care about arabs or isrealis I care about pakistan, you know as well as me how arabs discrimitae gainst Paksitani,a i dont care what they do to each other I only care about my country .

  • pakismine said:

    That’s not the answer to my question.

    I HAVE ASKED YOU; that; What will you do if your brother, mother, father, sister and wife had been murdered one day you wake up? Then you have nothing to eat and no one to console you and say that what was done may be wrong and condolatory. WHAT WILL YOU, AS ASIM, DO?

    Tell me.

  • asim said:

    Nota Isreal doesnt give a Rats ass about us and neiter do the Arabs, they all uses us and leave why should we care about them but us, who has helped us in our need, which country by the way pth emost after the earth Quake,it wanst a muslim country

  • nota said:

    Tehn why do you support Mush who is the cause of all this? Why don’t you care about what his gunda’s have been doing to please his bosses in FATA and Waziristan? Why is this OK by you? Who is breaking the deal he made with the tribals?

    Same your knee-jerk emotional out-bursts for yourself.

  • asim said:

    I will not go and kill Innocent kids , i would go and try to kill the people who did it , the ones in afghanistan iIwould not kill kids, Take a gun see the person face to face fire on them dont take the cowards way out and kil people who have nothing to do with the fight,

  • Adonis said:

    We did not have this chaos before this traitor mush raised his ugly head.

  • nota said:

    So much for “Suicide-Bomber Did It!” theory being regurgitated:

    From BBC: FIA official Mirza Mohammed Yasin told reporters that it was caused by a bomb planted near a lift inside the building.”

    Of course he will change his story later and Baitullah Mehsud will still be blamed if not already…

  • nota said:

    @asim
    “Take a gun see the person face to face fire on them dont take the cowards way out and kil people who have nothing to do with the fight,”

    You been watching too many Westerns, kiddo. Are you also saying FIA has nothing to do with the fight? And do look up the term “collatoral damage” that your masters are so fond of using to wash away all their sins. May be the other side uses that as a justification as well. And why shouldn’t they?

  • nota said:

    @asim
    “Take a gun see the person face to face fire on them dont take the cowards way out and kil people who have nothing to do with the fight,”

    You been watching too many Westerns, kiddo. Are you also saying FIA has nothing to do with the fight? And do look up the term “collatoral damage” that your masters are so fond of using to wash away all their sins. May be the other side uses that as a justification as well. And why shouldn’t they? Didn’t your guys (military) just bomb a house just the day before killing women and children? Your papers proudly screamed “Military Pounds Militant Hideouts” but the real story of what they pounded did not make it to most of the papers :)

  • asim said:

    What can I say people are showing there two faces putting smilies when men and women and kids have died

  • nota said:

    When I saw where the smiley appeared, I knew you would focus on that and forget everything else.(by the way it belonged somewhere else (after the word “kiddo” but this site puts it in the end.)

    If you can manage here is another article to read. I know you won’t and will just holler and scream with your eyes closed but here it is anyways:
    Predator in Pakistan

  • pakismine said:

    Yes nota why the hell you try to smile. Sorry Asim from his behalf. He didn’t mean it I’m sure.

    asim:

    So now that you admit that you will go and kill the ones who killed yours. Thanks for accepting that and that’s what I wanted to prove. Coward or brave, we don’t know what the next suicide bomber will be. So point to be noted:

    1) Don’t blame the personnels for the bombarding the innocents in Lal Masjid and FATA. AT
    1) Don’t blame the suicide bombers

  • pakismine said:

    1) Don’t blame the personnels for the bombarding the innocents in Lal Masjid and FATA. and at the same time

    2) Don’t blame the suicide bombers for bombing the innocents.

    BLAME THE ONES WHO ARE ORDERING THEM, MENTORING THEM:

    ISRAEL, US, MUSHARRAF, Q LEAGUE. AL-QAIDA.

  • nota said:

    @pakismine
    “So now that you admit that you will go and kill the ones who killed yours. ”
    So @asim is blaming someone for doing what he says he will himself do if put in the same situation. What a hypocrite!

  • Revivalist said:

    Musharraf can pardon an Indian spy that has been sentenced to death, but was the crime of the innocent children of Lal masjid so horrible that he could not rest until he had burnt them alive? For America and Musharraf the demand to implement Islam is an unpardonable crime, deserving of death sentence and imprisonment.

    The purpose of freeing the Indian spy is to establish Indian supremacy and give the world the impression that Pakistan is so weak that it is will undertake any desperate measure to make friends with. Moreover, such so-called confidence measures are in order to bury the Kashmir issue for ever and another step to make Pakistan a part of Greater India (Akund Baharat). This incidence is yet another example of how Musharraf, with his severe inferiority complex, is ready to bow his head at a moments notice before America, but stiffens his neck with arrogance when killing Muslims in Swat and Wana.

    I ask the Minster of Human Rights, Ansar Barni, if a convicted Indian spy is so deserving of human rights, why is it that he could liberate a single missing person amongst the hundreds of Muslims languishing in the torture cells of Musharraf.

    Only khilafah can elevate Muslims from a position of disgrace and humiliation to a status of honour and dignity.

    Regards

  • Saqib said:

    What a tragic event. How can anyone do this to innocent people? It can’t be human beings.

    I suspect Mush, MQM and PML-Q is to blame for this. We have enemies from outside; Yankees and Indians infiltrating from Afghanistan and furthermore we have our “own” Trojan horses/fifth column to do the damage from inside. This task has been put upon MQM and PML-Q. These are dangerous times. We need to get rid of Mush and lieutenants asap and then deal with the fifth column (PML-Q and MQM).

    I don’t believe anyone from the frontier did this.

    /Saqib

  • nota said:

    Express News is confirming the Model Town blast was probably a case of mistaken identity and the house right next door was the probable target as it belongs to an intelligence guy and the house itself is reportedly been heavily used for intelligence activities.

  • Optimist said:

    Oh no.

    revivalist is back with his usual rubbish. his brothers have just killed innocent people in Lahore (with the help of Mush).

    how many more lives you want revivalist?

  • geog47 said:

    The problems of Pakistan are growing day by day in all sectors of life. I believe the reason behind all these problems are the ruling class of Pakistan and the system of secular democracy which has brought Pakistan on this brink of disaster. The option left with us is neither democracy nor dictatorship; rather the only viable solution is Islam and the system of khilafah.
    We have tried all types of systems in Pakistan and these systems were doomed to fail because it does not represent believe of the people and the ruler never reflect the feeling and emotions of the people and the masses. The system of democracy has not just failed in Pakistan rather in the whole world. Capitalism is unable to look after the affairs of people in the world.

    Indeed the world is in dire need of Ideological change and the vacuum created by capitalism could only be filled with the ideology of Islam. So we should not refer to the system which is the root cause of all our problems which always bring elites in the ruling not only in Pakistan but in those countries which are considered as models of democracy like India, USA and Britain. Only a handful people are enjoying a luxuries life at the expense of millions and billions of people.

    In Pakistan in the last 60 years we have seen only those people could come into power who are land lords, industrialists and business men. They spent millions of rupees to secure seat in the parliament because they know that after becoming a parliamentarian they would play the role of God. What ever they say would become a law for others, they can make right wrong and a wrong right.

    Khilafah state will implement Islam in all sectors of life and will re-unify the Ummah and will use abounded of recourses for the welfare of this ummah and will protect the Blood, dignity, wealth, resources, unity and above all aqeedah of this Ummah. Khilafah will not only take the Muslim ummah out from this severe intellectual and political decay rather it will also take the whole of humanity out from the severe darkness of capitalism to the light of Islam.

    It is not the only solution left with us rather it is obligatory to work for the re-establishment of khilafah state.

  • geog47 said:

    ‘Tortured’ prisoner’s body arrives from India

    By Our Staff Reporter

    LAHORE, March 10: The body of a Pakistani man who had died in Indian police custody allegedly because of torture was handed over to Pakistan at Wagah on Monday.

    The victim’s brother Abdullah, who had gone with other family members to receive the body, told reporters that Khalid Mahmood , 26, had gone to India in 2005 to watch a cricket match.

    He said Indian intelligence agencies had arrested Khalid in Mohali when he was going to the Pakistan High Commission to report that he had lost his passport.

    He said the family came to know about the arrest in 2006 from a letter sent by Khalid. His mother, sister and a bother went to India and filed an appeal in a court for his release but they had to leave for home within a week because of harassment by Indian intelligence agencies, he

    said. This left the family unable to follow up the case.

    He said the family came to know about Khalid’s death in police custody on March 4 but he had died on Feb 12, which could be verified by an autopsy.

    He said Indian security agencies had ‘severely tortured’ Khalid because they considered him a spy.

    He also criticised the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi for failing to secure his brother’s release.

    He said the Indian government should be ashamed of such a brutal act, especially when Pakistan had released convicted spy Kashmir Singh.

    The body was brought to Lahore for autopsy and Khalid’s relatives held a demonstration. They blocked the Nila Gumbad Road, burnt an Indian flag and chanted slogans against the Indian government.

    The protesters urged the government to lodge a strong protest with the Indian authorities and pay compensation to the family.

    Khalid’s funeral prayers will be offered in his village Dera Islamuddin, Baseen, on Tuesday.

    Agencies add: Arif Awan, a lawyer for the relatives, said Khalid had been charged with spying and involvement in terrorism but he never appeared in a court.

    He said the relatives wanted an autopsy because they suspected that he had been abused in custody.

    Relatives who visited Khalid in a jail in New Delhi said his nails had been pulled off, his body bore torture marks and his eyes had sunk, according to his brother Inamul Haq.

    We are giving spies back to India and they are returning our people after killing them, Mr Awan said.

    An official of Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi told APP that it was informed on Feb 13 about the death and a letter was written the same day to the Indian external affairs ministry seeking details and the circumstances under which he had died. The Indian government had failed to provide any information, he said.

    http://dawn.com/2008/03/11/top6.htm

  • geog47 said:

    Shame on Mush Kutaa , Bagairat for releasing convicted spy Kashmir singh. This is how Hindus paid back

    http://dawn.com/2008/03/11/top6.htm

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    The Military and it’s policies have been an UTTER FAILURE for Pakistan.

    Everything they try to get their paws into, turnes against us. We are isolated, hated, most vulnerable and at the mercy of others because of the Military rule.

    We need to do something about it once and for all. and reverting the constitution back to 1999 isn’t the answer because Mush abrogated exactly that constitution.

    Pakistan demands blood from it’s patriots and it’s traitors. Or there will be no Pakistan.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Where is that Billaa Ansar Barney ??? He should have been here to collect this inncent man’s body.

    What a SLAP ON THE FACE of mush and his cronie’s appeasement policies. Indians are doing as they please and all Mush and his cronies care about is intrigue to save their own skins…

    Well they’re going to lose their powers, and they’re going to lose their skins.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Express your displeasure with Ansar Burney by sending an email to this address:

    humanrightsuk@aol.com

    you read it right. Human Right Suk! Paging Dr. Freud!

  • pejamistri said:

    I have always said that there is a method in these bombings in Pakistan. There are actually three categories of bombing.
    1. The first type of the bombing is part of the ongoing battle between Army and the extremist members of extremists. This group of extremists is the one which has been betrayed by army since 2001, these incidents have increased after the Lal Masjid fiasco. Moreover these bombings are distinct and can easily be differntiated. First of all they have a clear target i.e Army and security personal (security personals do not include Police, FIA or any other civilian agency , even not the rangers and such), they are usually high profile targets. Another characterstic of these attacks is that they are “real” suicide attacks and usually precise in hitting their target. Another characterstic of these attack is that they are not “managed” by agencies , hence it is hard to predict them, sometimes they happen in succession and 2 or 3 incidents in the span of a week in different locations in Pakistan and sometimes don’t happen for months. This is a fierece and deadly battle.
    2. The second type of these bombings are what I call “managed” incidents. Here are certain characterstics of such incidents.
    a) They are deadliest in nature, usually the death toll in such attacks is in the range 20-250 people.
    b) They are “fake” suicide attacks and security agencies are prompt in telling that they have found the head of suicide attacker.
    c) Security agencies will be quickly able to give the sketch of attacker and will be able to track down the people involved in the attack in 3-4 weeks.
    d) These attacks are usually easily guessed by the people who read the newspaper or come on pkpolitics.
    e) The targets in these attacks are usually “bloody” civilians (including the police/fia and other civil servants).
    f) The timings of such attacks is all the more important , so when you hear from Brig. Javed Iqbal Cheema , that “the security has been beefed up for the political leaders” or “suicide attackers have entered Islamabad” , or “All the security agencies have been put on red alert” etc. etc. , yes the attack is coming in a week or so.
    g) These attacks usually have “un-natural” timings, for example they won’t happen during Moharram or during large gatherings of PML-Q , however they may happen just before the lawyers procession in Lahore etc.

    3) Third type of bombings happen far less frequently, these bombings usually have very high profile target. Only incident in the last year was on 27th December 2007.

  • geog47 said:

    Pakistan buries cricket fan killed in India ISLAMABAD, March 11 (Reuters): A Pakistani man who lost his passport in India while there to watch cricket in 2005 was buried on Tuesday a day after his body was sent home from India where he had been imprisoned as a spy, his brother said. Khalid Mahmood died in an Indian prison on Feb. 12 but his family in Pakistan was only informed of his death on March 4, the family said. March 4 was the same day Pakistani authorities released an Indian spy, Kashmir Singh, who spent 35 years on death row in Pakistan on spying charges but was released after President Musharraf accepted his mercy plea. “He had gone to India to watch a match in early 2005 where he lost his passport and ended up in an Indian jail on spying charges,” Mahmood’s brother told Reuters. He said Indian authorities had not said how his brother died. But said his brother’s body bore signs of torture. A Pakistani Foreign Office spokesman said India never informed Pakistan about Mahmood’s arrest until he died. (Posted @ 21:08 PST)

    http://dawn.com/2008/03/11/welcome.htm

  • bechari-awam said:

    I Just heard Chaudhary Nisar revealing in Off the record that in 1999 mushi told him and shahbaz sharif that we should eliminate altaf hussain while he is sitting in London. when Nisar asked muhsi how can you do that to a person sitting in a foreign land, mushi replied that he has some sources who can do that on his behalf and no body will blame pakistan for that.

    @@dmin can you please upload this program. We should ask all these mqm people who are full of praise for mushi, what they now say about him.

  • bechari-awam said:

    just to mention that this discussion was at the very end of the program

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @bechari-awam: These were all tactics to trap NS and SS. He is the guy who started Kargil and he is the guy who would have setup this thing..

    Mushie had no reason to actually go through, he would only have used it as pretext to get NS in trouble. As soon as NS did the Nuclear tests, the Americans wanted him out of the way and they had their b!tch in position who did everything in his power to discredit NS. Kargil was the same thing.. this idiot and his buddies did this to deteriorate the situation so they could do a coup. Same thing would have been this plot.

    The idea was to trap NS and then get him ritually hanged on the behalf of his masters. His real masters are the Americans who have been advancing him through the ranks over the years.. Same goes for most of the chiefs and generals in our army. our system is heavily compromised and infiltrated by foreign assets.

    A massive purge will be needed to clear pakistan of these foreign leeches. They own properties outside and have NO sympathies with Pakistan. They use pakistan as a victim whose blood they can suck as long as they can and then they leave and live in their european villas with their FAT kids.

  • admin pkpolitics said:

    Off the Record with Ch. Nisar uploading on blip.

    Admin

  • Optimist said:

    @ Taba’an Khamosh

    Mush may have wanted him dead so that Mush could head that party. After all both are criminals.

    Mush would have put NS/SS in trouble, got rid of Altaf and become Chief of MQM and President too. In the same way Altaf had Azeem Tariq killed (first Chairman and founder of MQM) and put the blame on agencies.

  • Traffic said:

    @ pejamistri

    couldnt agree with you more. whenever civilians are the target, know that it is the agencies’ dirty work. no Muslim would give his life away for killing innocent people, and the people from tribal areas who carry out suicide bombings have a specific military target, they know they will goto hell if they attack civilians so why would they? seriously why would they attack civilians anyway? that will only go against them, only mush benefits from attacks on civilians.

    the news about the pakistani prisoner returned dead from india is tragic indeed. ansar burni should be brought on tv and humiliated in front of the nation for freeing convicted indian spies who worked against our country. he was making tall claims in the interview that indian public will pressure indian govt to release pakistani prisoners and in 10-15 days we will see indian response. well we have seen the indian response, which is a big slap on our face. how much more will this musharraf humiliate us as a nation?

    @ admin

    i think you should put this news on the front page of the indian response to ansar barni’s “kind gestures”. thanx

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @optimist: I dunno bro.. I think the “hidden hand” in the establishment has got heavy paan stains on it as far as I’m concerned. Mush and AH are collaborators and it is evident from his last meeting in london.

    I’m sorry but these ppl are not faithful to Pakistan in it’s current shape. Mush gave MQM the ministries and the MQM ministeries were not like “Ansar Barny” or “Kashmala” fake ministries. They took full advantage of their positions and good for them. If anyone thinks MQM did not import heavy weapons right under mushie’s nose is dreaming. Altaf Husain can’t be this stupid that he didn’t use the “Shipping and ports” ministry to fill up his armaments.

    This time when Pakistan Army goes in to Karachi, they’ll get a rude awakening when they find themselves facing anti-aircraft guns and howitzers.

  • geog47 said:

    Musharraf to visit China next month

    Updated at: 2340 PST, Tuesday, March 11, 2008
    ISLAMABAD: Pervez Musharraf will go on a six-day official visit to China next month.

    According to sources of the ministry of foreign affairs, the president would tour China from April 10 to 15.

    On April 11, he will have a strategic meeting with Chinese president Hu Jintao in Sanya, a city of China.

    The Chinese president will host a dinner in the honour of President Pervez Musharraf on the same day.

    According to the sources, the Self Proclaimed President of Pakistan will meet Chinese prime minister Wen jiabao in Beijing, the capital of China, on April 14.

    Delegations of both countries will also be present in this meeting in which agreements in various sections including trade, investment, shipping, construction of highways, energy, defense and science & technology will be signed.

    Ministers in the newly-elected cabinet will be included in the delegation of the President Pervez Musharraf during the visit of China.

  • Traffic said:

    @ TK

    i agree with you. mush was plotting against the nawaz govt all along, he wouldnt kill his fellow traitor altaf. this snake had been shown the way by his american masters long time ago. remember he had a female relative who was an israeli spy, whose case he defended. if he was a patriotic citizen, he wouldnt have defended and covered up for an israeli spy, chances are most likely he was also an israeli spy all along. the whole 9/11 episode was also planned such that the americans would have thier man in pakistan so they wouldnt have any problems with instigating a global war on Islam.

  • Saqib said:

    @Tab’an Khamosh
    Your argumentation makes sense. First we had ZAB, who in spite both veiled and direct threats was in a hurry to make preparations for the nuclear program. Henry Kissinger has been quoted to have made very blatant threat to ZAB. He stated that the Yankees would make an example out of him, if he did not comply. The Yankees found a traitor to do this dirty job in Zia. The Yankees really made an example out of a fine leader. I am not PPPP supporter, but one has to give credit to those politicians who made something for this country.

    1. Ayub Khan mismanaged the country. The result was dismemberment of Pakistan. 90.000 soldiers capitulated in Bangladesh. He was not in charge, but he was main responsible as he had been made all the “preparations”.

    2. Zia mismanaged on numerous fronts. The war in Afghanistan should have been supported, but we should have ensured that we did not a broad gateway to Pakistan. This gateway ensured unhindered smuggling of drugs and weapons. Before this we did not have so severe problems with nor weapons or drugs.

    3. Musharraf has mismanaged in way not seen before. He also removed a democratically elected leader just like his predecessors. Pakistan had never experienced suicide bombers. We got this “gift” from this (dush)man. He collaborated with every scum bag of a politician (MQM, PML-Q and JUI-F) to ensure his power base. He has shown that he know not any limits for sinking to lows. Invited the Yankees to interfere in OUR INTERNAL affairs, bombing in Pakistan, Buying prisoners from Musharraf…..the list is so long.

    We don’t want these generals at the helm of affairs. If they want to keep a little bit of respect they must cut all links to Musharraf and swear NEVER to interfere in civilian matters again no matter what happens to the traitor Musharraf. This way they will again be loved by the people of Pakistan – otherwise they are doomed to live an isolated life in GHQ unable to roam freely.

    /Saqib

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @goeg47:

    Clear indication he has NO plans to give up power easily. President under the constitution has NO BUSINESS taking ministers with him. They don’t serve under him, they serve in the cabinet of the PM. PM is authorized to make treaties with other countries NOT PRESIDENT!

    This means Mush is LYING when he says he will allow the parliament to work. This MOFO MUST be defeated even if it means marching on that evil building the Army House!!!

    Ameen Fahim better wise the f*dk up or we’ll all go to hell because of that guy! Pakistani Wadera’s are such Weak spineless F*CKS!

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @saqib: the americans engage in some real weird shit. I sound totally paranoid, but most of their “enemies” (disobedients) are hanged and humiliated after death.

    Bhutto
    Allende
    Saddam

    Mush kutti da puttar also wanted to hang NS and it is clear that it was because he went ahead with the nukes. This Madar C*** for his own skin, sat with charlie rose and firking said AQ Khan proliferated the nuclear stuff.. Even though it is the f*cking Jurnails who were doing it. He blamed a national hero for their crimes. And he would have given him up.

    Now they are trying to kill AQ Khan by slowly poisoning him. It is curious that all their prisoners are getting “fainting spells ” these days. That mengal balochi guy and AQ khan both are fainting repeatedly these days. I think our patriotic “intelligence agencies” are getting some top of the line poisons from their american masters.

    Gawd WTF did we do to deserver this sh!T.. Iran has one SAVAK and we have 6 of these..

  • Saqib said:

    I have never understood why anyone can buy the arguments about AQK exporting nuclear technology incl. centrifuges etc. to foreign countries. How can he do that on his own? It is impossible to run a one man show like that. There are no limit for Musharraf’s lies.

    /Saqib

  • Saqib said:

    I just heard (witch)doctor Imran Farooq from MQM give a statement that they are ready to talk with PML-N and PTI. What do they want to talk about? Anybody knows? Or was it the usual MQM bla…bla…bla?

    /Saqib

  • geog47 said:

    Musharraf under mafias and minorities rule?

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/Article4058.html

  • geog47 said:

    Turkish top general warns on extremists in Pakistan

    http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/turkey/8417175.asp?gid=231&sz=91334

    We are living in an age where the extremists call others extremists. Who else could be more extremist than the Turkish Generals, who are not only imposing a way of life ont heir own people with the barrel of a gun, but also butchering innocent people beyond their borders just for their asserting their basic human right to self-determination and self-rule. Now, they think they have a role in Pakistan’s internal matters as well. What is Gen. Yasar Buyukanit’s problem? Who has said in Pakistan that they want to bomb Turkey? Inade Turkey or occupy Turkey? In which way, “extremism” in Pakistan (another label for struggle against Mush’s tyranny) hurts Turkey? Actually what his extremist wants to say is: “Musharraf necessary for Pakistan’s stability.” This is nothing but defence of one extremist general by another. Who is serving and who is retired and who is the East and who is in the West don’t matter. All that matters is the bond of extremism and oppression, and their slavish mentality.

