Comments on: Capital Talk – 18 November 2008

By: aahmad

aahmad — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:55:21 +0000

Finally, Hamid Mir has come out of Zardari’s shadow and did an honest attempt on judiciary again.

By: miansmas123

miansmas123 — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:15:26 +0000

Meray aziz hamwatno! Kyo pare ho musharraf ke peechay.
Be realistic, Pakistan not gonna change in my life time so let mushrraf to enjoy his life , coz already many people of pakistan living in miseries. Atleast on person shud have gud standard of life.
Wat you think M i rite.

By: Traffic

Traffic — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:55:17 +0000

correction above: “otherwise” instead of “in that case”.

and sorry if i offended any fans(?) of khokhar here. but really guys stop deluding yourself, realize that when someone joins PPP he/she agrees to become shameless and a hypocrite. he/she agrees to kill their conscience and common sense and shamelessly defend all acts of the zinda shaheed chairman, whoever that may be at the moment. we need to get rid of this abomination called PPP from our system otherwise it will kill us from within.

By: Traffic

Traffic — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:49:12 +0000

@ asif65

“I was looking somebody from PPP with some character”

why dont you join NASA and start looking for water on Mars, more chances of you finding that than a person with character in PPP. the only time the words character and PPP can go in the same sentence is when its accompanied by “less”(as in character-less).

“I found this person. i.e. Justice Fakhar-un-Nisa Khokhar saheba!”

what? huh? oh, yeah thats what u meant, sorry i started drifting. but seriously come on, this chub cub khokhar has about as much character as beauty on her face(if you dont think she’s beautiful that is!!! in that case i might change my wordings a bit). she cant even get herself to say who she voted for, and anyone who defends the criminal zardari has about as much character as the snake himself. Period.

By: junaid

junaid — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:37:51 +0000

excellent program. good to see mir back on judiciary issue.
lovely speech of nawaz shareef.

By: Basharat

Basharat — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:27:57 +0000

Hats off Hamid Mir for doing program on reinstatement of judiciary.

By: Ghost Of TK

Ghost Of TK — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:48:45 +0000

@shimatoree:

To understand the fat mystery, please pick up any Pakistani recipe book and/or shan/ahmed/monkey masala packets and look at the backs for the informative recipes.

Every recipe starts with:

1. Onions 10 peeled and sliced
2. 4 cups oil/ghee or truck grease.
…
…

“har cheeze meezaan meiN ……dum dum dum dummm!”

By: shimatoree

shimatoree — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:44:40 +0000

Two points-

1. Why there are two extremely fat people on this panel ? Their faces are literally bursting with fat . The Lady from PPP and Mr. Akram Sheikh.

2. The Lady from PPP was polite but not much substance which meaans that she has not studied the genesis of the French Revolution

By: nota

nota — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:31:13 +0000

Justice Khokhar also stated a very simple solution to the judges’ restoration: a two line resolution stating all acts of Mush were invalid That certainly goes against PZP stand of “Daykhain jee issue itni simple nahi hay”. Question is WHY isn’t PML-N putting up that resolution though they have stated to do so many times? WHY isn’t PML-Q putting up that resolution though they too have threatened to do so many times?

Right now there is a better chance PML-Q will be the one introducing that resolution before the “friendly opposition” of PML-N. If it does happen, wouldn’t it