  • Optimist said:

    EXCELLENT NEWS FOR DEMOCRACY LOVERS

    Aitzaz Ahsan made Honorary Fellow Downing College , Cambridge University

    http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/news/dp/2008031001

  • aka4c said:

    How many slots is PML-N expected to get in the Federal Cabinet ?
    Who are the most likely candidates for these portfolios?

  • Adonis said:

    Ministers expected in the first stage: 14 PPP, 9 PML(N), 2 ANP.

    Ishaq Dar expected to take over finance.

  • Revivalist said:

    @Optimist

    Oh yes! I will am here and I will be here to expose evil people and thoughts such as DEMOCRACY (DEMON –CRAZY) and secularism, which is not only the main problem of Pakistan but of the whole world. What I said is rubbish? What is so rubbish in it, I said Mush can pardon a convicted Indian spy but can not pardon innocent girls and guys of Lal Masjid???

    The problem with you guys is that you see problem only in personalities rather the problem is not only there in the personalities it is absolutely in the system which has produces such corrupt, dishonest, traitor, agent rulers.

    Please don’t come up with such penniless and daft post otherwise the admin may ban you for such low level comments.

    Note: Only khilafah is the answer.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @geog47

    Very well said brother I agree with you that khilafah is the only solution for our problems and can liberate this ummah from the shekels of tyranny and oppression.

    Regards

  • nota said:

    One problem with these beard walas is that they have one simple solution for everything. How do you deal with economy / wars / famine / corruption / AIDS / drugs / cancer/ etc., etc.? One group shouts “Khilafat’ is the answer, one says “growing a long beard”, another offers “no women in schools” will remove all ills of the world….

  • nota said:

    Talk about a sore looser:
    ‘Penalty’ for rejecting NA speaker
    SIALKOT, March 10: The Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) has uprooted the recently laid pipelines from the rural areas of NA-111 (Bajwat-Sialkot) after the defeat of PML-Q candidate and National Assembly Speaker Chaudhry Ameer Husain in elections.

    According to some locals, the move seems to be ‘punishment’ for not casting vote in favour of the PML-Q hopefuls….

  • nota said:

    Speaking of gas pipeline politics:
    Asif starts behaving like PM!
    ISLSMABAD, March 10: Residents of Gujar Khan will benefit from a gas supply project under a Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) government, but eyebrows will be raised about the manner the project, according to a PPP press release, was sanctioned by the party’s co-chairman, Asif Ali Zardari, even before the formation of a government.

    “On the recommendations of Raja Pervez Ashraf, MNA-elect, the co-chairman (Asif Zardari) approved the project of providing gas to the local population within a radius of five kilometres from gas fields in Gujar Khan district. He also announced setting up of a dry port in Sargodha and taking up on priority basis the setting up of an industrial estate in Gujar Khan,” says a handout issued by the PPP Media Office here on Monday.

    There is no mention in the handout as to how a co-chairman of a party can give ‘approval’ to a project when even the newly- elected MNAs have not taken oath, what to talk about formation of a government….

  • nota said:

    Is US pulling a Henry Ford on us?
    US to work with ‘whichever govt is formed’ in Pakistan

    “You can have any color as long as it’s black.” — Henry Ford, about his Model T.

  • Revivalist said:

    “HALAL FOOD FOR THOUGHT” @ All Bro & sis,

    The failure of capitalism is evident from the fact that it is being implemented in nearly all countries around the world just 1% of the world’s population controls 40% of the world’s wealth, whilst 50% of the world’s population has a meagre 1%. As one looks at the world in which over 3 billion people live on less than two dollars a day one concludes that the West’s leadership of the world has failed to address mankind’s problems. The West cannot excuse itself; it has had ample time to apply its ideas and values over the last few centuries.

    The terrible state the Muslim world today is not because of Islam. In fact the complete opposite is true. Western governments today, true to their history, are predatory colonialists. Aided and abetted by Muslim rulers, the two parties work with hand in hand with each other. In return for access to cheap resources in the Muslim world, the Muslim rulers are supported by the West to stay in power. Western claims of supporting freedom for the Muslim world are untrue; expediency and strategic interests trump any such concern for representative governments’ and the welfare of the Muslims.

    It is because of the absence of Islam as a ruling system, the Khilafah, that these problems plague the Muslim world. Examining Islam’s past history shows that the Muslims prospered under the Khilafah whilst it was Europe that suffered ruin and oppression under Christian clergy domination. The Khilafah presents a real alternative to the current global political order. The West realises it will put an end to their free hand and suffering unleashed by their policies in the Middle East and the rest of the world. The Khilafah stands out as the only hope for the future.

    Regards

  • nota said:

    I have started to hate the word Khalifah(Thanks, Revivalist!) as much as I have started to hate the word Ummah (Thanks, Mush!)

  • Revivalist said:

    @nota

    It’s obvious that you would hate both these words because its stands right in the way of secularist democracy and you are for the system of secularism and democracy. The only ideological rival to secularism is Islam and khilafah is the practical method of implementing the systems of Islam.

    Ummah refers to all Muslims including you which encompasses all Muslims irrespective of there nationalities it is simply beyond nation states. According to one of the hadith of our beloved prophet (saw) “Muslims are one nation (Ummah) their land is one and their war is one”.

    Bro if you would go with such speed soon you would start hating Islam etc.

    Regards

  • Aneeza said:

    Amin Fahim serves notice to Khwaja Asif

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=13519

    I do not like the smell of this whole affair.

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    “you are for the system of secularism and democracy.”

    Actually I am not. Democracy is what the elite came up with to keep the masses oppressed — giving them a sense of “power” that they really don’t have. In it’s present state, all you get is choice between two poisonous “donuts”, one with chocolate filling, other vanilla. Secularism is similar tool used by the powers that be. Anarchy is what I prefer, personally.

    It is not the message I hate but the self-appointed / self-righteous messengers each offering me his own magic potion / shortcut to heaven. But I’d stick with “secularism” and “democracy” for now for the lack of better alternatives.

  • geog47 said:

    AQ Khan’s family threatens direct action

    By Rauf Klasra

    ISLAMABAD: Henny Khan, the loyal Dutch wife of Dr AQ Khan, has for the first time issued a direct threat to the government, saying the time for “low-profile, patriotism and national interest” is over and if her husband’s situation did not change “we will undertake whatever action we deem necessary”.

    Henny Khan, in her first strongly-worded statement since her husband was humiliated and detained by the Musharraf regime in 2004, has now sent a note to The News. Analysts said if the AQ Khan family decided to break their silence, they could grossly embarrass the government and reveal a lot of things that the military regime of General Musharraf had forcibly concealed.

    The first impression one gets from this unprecedented communication is that the AQ Khan family had decided to stop acting on the orders of the government to stay in a low-profile mode and had reached the conclusion that now it would not be blackmailed any more in the name of “patriotism and national interest”.

    Ms Khan also handed over a list of demands to the present and future government. “As the family, we are not requesting a public profile. All we ask is that Dr AQ Khan be allowed to lead a normal life, attend his NGO office, meet his friends, take his family out for dinner and be given the freedom that was promised by Gen Musharraf himself.”

    Ms Khan who left her own country to live with the top nuclear scientist of Pakistan seemed to have finally run out of patience. In recent months, Dina Khan, daughter of AQ Khan, used to defend her father in the media by giving his side of the story on important issues concerning her father.

    It is now quite clear that after years of reclusion, the family seems to have decided to challenge all the claims and accusations against Dr Khan and start confronting the government. The family has now vowed that it would use all available means to get freedom for Dr Khan who is in detention for the last four years.

    A recent report in The News “AQ Khan’s release not in sight” on March 6 by Qudssia Akhlaque actually made Ms Henny Khan to give her reaction. The report said: “On the future of Dr AQ Khan, sources in the Strategic Plans Division hinted that the status quo would be maintained as it was considered imperative for his own safety and the country’s national security.” The status quo referred to is his so-called “protective custody”.

    Henny Khan hit back on Tuesday by saying: “Allow me to point out that three attempts have been made on the life of the president. Is he being kept in protective custody for his own safety, even though there does not seem to be a dearth of those who wish him ill?”

    Ms Khan referred to a statement of Ch Shujaat Hussain who had said: “Within this protective framework, we will make all efforts to provide him an environment which is conducive to the health and sanity of a national hero who has played a definite role in creating a nuclear Pakistan.”

    Ms Khan commented on Shujaat Hussain’s statement by saying: “Again allow me to point out that, though Mr Shujaat himself was instrumental in negotiating the deal in which Dr Khan was to take the full blame on himself and, in return, was to be granted pardon with full freedom of movement and travel within Pakistan, his government did nothing to implement their part of the deal. Now, after 4 years of broken promises, we hear talk of working within this protective framework.”

    She maintained that it was the same Ch Shujaat who, in an interview on Feb 5, 2004, said: “He (AQ Khan) has saved the country a second time”. The report in The News had observed that the dominant view in defence policy circles was that as long as the AQ Khan issue was alive, it would be difficult for Pakistan to give him a public profile.

    Reacting to this observation, Henny Khan retorted: “Now it was not acceptable to the family any more as we think the time for low profile, patriotism and national interest is over. We will allow whichever government comes to power sufficient time to take some sort of action in my husband’s case. If nothing is forthcoming, we will undertake whatever action we deem necessary.”

    Where is awaam for MR KHAN??????????????????????????? This how a HERO is treated in Pakistan we are begairat nation……..

  • geog47 said:

    We deserve the situation we are in………………

  • Revivalist said:

    @nota

    Dear Bro I am very happy that you are not for secularism and democracy, but the problem is that you think there is not better alternative to it, there for you have accepted this as a last resort.

    Bro good news for you is that there is an alternative to the system of Democracy, which is khilafah and to understand khilafah and its structure in detail please visit http://www.khilafah.com and go to khilafah section. We have a complete book on ruling system in Islam and numerous articles and booklets about khilafah and democracy.

    As for as your second point of self-appointed/ self-righteous messenger are concern, If I have aver claimed that pardon me for that. I always say that khilafah is the answer because khilafah will implement other systems of Islam, will re-unify the ummah and will take the massage of Islam forward.

    “Khilafah will be back on the method of prophethood” (Masnad Ahmed)

    Regards

  • hamaradeen said:

    How can a system designed by people could be superior to the system given to us by our creator? Pakistan is heading towards becoming another Turkey.

  • 27122007 said:

    @Revivalist
    who will be khaleefah?how will u choose khaleefah from common people? or u will just make anyone khaleefah like dictatorship?

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @hamaradeen: The only thing I know of given to us by our creator is “The Holy Quran” (You should also read up on the nature of Vah’i and the actual logistics of how the fragments were transmitted)

    Can you point out the sections in The Quran which give us “the system given to us by our creator?” — For your convenience, I am including a reference to the meaning of the word “system”

    I wouldn’t be surprised if you refuse to accept an “un-islamic” website as the source of meaning for the word you are using to imply certain things (word: system) . Perhaps we should use a dictionary not created by humans but given to us by our “Creator?”.

  • bechari-awam said:

    @27122007
    “who will be khaleefah?how will u choose khaleefah from common people? or u will just make anyone khaleefah like dictatorship?”

    not again!!

    this revivalist guy will shower you with some shahab nama size article which no one can possibly go through in this day and age. I asked him the same question some 6 months ago and I never got a bulleted answer but a long long long ^2 article which I would had been reading even until by now if I was that stupid :)

  • nota said:

    chanab on March 12th, 2008 11:54 am

    “our army is the best army in the world…”
    …in thuggary, killing innocents, conquering own territory and loosing own territory, kissing b*tth*les of their imperial masters, developing housing societies, riging elections, destroying institutions, pocketing commissions, …

  • nota said:

    Oops! posted the above in the wrong topic. Apologies!

  • hamaradeen said:

    “And obey Allah and His Messenger; and fall into no disputes, lest ye lose heart and your power depart; and be patient and persevering: for Allah is with those who patiently persevere. And be not like those who started from their homes insolently and to be seen of men, and to hinder (men) from the path of Allah: for Allah compasseth round about all that they do”. [surah 8 (Al-Anfal), ayat 46-47]

    And of course, when we are separated into countries and groups and fighting amongst ourselves, we take each other to be enemies and others outside the community of believer as friends. This is what Allah (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) warns us against doing in the following ayah:

    “Or think ye that ye shall be abandoned, as though Allah did not know those among you who strive with might and main, and take none for friends and protectors except Allah, His Messenger, and the
    (community of) Believers? But Allah is well-acquainted with (all) that ye do”. [surah 9 (Al-Tawbah), ayah 16]

    Later in the same surah, Allah describes the believers as “protector-friends” of each other :

    “The believers, men and women, are protector-friends of each other, enjoining the correct and forbidding the incorrect.” [surah 9 (Al-Tawbah), ayah 71]

  • hamaradeen said:

    As for the Sunnah, Nafi’a reported saying: “‘Umar said to me that he heard the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) saying: Whoso takes off his hand from allegiance to Allah (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) will meet Him (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) on the Day of Resurrection without having any proof for him, and who so dies whilst there was no bay’ah (allegiance or a pledge) on his neck (to a Khaleefah), he dies a death of jahilliyah.”

    This is because the state of the people during the jahiliyah and before Islam was that they were divided with no single leader. They were constantly fighting amongst themselves wasting their effortsand resources. After Islam came, it united them into a single Ummah and a single community of believers with one leader. So whoever chooses not to participate in this new united community has reverted to the state of the pre-Islamic jahiliyah.

  • hamaradeen said:

    The laws written in the Quran are not only personal laws but also the laws of the system. As long as the laws within the quran and sunnah are implemented into the system not only on paper but also practically with accountability I will accept it to be a system of Islam. I cant find one example from history which shows Islamic laws implemented through democracy and by selecting a noble leader.

  • Omer Khan said:

    Dear Hamaradeen: we are all muslims and we love the idea of some muslim confederation. Obviously OIC is an impotent soap box, so someting else is really needed. But really Islam is a very vibrant belief system and people in muslim majority country would love live by their cherished belies and have a government which does not meddle in their affairs and aspirations.

    But from whenc can come Khilafah? I mean obviously muslims and arabs of the middle ages were the Americans of today (ok pre world war I yanks) in plurality, liberalism and empirical tradition for variousswathes of times. But nw we have other people who contributed much to humanity. So don’t assume ill faith just because it was done by non muslims. After all the Prophet did ask us to venture forth and learn and acquire knowledge where ever it is found. So unless any system affirms reality it is not going to succeed.

    The US constitution required seperation of church and state because they had to deal with a an entire bureacracy called church. We muslims don’t. In essence I find the US constituion, the bill of rights and the ideals embedddin this country’s foundation as very Islamic with ofcourse a different flavor. Really you should check it out.

    Because Khilafah as it was practiced by the Ottoman turks was nothin more than just another Holy Roman empire. Ok much much more benign, civilized, tolerant and pluralistic. But it was one nevertheless. Think about ti.

  • Omer Khan said:

    @Admin

    Dear Admin a few suggestions for your consideration sir.

    pkpolitics is probably the best pakistan forum I have visited. It allows for maximal discourse and lets things be. Great policy. Congratulations pkpolitics team.

    I would like to see an “edit” option in the video comment sections if possible.

    Ability to embed google or youtube videos atleast in the Discuss section.

    And please crackdown on multiple nicknames. that is dishonest and trolling. An IP which does hat regularly should be warned and maybe banned for a period of time.

    Thankyou for all your wonderful efforts.

  • hamaradeen said:

    Islam allow laws to be made by humans as long as it is in the boundary of Islam.
    Allah provided us not only with the Quran but also a living example, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). I think the system he created would be according to the will of Allah, and as muslims we should idealize the system he recommended for us.

  • Omer Khan said:

    Muhammad saw was a great man indeed. The book 100 most influential figures ranks him as #1. But he was a man. Let us never forget that. Innocent like other prophets but still a man.

    And Islam if, as we say is a religion of nature, then it indeed allows us humans to take much guidance from the Quran to use our human reasoning based on accumulated wisdom and experiences to formulate laws, mores and code of ethics as to how we should govern ourselves. No one disagree with that Hamaradeen. First one to subscribe to that notion would be Jinnah the founder of this republic.

  • Ali Mawiah said:

    @Tab’an Khamosh

    I always enjoyed comments & thought from you about Pakistan politics and I can surely say you have very good eye on current affairs and events. I really like that you talk using solid references and links.

    Brother I realize that this is a modern world and time has changed now. But when we say system of Allah ( creator ) . We mean that system that Allah has preferred for humans. Not just for govt., for politics, economic, social affairs for education and for each every aspect of our life that we can think of.

    If you are willing to find everything from Quran, this is great thinking but who is the best translator of Quran and its teaching? I would say Prophet Muhammad and I know you will not disagree. if you look at the life of prophet Muhammad you will find this “system” and all other systems I’m talking about. I’ll not stretch this too much but one more thing, this is a good forum to discuss politics and current affairs and of course to share your opinion. but some time it happens that we don’t fully see eye to eye with others , I believe we should show some tolerance and you know what we need to take ownership of our religion , when we say “mullah did this and that and this is not religion of mullahs” but why don’t we take the ownership ? You know my brother why Islam is the most unaltered religion because it has followers who are “fundamentalist” when I say fundamentalist I dont mean usama , mullah umer or any other political mullah ( any one who is responsible bad reputation of the religion ) , I mean true follower who really love their religion and who have given whole their life for the sake of this , its good that you know the meaning of “system” and this meaning is acceptable to me but please do not try to give impression that Quran does not suggest a “system” for us.

    About khilafat I do not agree with the @hamaradeen , because this is not the way we achieved it before.

    please please do not regard me as your challenger on this forum. I’m a regular visitor of this forum just wanted to respond to your remarks. If you any disagreement I’ll be glad to reply you and sorry if it hurts someone.

    Ali Mawiah

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @hamaradeen: Dear brother, you seem to be confusing “system” with “outline and general guidance”.

    Please back up your claim that you have the knowledge of a political system of governance and that it is in the only known source from A (swt) ie; the Holy Recitation.

    Please confirm.

  • hamaradeen said:

    The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History a book by Michael H. Hart who is an American Christian placed his own lord Jesus Christ he placed on number 3 and our beloved Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). This is what he says about Muhammad (pbuh)

    “My choice of Muhammad to lead the best of the world’s most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels.”

    Contribution to humanity of our beloved Prophet (pbuh) is incomparable to any human being in this world. Christianity was brought as a mazhab, islam came as a deen.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @Ali Mawiah: I do appreciate your kind words bro. I am not saying we should find everything from the Quran, but only that it is a guideline and a message. We can live in a modern world, do not be in defiance God and his Prophet (s) and still achieve nationhood with dignity and honor.

    If one thinks about it the Prophet & Sahaba were Modern men of action. They were modern for their time. They broke with the past, they were revoutionaries. This is the main difference. It is not that they wore something or had beards cut in a way or were engaged in some daqiyanoosi stuff.. they were modern men of action who behaved in their world in a dynamic and modern way. I can put a lot of fluff around it but this is what it was.

    Now the question is that system of governance. We do need a system, but for the water to boil heat has to get to every molecule. You can’t change physical and historical processes by working towards outward manifestations of a process.

    Example: A civilization, at its greatest heights exhibits (or may exhibit)) it’s greatness with great architecture, but the converse isn’t true. A decrepit civilization cannot become great by merely building great buildings..

    It is the internal transformation of the human that one needs to seek, and everything else will take care of itself. We don’t need to become overtly “Islamic” or grow funny beards or wear the same things they wore 1400 years ago, we need to “FEEL” they way they felt. Act the way they acted in the face of new challenges.

    That which they did was not “religion” in the way that we think of it. It was living now we mistake ritual-ization for a way of life. We will not have a just system, even if we call it Khilaafah, if we don’t have educated, open minded human beings with a Muslim substrate. All of the universe is based on a few particles.. All of Islam is based on 2 things. Those are in the Kalimah. That is IT. The rest is just commentary. This is what I believe. Now, don’t take this as me trying to get licese for bidah or fitnah, but for a canvas in which you can recreate your world without insurrecting against God & Prophet. I think this is possible.

  • geog47 said:

    C-4 explosive and latest American technology used in the latest so-declared “suicide” attacks in Pakistan

    Daily Express report. March 12, 2007 (Urdu). The reports quotes staff from bomb disposal squad making these claims.

    http://www.express.com.pk/epaper/Article.aspx?newsID=1100367757&Date=20080312&Issue=NP_LHE

  • geog47 said:

    ‘The up-and-coming PPP emperor’: By design or by chance ???

    http://dictatorshipwatch.com/Article4368.html

    Is it so that we were fed with on deal publicly (Mush-BB deal) and the work was on on another deal (Mush-Zardari and their master’s deal)? There are several reasons which indicate Zardari was considered more appropriate than Benazir. Such as: 1) He is the main figure behind the loot and plunder during benazir’s reign. 2) He is as greedy opportunist as Musharraf. 3) He is as much careless about the future of the nation as Musharraf is. 4) He has criminal instincts which the US warlords can exploit easily. 5) There were criminal charges against him which could be used to blackmail him in favour of Mush and the US agenda.

    Other than many such personal traits and weaknesses, there are other indications which makes one suspicious of Zardari’s role and ambitions. All that he said and did after BB’s assassination is not what a normal individual would do in normal circumstances. Not allowing a proper autopsy is one of them. To further confirm this, we will see if he invites a UN investigation which Mush blocked in the first place. To understand the reality, we need to traceback and find about the Mush-US-Zardari behind the scene deals even during the life of Benazir. BB was unacceptable because she knew too much and then she couldn’t keep her mouth shut. See here for example.

  • geog47 said:

    See here for example

    http://dictatorshipwatch.com/Article3242.html

  • thehustler said:

    WTF is zardari doing? If he wants to be PM, he should have come out and said it or at least not publicly & repeatedly deny this. He has engineered this whole drama of delaying the announcement of nominee and now saying every one wants him to be PM so he will respect their wishes. It’s such a lame strategy – everyone can see through it.

  • mbokhari said:

    @ Revivalist

    I think every one here has figured out your modus-operandi already. You don’t need to post obscure rants anymore. Just post with a single dot.

    On commenting on any given event, you regurgitate the events, then just present: TADA!!! Khilafah as the best system. I am sorry but you and your kind are the epitome of obscurantism. Politics and political economy are a science, ok? Finance and banking are a science.

    You present no arguments why your proposed solution is better than what we have and are trying to perfect: Western democracy and separation of powers.

    I seriously suggest you read the following authors: Alexis de Tocqueville on “Democracy in America”, Plato’s “The Republic”, Aristotle’s “Treatise on Government”, Marcus Aurelius on “The Meditations”, John Locke on “Liberty” and Thomas Paine on “The Age of Reason”. There may be a lot better books but these are the ones I have read and they have taken me out of the mental cesspit that you seem to be waddling through.

    If you take anything from what I have written, please, pretty please, with sugar on top, atleast read de Tocqueville, Thomas Paine and John Locke. You can get these books in pdf format from the Gutenberg.org website.

    To demonstrate your mindset and level of arguments:

    -= “What should we do about the Judiciary? =-”

    Musharraf…lawyers…Umar (r.a)…KHILAFAHHHH…Aitzaz Ahsan…Islaaaaam…judiciary…
    Baatil..taghoot…kufr…KHILAFAAAHHH…!

    -= “How should we solve traffic problems? =-”

    Camels in 7th century Arabia…left hand drive is evil because left hand is evil…only right hand bridle has barakah…KHILAFAHHH…the camel in the arab’s tent…camel has sunnah validation…cars evil…kufr…baatil…taghoot…KHILAFAAHHH

    -= “How do I make Chicken Tikka Masala? =-”

    Chicken tikka masalah is Indian…only Dajjaj bil Fa7m is good…but we Khilafah-freaks are very flexible, so here it goes,…kill the chicken with your sword held high, the glint of setting sun bathes your face in a blood-tint while the pure halal desert breeze sways your jallaba…feel the neck of the chicken crunch helplessly under the merciless sword of the unsmiling mujahid…

    and then cook it..

    and, oh yea,…KHILAFAAAAAHH!!!!

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @mbokhari:
    hahaha! that was funny bro! I needed that laugh! harharhar! :)

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @mbokhari: I’m going to save your response and cut-n-paste it (if you don’t) from now on in response to these posts… (with credit of course) this is brilliant!

    P.S. If you get Revivalist to read Alexis de Tocquevill, I will propose your name (or nom de plume) for a Pulitzer at least!

  • mbokhari said:

    @ Tab’an

    Thanks for doing ur bit on upholding rationality, reason, logic and sanity in the face of obscurantism, muddle-headedness and outright stupidity…God, such people make me mad…

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @mbokhari:

    To your list I would add Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk by Tabari and History of the Jews by Simon Dubnov.

    BTW, we have heard a lot recently about Islam being against copyright etc (and I support that) but I defy you to find a full set of the HIstory of Al-Tabari for less than a thousand dollars. Shame on all these lip-service “Muslim intellectuals” who spend their time cutting pasting stuff from the web-sites but make no efforts to make the Muslim Intellectual Classics available to Muslims on a DVD or for downloads.

    The real shame is that most of the volumes of Al-Tabari’s histories have been translated by Jewish and Christian scholars as our Muslim brothers just can’t be bothered with such tedious intellectual work.

    So my challenge to Revivalist and hamaradeen: Get me a full text of Al-Tabari’s history in electronic form without charging me an arm and a leg. No wonder no muslim kids even know of these intellectual giants we have in our history.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    A tale of two plus one generals:

    1. The top general in the world’s most powerful army is sacked and there is NO COUNTER COUP!

    2. The top disobedient and incompetent general in the “Islamic” republic is sacked by his legal boss for bad performance. There is a counter coup, the “karaaNchee” corps supports the “son of karaNchee” and he is put in power by force.

    3. Rewind 1200 years or so. The most capable, popular and illustrious general (Khalid Bin Walid) is sacked by the political executive of the state of Medina for extravagance etc. The general takes his uniform off without any coup or capture of the local area even though he _could_ do it .. FULLY submits to the will of the political authority!

    Now, ask yourself, whose character is more like the character of Khalid bin Walid? The Christian or the Goddamned Munafiq called Mush and our fake “mard-e mujahids” who support every coup against the civilian govt.?

    Now you know why the foreigners have their legs up your ar$e as you busy yourselves with impotent “protests” about stupid cartoons that have been published (by your enemies no less) for centuries.. (don’t believe me? read Dante! ..)

    P.S. Oh and btw, they’ll probably attack Iran, and what that means is.. no way, now how Mush is going anywhere if Unky sam can help it.. unless of course there is a popular revolution.

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2008/03/middle-east-fal.html

  • Optimist said:

    I can’t think of a better heading for this news, so I would say:

    MOHAJIR ON MOHAJIR VIOLENCE IN KARACHI

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2008/03/080312_mqm_attack_sen.shtml

  • AMagsi said:

    Fight between Kh. Asif and Javed hashmi.

    http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/mar-2008/13/index3.php

  • mbokhari said:

    Let us pray!

    “Ya Allah Israel me Martial Law laga….Ya Allah India me PCO lag jaye…Ya Allah US me 8th amendment pass ho!! Ya Allah mussulmano pe rehem kar!

    Ya Allah, hear our supplications and make Dick Cheney depose Justices Rehnquist, Sandra Day O’Connor, Alito and others. Ya Allah shower us with your grace and make Gordon Brown shut down BBC, ITV and Sky News.

    Ya Allah. may the Americans and Europeans start burning muslim-owned 7-11s because a mullah in Chicha Watni preached that Jesus was not the son of God.

    Ya Allah, help the fundamentalist evangelist Christians. May they burn down MIT, Harvard, Berkely, Oxford and Cambridge. Ya Allah, may the “Revivalists” and Hizb-ut-Tahrir of the West start campaigning for the restoration of the Holy Roman Empire and try to overthrow their free press, independent judiciary, subservient military, sovereign parliament and autonomous universities.

    Ya Allah raise an army of people in the west equivalent of our Hizb-ut-Tahrir, of our Al Qaeda, of our Sipah Sahaba, so that they may destroy the West from within. As their muslim equivalents are destroying us from within.

    And finally:

    Ya Allah, give us grace to accept with serenity the things that cannot be changed,

    And the courage to change the things that should be changed.

    And the wisdom to distinguish the one from the other.

    (Amen)

    ———————-
    @Tab’an

    p.s. I have always wanted to read Tabari and Ibn Rushd. Tabari was way before the Rational/Devotional split of the Mutazalites and Asharites. Ibn Rushd, Farabi, Kindi belonged to Mutazalites. They were philsophers, mathemeticians and scientists.

    The Asharites were Ghazali, ibn Taimiyya and others that eventually caused the intellectual stangation of the muslim world. This was at the time of the Mongol Invasion and the Asharites argued that the Mongol invasion and muslim defeat is a result of muslims studying western sciences and philosophy (sound familiar?) and therefore no more studying Plato, Aristotle, Aristophanes or anything else.

    Just focus on the Quran, Sunnah, Tafseer and try to solve the problems of politics, economy, society, traffic congestion, cough, soar throat and heartburn. Result? Decline that never seems to stop and then we have these obscurantists like Al Qaeda and Hizboos that are eager to hasten it. Like vultures poised over a dying man, they want him dead and decomposed so they can pick up the pieces. Ergo, the daily bombings in Pakistan.

    But of course you knew all that. I wrote it for the benefit of people who have not looked into this side of our story.

    Works of Ibn Rushd
    Some Mutazilite Books

    I am not good with tagging. The links again, are:

    http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ir/
    http://www.mutazila.com/ba/ba.htm

  • mbokhari said:

    A tale of another General:

    General Douglas Macarthur who was one of the greatest American Generals that won the WWII. He was a bit too patriotic. The president wanted a ceasefire with China while Macarthur tried to force war. He was fired by the president and Gen. Macarthur accepted this gracefully.

    He was a general who WON a great war. Unlike some other tinpot Generalissimos I could mention who have NEVER won any wars.

    This was his last speech. I wish some Pakistani General would exhibit such grace and ‘fade away’ instead of occupying the presidency with his rotting corpse and befowling the whole country with the stench of corruption and decay:

    “The shadows are lengthening for me. The twilight is here. My days of old have vanished, tone and tint. They have gone glimmering through the dreams of things that were. Their memory is one of wondrous beauty, watered by tears, and coaxed and caressed by the smiles of yesterday. I listen vainly, but with thirsty ears, for the witching melody of faint bugles blowing reveille, of far drums beating the long roll. In my dreams I hear again the crash of guns, the rattle of musketry, the strange, mournful mutter of the battlefield.

    But in the evening of my memory, always I come back to West Point. Always there echoes and re-echoes: Duty, Honor, Country. Today marks my final roll call with you, but I want you to know that when I cross the river my last conscious thoughts will be of The Corps, and The Corps, and The Corps. I bid you farewell.”

  • Optimist said:

    I am surprised that police didn’t do enough to stop violence against women of Mohajir Quomi Movement (MQM-Haqiqi) by Mutahida Quomi Movement (MQM- Musharraf).

    This Mohajir on Mohajir violence is dangerous for the city and country. I hope that this is not a start of another cycle of violence. After all this violence included Murder of a worker, abduction and many other sad incidents.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2008/03/080312_mqm_attack_sen.shtml

    http://jang.com.pk/jang/mar2008-daily/13-03-2008/mulkbharse.htm

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @mbokhari: Very Well Said! (and Ameen! for once to a du’a posted on pkplitics)

    I have read a bit of tabari’s history and it is absolutely fascinating. The description of the prophet’s death and the way the intrigues went on makes is so human it is not even funny.

    The reason the generations “closer” to the period could act in paragmatic (and essentially revolutionary) fashion was that they took these people to be humans like themselves, not some divine being who had jibreel and mika’eel at their beck and call every second to bull-doze every problem.

    This is the problem today. We have lost the revolution (that got us the empire), we want the empire, but we’re cargo culting using rituals and hoping the abaabeel are going to land any second. it is sad really.

    I have tried getting the Tabari set but can’t find any “islamic” bookstores carrying it. If they do it is in Arabic. I mean really, who needs to translate anything into lesser languages after all… ? sigh!

    I totally agree with your indictment of Ghazali and friends! Unfortunately (possibly by some one’s plan) our clocks start the time we were “liberated”. Our education materials especially history has been compromised (in every country) by our foreign herd-masters. Our kids grow up learning stupid illogical bull-shit and we think our troubles started in 47 or whatever …

    The trouble started with Ghazali and co. And we’re reaping the rewards to this. It does ring a bell, but you tell people about it and they look back at you with empty stares and you know in the back of your mind that we’re all going to hell in a handbasket if we don’t correct.. but how?

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @mbokhari: re: your McArthur quote and it’s eloquence, compare with what our “rotting corpse” of a jurnail said in his second auspicious usurpation of democratic rights:

    “inti-aaa pasaNdi inti-aaa ko poNch giii ae!” (phonetically speaking)

    Makes one wonder keh, Yeh khoTay sikkay hamaari Qismat maeN hi ki’yooN likhay thay yaa-rab?

    Jaanay kis jurm ki paa’ie hai sazaa yaad nahiN. “

  • Revivalist said:

    @ 27122007
    Bro to know who would be the caliph and how would people choose him please refer to this article. Let me make one thing clear to you bro that khilafah is the ruling system in Islam and has its own principles regulations and structure, it is completely different from Democracy, dictatorship or any other ruling system and is better then all with out a doubt. Moreover it is a system which is prescribed by our creator and then implemented by the noble Sahaba (ra) and remained there for centuries.
    There is a misunderstanding amongst few brothers here who think that we want to revive Usthmani khilafah or Abasi khilafah and give few examples which they have read in propaganda books. In fact our struggle to revive Islam and the method to revive Islam is khilafah, we want to revive khilafah Rashida.

    http://www.khilafah.com/kcom/the-khilafah/issues/the-method-to-appoint-a-khaleefah.html

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @ Tab’an khamosh and all other bro and sis who question the existing of a ruling system in Islam.

    Bro You said to hamaradeen that “Can you point out the sections in The Quran which give us “the system given to us by our creator?” so let me refresh your mind once again by giving you some example from Quran and hadith about the system of Islam particularly ruling system. Moreover It is part of our believe that Islam is a complete way of life because Allah (swt) mentions this is his holy Book.

    The mechanism through which we live Islam is the Khilafah ruling system. This is the same Khilafah ruling system that the Khulafa Rashideen implemented and the same one which existed right up until 3rd March, 1924, when it was destroyed by the British agent and traitor, Mustafah Kemal. The Prophet (saw) said:

    “The knots of Islam will be broken one by one until every one of them is undone. The first to be undone will be the knot of ruling and the last will be the knot of Salah” (Musnad of Imam Ahmed)

    THE FARD (OBLIGATION) OF AL-KHILAFAH
    In the Glorious Qur’an:
    Allah (SWT) says in the translation of the meaning of the Qur’an ul-Kareem (TMQ):

    1. “But no, by your Lord, they will not have Eeman until they make you (O Prophet) rule between them in that wich they dispute, and they find in their souls no resistance against your decisions, but accept them with the fullest conviction” (TMQ 4:65).

    2. “Indeed, we have revealed to you the book with the truth so that you may rule between mankind by that which Allah has shown you” (TMQ 4:105).

    3. “So rule between them by that which Allah has revealed, and follow not their desires, but beware of them in case they seduce you from just some part of that which Allah has revealed to you” (TMQ 4:49).

    4. “Whosoever does not rule by that which Allah has revealed, they are disbelievers (Kafiroon)…..the thaalimoon (oppressors)….the fasiqoon (evil doers)”
    (TMQ 4. 5:44-47)

    These ayaat(versus) of Qur’an, and many others, prove beyond doubt the obligation of ruling by what Allah has revealed. The first one in particular refers to the Muslims directly by stating that we have no real Imaan (belief) until we make them judge between us by Allah’s revelation. This is an indication of the obligation for all Muslims to establish Allah’s ruling system.

  • Revivalist said:

    In the Ahadeeth of our beloved Prophet (saw):

    1: Imam Muslim narrated from Abu Hazim who said:
    I was with Abu Hurairah for five years and I heard him narrate from the Prophet (SAW) that he said: “The Prophets used to rule Bani Israel. Whenever a prophet died another prophet succeeded him, but there will be no prophets after me; instead there will be Khulafaa’ (Khalifahs) and they will number many”. They asked: what then do you order us? He said: “fulfil allegiance to them one after the other. Give them their dues. Verily Allah will ask them about what he entrusted them with”.

    This Hadeeth is a clear statement of the fact that the form of government in Islam, after the Prophet (SAW) is the Khilafah, and not an Islamic Republic, Islamic Socialist Republic or Islamic Imarah. This understanding is supported by numerous other Hadeeth that indicate the only system of government in Islam is the Khilafah.

    2: Imam Muslim narrated from Abdullah bin ‘Umar who said that the Prophet (saw) said,

    “One who dies without having bound himself by an oath of allegiance (to a Khalifah) will die the death of one belonging to the days of ignorance (Jahiliyah)”.

    3. Ahmed and Ibn abi ‘Asim narrated that the Prophet (saw) said,

    “Whosoever dies and he does not have over him an Imaam, he dies the death of Jahilyyah”.

    Thus the Prophet (SAW) made it compulsory that every Muslim should have over him an Imaam, which is also represented by having a pledge of allegiance (bayah) on his or her neck. The pledge of allegiance is not given to anyone except the Khalifah. The Ahadeeth inform us that those who run the affairs of Muslims are Khalifahs (some times called Amir ul-Mu’mineen or the Imam). Therefore, this is a command to establish or appoint them.

  • Revivalist said:

    Finally In the sayings of the Sahabah:

    Ali ibn abi Taalib (r.a.) said, “The people will not be straightened except by an Imaam (Khaleefah), whether he is good or bad”.
    (Bayhaqi, No. 14286, Kanz ul-ummal)

    Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (r.a.) said “The people in the Ummah will not suffer even if they were oppressors and sinful if the rulers were guided and were guiding. But the people in the Ummah will suffer and perish even if they were guided and were guiding if the rulers were oppressors and sinful”.
    (Abu Nu’aim narrated in ‘Hulayat Awliyyah.)

    ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab (r.a.) said,
    “Laa Islam bi laa Jamaa’ati wa laa jamaa’ati bi laa Imaarah, wa laa Imaaratu bi laa sam’on wa taa’ah”.
    “There is no Islam without a community, and there is no community without a leadership, and there is no authoruty without hearing and obeying”.

    In the sayings of the Ulemaa:

    Imam al-Qurtubi said in his Tafseer of the verse, “Indeed, man is made upon this earth a Khaleefah” (TMQ 2:30) that:
    “Haatheeh il-Aayatu asalun fee nasabi Imaamin wa Khaleefatin, yosma’oo lahu wa yotaa’u li-tajtami’i bihi il-kalimatih, wa tonaffithu bihi ahkaam il-Khaleefah, wa laa khalaafu fee wajoobi thalik bayna al-Ummati wa laa bayn al-a’immah, illa maa rawaya ‘an il-Asam al-Mu’tazzili…”
    “This Ayah is a source in the selection of an Imaam, and a Khaleefah, he is listened to and he is obeyed, for the word is united through him, and the Ahkam (laws) of the Khaleefah are implemented through him, and there is no difference regarding the obligation of that between the Ummah, nor between the Imams except what is narrated about al-Asam, the Mu’tazzili (a deviant group)…”.
    (Tafseer ul-Qurtubi 264/1.)

    Imam al-Qurturbi (rh.a.) also said,
    “The Khilafah is the pillar upon which other pillars rest”.

    Imam an-Nawawi (rh.a.) said,
    “Ijma’oo ‘alaa annahu yajib ‘alal-Muslimeena nasabun Khaleefah”.
    “(The scholars) consented that it is an obligation upon the Muslims to select a Khaleefah”.
    (Sharhu Sahih Muslim page 205 vol 12)

    Imaam al-Ghazali (rh.a.) when writing of the potential consequences of losing the Khilafah said,
    “The judges will be suspeneded, the Wilayaat (provinces) will be nullified, … the decrees of those in authority will not be executed and all the people will be on the verge of Haraam”.
    (al Iqtisaad fil Itiqaad page 240.)

    Ibn Taymiyyah (rh.a.) said,
    “Yajib an yo’rafa anna wilayata amr in-naasi min a’thami waajibaat id-Deen, Bal laa qiyaamu li-Deen illa bihaa”.
    “It is obligatory to know that the office in charge of commanding over the people (ie: the Khilafah post) is one of the greatest obligations of the Deen. In fact, their is no establishment of the Deen except by it….this is the opinion of the salaf, such as al-Fadl ibn ‘Iyaad, Ahmed ibn Hanbal and others”.
    (Siyaasah Shariyyah – chapter: ‘The obligation of adherence to the leadership’.)

    Imam abu ul-Hasan al-Mawardi (rh.a.) said,
    “‘Aqd ul-Imamati li man yaqoomu bihaa fil-ummati wajib bil-Ijmaa’ “.
    “The contract of the Imamah (leadership) for whoever is standing with it, is an obligation by Ijmaa’a (consensus)”.
    (al-Ahkam us-Sultaniyyah [Arabic] p 56.)

    Imam Ahmed (rh.a.) said:
    “Al-Fitnatu Ithaa lam yakun Imaamun Yaqoomu bi amril-Muslimeen”, which means,
    “The Fitna (mischief and tribuulations) occurs when there is no Imaam established over the affairs of the people”.

    Abu Hafs Umar al-Nasafi (rh.a.) a noted scholar of the 6th century Hijri states;
    “The Muslims simply must have an Imam (Khaleefah), who will execute the rules, establish the Hudud (penal system), defend the frontiers, equip the armies, collect Zakah, punish those who rebel (against the state) and those who spy and highwaymen, establish Jum’ah and the two ‘Eids, settle the dispute among the servants (of Allah), accept the testimony of witnesses in matters of legal rights, give in marriage the young and the poor who have no family, and distribute the booty”.

    Imam Al-Juzayri, an expert on the Fiqh of the four great schools of thought said regarding the four Imams, “The Imams (scholars of the four schools of thought- Shafi’i, Hanafi, Maliki, Hanbali)- may Allah have mercy on them- agree that the Imamah (Leadership) is an obligation, and that the Muslims must appoint an Imam who would implement the deen’s rites, and give the oppressed justice against the oppressors”.
    (“Fiqh ul-Mathahib ul- Arba’a” [the Fiqh of the four schools of thought], volume 5, page 416.)

    Imam al-Haythami said,
    “A’lamu anna Sahabata- Ridhwaan Allahu ‘alayhim -Ajma’oo ‘ala anna nasab al-Imaamata ba’d inqiraadhi zaman in-Naboowa waajibon bal ja’aloohu ahamu wajibaat hayth ushtaghloo bihi ‘an dafani rasool illah”.
    “It is known that the Sahabah (r.a.h) consented that selecting the Imaam after the end of the era of Prophethood was an obligation (Wajib). Indeed they made it (more) important than the (other) obligations whilst they were busy with it over the burial of the Prophet (saw)”.
    (al-Haythami in Sawaa’iq ul-haraqah:17.)

    I hope these are sufficient example to clarify the point. Even after reading these post if you guys still have any question or queries please feel free to ask any question which is not clear yet.

    After this we would discuss Democracy and those who advocate democracy would come up with there arguments to prove it Islamic and to prove it is an effective system and really exist in the world and the system which is we see in the world is not Elitocracy.
    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @bechari-awam

    This is a matter of life and death for us as it was an issue of life and death for our beloved prophet (Saw) and you are not even ready to read a few pages. Vary ironic. If you are not interested in knowing about khilafah then don’t discuss.

    Regards

  • rasheed said:

    @Revavilist,

    I cannot the reference at this time, but I have read that the word “Khalifah” was not in the Arabic vocabulary or dictionary until 2nd century, therefore I believe our Prophet PBUH could not have said these statements.

    Can you refer anything from Quran with the word “Khalifah”?

  • Revivalist said:

    @Umar khan

    Bro to clarify an important point to you is that our struggle is not to bring back Uthmani khilafah or Abasi khilafah and nether this is obligatory upon us rather what is obligatory upon is to re-establish Allah’s Deen in all aspects of our life affairs and the method to do this is khilafah and I have give some detail evidences which prove it with out a doubt that the ruling system in Islam is khilafah.

    Secondly we often confuse two things one is Tahzeeb and other is Tamadun or in simple words one is actions and other is things. There is an Islam principle which makes this issue crystal clear for us. Like every action is haram unless you have a evidence which can prove It Halal and every thing is allowed unless there is an evidence which prove it Haram. AS for as the material advancements are concern, these are universal and Islam does not forbid it. So this points needs to be clear that when we say khilafah we don’t say that we will abandon everything invented by the west, it’s absolutely rubbish. Islam is the most modern system in the world and will remain so till the last day.

    Unfortunately some of our bro here do not understand Islam or don’t want to understand it. The problem with them is that they take west as reference point and judge Islam according to that, which is absolutely nonsense.

    According to Islam every article needs to be derived from the sources defined by Islam and not through majority or some intellectuals would allow doing so for others. So for any constitution to become Islam this is the yardstick.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @mbokhari

    Bro Your post is way below the standard of discussion and shows your utter ignorance about HT, khilafah and Islam, try to do some more research and for that don’t rely on propaganda material and TV channels.
    Your pity questions are already answered in my previous post to please do read them and please do try to come up with some rational points next time.

    Regards

  • babarsaab said:

    Aiwan-e-Saddar agree on reinstatement of deposed judges

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=40179

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    The four quotes from Quran no where mention the Khalifah business. They also only stress the revelation made in the Quran itself and not the Hadith. Put along that the fact that the Hadith were put together some 150 years later and Bokhari himself rejected more than 99% of the hadith he had collected, I refuse to accept them as “unchallengeable”. Take for example:

    Narrated Hudayfh Ibn al-Yaman:
    Prophet said: “There will come rulers after me who do not guide to
    my guidance and do not practice my Sunnah, and the hearts of some
    them are the hearts of Satans but they are in the body of human.”
    I said: “What should we do at that time?” Prophet (PBUH) said:
    “You should just listen to them and obey those rulers. No matter if
    the hurt you and take your wealth, you should follow them and obey
    them.”

    Here are two more, one right after the other:
    Volume 1, Book 6, Number 303:
    Narrated ‘Aisha:
    Fatima bint Abi Hubaish said to Allah’s Apostle, “O Allah’s Apostle! I do not become clean (from bleeding). Shall I give up my prayers?” Allah’s Apostle replied: “No, because it is from a blood vessel and not the menses. So when the real menses begins give up your prayers and when it (the period) has finished wash the blood off your body (take a bath) and offer your prayers.”

    Volume 1, Book 6, Number 304:
    Narrated Asma’ bint Abi Bakr:
    A woman asked Allah’s Apostle, “O Allah’s Apostle! What should we do, if the blood of menses falls on our clothes?” Allah’s Apostle replied, “If the blood of menses falls on the garment of anyone of you, she must take hold of the blood spot, rub it, and wash it with water and then pray in (with it).”

    Now how do you accept both? While first suggests a woman cannot pray during menstruation, the very next one suggests the opposite.

    Want one more? How about:
    Volume 8, Book 78, Number 634:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “(The Prophet) Solomon once said, ‘Tonight I will sleep with ninety women, each of whom will bring forth a (would-be) cavalier who will fight in Allah’s Cause.” On this, his companion said to him, “Say: Allah willing!” But he did not say Allah willing. Solomon then slept with all the women, but none of them became pregnant but one woman who later delivered a half-man. By Him in Whose Hand Muhammad’s soul is, if he (Solomon) had said, ‘Allah willing’ (all his wives would have brought forth boys) and they would have fought in Allah’s Cause as cavaliers. ”

    Sex with 90 women in one night? Please! Or was it 60 wives?
    Volume 9, Book 93, Number 561:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:
    Allah’s Prophet Solomon who had sixty wives, once said, “Tonight I will have sexual relation (sleep) with all my wives so that each of them will become pregnant and bring forth (a boy who will grow into) a cavalier and will fight in Allah’s Cause.” So he slept with his wives and none of them (conceived and) delivered (a child) except one who brought a half (body) boy (deformed). Allah’s Prophet said, “If Solomon had said; ‘If Allah Will,’ then each of those women would have delivered a (would-be) cavalier to fight in Allah’s Cause.” (See Hadith No. 74 A, Vol. 4).

    Which version should I accept? Well I categorically reject them both. I could go on and on but I won’t. Of course I have no problem with at least one of them:

    From the Quran itself:
    “– and We have sent down to thee the Book explaining all things, a Guide, a Mercy, and Glad Tidings to Muslims. ” (Quran 16:89)

    For me that is sufficient!

  • nota said:

    @babarsaab
    “Aiwan-e-Saddar agree on reinstatement of deposed judges”

    If true, it means one whole year of Mush still to go. That s*cks. As part of the deal I an certain an NRO for Mush/Qayyum/Pirzada/PML-Q/MQM & Co. It truly s*cks big time!!!

  • Omer Khan said:

    @revivalist. Problem is I don’t understand as to what you exactly mean by Khilafah really. What is your prototype for it? The first four caliphs? That’s is still not sufficient by today’s standards. And to be dismissive of human intellectual breakthroughs “just because” shows an aversion to empiricism. Maybe it is just semantics. How about referring to a prime minister as the khalifah? lol Will that rock the boat? For sure, we dont want a life long figure head of state once elected unless he/she is like the Queen of England.

    Look I do appreciate your civility. You have been consistently more civil than any other participant here. That’s awesome. But it is just the particulars which are confusing.

    What do you mean by khilafah? how do khalifahs come into being? what kind of a state would it be? Soviet Union or China like? Like Khomeni’s Iran, or the Taliban? Would private actions be regulated?

    Will there be punishment for adultery?
    will there be punishment for whacking off to porn?
    Will personal choices like hijab be enforced? To what extent?
    How deep will the govt. be involved in telling people what to do? Will stem cell research be allowed?
    Will there be stoning to death?
    How will the state deal with dissenters? will the testimony of women be half of men? What is the text from which the state derives authority? koran and hadith? or just the Koran? Will the sahih hadith be considered infallible?

    I don’t think even you are clear on those issues. We are all muslims here, majority of us.

    I think that you are stuck up on semantics buddy. You just don’t like English langauge words. Take this:

    “Thus the Prophet (SAW) made it compulsory that every Muslim should have over him an Imaam, which is also represented by having a pledge of allegiance (bayah) on his or her neck. The pledge of allegiance is not given to anyone except the Khalifah. The Ahadeeth inform us that those who run the affairs of Muslims are Khalifahs (some times called Amir ul-Mu’mineen or the Imam). Therefore, this is a command to establish or appoint them.”

    I don’t see how this quote is different from what Imran Khan wold say for example. SO everyone is mostly saying the same thing. People here are a little scared because of our experiences with totalitarian states that did herald Islamic slogans but did not deliver like Iran for example or Taliban. Not that seculars like Saddam or Qaddafis or Karimovs did any better. But think about it: we are already majority muslims and know that situation in our ummah is precarious, and so do you. So pretty much is on the same boat. Now if you have this aversion to words like “secularists”, or think that what we in Pakistan want fahashi etc. you are wrong. Infact anyone who tried to shove their “progressive moderate enlightenment” down the throat of any people suffered the worst consequences be it Shah of Iran, Najibullah, or is greatly reviled like Musharaf and Ataturk by their own people and counter currents emerge in eiher case.. So, really if to you like the word khilafah because you think it represents liberty, freedom, tradition and progress, then join in the Jihad. Everyone is asking for the same thing.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    “I’m the little jew who wrote the bible”

    – Leonard Cohen

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Revivalist: Yaar tu lambi gallaN karna aeN pa’iee .. choTi sidhi “to the point” gal karo paaji..

    Also, please for the love of god stop referring people to articles, you need a draft constitution.. where is the draft constitution for your state? you are going to refer people in the “Khilaafa Courts” to the article on HT website bro? that is not fair to people. ;) HT people should do this as a constitutional exercise if nothing else.

    @nota: good points, I’m assuming the bold parts are the ones rejected? or were the whole of them rejected after the bold part made the fragment unacceptable? A good reminder to all those who, like fundamentalist christians, forget that Islamic scholars gave the science of critical peer review etc to the academic world. This was not a greek science.

    @Omar Khan: yaar ham is say yehi poochtay rahay haiN or jab poochtay hai revivalist bhai kuch dinooN ki chuTTi par chalay jaatay haiN lekin seedha jawab naheen detay :)

  • Optimist said:

    @ TAba’n Khamosh

    Revivalist doesn’t need any draft constitution. All they need is brutality which they have in abundance.

    Any difference of opinion? They will shut you up by quoting some Hadith and if you dare to challenge their views you will be contradicting Hadith!! And thus target of their violence.

  • Optimist said:

    @ Omer Khan

    Don’t waste your energies on these Mullahs.

    ~ Marde NadaaN pe Kalaam i Narm o Nazuk Be Asar

    That is why I never engage in intellectual discussions with a. Mullahs and b. MQM supporters. Just use small/sharp sentences (like newspaper headlines). They don’t deserve anything more than that!! If they were capable of that, they would be following something sensible (which may be against our views but not as baseless as Mullahcracy and Bhatta Khori).

  • geog47 said:

    Here is the DRAFT CONSTITUTION for Khilafah system.

    http://www.islamic-truth.co.uk/islamicstore/pdf_files/system.pdf

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @geog47: thanks. Finally after 2 months of asking, someone understands my question.

    This is a good first step, but seriously, why only “men” ? Women are not good enough to be a khaleefa? though this is not a sticking point. Anyways, moving on.

    q. Article 180 – who determines haram ?? what are the check and balances on these religous scholars who do this? (just point to the article no. if it’s already there)
    q. What articles in this constitution constitute a system of checks and balances against excess of political appointees (all done by khaleefa it seems)?
    q. It would help to have a list of scholars who have worked on this? their histories and their qualifications. Why is this not part of it( plz no long answers on how britain doesn’t do it so do force us to do it either — every constitution has a list of authors. who are authors for this?)

    Looks like the Khaleefa (like general tyrant zia) can just declare one day that he had a dream and therefore he is the absolute tyrant? who will stop this “khilafa state’ from turning into soviet union. ??? Keep in mind the size of the state. If you pull this off, this will be the biggest super power the world has ever seen. Do you really think ONE MAN (or WOMAN) without checks and balances can handle that?

    And please, HT people, enough with cutting and pasting chapters from Bokhari. You’re not helping anyone (and neither do you impress anyone) by doing that. Just quick answers to questions so we can move the dialog along please?

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    “not a sticking point” means for the purposes of this discussion. but definitely one if things ever comes to pass (good luck on that btw)

  • hamaradeen said:

    oops I have missed a lot, this is turning out to be a good debate and I am learning a lot out of this.

    @geog47
    WOW thank u for providing that document. Much appreciated.

  • Omer Khan said:

    @optimist and TK, truth is, I find Revivalist much more amiable than either of . Perhaps I should include myself to the list. He is annoying perhaps because of his lack of finese in what he or she is trying to say, but I respect his behavior. No where has he called for murder or this and that yet people perhaps frustrated by his obtuseness continue to do so. I would only show contempt if he indulged in uncivil name calling, threats, libel, and accusations.
    Using terms like mullah or Islmaist or whatever are just tactics to stifle debate and just knock down a straw man.

    Truth be told, Mullahs are the least of the sinners in the game called Pakistan or even around the world. Not to mention that bad mullahs or political opppertunist mullahs are hugely dwarfed by good mullahs. They have had some street power but have the least amount of blood on their hands and loot and plunder of the country especially compared with the self proclaimed secularists like MQM or Pak military generals and politicians. I say this to remind people. Just like I remind people that criticism of Pakistan’s system should not translate into Pakistan is the worst place . I keep reiterating that.

    Infact, mullahs have held more nationalism that resonates with the people than non mullahs (whatever these terms mean). They bring balance to these corrupt, swindling, hyppocritical, machiavellian governments. Hence the civil society must address the issues which irk the public before things get out of hand, erstwhile the entire nation becomes a mullah whether it is Hamas’ palestine, or Islamic movement of Uzbekistan, Iranian revolution etc..

    I have seen quite hostility and mob like behavior from these non mullahs on this website. Infact I had been banned from forums a few years ago for raising voice against Musharaf when the entire nation was sopoforic, foremost of whom were the so called leftists (whom I would never call liberals) (whose prejudice, arrogance and myopia runs deep) who had surrounded Musharraf with festoons and hailed his treacheries as pragmatism. And even rejoiced at lal masjid and Kashmir’s pacification and what not. Same mentality. Only more detached from the public, more devious and venal.

    SO please let’s not pontificate here.

    I have deep problems with these brethren’s argument of khilafah, because I don’t know what it means and how rational it is. Does not mean I am hostile to them just because.

  • geog47 said:

    NA resolution to restore Judges has no legal status: Malik Qayyum

    Updated at: 2030 PST, Thursday, March 13, 2008
    ISLAMABAD: Attorney General of Pakistan Malik Qayyum said under the constitution the first session of the National Assembly would be convened to take oath from newly elected members and elect the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the House.

    In an exclusive discussion with Geo news at Attorney General’s office on Thursday, Qayyum said the President of Pakistan used to invite the leader of the majority party to form government but after the 8th Amendment, the President, under the constitution, would ask the member to form government, getting majority support in the House.

    Responding to a question he said the President has the authority to convene NA session to elect the House leader but no time frame could be given for that. However, he said, if one fourth majority of the members gives requisition, the session can be convened.

    Answering another question Qayyum said Judiciary of November 2 could be restored by a single resolution since the Supreme Court had already reviewed its legal status.

    He said government had no plans to file reference against any such resolution in the Supreme Court. He said Chief Justice Abdul Hamid Dogar neither wrote any letter to the President under article 190 nor expressed any such intention.

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=40233

  • geog47 said:

    Pakistan army: Shell fired by US-led coalition forces in Afghanistan kills 2 women and 2 children.

    Good job US soldiers. Very effective way to provoc reaction. These families don’t live in the space in isolation. They are part of bigger families. These women and children are not widows and orphans. This is a very successful way to winning hearts and minds for more and more reactionary violence to be called “terrorism” for continuing the war of terror.

    Associated Presstitutes are playing their games as well. Pakistani and Chinese media is reporting as least six deaths. But AP reports only 4.

    Many people take it lightly. But it is as much horrible for the Pakistani to digest as if it would be for the Americans to see Pakistani forces invade and occupy Canada or mexico after a pre-planned war (or a pre-9/11 planned war, or a pre-flase flage operation war) and then shell the US territory on regular basis, killing women and children for years in a row under the pretext of eliminating a non-existent “al-Qaeda,” whereas its commanders admit that only 10% of the occupied country is under the control of their puppet regime.

  • ayan said:

    Musharaf is conspiracing agianst the mandate of People of Pakistan

    Musharaf is conspiracing agianst the mandate of People of Pakistan by delaying the session of National assembly. He is doing this to extend his rule as much as he can. He knows now has no bullet left in his pistol. Either he has to surrender or ………

    To prove this that he is delibrately delaying the session let us see the dates. In Pakistan elections held on Feb 18, 2008 . Musharaf already did various pre poll rigging at large and when even then election results come against him he is doing right what he did in the elections of 2002. i.e. He is trying to create Patroits among Palkistan Peoples Party. So after 15 days on Mar 4,2008 Election commission of Pakistan after getting approval from Musharraf announced the Election Result. and then Musharraf got an urgent information that the People of Jacobabad are deprive of water. So he urgently flown to Jacobabad to provide water to the people of Jacobabad. Then he came to know that the city of Multan has not its TV station. So He went there so that people of Multan can have their own PTV centre. Then his seceretary Soomoro informed him Sir jii this newly elected assembly has to swear its oath so should I send you the summary for the session of Parliment. He then realized that ok the newly elected representative have to take the oath. So with his permission his seceretary soomoro send him the summary for requisition of National Assembly. He saw that and then finally he thought he should call the National Assembly session atleast 1 week late(i.e. on 17 March). Why??. The reason is same he is still not getting results in his favours.

    Let us see what is happening in our brother muslim country Malayasia. In Malayasia elections held on March 8, 2008. The result comes as a set back to the ruling party and the ruling party of Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi lost their two third majority in the parliment of 222 seats and setteled on 139 seats getting only simple majority. But the most important thing from Pakistan perspective is that the next term prime minister of Malayasia took oath on March 10. Just after two days of election.

    Why delay in Pakistan

    So why it is in Pakistan that Election is helding on Feb 18 and the new assembly would be going to begin its first session on March 17 i.e. one precious month of this whole nation is being lost due to a selfish person who is unable to see any thing except himself. This person is betryaing Pakistan and people of Pakistan in the name of ” Pakistan comes first”. People of Pakistan should realize that their future is in the continuation of system and the restoration of Judiciary on Pre 3rd Nov 2007 condition. We should not compromise less then that. Any thing comes in the way should be treated iron handedly. We dont want our future generation to hang into the same situations agian and agian created by these stupid and criminal army generals. Keep this thing in my that this is the condition of Now or Never. Just imagin that Europe and USA have settled these issues almost 300 years ago and we are beating about the bush agian again and gain. May Allah save Pakistan form the evil tactics Musharraf and company.

  • geog47 said:

    Remote controlled or suicide bombing?

    http://www.express.com.pk/epaper/Article.aspx?newsID=1100368397&Date=20080313&Issue=NP_LHE

    You won’t see this kind of write ups in the English press from Pakistan. The reimge controls it more tightly than the Urdu press because it knows what the people know, but it doesn’t want the rest of the world to know the same through the English press.

  • geog47 said:

    Surprisingly, it is BBC raising serious questions about the so-labelled “suicide” bombings in Pakistan.

    http://www.express.com.pk/epaper/Article.aspx?newsID=1100368376&Date=20080313&Issue= NP_LHE

    Soon after every carnage in Pakistan, the media go into new frenzy of lies lies and deception to label every terrorist bombing as a “suicide” attack without making any further effort to investigate the henious crimes.

    For the first time, BBC is raising some serious questions into the latest bombing incident in Lahore. The above link takes us to an Urdu report from Daily Express (March 13, 2008) which gives details of the BBC report, where an unidentified police offices reveals that the FIA office was a top secret location. It was used for investigating terrorist crimes in the country. It was situated behind a servant quarter in Model Town. BBC asks, how does the “terrorists” get infomration about the top secret locations of the security forces.

    How do the terrorists know the details and whereabouts of secret places, unless they are told by those who know them but no one suspects them due to their being non Pakistanis. Many American instructors in torture know such whereabouts.

  • 27122007 said:

    @Revivalist on March 13th, 2008 4:31 am
    The Muslim Ummah discharges this responsibility by appointing a representative who will implement, protect and propagate Islam. This representative is the Khaleefah. http://www.khilafah.com/kcom/the-

    khilafah/issues/the-method-to-appoint-a-khaleefah.html

    what is diff bw khaleefah and PM? y do u care so much about title???? who will make sure that khaleefah is not acting like musharaf?? answer is available on same link u told me it says”Ummah must continue to account the Khaleefah and his government ” do u see what im saying? im saying that even in khilafat it is duty of umah to amke sure that state sffairs r going in right direction ok. (same is in democracy)

    i would again ask u same question what is diff bw democracy and khilafat(well i know democracy starts with D adn khilafat starts with K) plzdont send me another link again. try to reply in ur own words.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @geog47: I knew this couldn’t last long. Please stop this BS! stop implying or buying into the “remote control” theory.

    If you don’t believe go look at live leak and see how many of Muslims are going to these “ghazwa’s”. These people in their mind are doing the right thing, but either say your support it or say you condemn it, but plz don’t try to weasel out of it by clutching on straws.

    I can buy the express premise for the karachi blasts, there is some ambiguity about the shooter vs. bomber in BB murder, but this video is clear as day. There are 2 ppl in the carry and they way he overran the guard, this was not an innocent delivery boy who didn’t know he was carrying a bomb. These were people, and they did it and they were Islamic Extremist TOOLS.

    Maybe they were misled by some outfit that sells these fools to the highest bidder in rAW or mossad or whatever, but these were blind followers of “islamic scholars” who are doing it for various reasons.

    Your attempts to deflect responsibility from Islamists (who share the goal of Khilafa with you) are transparent and dis-ingenuous. With all due respect. (due).

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @geog47: plz look at the driver and the guy sitting behind him. Do they look like remote controlled “robots” to you? if they are they look very human. video is half way through the footage

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxAWR92RZMQ

  • Optimist said:

    These Mush lovers are sending people SPAM emails supporting Mush on judiciary issue.

    Does anyone know these email addresses (do you know who these people are?)

    ahmad.nawaz12@yahoo.com

    adnan.malik29@yahoo.com

  • Riddle 792 said:

    I just cant stop myself in sharing this following link with you guys. May be you have seen this before but its news to me.

    and I ask this question that what is the relationship between Bilal Musharaff and the Pakistani Ambassador who is sitting so obidiently in this picture and are meeting with Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal in this picture for a Business Dealing.

    Rumor is in Boston where Bilal Musharaff lives that he has become a millionaire since the illegal coup of 1999….. ?

    I think its time when we should start planning for the accountability of the last 8 years… may be a section devoted to these kind of things on pkpolitics… ?

    http://bp1.blogger.com/_JtRP5wIdjrs/R9moI9C7PyI/AAAAAAAAAhA/uVvYJ4H4bho/s1600-h/BilalMusharraf.jpg

  • nota said:

    @Riddle 792
    The answer is right in the caption of the pic. Thanks to Mush, Bilal the lowly “Munshi”/Accountant has become a vulture capatilist (ePlanet Ventures and Global Venture Capital… :)

  • nota said:

    PML(Q) – The pitiable plight of a party with nothing to say

    ISLAMABAD: The PML-Q and other political allies of President Pervez Musharraf are engaged in a waiting game with the hope that the bonhomie between the PML-Nawaz and the PPP would be short-lived and their ‘internal contradictions’ would take over and break them apart.

    The PML-Q leaders are very quiet and waiting for their opponents to commit mistakes. “They seem to have no other option but to react to the PPP-PML-N moves. Why should we be proactive now when we want them to form governments and commit mistakes? Then we will react in our own way,” said one PML-Q leader.

    Over the past few days, particularly after the Murree Accord between the PML-N and PPP, the PML-Q has been remarkably mum.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @Riddle 792: ohh that is only a few billion dollars of our nation here and there bro, but really, let’s talk about the REAL issue.. like Imran Khan banging some chick or allegedly going to a mujra party… oh oh and what about those horses… oh oh .. I know i Know.. … why they don’t follow article 3 or clause 5 of something neither u nor I give a crap about….

    I mean really, let’s talk about who banged who in their personal lives.. whether they shave their pubic hairs or not.. kiski bivi kiskay saath jaa rahi hai.. Why u talking about the poor innocent president (22 grade officer) and his poor innocent son? what he do to you?

    YOU’RE NOT MUSLIM! YEH KHILAAFE ISLAM hai.. Progressiveeeeeeeismsmsmsm1!! smack smack smack the woman councillors… “kheltiyaan to larkiyaan bheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeN!!!”

    etc. etc.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    ePlanet has done deals worth 12B or so. I am curious now, does anyone know how deep ePlanet ventures has roots in the Pakistani establishment? it started in1999 but the founder was a investment banker in Hong Kong before that..

    Yaar if we have such smart guys in pakistan, why aren’t they investing in Pakistan and bringing investment to Pakistan? How many ventures in Pakistan did ePlanet support? (My guess is ZERO)

    any hoo, here is the blurb on Bilal Musharraf:

    http://www.eplanetventures.com/en/team/team_ic_na_musharraf.html

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    I’m sorry, but Amin Fahim is the real Trojan Horse. He maybe the president, but the chairman can still make someone else president of the caucus and demote Makhdoom Amin Fahim for insubordination . This is against party discipline. If he had a problem, he should have spoken the F**K up when they were nominating Bilawal Zardari was being nominated as chairperson.

    Even now, if Bilawal Zardari gives ONE statement that he supports Asif Zardari’s decision, that will be the End of Mr. Fahim . This he can ask Mustapha Khar, Jatoi, and a host of others.

    In any case, he is being a douche and he is sabotaging the process now. He is belligerant, in defiance of the party chairperson and openly threatening to side with Musharraf! Which is in contrivance of Party’s democratic policies and cause for termination !

    He is the head of the “LAST” pppP group! NOT THIS ONE, Zardari hasn’t nominated the head for this group yet. The party didn’t fight the election under MAF, they did under Zardari and the CEC. They need to wise the f**k up or this one f*ck face wadera is going to f*ck things up for everyone. What I hate even more about him are his supporters, MQM and Musharraf? how can this man be even be in the top 3?

  • Omer Khan said:

    LOL, some pendejos here are loosing their minds! You know it when the keys on the keyboard get jammed.

  • rasheed said:

    @Taban,

    Amin Fahim can turn the game upside down and make a big hell in entire Pakistani politics.

    Amin Fahim has not been only meeting Musharraf frequently, but has also met MQM Governer Sindh Ishrat Ibad.

    MQM has big numbers in provincial government in Sindh and defection of just few PPP members along with Amin Faheem and his son towards MQM will assure MQM’s government in Sindh.

    Once MQM assume government, they will ban entries of everyone they don’t like in Sindh just like they have been doing in past.

    I had this suspicion from many days, but Jang has confirmed this in today’s newspaper:

    http://jang.com.pk/jang/mar2008-daily/14-03-2008/main4.htm

  • Malek said:

    MAF hasnt got the b*lls to do anything. if he had ….he had already been the PM. he is playing establishment game and will sink in it with establishment.

    Anyway AF is not an issue. Its PPP’s choice whoever they want to nominate as PM. The real issue is restoration of judiciary and of musharraf’s rule.

    to the true supporters of judiciary and democracy: please ignore AF issue as it will only distract us from the 2 core issues

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @rasheed: I believe that is the thinking but I’d have to agree with rasheed that Mush and his past, present and future share with him traits of cowardice and treachery.

    In any case, not only are they cowards, they are also incompetent and lazy. Because they are basing the whole thing on extending the offer to make govt to the head of the majority, but I’f I’m correct, M.A.F ceased to be the head of that majority when the last parliament was dissolved.

    Right now, he’s not a head of anything in the parliament because:

    (1) he’s not been nominated to that position for this parliament, and
    (2) the parliament is not in existence and therefore no such caucus of PPP parlimentarians exists (unless of course PPP & PPPp are two legally distinct entities)

    From Article in wikipeda [1] ‘definition’ of caucus in a Commonwealth context :

    n some Commonwealth nations, a caucus is a regular meeting of all Members of Parliament who belong to a political party. In a Westminster System, a party caucus can be quite powerful, as it can elect or dismiss the party’s parliamentary leader. The caucus also determines some matters of policy, parliamentary tactics, and disciplinary measures against disobedient MPs. In some parties, the caucus also has the power to elect MPs to Cabinet when the party is in government. For example this is traditionally so in the Australian Labor Party (ALP) and the New Zealand Labour Party. The term is rarely used in the United Kingdom.

    Ref [1]: Wikipedia: Caucus
    Ref [2]: Definr.com : caucus

  • Asif said:

    ……”One mistake many of us are making at present is to confuse Musharraf with the establishment. It is Musharraf who is discredited. The establishment remains as powerful as before. The army under Gen Ashfaq Kayani may have taken a step backwards and may be making the right noises but its power, for good or evil, hasn’t diminished and officers of the rank of major general and above have lost none of their contempt for politicians as a class.”…..

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=101160

    A direct aim at Gen Kayani by newly elected MNA Ayaz Amir.

    Ayaz Mir is no more a journalist now hes a parliamentarian from noon leagues platform so his every word would be considered a part of party’s thinking & policy.
    Even before taking oath he has opened another front & started firing on Gen Kayani & his surrogates. He has forgotten that we should resolve the Judiciary issue first & then aim at next target. But he seemz to be too much excited to be a parliamentarian & wanna bring into limelight the new issues way before even digging into the opened ones. Good luck man

    The list of blunders has started piling up.

    “Zardari could be a candidate for PM from PPP”, Dr. Babar Awan
    “We have reservations regarding Makhdoom’s candidacy for PM” Khwaja Asif
    “Officers of the rank of major general and above have lost none of their contempt for politicians as a class.” Ayaz Mir

  • nota said:

    Couple of stories to go along with the one you posted:
    @Asif
    It is being reported PML(N) is demanding defense ministry. If true, I don’t think military will be too keen on that.

    ‘Army is the biggest political party in Pakistan’: Mehdi Hasan

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @nota: re: the Army being a political party, unfortunately, I’d have to agree. I have been thinking along these lines as well (but more from an interest group perspective).

    It might be worthwhile to just elect representatives from the Army but to even come to the point where you have to say things like these you know you are totally screwed and your Army has no respect for the law or constitution.

    Unfortunately the medicine the army needs is the bitter one and only civil war or revolution can give our venerable “officer’s corps” a taste of the reality that they so rightly deserve.

  • nota said:

    I think Zimbabwe has a point!
    Killing sport to spite Mugabe dishonorable
    …If morality is indeed the bottom line then England should also boycott Pakistan. There, a vicious dictator presides over a state that employs violence to suppress dissent too. The difference between General Pervez Musharraf and Robert Mugabe is that the former is an ally of the US in the global war on terror….

    ( By the way, no matter how bad Mugabe is, the imperailist’s are really are trying to kill Zimbabwe for not towing their line…at least that’s the conclusion I have come to.)

  • zia m said:

    Amin Fahim had a meeting with Fazlu,wonder if they are upto something

  • Omer Khan said:

    @nota: Thank you sir for the excellent link: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gcUTN54Cwl_0UHAj5rR42T2vOoUA

    Which honorable court acquitted him? We should ask Aitezaz…lol

    I see thy grin Mr. Zardari. you’re just two French fries short of a happy meal.

    ah, the wheels are turning.

  • nota said:

    @Tab’an Khamosh
    Also do keep in mind that the army is now the biggest feudal class as well. Their agricultural land holding are increasing by the day as more and more land is handed to them for free. Put along that guaranteed water supplies (they get their own canals that are always full of water), uninterrupted electricity, special-rate fertilizers, and paved roads, they are making a killing in agriculture as well.

  • nota said:

    Some info on the agri-land holdings of the military (link) as per Ayesha Siddiqa.
    …Of course this does not mention the additional benifits they get (water, power, etc) but that certainly is the case:
    Approximately 12 per cent of the Pakistani state’s total landholding of 93.67 million acres (1 acre = 0.405 hectares) is controlled by the armed forces. While other institutions such as the railways, Ayesha Siddiqa notes, also have significant lands, the armed forces are unique in having the power to put public holdings to private use. Thus, of the armed forces’ 11.58 million acres, 6.8 million acres of rural land is held directly by individuals, retired and serving. Another 35,000 acres have been handed over to subsidiaries controlled by the armed forces, such as the Army Welfare Trust, the Fauji Foundation and the Bahria Foundation.

    To peasants, the new masters of the countryside are familiar: the “behaviour of senior military officers towards landless peasants or ordinary soldiers, who are also given agricultural land, is like that of any big feudal landlord”. Indeed, she argues, these land acquisitions have taken place “not just for capital accumulation but also to exhibit the military’s authority and power in relation to other stakeholders such as the landed feudal class and the masses. In fact, the military’s land acquisition, especially agricultural land, has transformed the military into one of the many land barons or feudal landlords.”

    Not surprisingly, the emergence of this neo-feudal class has provoked considerable resentment. Much of the land given to the new land barons is in areas from where soldiers are not traditionally recruited, such as Cholistan in south Punjab. For one, the “transfer of land to non-residents creates socio-political tensions with the indigenous population, who accuse the military of `invading’ their land”. More important, it has accentuated resource conflicts. “It is believed,” Ayesha Siddiqa records, “that water for agriculture gets diverted to lands where the senior generals have their properties rather than being provided to Sindh and Baluchistan, which are lower-riparian provinces”…

    From Pakistan: the army as the state
    Pervez Musharraf himself knows this too. This is why reform of the military conglomerates is unlikely to be high on his agenda so long as he is in power, as the following speech from 2004 (quoted in Military Inc) confirms:

    “The [housing] societies everywhere are the top societies of Pakistan. Now why are we jealous of this? Why are we jealous if somebody gets a piece of land, cheap when it was initially, and because of the good work done by the society, the price rises by 100 times and the man, then earns some money. What is the problem? Why are we jealous of this? There’s no problem at all.”

    But there is a problem. Pakistanis may have a preference for army-run education or air-force-operated airlines, but they are fed up with feudalism. The last thing they will tolerate is a new feudal class of soldiers. It is a lesson that their military rulers must heed.

  • Asif said:

    One thing that keeps irritating time & again is the kinship of politicians & generals. Nobody brings this on board that which generals & politicians are two sides of the same coin. Its a very complex “elite political culutre” where they protect each others interests all the way whether its dictatorial rule or the democratic one. These “complex political elites” are the real leaches of the poors blood.
    Theres a very strong group of politicians & generals, which remains in power always but witha different label each time. They are one whatever is the scneraio of govt. its very hard to crack/ hack them. Atleast what I have seen until now is the same families are in power , every time with a different “label of convenience”.

  • Tanweer Amjad said:

    @admin
    it won’t be a bad idea to start a poll for the most probable prime minister. The choices may include Makhdoom Amin Faheem, Ch Mukhtar Ahmad, Makhdom Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Syed Yousaf raza Gillani, and may be Sherry Rehman. May be you have already conducted a poll, but this time it would be more effective.
    Regards

  • geog47 said:

    Chief justices of all courts meet under Chief Justice SC

    Updated at: 2255 PST, Friday, March 14, 2008

    ISLAMABAD: Expressing their full confidence on the leadership of the Chief Justice Supreme Court Justice Abdul Hameed DOG, the chief justices of all courts have assured him of their full support.

    A meeting of the chief justices of all the high courts of the country including the chief justice of Azad Jammu & Kashmir High Court was held under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice Supreme Court Justice Abdul Hameed DOG.

    According to the statement issued from the Supreme Court, the chief justices of all the high courts expressed their full confidence on the able leadership of the Chief Justice Justice Abdul Hameed DOG and assured him of their full support.

    In the meeting, challenges facing the judiciary system for providing justice in the country were discussed in detail.

    According to the statement, the increasing number of pending cases was termed the biggest issue for the judiciary system.

    This has been decided in the meeting that the measures would be taken to process the cases of accused women, prisoners and under-age accused within three months on priority basis.

    For this, special sections would be established in the high courts and the sub-courts to appoint and supervise the cases for hearing.

    The meeting approved various proposals like construction of new jails specially for women, improvement of jails’ conditions and establishment of a lock-up near the courts complex.

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=40381

  • geog47 said:

    Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhery rejects monetary, other benefits from govt.

    Updated at: 2150 PST, Friday, March 14, 2008

    ISLAMABAD: The Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhery has rejected government’s offer of huge sum of money and foreign settlement here on Friday.

    According to family sources of the Chief Justice, a high profile representative of government met Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhery at Chief Justice House in Islamabad few hours ago.

    The representative said the money would secure the future of CJ’s children and he could be settled in any country of his choice, claimed Justice Iftikhar’s family sources.

    The Chief Justice, however, once again turned down the offer.

  • geog47 said:

    Shahbaz to contest bye-election from two constituencies

    Updated at: 2345 PST, Friday, March 14, 2008
    LAHORE: President Pakistan Muslim League (N) Mian Shahbaz Sharif said that he would contest bye-election from two constituencies while he also advised Chaudhry Aitezaz Ahsan to take part in the bye-elections in which he himself would run his (Aitezaz’s) election campaign.

    He expressed these views in a joint press conference held after a meeting with Aitezaz Ahsan at his own residence in Lahore.

    Paying rich tribute to Chaudhry Aitezaz Ahsan, Mian Shahbaz Sharif offered that he (Aitezaz) would be a joint candidate of the PML (N) and the PPP, and in the way he led the lawyers is a historic event.

    Shahbaz Sharif said that he does not accept President Pervez Musharraf as the constitutional president. However, he would sacrifice whatever required for providing justice in the country and consoling the people.

    President Supreme Court Bar Chaudhry Aitezaz Ahsan said that controversies are going on in the President House against the Murree Declaration and for averting this, the lawyers movement is working on a strategy.

    He said that his participation in the bye-elections would be decided by the Pakistan People’s Party but he would also make consultation with the lawyers.

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=40385

  • Optimist said:

    @ Revivalist

    you said:
    ‘Moreover copyrights are also forbidden in Islam’

    Shame on you.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @Revivalist: If you’re reading this, I’m still waiting for a link to Tabari’s history. Maybe HT should spend it’s energies on preserving Islamic classics online? instead of the propaganda literature?

    Just a thought bro.

  • Optimist said:

    @ T K

    Revivalists masters are jews who don’t want Muslim countries to have what they have (i.e. democracy).

  • Asif said:

    Aitezaz Ahsan won’t participate in bye-election until & unless Judiciary is restored. Everybody knows this. To compaign for AA is no more than a political stunt.
    Its time to deliver, the lawyers & people are done, now its political parties turn to come up to the expectations of the people. And the most important thing “don’t diclose your differences publically” as some of the “mature ploticians” has started messing up with their irresponsible statements even today Ayaz Mir took a direct shot at Kayani & his surrogates that can be avoided very easily at the moment. May Allah guide us thru hard times. Amin.

  • Optimist said:

    Amin Faheem is meeting Maulana Diesel for making government!!!

    Asfand Yaar Wali has refused to meet MAF.

    MAF is determined to commit political suicide!!

  • Optimist said:

    Fake/PCO Chief Justice had a meeting with all other PCO judges from High Courts.

    Inshallah all these conspirators -Lotas and Fake judges – will be defeated with Mush.

  • hamaradeen said:

    @optimist @ Tab’an Khamosh
    Prominent scholars like Dr. Israr Ahmad, Taqiuddin Nabhani and movements such as the Khilafah movement were not Propogating propaganda literature, and I find these people words to be more trustworthy and closer to Islam compared to your corrupt political idols which changes from time to time.
    Let me tell you, use your words very carfully as you would be questioned on the day of judgement for what you have said in this world. If their was no concept of system in Islam then our Prophet (pbuh) shouldnt have established it.
    I think you are probably going to get your senses back once you find your own system cripple in front of your own eyes.

    Allah says in the Holy Quran
    Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish.” Qur’an 17:81

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @hamaradeen:

    This comment intentionally left blank.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    maulvi doing topi drama …. wait for it… wait for it

    http://vidpk.com/view_video.php?vid=10197

  • Optimist said:

    @ hamaradeen

    That Sura of Quran is about your and Revivalist’s views. Your falsehood lays perished and truth is lawyers’ movement for democracy! Al-humdolilah

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    A sad piece by Afzal Tauseef:

    “Namrood ki Khudaa’ie”

  • Optimist said:

    Maulvi doing Drama is really funny. I think this video is about Revivalist and Hamaradeen.

    @ TK

    thanks for the source. I wish I could copy this link to every link but then I would be violating rules of this website.

    http://vidpk.com/view_video.php?vid=10197

  • Revivalist said:

    @27122007

    The difference between khaleefa and PM is that Khaleefa is the ruler which Implements the system of khilafah while PM Implements the system of democracy and the difference between the system of democracy and khilafah is that Democracy stands on two main principle

    1- sovereignty belongs to the people (parliament)

    2-Majority is authority.

    While in khilafah,
    1-sovereignty belongs to shariah
    2-Authority belongs to the people
    3- Electing a caliph is obligatory upon every Muslim
    4- Adoption of any rule is the exclusive right of the caliph.

    These are the bases upon which the ruling system of Islam, khilafah, stands.

    As for as accountability in the khilafah state is concern so bro we have a complete book on this issue but I will try to sum it up in short worlds.
    In democracy according to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION you are free to do accountability of the ruler and you are free not to do so, while in Islam it is absolutely mandatory to do accountability of the ruler. In democracy just by having two third majority one can change a whole rule and can introduce a new one even if majority of the people disagree with it .i.e. LFO. While in khilafah for passing any rule or policy a caliph is obliged to have evidence from Islam, so accountability in Islam is easy and strong where caliph can not go for any thing just by labeling it as “National interest”.

    Ironically in democracy when a ruler wants to go against the constitution or basic democratic rules they label it “BOLD DECISION”
    In khilafah there are 4 layers of accountability.

    1-Majlisul Ummah
    2-Qazi Mazalim (court especially dealing cases against the rulers)
    3- Political parties
    4-General Ummah

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @Tab;an Khamosh & Optimist

    Why don’t you try and do this, are you out of this Ummah. Bro I will remind you and your friend Optimist a very relevant hadith of our beloved prophet (saw) in which He (saw) said “BURI BAT SA KHAMOSHI BAHTAR HAI”

    Regards

  • nota said:

    @Asif
    “One thing that keeps irritating time & again is the kinship of politicians & generals. Nobody brings this on board that which generals & politicians are two sides of the same coin. Its a very complex “elite political culutre” where they protect each others interests all the way whether its dictatorial rule or the democratic one. These “complex political elites” are the real leaches of the poors blood.”

    Thanks for bringing that up. But also add to that the kinship between them and top bureaucrats and law enforcement as well. That is why nothing ever changes. I am relating a story below about Khuaja Saad and can someone confirm for me if he really belongs to the “Qubza” group? Has anyone heard of the Haji Rafiq?

    Just a couple of days ago I heard the following from my uncles. They were talking about Khawaja Saad Rafique (KSR) and it was news to me to be told that he too belongs to the Qabza group of Lahore. Then one of them related this story: There was some property dispute between KSR and some Haji Rafiq so Haji Rafiq asked my uncle to go along with him to meet the Rangers boss (a general) to see if he can be of help. The general, when told why they were there, burst out laughing and told them that he was with the other party (KSR) and in fact they had just left from there. The kind general then asked them to go see someone who would be able to help. When they went to see that guy, he said he will have to call this other guy over. Sorry I forget the name but my uncle said he is one of the biggest gundas of lahore so they got scared and said “No thanks” and left. To cut the story short, haji Rafiq was later picked up and put in jail and so was his son and some family members. Eventually the matter was “settled” with a payment to KSR of 25 crore rupees. I am told a dejected Haji Rafiq left Pakistan after that and now resides in Dubai.

  • Revivalist said:

    Mr. Nota

    The ayahs of the Quran stipulates that Muslims Must rule amongst themselves according to the Ahkams reveled by Allah (swt) and the method to establish those rules of Islam would come from our beloved prophet (saw) and his noble companions. When we examine there lives we see that they established Islam through establishing khilafah. So Quran, Hadith, Ijma us-sahaba and Qiyas all point to the fact that the ruling system in Islam is khilafah and nothing else.

    As for as your claim that Hadith can not be considered as a source shows your utter ignorance about Quran itself. If you want to have a discussion about this topic then come to “discus page” to have this discussion. To know about the exact meaning of a particular hadith you should go and ask a Muhdith who knows this or try to be a Muhadith yourself then these things would become clear for you.

    However let me ask you a simple question what is the method of prayers (salah, Nimaz) in the Quran??????

    Regards

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    “However let me ask you a simple question what is the method of prayers (salah, Nimaz) in the Quran??????”

    Might come as a shock to you but it really does not matter to me. There is no one way.

    Why don’t you enlighten me what is the “exact” meaning of one of the Hadith i mentioned, say:

    Volume 8, Book 78, Number 634:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “(The Prophet) Solomon once said, ‘Tonight I will sleep with ninety women, each of whom will bring forth a (would-be) cavalier who will fight in Allah’s Cause.” On this, his companion said to him, “Say: Allah willing!” But he did not say Allah willing. Solomon then slept with all the women, but none of them became pregnant but one woman who later delivered a half-man. By Him in Whose Hand Muhammad’s soul is, if he (Solomon) had said, ‘Allah willing’ (all his wives would have brought forth boys) and they would have fought in Allah’s Cause as cavaliers. ”

    And please don’t say it is to impress upon us the need to say “Allah Willing” after everything and to have as many babies as we can. I will not buy that. Nor would I buy Solomon suffered from super-duper virility. So take a shot.

  • Liaison said:

    @nota
    One of core belief of Iman is believing in prophets. And that includes Sunnah of prophets. Since Deen is completed with Quran and the prophethood is sealed by Prophet Muhammad PBUH, we being muslims, adhere to follow them. It is not a choice.
    Prayer ismentioned in quran at many places e.g. surah (11,14,17,19….) . Now Prophet Muhammad PBUH is our pratical guidance of quran.
    If anyone follows any four school of thought for his/her all affairs it is ok. But the fundamental thing is that one should also learn that school of thought before following it or questioning it. That’s all.

  • geog47 said:

    Pakistan withdraws foreign cases against Bhutto’s widower

    http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-03/15/content_7792249.htm

    This is very interesting. Untill February 18, he could not even run for elections. He has not even won the elections. And quashing all cases against him within a week just doesn’t make any sense. There definitely is something that we don’t know.

  • Revivalist said:

    @Omar khan

    What do you mean by khilafah?

    Bro khilafah is the ruling system where sovereignty belongs the sharah and where ‘Authority belongs to the Ummah’. It is a state for all the Muslims under single leader know as khaleefah. The khaleefa is not a king or dictator who imposes his authority on the people through coercion and force. The khaleefa authority to rule must be given willingly by the Muslims through the Islamic ruling contract known as Bayah. Without this bayah the khaleefa cannot rule.

    There are seven mandatory conditions for a person to become a caliph; violation of any of these will result in the impeachment of the khaleefa and his removal from office unless the violation can be rectified. The conditions are;
    1-Muslim 2-Male 3-Mature 4-Sane 5-Just (adil) 6- Free 7- competent

    Moreover Islam firmly believed in the rule of law. No one in the khilafah including the khaleefa himself is above the law or has Immunity from the prosecution. Benefit and harm are not excuses the khilafah can use to violate this principle as we find western democratic state doing. America’s suspension of all legal and international norm for suspects held in Guantanamo Bay is a prime example of this. US president Bush defended the CIA’s rendition program and torture of terror suspects as an extraordinary measure justified by the extraordinary circumstances of the fight against terrorism. British PM Tony Blair after the 7/7 bombing in London said, Let no-one be in any doubt, the rules of the game are changing.

    Islam has an effective judiciary which is responsible for issuing judgments that are enforced by the state. It settles disputes between people, prevents whatever may harm the rights of the community and settle the disputer between people and any person who is part of the government, weather the khaleefa, his cabinet, civil sarvants or any other person.

  • Revivalist said:

    how do khalifahs come into being?

    Khilafah will come into being by having an organize group whose sphere of activity must be political and intellectual in nature. This is what we get from the life of our beloved prophet (Saw), where he did political and intellectual struggle in Mecca and as a result a state established in Medina

  • Revivalist said:

    what kind of a state would it be? Soviet Union or China like?

    It will not at all be like Soviet Union or china because khilafah would not be a socialist republic it would solely be based on Islam. it wont be an authoritarian state.

    Like Khomeni’s Iran, or the Taliban? Would private actions be regulated?

    Khilafah will not be like Iran or Taliban because we do not conceder these two khilafah states. And we have written a complete refutation of the Iranian constitution.

    Will there be punishment for adultery?

    Sure, because it is the hokum of Allah (swt).

    will there be punishment for whacking off to porn?

    Khilafah state will not allow anything which leads people to haram because according a sharia principle “Anything which leads you towards haram is haram”.

    Will personal choices like hijab be enforced? To what extent?

    Hijab is not a personal choice rather it is an obligation upon a women when she leaves her home and inter into public sphere she mush wear Hijab.

  • hamaradeen said:

    @nota
    dear brother. I manage to find the answer by doing a sinple query on google.

    Earlier we have observed that a hadith recorded in Sahih Muslim on the authority of Abu Hurayrah was regarded as Ma’lul (defective) because the reported saying was not of the Prophet but of Abu Hurayrah’s friend named Ka’b al-Ahbar. This is recorded by Ibn Taimiyyah in Majmu’ Fatawa. Ka’b al-Ahbar was a former Jew. The story of ‘The Creation’ narrated by Abu Hurayrah, was very similar to the version found in the Book of
    Genesis. We have also observed that a hadith recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari on the authority of Abu Hurayrah, in connection with the earlier Prophets Moses and Job, “both taking baths naked”, is also a Ma’lul (defective) hadith. Such ludicrous tales of the earlier Prophets may also have been interpreted from the tales of the Jewish friends of Abu Hurayrah and not from the Prophet. The above preposterous and ludicrous narration in Sahih al-Bukhari, about the sexual exploits of the earlier Prophet Solomon on the authority of Abu Hurayrah, is also a Ma’lul hadith. One need not be a professor of
    mathematics to work out the probabilities of a person having “slept (had sex) with all the ninety women” in one night.

    Clearly, Abu Hurayrah has been influenced by stories from the Jews, although the hadith bears no resemblance to stories in the Hebrew Scriptures.

    Abu Hurayrah has repeated this ludicrous hadith six times, and they all are recorded inthe Sahih al-Bukhari. Surprisingly, Abu Hurayrah has not been consistent in his narrations. He has given five different figures for the number of women Prophet Solomon “slept with in one night”. In hadith 9: 561, there were sixty women; in hadith 4: 635, seventy women; in hadith 8: 634 and 711, ninety women; in hadiths 4: 74A and 7: 169, ninety-nine or one hundred women. The question is; which of the above narrations is authoritative and true? If you accept only one of the above listed narrations to be
    authoritative and true, then the rest of the recorded narrations have to be declared as nonauthoritative and untrue. If one acknowledges all the recorded narrations to be authoritative and true then one has to accept not only this most unlikely story, but that the similar events were repeated on at least five different nights and narrated by the Prophet at least five times with five different figures.
    Imam Bukhari is said to have been extrameticulous in his collection. If so, could he have recorded all these self-contradicting narrations in his own work? If not, whose compilation is this and what other hadiths has
    this anonymous storyteller added to the collection?

    The holy Quran says:

    verse 31: 6:

    But there are among men those who patronize ridiculous hadiths without knowledge (thereby) misleading (men) from the Path of Allah and throwing a butt of mockery (on the Path): for such there will be a humiliating Penalty.”

  • Revivalist said:

    @Omar khan
    How deep will the govt. be involved in telling people what to do? Will stem cell research be allowed?

    Will there be stoning to death?

    State will ensure the implementation of Islam but will not spy people they way our governments are doing. The state will stop all sorts of societal evils and the rest is between you and Allah (swt).

    How will the state deal with dissenters?

    It depends upon the issue. However Islam allows no body to take his hand off from the allegiance of the caliph unless certain condition fulfills i.e. The caliph implements open kufr. Bayah is a contract between the people and the caliph and both are bind by this.

    will the testimony of women be half of men?

    It is not the case in all matters but only in specific matters. However the state will decide things according to Islam.

    What is the text from which the state derives authority?
    Quran, Hadith, Ijma-us-sahaba and Qiyas

    Will the sahih hadith be considered infallible?
    No Only hadith Mutawatir will be considered as infallible and could be taken in Aqeedah.

    In addition to this i would also add a link to an article which will further clarify the nature of the upcomming khilafah state.

    http://www.khilafah.com/kcom/the-khilafah/issues/the-khilafah-is-not-a-totalitarian-state.html

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @nota

    Very ridicules answer. Now let us know about your believe? Are you Muslim or not, because taking our discussion forward we have to know about each other’s believe.

    As I said I m not a Muhadith to explain Ahadith for you but as a Muslim I can not even dare to say that hadith should not be considered as a source to derive laws because it will make me out of Islam and it is absolutely wrong and rubbish to say this. It shows your absolute ignorance about Quran and Islam.

    Regards

  • geog47 said:

    Pakistan’s looting by its own military continues

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=101357

    The parliament never discusses the defence budget although defence is one of the top spenders of people’s money. The people are not considered worthy enough to debate the defence budget. The constitution does not bar the parliament from discussing the defence allocations. It is a self-imposed restriction that our parliaments have been following since independence either voluntarily or under duress. Our adversaries as well as our foreign friends know how and where we spend our defence allocations. It is only the people of Pakistan who do not know the details of defence spending.

  • geog47 said:

    Afghanistan fires 4 more missiles at Pak village

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=13582

    Laanat on Napak fauj…….

  • geog47 said:

    Asif emerges as ‘Mr Clean’ after acquittal in last case

    March 15, 2008 Dawn reports: Asif Ali Zardari, the co-chairman of the Pakistan People’s Party, on Friday emerged as one of the cleanest politicians in the country after he was acquitted in the last remaining corruption case against him. One needs to read the following summary account and ask, is this all noting but lies on the part of Mush’s and other Pakistani, Swiss, Polish, French governments. Were all these NYT reports also nothing but lies? And only this is true that Asif Zardari is now the cleanest “leader” in Pakistan.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Barni knew about Khalikd Mahmood’s death but hid it until he could get credit for Kashmir Singh’s release. SHAME!!!

    http://express.com.pk/images/NP_LHE/20080315/Sub_Images/1100369628-2.gif

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Another example of the great work the Punjab government unde Qutta League did.

    mounds of sh!t near Shalimar garden gate:

    http://express.com.pk/images/NP_LHE/20080315/Sub_Images/1100369823-1.jpg

  • geog47 said:

    Pir Pagara announces support for Fahim’s premiership

    Updated at: 1815 PST, Saturday, March 15, 2008
    KARACHI: Spiritual Leader of Hurs and Chief Pakistan Muslim League (Functional), Pir Sahab Pagara Saturday announced his support for President, Pakistan People’s Party Parliamentarian Makhdoom Amin Fahim to take over Prime Minister’s post.

    After his meeting with former prime minister, Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali here at Kingri House, Pir Pagara said no one deserves the post of premiership more than Makhdoom Amin Fahim.

    “Amin Fahim has always supported a just cause and therefore we will support him in all circumstance,” he added.

    Pir Pagara said he will welcome Amin Fahim whenever he decided to meet him.

    Former prime minister, Mir Zafarullah Jamali on the occasion endorsed the stance of Pir Pagara, saying Makhdoom Amin Fahim continued to remain loyal to PPP and Ms Benazir Bhutto by rejecting the offer of premiership several times in the past.

    Now PPP should offer Amin Fahim the post of premiership for which he has earned the right.

  • Optimist said:

    @ Revialist & Hamaradeen

    Once Dr Israr wrote in Daily Nawaiwaqt that in some countries people are working on Khilafah. These people might be trying to make a model and prove it as a failure so that they could claim later that Islamic system doesn’t work.

    I think Dr Israr was talking about you. You guys are either deliberately trying to malign Islam or you are being used by Mullahs.

    Inshallah you guys will fail. Your masters are cruel Mulllahs and Jews who are trying to deprive Muslims of the system (democracy) they used to become developed nations.

    Lawyers movement has succeeded and Muslims have spoken. You guys are anti-Islam and you are destined to fail.

    Allah says in the Holy Quran
    Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish.” Qur’an 17:81

  • Clause-47-AK said:

    The purpose of this Demonization of Democracy is to distract the Muslim Nations from having a viable system. This is the biggest clue that Jews are behind Hizb-ut-Tahrir.

    There is real resistance against the imperial powers, but it is only coming from those people who are considered “extremists & fundamentalists’ by the west. But those people do not believe in democracy because of foreign agents like HT.

    The biggest coup that the west has managed against Muslims is to inject groups like HT who have convinced Muslims that concensus based representative decision making is haraam.

    The day there is a real Islamic social Democratic (not the fu*king mullah who want petroleum ministries) movement, the west will be screwed, but the thing is, paradoxically, they are the biggest controllers of most “Islamic” movements. They use these people like pawns in their strategic aimes and have been doing so for centuries.

    Think about it? Why is Hizb-ut-Tahrir ONLY in Britain? Why don’t they leave from there ? They call it “Demon-Crazy” But like shameless poodles they take their safety from these people they call “taaghoot”. Some Taghoot! you suckle from the TITS of a PIG and say you fight for Islam? you are fattened on the tissues of the PIG! So You are PIGS!

    Can you live inside the stomach of a PIG and claim “I’m going to get this PIG one day?”

    And shamelessly, in private meetings, they excuse their stupid behaviour by saying “we are just taking advantage of these people” . WTF!

    Indeed their masters are the JEWS!

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    Thanks you! I knew you will not be able to answer any of the issues I raised and you will resort to name-calling. “Very ridicules answer”, “Are you Muslim or not”, “absolutely wrong and rubbish”"your absolute ignorance about Quran and Islam” are really not proving your point. :)

  • mbokhari said:

    @Revivalist
    @Tab’an
    @Optimist

    I had a funny Mullah speech mp3 on my PC. I just added some visual aids.

    Enjoy.

  • hamaradeen said:

    @optimist: Hahaha! why dont u quote Dr Israr Ahmad on the majority of the issues he has spoken about. “Pakistan ka Nizam batil hai, Kafirana hai”, “taking part in elections in Pakistan is haram”, I am not saying the lawyers movement is wrong, Inshallah they should suceed, and the movement shows Pakistan mai murda loog nahi rehtai, but in such a corrupt system their is a bleak chance of them succeeding, and i doubt the credibility of such Judges who supported the dictator before. Insaan se ghalti hoti hai, 8 saal lambi ghalti nahi hoti.
    and i doubt Dr Israr Ahmad he wrote that, please give me the reference of the article.
    In a system where their are two kinds of court , Shariah court and Pakistani court, why isnt Sharia court implemented as the spreme court? Why are muslims given a choice of Sharia court or a Pakistani court? Moreover if you are guitly of a crime you can ask the head of state for forgiveness, Does democracy allows your head of state to forgive someone?!!!! Then this is totally contradicting to Islam.

  • Clause-47-AK said:

    Who gives a sh*t about asrar? there is no system of scholarship left in islam.. every idi ot wakes up one day.. reads a website and thinks he is alam-e deen?

    One day we will have revolution in Pakistan and we will hang HT trai tors along with teh napak army bhagora with the army brass and all the secretaries who have r8ped pakistan.

  • geog47 said:

    Foreign woman dead, over 15 injured in Islamabad blast

    Updated at: 2110 PST, Saturday, March 15, 2008
    ISLAMABAD: A foreign woman has died and over 15 others have been injured in Islamabad blast on Saturday evening, the sources said.

    The officials have confirmed the death of the foreign woman. The majority of injured is reportedly foreigners, the sources added.

    The blast occurred in the backside of an Italian restaurant “ Luna Caprese” near Super market, the sources said. Over 15 injured including foreigners have been shifted to hospitals.

    Nature of the blast, which happened at about 850PM is yet to be ascertained.

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=40499

  • zia m said:

    Bomb blast at italian rest. in Islamabd 2 killed and atleast 10 injured mostly foreign nationals Geo News

  • Clause-47-AK said:

    Revivalist speaking at a HT recruitment rally in the UK.

    HT strategy is simple:

    1. Say something people agree with (Situation in Pakistan is bad )
    2. Quote something from the H.Quran (aaya no. x, y z)
    3. Therefore, we have to implement Khilafa (trust us)

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ML7qxH6b_hE&NR=1

  • geog47 said:

    Mashallah Hizb has lot of support …

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Nw7IUWclWiw&feature=related

  • nota said:

    @Clause-47-AK on March 15th, 2008 4:58 pm
    HT strategy is simple:
    1. Say something people agree with (Situation in Pakistan is bad )
    2. Quote something from the H.Quran (aaya no. x, y z)
    3. Therefore, we have to implement Khilafa (trust us)

    It’s not just HT but all these religious organizations — I call them cults — are like that (just replace “Khalifah” with the “magic potion” they are selling). And I am not just talking about muslim organizations. All the christian orgs (born-again, missionaries, christain-zionists, fundis) I have come across have the same modus operandi. All of them are basically looking for suckers.

  • Optimist said:

    @ Hamaradeen

    When I see people like you playing with Quran, I thought I have actually read whole Quran and Sahih Bokhari with translation and I often read Dr Israr. I have read almost all books by Maulana Moudoodi.

    I know people like you – Hamaradeen & Revivalist etc – work to harm Islam and shut others by Fatwa. I think I should quote Quran etc to tell you that you are wrong. If you can pick few Suras of Quran, I can pick many to support myself.

    From now on, I will speak to you in the language you understand.

  • Optimist said:

    And another thing ‘Hamradeen’

    When you quote Quran/Hadith, your purpose is to shut others and scare them of hell (you did mention that when replying to me). When I quote Quran and Dr Israr, your reply start with Hahahaha

    If we reply with Hahaha, you will say that we have done Kufr. Say sorry to Allah for doing Kufr. You will go to hell for making fun of Islam!!

  • Optimist said:

    @ Clause AK-47

    Look at the dressing and style of those sitting to listen to Hizub Tahrir. They have wanna be ‘gangsters’ and useless guys who should be focusing on their studies.

    @ Revivalist

    Claiming benefits from British government is Haram for people like you. Why don’t you tell your members to earn Halal and don’t live on Charity of British tax payers and spend time in propagating this ‘Hizb La Hasil’. Why don’t you guys follow example of Hazrat Omer and do some labour work and then learn Islam.

    Most of the Hizb guys I know are living on state benefits (some of them are involved in fraud to fund their ‘habit’ of sitting at home and posting copy paste messages). Is defrauding British banks allowed in your religion? If not, what has Hizb done to stop its members? All I hear is anti-democracy messages.

  • Optimist said:

    An old column by Javed Chaudhry on Pakistani ISI’s activities in fighting war for US.

    Woh Gadhe Kahan Hain (Where are those Donkeys).

    http://www.express.com.pk/images/NP_LHE/20061107/Sub_Images/1100061475-2.gif

  • mbokhari said:

    A Great Article in the New Statesmen:

    Why I left Hizb-ut-Tahrir.

  • Clause-47-AK said:

    quote:

    A party text by Abdul Qadeem Zallum, the second leader of HT, states that if necessary millions of Muslims and non-Muslims will be killed. How would this fact make the party different from the tyrannical rulers it continuously curses and defames?

    I no longer agree with the politics and principles of Hizb ut-Tahrir, and I urge other members to reconsider their affiliation with this potentially dangerous group. They should seek a wider knowledge of Islam and open themselves to more tolerant opinions.

  • hamaradeen said:

    I wasnt making fun of islam, I was laughing on how negatively you approach an Alim e deen who has struggled all his life to establish khilafah. I am sorry if I said something wrong there. I am not eligible to give Fatwas or nething. Whatever i type here is what I listen and read from scholar. The point of giving Quranic references is to support my statement. The way we should approch is if I am wrong I will change myself, If you are wrong you should change urself.

    @nota: Please explain me what was the khilfah movement was? cult, conspiracy? something to do with jews? what?

    @Optimist: If you find party memebers doing wrong, you cannot say the whole party is wrong. Their are bad eggs in every organisation.

  • Optimist said:

    @ hamaradeen

    If you support a cause, you should be better than other causes. While people who fight for democracy etc are majority nice people, Hizub Tehrir guys are involved in dirty things. When organization members use that to support their agenda, it is even more shameful. What is your party doing to stop that? Nothing!! If you keep on eating Haram, the Khilafah you will establish will be like Taliban.

    From your language, I guess you support such activities. Abu Bakar (RA) once went to someone’s house, when he found out that the owner of the house MIGHT have some Haram source of income, he used his finger to Vomit what he had eaten in that house. If you claim to be Khilafah lover, why not raise that voice against members of your organization.

    Remember, those who grow up on benefits do acts like 7/7 (london bombing). It take Halah source of income, not halah chicken shops to do halal acts. If you meet some members of Hizub Tehrir ask them what is their source of income. I think Revivalist and you should ask each other as well.

  • Clause-47-AK said:

    They suckle from the teats of khinzeer and yet they claim to serve their Lord. The truth is they serve their masters who control them from behind the scenes. They are a faction among factions, they are a fitnah amongst the believers and they serve Baal!

    They shall burn in hell for serving baal and the golden calf, and their cries of agony and pain and excuses of being ignorant shall not be heard on the day of justice.

  • geog47 said:

    American nurse killed in Pakistan blast

    There are two possible culprits for this crime:

    1. Most probably, it is the CIA’s first-in-Pakistan teams which would like to consolidate the mindset that Pakistan cannot be controlled without a US invasion. This was the perception which led to the invasion of Afghanistan after years of hard work by the US warlords on the media, academia, political and religious front.

    2. It could be the victims of the US crimes and its war of terror. If that is the case, these victims turned extremists are in no position to settle the score with the cowards which bombed their families from a safe distance. So in utter desperation and madness they go wild and attack anything that looks American or western to them.

    In both cases, the US is responsible for the on going bloodletting in Pakistan. Also keep in mind that Islam has nothing to do with both the above cases of madness, except that part of the motivation to target Pakistan comes from the prevailing Islamophobia among the warlords in Washington. This Islamophobia has translated into targetting Paksitan because of its nuclear and military strength.

  • Omer Khan said:

    I don’t understand how the hell muslims are being controlled by this really esoteric abstract thing called mullah. And how is that mullah being controlled by the jews LMAO!

    This is one funny pandemonium here. And ofcourse much red hot iron rod for the poor jew.

    It would help if people would talk particulars instead of counterintuitive and factual accusations.

  • Omer Khan said:

    @Revivalist. Thanks for answering the questions. I am not satisfied with them. Nor do I find the draft constitution of Hizb viable or rational enough.

    mbokhari, nice expose.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Gawd! Revivalist! (aka “hamaradeen”?) enough already bro! Everyday I come back with 50 more messages on the same issue.. don’t you guys have any other forums to go to?

    Do you think we forgot from last week’s News and Views?

    @mbokhari: nice link. I have had these suspicions about the cult-like nature of this group.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @Omar Khan: totally.. poor poor jews.. why won’t the teGHOGHIst MAWZLUMS let them be..??? why?? why?? poor poor jews!.. unblemished and innocent like white satin sheets.. untainted little cloudy puffs of goodness and cuteness.. cute and cuddly jews.. poor poor jews
    ;-)

  • Omer Khan said:

    Every one here is a mullah. The term has an ever increasing compass. Thanks to the laudings and flurry accorded to it. It seems to have become quite interchangeable with the term muslim. Those who label others as mullahs, are themselves mullahs. Actually mullah is more like someone who psychologically belongs to the ummah in whatever capacity. I feel like writing a ballad adressing the “state of the mullah”. It’ll have more applause pause than Bush’s “state of the union could ever muster.”

    Mullahs do believe in a lot of conspiracies though mostly attributed to jews and foreigners from afghan jihad, to kashmir jihad to chechnyan jihad to Khilafah, to 9/11, to domestic terrorism, to creation of Pakistan. But they do disagree when it doesn’t fit their dye for example if someone said Islam itself is a jewish conspiracy. Then they point to others with all sorts of niceties. Some even come up with one word remedies. Or feel they’ve figured it out by reading some non mullahs.

    I like.

  • hamaradeen said:

    I am sorry but you have deeply misunderstood me, nor do i know about Hizb that much , neither to I represent them. But what I do know is Hizb has been always been the forefront of defending Islam. When the danish cartoon issue arrised I saw a lot of contribution from this group on tv, when the issue of head scarf arose I saw them supporting that issue, they have always been a big supporter on the palestinian issue, they spoke out when Salman Rushdi was been praised for his efforts creating “harmony” through his book, and all this just on tv, no other source.
    When you say “NICE” people does it mean ppl who support “enlightened moderation”, women in islam being suppressed, cutting off hands is barbaric?
    I cannot comment on someone earning haram and halal if I dont know him, as for working for khilafah and earning haram is concerned I dont have much knwledge on this topic but I will look into it. Untill then lets pray for Khilafah to come so there wont be much chances of earning haram.

  • Omer Khan said:

    I like white satin sheets. Someone posted a link to a video to that song on jewtube.

    I never heard of those guys, but I liked the song.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @Omer Khan: L’Chaim!

  • mbokhari said:

    @admin

    I think I speak for everyone here when I say that these Khilafah-mongers have hijacked a rational debate. They are promoting an ideology that has nothing to do with the current political turn of events in Pakistan. These HuT guys are promoting a non-Pakistani agenda, an alien agenda. For want of a better word, they are _trolls_.

    I request that you accommodate these guys by creating a separate thread, I don’t know, call it, “Role of religion in Pakistani politics” or, “Politics and Religion in Pakistan”. This would save us from this trolling while at the same time not violating their freedom of speech.

    You have created something nice in this website. We all feel a sense of protective ownership of this website and what it represents, that, Pakistanis as a nation have the capability to argue rationally and create consensus. The deluge of dawaganda (dawa propaganda) is defeating this rational exchange of ideas. Give them their own space and let them mentally pleasure each other.

    And, this dawaganda has NOTHING to do with News & Views anyway. Say NO to dawaganda just like you would slam the door on Jehovah’s Witnesses for the simple reason that they come to convert you to THEIR point of view and NOT to listen to you.

    I, for one, feel this insults my intelligence. I think I may just start preaching a communist creed in parody of these mental zombies ;-)

    As narrated by al-Unwin al-Publications (r.a – rights assured) on authority of Amazon.com (may God extend their bandwidth) al-Bertrand al-Russel (may God ease his misery in hell) has said that, “O preachers of dawaganda, should I not tell you of things wherein there is no doubt?” And the dawa-brigade said, “No, O most learned of Cambridge philosophers, please don’t”. And then the Hizb-ut-Trolls promptly stuch their hands on their ears while loudly going: “Gala balalagala KHILAFALAFLALA”.

    And that is when al-Bertrand al-Russell gave the following ten commandments.

    The Ten Commandments of Rationality

    1. Do not feel absolutely certain of anything.

    2. Do not think it worth while to proceed by concealing evidence, for the evidence is sure to come to light.

    3. Never try to discourage thinking for you are sure to succeed.

    4. When you meet with opposition, even if it should be from your husband or your children, endeavor to overcome it by argument and not by authority, for a victory dependent upon authority is unreal and illusory.

    5. Have no respect for the authority of others, for there are always contrary authorities to be found.

    6. Do not use power to suppress opinions you think pernicious, for if you do the opinions will suppress you.

    7. Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

    8. Find more pleasure in intelligent dissent than in passive agreement, for, if you value intelligence as you should, the former implies a deeper agreement than the latter.

    9. Be scrupulously truthful, even if the truth is inconvenient, for it is more inconvenient when you try to conceal it.

    10. Do not feel envious of the happiness of those who live in a fool’s paradise, for only a fool will think that it is happiness.”

    As quoted in “The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell”, Vol. 3: 1944-1969, pp. 71-2.

    Guaranteed to be missing at your nearest Islamic bookstore.

  • Optimist said:

    @ hamardeen

    your post tells us that you support Hizb ut Tehrir out of ignorance and only because of their popular stance ‘because they are defending and are at forefront’ of popular issues. Same like Russia had defended Iraq and now Iran.

    I would suggest you get some knowledge of Hizub ut Tehrir before you come here supporting them. Do some search on the internet, such as ‘Hizb ut Tehrir’ exposed.

  • Optimist said:

    Pakistan’s Jihad policy in Afghanistan and its consequences….

    Woh Khauf say Mar Gaye… by Rauf Clasara

    http://jang.com.pk/jang/mar2008-daily/16-03-2008/col10.htm

  • eric cartman said:

    @mbokhari
    “I think I speak for everyone here….. ” wow I mean wow
    Try speaking for yourslef ohh you cant….. then keep quoting others

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @mbokhari: Another Classic! hahaha! that was brilliant! :)

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @mbokhari: Speaking of “Islamic Bookstores”… Let me narrate to you a story about an “Islamic Bookstore”

    A friend of mine visited one and related to me that this bookstore did not have any scholarly books on Islam. Nothing from the classics, nothing from any of the shining stars of Islamic Intellectual, philosophical and scholarly works. But it had over 30 separate titles (multiple copies each) on the proper way of having sexual relations with one’s wife.

    I kid you not.!! Oh and they also have you know Quran’s in arabic so no one knows what is being said and they need stupid mullah’s to interpret the thing.

  • Optimist said:

    Q-league’s torture on opposition in Lahore. Now we know why Mush made this Nazim System. This also explains why MQM (Mush group) likes Qenchi league

    http://www.express.com.pk/images/NP_LHE/20080316/Sub_Images/1100370318-2.gif

    http://www.express.com.pk/images/NP_LHE/20080316/Sub_Images/1100370332-1.jpg

  • eric cartman said:

    @Taban Khamosh
    Oxymoron: ring a bell…your name is someting someting khamosh…..

    Secundum quid: regarding your comment on islamic bookstore. it is like saying : A black man is white as to his teeth, hence he is white…WRONG no he is still a black man. still could not understand then forget about it…its not for u to understand.

    @mbokhari: To my understanding Admin doesnt promote Secular fascism here now does he? and if the guy was saying some about “tahrer” and u think he is off the topic which i dont think he was coz the topic of thread is “News and Views” and its his view you dont agree with him u dont have to but by saying that non-pakistani agenda and open another thread for them…simply shows ur mentality…seculare fascist thats all i can say.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Chilling documentary on secret parallel control structures in europe to fight the cold war:

    http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=264709845600167246

    Watch part 2 & 3 as well. And then ask yourself: Why is there a hidden hand in Pakistan?
    why does that hidden hand work in favor of the old colonial masters?

    Was there a structure left in “pakistan” to control this area after most of India got independence?

    It seems our ‘establishment’ is nothing more than a secret structure left for manging the Western interests in this corner of the world.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    wah! Hizb-ut-Trolls! Instant Classic!

    @eric crapman: There is some ambiguity about a fool as long as s/he keeps his mouth shut. There is no ambiguity about you anymore. Stop trolling.

  • eric cartman said:

    Wow… cant take criticism can ya? start calling names…wow..I am not gonna go that low…You have no respect for your own country how could you respect other human being calling “Islamic F*KN republic of Pakistan”
    This conversation is over…Peace Out

  • Revivalist said:

    @Optimist

    When ever I read your post and of your friends, it reminds of me of the people living in Mecca who were against the massage of Islam and wanted to stop it from spreading but out of ignorance they were in fact helping the massage to spread.

    As for as Dr. Israr Ahmed in concern if you know he was member of JI and when JI came to this corrupt politics of democracy he left JI, soon after that he met some members of HT and got convinced that working for khilafah is obligatory is the only solution for the Muslims. He wrote all this in his book “khutubate Khilafat” on first page.

    Please don’t repeat such inaccurate post again try to do some research and most importantly try to learn something about Islam and make it your reference point for life.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @ Clause-47-AK

    Democracy it self is a demonize system what we are doing is to expose its fallacy to the people both from reality and from Islam, if you think we are wrong then come up with your arguments and prove it that IT EXIST in the world and is an Islamic system, Only blaming HT will not take you anywhere.

    For you information HT is not ONLY in Britain, it only start working there and got popular amongst the Muslims in 90es. HT is every where and is getting momentum in all corners of the world. But the problem is that people like you are unable to see it. We had a huge conference in Indonesia where more then 100000 people participated in that. Despite of these brutal regimes in the Muslim world and ban on HT, we are actively working for the re-establishment of Khilafah.

    As for as a silly comment of yours about Jews support of HT is concern so please watch Imran waheed spokesman of HT in Uk talking to Tim Sebastian in Hard Talk and listen to what he said about the state of Israel. It is the same propaganda which Quraish did against the massage of Islam. Before blaming some one please makes sure what you are saying is correct or not other wise you will be answerable for it on the day of judgment and you know TOHMAT is very much discouraged in Islam is a big sin.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @nota

    I told you I am not a Muhadith to answer all your questions regarding Ahadith. You failed to answer my question so I would repeat it again. Are you Muslim? I think it’s a Very simple question to answer.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @Clouse………

    Sorry bro you are wrong. HT agenda is to resume Islamic way of life by reestablishing Islamic khilafah, which is the only a viable solution for all our problems as well as an OBLIGATION upon every Muslim to work for. What ever we say and write is based on evidence; therefore we accept any correction and objection based on evidence.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @Clause……..

    It is as the enemies of Islam are quoting Quran out of context and saying look it is mentioned in Quran to kill jaws and Christians. Bro be mature. However could you please mention the source of the quote you mentioned????

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @Optimist

    Allhamdulillah, HT guys fulfills all their obligations very well and keeping themselves away from all sorts of Harams. Please stop putting your empty headed allegation against HT Members. Our discussion is not about personalities in fact our discussion is about DEMON_CRAZY and khilafah so don’t distract the discussion which you guys always do and come to the main point.

    Regards

  • eric cartman said:

    @Revivalist
    Bigup to you brother

  • Revivalist said:

    @Omer Khan

    You are always welcome bro. what are the points about which you are not satisfied???? May be its not rational for you but it is for me and for many other Muslims. IF you see anything which is un Islamic in it or you think some articles should be removed or added we are open for any correction but based on stronger evidence. Therefore if you see it is a draft constitution it is not the final word. It is In fact based on IJTIHAD of the Ameer of HT which can be replaced with stronger one.

    Regards

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    “Are you Muslim?”

    I did not answer your simple question because your asking that was a disgusting act on your part and did not think it deserved a response. But since my not answer that is being used by you as a shield to hide behind, let me say I consider myself to be one but I still have a (lifelong) way to go. For me its a constant struggle. But let me also tell you the fact that every beard-wala I have had the pleasure to talk to has called me a “Kafir”, and to me it means I must be doing something right.

    (P.S. All christian fundis I have come across have accused me of being a muslim.) :)

  • Optimist said:

    @ nota

    I think you should tell this twisted Revivalist about Iqbal:

    Mula e Tang-Nazar neiN Mujhe Kafir Jaana
    Aur Kafir Ye Samajta hai ke MusalmaaN mein hooN

  • Optimist said:

    @ Revivalist

    Do you want me to name you a few members of Hizb ut Tehrir who are on benefits and don’t earn Halal?? Dare me if you need a few names! These able bodied individuals are taking charity of British taxpayers and propagating Khilafah.

    Doctor Israr has very strange views about Iqbal, despite quoting him in every speech.

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=wVOMV7vDFck

  • mbokhari said:

    @Revivalist

    I have a few questions for you bro:

    TIME: Before Qayamat___________Total Khajoors: 100 (plus bonus rewris)

    Q1: What happens if after all yer preachin’ and hollerin’, Muslims don’t come round to your point of view? For example, if a referendum was held in Pakistan today and HuT lost? What would you do then? Explain by potential scenarios.
    [5 khajoors]

    Q2: Since you (or your other avatars/alter egos) mentioned the defining muslim struggle of Mecca, do you mean to say you are the Meccan Muslims and we are the Quraish? Are you bringing a new religion? Is the difference between you and us, who are kalma-recitin’ muslims, as great as it was between Muhammad (saw) and Abu Jehl? (Hint: Khawarij, Hashisheen, Hassan bin Sabbah,Qadianis, Bahai’s,Hizboos)
    [5 khajoors]

    Q3: How do you intend to carry out your political program? Since you, in a stupid juvenile manner, insist on calling democracy ‘demon-crazy’, I presume yer not too cool on holding a referendum? What’s it goin to be then? A coup d’etat? Invasion? Bloody revolution? Be precise and keep your answers to ONE paragraph.
    [4 khajoors]

    Q4: What if your bloody revolution was resisted and seen as a naked power grab (which it is, though I am very amused at your organization’s pathetic impotence), will you unleash an unholy army of Hizb-ut-Terminators? If yes, could you please inform me 24 hours in advance? I would need to contact the governator of California.
    [72 virgin khajoors]

    Please answer these questions and prove to everyone that your Khilafah is not just a Khali Lifafah

    Calculators, Lies and evasiveness not allowed.

  • nota said:

    @Optimist
    “Mula e Tang-Nazar neiN Mujhe Kafir Jaana
    Aur Kafir Ye Samajta hai ke MusalmaaN mein hooN”

    Thanks! Hadn’t heard that one but I know exactly what Iqbal is talking about and what I meant !!!

  • mbokhari said:

    @Tab’an

    Dude thats so true, what you said about the outfits masquerading as ‘bookstores’, See that guy’s response to your suggestion of finding Tabari’s book in e-format. If he was a true student of Islam in the old mould of the great Islamic intellectuals of yore, he would have gotten on the phone to his Imam at their Hizbi temple and at least found out if a copy of Tabari in pdf even existed.

    But I guess the Imam must have been busy practicing one of the 30 ways of diddling ;-) al-Kama al-Sutra indeed.

    Just goes to prove one thing. The Beard-Brigade can’t come up with a simple straight answer. Slimy and slippery, they wriggle out of the grip of logic. They truly hope if they throw up countless ahadeeth in the air, somehow a pattern will emerge when it all crashes to the ground. Sorry dorothy, it don’t work that way. So, they finally give up and just resort to cutting-n-pasting stuff, repeating themselves in endless loops of fallacious logic, and generally making fools of themselves.

    Revivalist, thy name is Recyclist !!!

    A friend of mine once commented on the mental acrobatics of the Beard-Brigade. He said, “Arguing with religious zombies on the basis of common sense and reason is like fighting an unarmed man. It just won’t be sportsmanlike”

    I hope. in the centuries ahead, a few moderately intelligent people will one day evolve out of the endless diddling in the 30 ways (al-Baskin al-Robbins, a flavor for everyday)

  • Revivalist said:

    @nota

    Bro why are you escaping from giving a simple answer because you know you will be trapped if you give answer.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @mbokhari

    Q1: What happens if after all yer preachin’ and hollerin’, Muslims don’t come round to your point of view? For example, if a referendum was held in Pakistan today and HuT lost? What would you do then? Explain by potential scenarios.

    A- Bro it is a matter of believe and I believe that khilafah will reestablish again upon the method of prophethood and this is what our beloved prophet (saw) said in one of his hadith in Masnad Ahmed. “Suma takono khilafah ala minhajun-nabuwah” which means khilafah will re-establish on the method of prophethood. Moreover if you see the recent surveys conducted by many international organizations like world public opinion you can find out that what Muslims want. So Muslims are read for khilafah and that why the corrupt, tyrant, dishonest, hypocrite and daft rulers of the Muslims world with a strong collaboration of the west are trying to silence the voice raising for khilafah through tortures and banns but they failed to understand that they can not stop it what they can do the most is to delay it.

    Q2: Since you (or your other avatars/alter egos) mentioned the defining muslim struggle of Mecca, do you mean to say you are the Meccan Muslims and we are the Quraish? Are you bringing a new religion? Is the difference between you and us, who are kalma-recitin’ muslims, as great as it was between Muhammad (saw) and Abu Jehl? (Hint: Khawarij, Hashisheen, Hassan bin Sabbah,Qadianis, Bahai’s,Hizboos)

    A- I never said that you are Quraish rather I said stop behaving like Quraish. They were also trying defame Muhammad (saw) and his companions and wanted to take people away from the massage of Islam and I see the same thing here. You guys are doing a false propaganda and nothing else. IF you want to prove your point then state it and prove it with evidence, the stronger will survive.
    Q3: How do you intend to carry out your political program? Since you, in a stupid juvenile manner, insist on calling democracy ‘demon-crazy’, I presume yer not too cool on holding a referendum? What’s it goin to be then? A coup d’etat? Invasion? Bloody revolution? Be precise and keep your answers to ONE paragraph.

    A- We are trying to imitate the method of our beloved prophet (Saw) which was to carry out political and intellectual struggle. And ultimately convince people of power and get a smooth transition of power the way our prophet (saw) did in medina. He (saw) made a party worked in the society to expose the leaders and there system and gave an alternative leadership and system and tried to met people of influence. He met more then 40 tribal leader and asked them to support Islam and give Unconditional Nusrah (authority).At last Aus and khazraj which was two tribes of Medina convinced and a smooth transition took place. This is what we want and trying for.
    One thing which is very important to mention here is that our beloved prophet (saw) was offered to become the sardar of Darun-Nadwa which was suppose to be the parliament of Quraish but he (Saw) refused to be the part of Darun-Nadwa and continue his struggle with out being part of it.
    Q4: What if your bloody revolution was resisted and seen as a naked power grab (which it is, though I am very amused at your organization’s pathetic impotence), will you unleash an unholy army of Hizb-ut-Terminators? If yes, could you please inform me 24 hours in advance? I would need to contact the governator of California.

    A- I would simply say please take your time and ask a decent question.

    Now eat those khajors and come up with some more questions.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @Optimist

    It would be better to do some research to prove that charity which they are taking is Haram and convence them on this point.

    Why dont you do this?

    Regards

  • amirkhan said:

    Revivalist,
    Please tell me who was the last Kalif or Khalifa. I am really interested to know.

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    “Bro why are you escaping from giving a simple answer”

    Man you are funny. I don’t give an answer to a ridiculous question and you say I must. I answer it and you say my answer is simple (certainly no simpler than shouting “Khali Lifafah” (Thanks mbokhari)). I really am not “trapped if I give an answer”. I DID give you an answer! Islam for me is really simple and I don’t need to go through some 10 volume collection telling me what the meaning of a word “IS” is (thanks Clinton).

    Tell me: Is Quran simple and easy? (see 54:17)

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    Speaking of not answering, I am still waiting for your response to my questions about Hadith. Am I supposed to acept ALL Hadith without question?

    I will be satisfied witha simple answer. A “yes” or a “no” will do.

  • Revivalist said:

    @Amir khan

    Khalifah Abdul majid.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @nota

    Accepting hadith as a source is one thing and questioning some Ahadith is another. You are in fact rejecting the complete source. When I asked you about the method of prayer you said there is no method, now what should I consider you?

    Regards

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    “what should I consider you?”

    “My dear, I don’t give a d@mn!” — Rhett Butler in Gone with the WInd

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    By the way, you still did not answer me.

  • Revivalist said:

    @nota

    I admit that I am not an expert in the field of Hadith so I don’t know, go and ask a Muhadith and you will get a reply for it. I think you don’t know the answer of my question which is ARE YOU A MUSLIM?

    Regards

  • geog47 said:

    @Revivalist

    Please dont waist your time explaining system of Allah (sw) to few rejectors here, return of the khilafah is imminent wiether they like it or not.

    History has shown us that all unwanted empires fall quickly. The British Empire, touted as the world’s biggest, came and went in the space of 200 years. The USSR existed for a mere eight decades before it too collapsed. No one calls for the return of these tyrannical empires, and everyone views them with disgust.. It is but a matter of time and the will of Allah (swt) before the Khilafah returns, inshallah. And when the Khilafah does return, by Allah’s leave it shall ensure independence and autonomy is returned to the Muslim world and rid itself of the direct and indirect forms of colonialism that the West has shackled the Ummah with for so long.

  • geog47 said:

    The Pakistani flying carpet — Khalid Hasan

    saw an Indian Airline Airbus taxiing in. It was a normal passenger flight. The door opened and out walked Prime Minister Mrs Indira Gandhi. One man took her briefcase, another held an umbrella over her head and she got into a beat-up white Ambassador and drove away

    The poorer a country is, the more scant the regard those who preside over its affairs seem to have for public funds. The taxpayer in whose name all is done is nothing more than a depersonalised entity, a cliché, an irrelevance, a cipher. Each penny spent by those holding positions of governance out of the state exchequer should be a penny spent in the public interest. Sadly, it is not so.

    Over the years, our elected and unelected governments have become increasingly profligate, their leaders spending public money as if there was no tomorrow. There is no questioning of what they do. Legislatures, what there has been of them, have been either powerless or disinterested. And on the rare occasions when they have asked questions as to the need or justification of government expenditure, they have been ignored. In one case, not long ago, a certain quasi-public establishment simply refused to appear before a committee of the legislature when summoned to answer a few questions concerning the financial propriety of some of its activities.

    In the early years of Pakistan, public funds were spent with the utmost meticulousness. The first prime minister of Pakistan, Nawabzada Liaquat Ali Khan, who donated his personal residence in New Delhi to serve as the high commissioner’s residence and who after his assassination was found to have left not more than a couple of hundred rupees in the bank, was refused the slight increase he had once sought in his sumptuary allowance. I think it was Mumtaz Hasan, joint secretary at the finance ministry, who had turned down the prime minister.

    Can this be imagined today? From my own experience I recall that when Aziz Ahmed visited Canada in 1976 to negotiate important business with the Canadian government, the embassy got him a double room in one of the city hotels. He was furious at this waste of public money and insisted on getting a single room. “I just need enough space to say my morning prayers and the bit of yoga I do,” he said. A single room was finally found. I recall the assistant manager saying to me, “Was there something about the double room that His Excellency the foreign minister did not approve of?” “No, all His Excellency wants is a single room without frills,” I told him. I compare that with the Dorchester Hotel, London’s Sultan of Brunei suite that the president stayed in last month, which cost 6,500 pounds (not 17,000 pounds as reported) a night.

    Last week, I wrote about the travels of our presidents and prime ministers, which triggered a few responses, one of them from a journalist who has travelled with many of our heads of state. He writes, “Yours was a timely warning to the incoming government before its members set their sights on distant lands, mostly in the West. But I fear that they will prove as shameless as their predecessors were. Over the years, we have seen things deteriorate, not improve. One thinks of Shaukat Aziz’s disastrous trip to New York with over 45 hangers on to attend a UN meeting in a room with a capacity to seat a total of 40 people. Only two of his party were allowed in. Then President Musharraf created a record by remaining abroad for a full 19 days, with nearly half the period devoted to the promotion of his book. May I add that most of the “Mansura-cleared journalists” with Gen Zia-ul Haq ended up by running up high hotel bills for watching hard porn movies. Once in Toronto, the highest bill was logged by a long-bearded gentleman from Peshawar. Most of these Zia favourites were often to be seen in New York’s notorious 42nd Street.

    ZAB did start the tradition of large media delegations, but his direction was less towards the West and more towards Asia and Africa. Besides, ZAB always somehow found the time to read all the reports being filed about his ongoing visit. Once in Beijing, he asked an agency reporter at a Pakistan embassy reception why he was long on one important point and short on an equally important one. The reporter replied that by the time he had reached the second point, the newspapers in Pakistan had gone to bed. He promised to file the uncovered part the next day. ZAB had similar inquiries from other reporters on his trips. He made those he took with him work, whether they were journalists or ministers.”

    Capt Javed Muzaffar, a retired PIA captain who lives in Houston wrote, “Once I had Begum Shafiqa Zia travelling on a routine DC-10 commercial flight from Islamabad to London. I was the operating captain. She was going for medical treatment. The traffic staff informed me that she was carrying 11 enormous suitcases (no extra baggage charges had been paid). Before take-off, I saw her sprawled on two first class seats. Gen Zia had come to see her off and he waved to me from the tarmac. Another time, I had to ferry back a VVIP configured DC-10 from Islamabad to Karachi after Gen Zia and his entourage had deplaned. I was astounded when I boarded the aircraft, wondering if it was the same DC-10 I knew so well. There were leather seats, plush carpets, a conference room, new curtains, a large curtained-off bedroom area, special cutlery and crockery and what have you. The leftover food my skeleton crew and I were served was out of this world. I just could not help thinking about the enormous cost of all that to our poor nation.

    “It seems that the general public does not know that whenever a PIA aircraft is requisitioned for VVIP travel, it is luxuriously “refurbished”, only to be reconfigured later for the plebians who pay to fly. There are already 15 aircraft, including helicopters, in the Pakistani VVIP fleet. There is a Boeing 707, an almost new luxuriously fitted Boeing 737, a Falcon executive jet, a Cessna Citation and an Airbus 310 gifted by Qatar. On top of that, three new Learjets have been purchased recently at a cost of $60 million. I would ask readers to think about the astronomical cost of hangaring, maintaining, certifying, fuelling, crewing and catering involved here. Take India. Once I was parked in an Airbus 300 at Bombay Airport when I saw an Indian Airline Airbus taxiing in. It was a normal passenger flight. The door opened and out walked Prime Minister Mrs Indira Gandhi. One man took her briefcase, another held an umbrella over her head and she got into a beat-up white Ambassador and drove away.”

    Perhaps therein lies the difference between the two neighbours.

    Khalid Hasan is Daily Times’ US-based correspondent. His e-mail is khasan2@cox.net

  • geog47 said:

    Another false flage in the making: US, UK confirm their citizens injured in Islamabad blast

    http://www.geo.tv/home/15318.htm

    It was American embassy employees who were killed few years ago in blast that became the reason for full scale entry of US Govt’s different agencies. And now what will happen has to be seen. 911 caused the mass invasions into Paksitan as well.

  • nota said:

    @Revivalist
    “@nota
    I admit that I am not an expert in the field of Hadith so I don’t know, go and ask a Muhadith and you will get a reply for it. I think you don’t know the answer of my question which is ARE YOU A MUSLIM?”

    You still did not answer me. I know you don’t have an answer. I know you will never answer me and the reason isn’t that you are no Muhadith or Aalim or Mufti. You are copping out, plain and simple. If you answer yes, that leaves you exposed to expecting things you know you cannot defend. If you answer no, the f*cade you take pride in crumbles and you are left n*ked.

    You keep asking ARE YOU A MUSLIM and not accepting my answer. Let me just say I am as much a muslim as your mother. Hope that answers that finally. :)

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @mbokhari: The thing with hizbi’s unfortunately is that like call-center people they can’t really stray too much from the sales script. Logic is the slippery slope to rationality, and we all know where that can lead us! I just wanted to see how he was going to excuse himself (weasle?) out of this.. but he has pretended my question didn’t even exist. That is a good strategy. Now imagine a Khilafah pretending as if problems don’t exist. We don’t have to imagine really, we can look at all the tyrannies in the Muslim world supported explicitly by their ilk.

    Their method is ultimately violence or will have to be. They are just deferring it until they get enough zombies and then bye-bye elections! They’re going to do it like they’ve done for a thousand years, enforcement through bayonets. Within a generation the system will devolve into a hereditary kingship.

    But then again, who’s gonna be around to a temporary nick on a forgotten forum on the “old” internet that they were WRONG! naaa na-na naa naaa! :)

    it’s just tyranny, dressed in a jubba-o-dastaar . (oh and they think Iran’s system ain’t good’nuff neither!…)

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    “…to remind a temporary nick …”

  • Saqib said:

    Missiles fired on a house inside Pakistan territory. Is it napak army or the he napak Yankees?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7299352.stm

    /Saqib

  • nota said:

    @Saqib
    “Is it napak army or the he napak Yankees?”

    Does it matter? Are they two different entities???

    I hear they Yanks have let it be known Pakistan has no choice but to be a part of the War of Terror(WOT). Were those eleven demands an attempt to preempt the new government considering withdrawing from the WOT?

  • econfused said:

    Did all pkpolitics viewers missed out another important news?

    Murree Declaration challenged in SC

    http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=13600

  • Londonistan said:

    Problem with people like Tab’an Khamosh is that no matter how lucid the idea is they will always look towards darkness, we call them intellectual bats can’t bare the light “noor” of quran. Stereo types who have no solutions of their own but keen on criticizing anything which opposes the existing power structure in any given time. Irrespective, if its Khilafah, Communism or Capitalism, they will always support the one who is in power at the time without trying to understand the basis of any system. Like Sura Fatah, once Islam will inshallah prevail his children will be supporting Khilafah the way he is now supporting Capitalism. These kinds have no ideological under standing of anything because these people are inherently LAZY. Neither they can think anything practical on their own nor can they accept the practical solutions explicitly explained by their own creator. Infect if one do a deep analysis of their comment one can easily see the Tyrannical mentality they support, and actually they are the worshiper of the “Power” only in any form. Without any proof they will keep on accusing HT that they promote “violence” & support Tyrannical Rule like Mush, Karimov, Husni Mubarik,Saudis ect Infect HT has given their lives to raise voices against these tyrants, What have you done other than being a “Tab’an Khamosh” and writing few comments on websites, a self declared arm chair revolutionist. Allah has give his words that His System will prevail no matter what! So keep fighting against the Will of Allah and time will decide! Best of Luck…lol

  • nota said:

    @econfused
    “Murree Declaration challenged in SC”

    The petitioner prayed to the apex court to declare that no person or group of persons outside parliament can interfere with the election of Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly or a provincial assembly or determine their political identity.

    Orakzai prayed to declare that the office of the Speaker of an assembly cannot be politicised as part of any power-sharing agreement between the political parties on the floor.

    So this is what the geniuses Qayyum and Pirzada came up with. Tomorrow will be an interesting day…

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @londonistan: Not sure what you’re trying to say there dude, but as far as fighting ‘against’ tyrannies, it needs to be looked at in the larger context. You mullah’s are like communists. You sell out at the most critical moment.

    Also, the communists fought against the Tsar, that doesn’t mean they were any better when they came to power. Similarly the Nazi’s were anti-communists but that doesn’t mean their own actions were any better than the one’s they douncounced.

    So, being ‘anti’ something doesn’t mean anything until we see what the context is and where the ideas will lead to a given group. I find your ideas rather muddled and un-focused. In one part you accuse me of worshipping the rising sun, somewhere else an arm-chair revolutionist (whatever that is) and then claim Im for capitalism?

    WTF? Can you find anything more capitalist (before even the concept existed) than Islam? I don’t want to bring the I word because 2-3 people will start having islam-gasm all over the comment section, but seriously, Islamic empire was the first global trade network like almost a thousand years ago! WTF are you talking about? Islam and free market (FREEEEEEEEEEEE! FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! look it up) capitalism are Islamic concepts.

    Now, what _you_ think to be “capitalism” due to your apparent excessive FOXNEWS/CNN/CNBC viewing habits is not really capitalism, it is just a system of control and exploitation called ‘capitalism’. Kind of like “freedom on the march”. These are all doublespeak code-words (for the suckers) for imperial control of world populations.

    I don’t doubt that many who support HT are sincere in their cause, and the reasons their support stems from is also genuine, but if the organization as a whole is a tool of your enemies, then better knife the baby yourself then give something to your enemies on a platter.

    With all the work being done by HuT, their masters win both ways. First HuT is working hard to undermine genuine representative democracy in Muslim countries (guess who else is working hard? yes.. the West) .

    And if by some contrivance (like in case of Pakistan) a monolithic state comes into being it will be weak by nature, the muslims will defer to it for half a century or so, the west will get to have it’s next ‘monster’ that they so desperately need right now after soviet union and guess what? they’ll only need to subvert one tyrannical centralized control structure of the Khalifah.

    So, if they need nickle mining at loot-sale prices in Indonesia or carpet-bagging prices on the Balochi Gas or Iranian Oil, they’ll just deal with one set of tyrants.

    The enemies win either way, courtesy of all the hard work done by the gullible members of HuT.

    So, if you are really working for this, you better make sure there are going to be checks and balances otherwise you will burn in HELLFIRE for ever! The demons will gouge your eyes out and you will have to eat Zuqqum and drink boiling water for betraying the Muslim nation.

    etcetera etcetera

  • muqqafa said:

    I am listening to Musharraf giving interview to Atiqa Oddho.
    This is where this man has gone down to….cant face journalists, gets a beautiful but mediocore woman to interview him…
    the things he is talking about cannot fool the people of Pakistan…I think it is aimed at foreign audiance…
    now he says that any decision is taken with 2/3 information and analysis and 1/3 blindly…because you do not have full information…
    I can only smile…he thinks we have forgotten all his previous claims about self-righteousness and presenting himself to be the only one who knew and knew for sure what is Paksitan’s national interest…

    shame on you Musharraf…

  • yaqub2005 said:

    The morale of PERVEZ MUSHARRAF was definitely very low in his interview. He admitted that he was under pressure and that is why he smiles lesser as compared to before. If he has admitted being under pressure then he can decide any time to resign. One of his aides has already indicated as per today’s The NEWS report.

    He said that he wants to spend happy time with his grand children after retirement.

    He should go home and leave the future decisions to parliment.

  • Optimist said:

    @ Revivlaist

    I salute you for distracting us from real conversation – free judiciary – and involving us into a worldwide Khilafah movement.

    I also thank this website for letting this happen. Who needs Taliban when we have Maulana Fazal ur Rehman on this forum!!!!

    Who needs Aitzaz Ahsan/CJ Iftikhar, when we havve a Khalifah on this website!!

  • geog47 said:

    Our Brave Soldiers shoot dead civilian woman in Swat:

    Updated at: 1950 PST, Sunday, March 16, 2008
    SWAT: Pakistani troops shot dead a civilian woman on Sunday after opening fire on a suspect vehicle when it failed to stop at a checkpost in a curfew-hit northwestern region, the army said.
    The army expressed “deep regret” over the incident, which happened in the early hours in the Swat Valley, a former tourist spot where troops are battling militant followers of a pro-Taliban militant cleric.

    The scenic region near the Afghan border has been under a night-time curfew since troops launched a military operation against the cleric, Maulana Fazlullah, in October last year.

    A military statement said that soldiers fired warning shots in the air to stop the vehicle when it approached the checkpoint in Matta district shortly after midnight on Sunday morning, then fired shots to puncture the tyres.

    “As a result of firing, one female was seriously injured. She was provided with first aid and evacuated to hospital by security personnel on duty. However, she later succumbed to injuries,” the statement said.

    The other people in the car, a man, two women and two children, were not harmed, it said.

    “We deeply regret the incident and loss of precious life,” the statement added. The army said in February that it had secured 90 percent of Swat, with more than 230 militants and 36 Pakistani soldiers killed during operations.

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=40593

  • geog47 said:

    Wana Missile strike death toll rises to 20

    Updated at: 1820 PST, Sunday, March 16, 2008
    SOUTH WAZIRISTAN: The death toll in Wana Missile strike, the main town in the tribal district of South Waziristan, has increased to 20, the sources said.

    Seven others were also injured when a missile struck a suspected militant compound in a lawless Pakistani tribal area on the Afghan border Sunday.

    Residents said they heard several blasts after several missiles fired from an unknown site hit the home of a local tribesman in a village near Wana.

    Foreigners linked with Taliban and Al-Qaeda militants were believed to be staying at the compound in Doog village, the residents said.

    “Militants have cordoned the blast site and are taking out bodies from the rubble,” one local tribesman said.

    “The missile has left only part of a boundary wall intact and turned the compound into a pile of debris,” he said.

    “Body parts were flung into the air and were lying in nearby farmlands,” he added. Pakistan’s chief military spokesman major general Athar Abbas said that he had received reports about blasts, but had no details about casualties yet.

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=40587

  • econfused said:

    @optmisit, & Taban

    The easier way to carry on with relevant conversation thread is start ignoring posts by Revivalist and londonsitan. You are just wasting your energies who has a mission in life.

    @Taban

    I posted the news about SC, as that seems like a move by presidency to undermine parliament again. I personally think, Parliament should declare residence of CJ Iftikhar Ch. as the New Supreme Court building. Dogar and like minded can stay in old SC building, and we can just say that as “Tomb of Supreme Court” while new parliament should also make Sharif-ud-Din Pirzada and Malik Qayyum Mujavir of that Tomb. As an exit strategy, Mush can be considered gaddi nasheen for that Mizar.

  • geog47 said:

    Seven police officials injured in Mardan blast

    Updated at: 2045 PST, Sunday, March 16, 2008
    MARDAN: At least seven police official were injured in a remote control bomb blast in Mardan, the sources said.

    A police patrol vehicle was bombed in Bakshali village, in Mardan, the sources added. An improvised explosive device or remote controlled bomb went off near the Dubai bus-stand targeting the police vehicle.

    Two of the injured policemen were reportedly in critical condition.

  • nota said:

    Mush’s Pakistan:
    232 arrested after blast in Pakistani capital

    Why so many? How many were arrested when after Lahore bombings? I get p^ssed because this shows the lives of our citizens are worth a lot less than those of foreigners. Now 232 people of my country will be tortured just to show the west we truly are their slaves.

  • CJ Musharraf said:

    After watching his interview I realised that he started falling when he played dirty politics of fooling people due to cheap politicians and advisors around him.

    But he once himself said in one of his own prog Ewan E Sadar that if the decision maker makes wrong decision then he himself is stoopid. Now that he has realised, he should go.

    He dosent have any stamina to do anyhting. I bet anyone that he will resign very soon.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Mush Interview with Geo:

    Part 1
    Part 2
    Part 3
    Part 4

    Aah, what strength of character! You need strong character to RAPE the CONSTITUTION!

    And WHAT THE F*CK is with that MUZAK in the background? WTF???

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Just imagine: This is the room where he and his cronies detained the Chief Justice of Pakistan, and tried to intimidate him into resigning. Then kept him in illegal detention in this room while the replacement judge was being announced on PTV. this is where the “agency” dogs came into the room to intimidate the highest judge in the land.

    And now, American supplied psy-ops muzak a-playing, he wants us to believe he is a man of character.

  • nota said:

    @muqqafa on March 16th, 2008 2:43 pm
    “I am listening to Musharraf giving interview…I think it is aimed at foreign audiance…”

    It is in English so you know the target audience. By the way why is sitting looking like a Chaudhry?

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    Gaawd! part 4 1:55.. Atiqa Odho the sycophant blows the president on national tv…

    Prisoners against the wall!

    ready!

    aim!

    FIRE!!

  • amirkhan said:

    Revivlaist,
    Khalifah Abdul majid, If this is the person who was the ruler of Turky. Go and read their personal creator. How they were caliph they were just rulers or Kings if father dies son become a caliph. You want this for us I do not understand man.

  • amirkhan said:

    creator = crector

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    I watched the interview.. Now I feel so dirty I have to go throw up and then take a shower!

    EWWWW!!!

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @admin: sorry wrong caliph. can u plz delete my comment (March 16th, 2008 5:12 pm) plz??

  • gv said:

    @TK

    hey the link works but the video doesnt play any tips?

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @gv: works for me.. maybe you need to install a plugin or something? (I’m using OSX/Safari)

  • gv said:

    ok thanks i’ll try that

  • Adil said:

    @TK
    I watched the interview. I think Mush is paranoid about himself being an indispensible leader for the country ( psychopath). Look at Atiqa Odho, as u rightly said, blowing him on tv. These are the sort of people who have given him an impression that He is the best thing on planet earth. Look at his interview, its an out an out effort to address the elite of society ( who still follow him ).
    This is an effort by Mush to create his soft image to the society but I donno I have this feling for the 1st time that He is CONCERNED about his declined image but He cant do anything now. Point of No return !

  • Adil said:

    @ Admin
    Which video is coming tonight?

  • geog47 said:

    Am ready to shed my last drop of blood for Pakistan: Altaf ( BARKING FROM LONDON)

    Updated at: 2330 PST, Sunday, March 16, 2008
    LONDON: Leader and Quaid of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) Altaf has vowed to render every sacrifice for Pakistan.

    “I am ready to shed my last drop of blood for Pakistan homeland,” he said in a telephonic address to the meeting of united opposition, which held in Islamabad.

    The nomination of MQM leader Farooq Sattar as joint candidate of the united opposition for the slot of Prime Minister marks the beginning of the elimination of feudal system in Pakistan, Altaf Hussain said.

  • econfused said:

    Did anybody catch the telephonic Khitaab of Chooran Wali Sarkar to Ch. Shujaat.

    You can see the pain on face of Ch. Pervaiz Ilahi. Ch. Shujaat looked like a comedian talking in microphone along with cell phone.

  • Tab'an Khamosh said:

    @geog47: INteresting! If Altaf bhai wants to end feudalism, I think someone already raised this issue here, why does he support Makhdoom Amin Fahim (who happens to be a feudal from Sindh — last time I checked)?

    @Adil: totally bro. The sycophantic mentality of our people is just perfect for tinpots like these. And she totally shamelessly said this with a straight face.

    It was the most disgusting piece of “new Journalism” I have seen from the new pakistani media. I can’t believe all the people around here were making such a fuss over Geo closure.. Honestly, I think Aaj is the real cutting edge and progressive channel here… Geo is kinda blech!

    btw, the piece in this Jalib docu about our darbari (for sale) intellectuals is a damning indictment of our “daanishwar” class.

    http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-7992173788748993874 (skip to minute 9:45)

  • for6otten_sindhi said:

    Okay, Does any KHI folks know if this is true or just prapaganda by Haqiqi group? They are claiming Musharraf Qaumi Movement killed 11 (eleven) workers and abducted 8 young women…

    this is turning into maha bharata with ravan abducting gita and all… only remains to be seen who will be the hanuman jee of this story.

    http://www.khabren.mqm.com.pk/news/2008/march/details/12mar08.gif

  • GM said:

    @for6otten_sindhi

    Same has been reported in Daily Ummat also ( i think 15 march)

  • chooran vali sarkaar said:

    @geog47: Bhai soovvar ki qurbani jaez nehin! Un say kaho Gordon Brown ko offer kar den kiyon ke voh log to sab chalta hai! ;)

    choooooooooooorrrran khiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaa layoooooooooooooooooo !!

  • Optimist said:

    @ for6gotten_Sindhi

    I am happy to see a real Sindhi here (there is an MQM/Mush lover who calls himself forgotten_Sindhi!!). I remember real Sindhi with ’6′ in the nick.

    In addition to the above news, MQM has killed 2 Haqiq group and 2 Sunni Tehrik because they protested against Danish Cartoons!! Mush’s enlightened moderation…

    Jang was forced to write ‘Inna Lilah’ for MQM (Mush) supporter but did not write anything for the 4 others.

    http://jang.com.pk/jang/mar2008-daily/17-03-2008/main2.htm

  • for6otten_sindhi said:

    @Optimist: dear birathar! I am sindhi, proof is that sindhi in my name. I like vedeio on this site, mashalla!

    salaam saiin!

    Birathar, MQM is now good because they now accept the rural culture of our province. Altaf Hussain birathar bhai support Makhdoom Amin Fahim Gaddi Nasheen of silsila sarvariyah. Birathar, Makhdoom sahib is a well nown personality of Sindh, they are land owners from long tiem. Malka Viktoria give them the land! They have very high family calibre and blood of royal lords. They have hundred of thousand of acre, but they are not warlord. These are lies. The are the wad wadero of the village so they are called wadera! it is by love that their worker call them wadera. We explained to Altaf bhai biradar, and now he support Amin Fahim. Also Pir Pagaro support Amin fahim and some ppl say Pagaro is from Fauji jo darro! but that is lies.. pagaro support democracy and haq parasti birathar.

    We are happy to see birathar Altaf bhai support now rural leaders, he used to call Makhdoom saiin wadera and feudal but that is proppogunda! now MQM and MAF are like birather! they will work for sindh and no problems in sindh.. if everyone listen and do as Altaf Hussain say to every body otherwise some na-maaloom gunda will attach karachi and sindh. that will be bad. you don’t want that do you?

    Yes MQM and MQM and ST are now fighting.. I think they should stop and make peace and support MQM because MQM is the only party who is fighting wadera and feudal lords like Amen Fahim.

    I am real sindhi. The proof is the word sindhi in my nick.

  • Revivalist said:

    @Amir Khan

    Bro I told you and would repeat it again that we are not struggling to bring back Uthmani khilafah rather out struggle is to bring back Islam and its golden period khilafah Rashida. It does not mean that we will reject all material advancement. Please don’t ask me this. Islam is the most modern way of life and will remain so till the last day.

    Even if you compare the last days of khilafah with any Muslim country today its matchless. In the last days of khilafah when Jews wanted to take some land in Palestine what was the reply of Khalifah Abul hameed. Please read that and see the responses of our current shameless rulers both democratic and dictators. Even in the last days of khilafah when the British and French wanted to stage a play written by Voltaire which contained negative remarks against our beloved Prophet (saw) and about the mothers of the believers what was the response of Khalifah Abul Hameed and what is the reply to Denmark and other western courtiers of our puppet rulers?

    IT is obligatory upon every Muslim to work for the re-establishment of khilafah which will protect the ummah and will restore its dignity and honor.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @Econfused

    You guys can’t resist they way your masters can’t because it is an Ideological struggle which will end up as a great victory for Islam and would be shameful defeat for your secular demon-crazy. Initially your west tried to keep the struggle for khilafah on low-key but soon they realized that they can not afford it so they started there evil propaganda against the concept of khilafah by saying that this is authoritarianism etc and put this evil concept in the mind of some of our pseudo intellectuals and now they are behaving as there surrogates.

    We all have mission in life which is defined by our creator for us but unfortunately some of us don’t understand it in time and they spoil there energies defending falsehood and evil.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @Optimist

    Thanks but try to understand things. This false judiciary which is the leftover of a British lord will not take you anywhere.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @nota

    LOL, If you don’t understand simple and easy sentences of English it’s not my fault. I told you that Hadith has got many types one of its type is MUTAWATIR, if any body deny it, he has denied a Qatai thing. As for as other Ahadith are concern so there is a difference of opinion amongst the scholars so you can ask about the authenticity of a particular hadith but saying that hadith is not the source is the biggest blunder and takes a person out from the fold of Islam and by saying this you have cut Islam half. However for people like you who believe that the method of prayer does not exist in Islam it’s easy to accept anything which matches there interests.

    You can’t be a Muslim like my Mother because she believes in Islam and does not cut Islam into peaces and takes that peace which matches her interest.

    Regards

  • Revivalist said:

    @Tab’an Khamosh

    Again baseless, groundless and hollow arguments from your side, which is as usual expected from people like you. HT is a well known political entity and its method is also well known to people who know HT and does not only reply on material written against HT.

    Try to search how many prisoners do we have in central Asian prisons, how many are there in the Middle Eastern prisons etc and how are they treating our members. Despite of all these hardships HT is stick to its method of political and intellectual struggle, you know why? Because we follow the footsteps of our beloved prophet (saw) and when we read the method and understand it we see no arm struggle during maccan period. This is the only reason whey we do not resort to arm struggle. This method remained for more then 50 years of our struggle and will remain so because of the reason I told you. So please stop your childish blame game and come to real discussion and defend your thoughts which are on its death bed.

    “I have often thought that if a rational Fascist dictatorship were to exist, then it would choose the American system. ” Professor Noam Chomsky

    They say democracy is the rule of the masses for the masses by the masses, where the masses freely elect their leaders.

    But the Reality is:

    The masses do not choose but they are constrained by the choices given to them. The reality of this so-called freedom of choice extends only to the two or three major parties contesting for power. They are all funded and backed by the corporates. You understand now!

    Regards

Leave your response!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Username


Password


Recent Comments
Blog Comments
Search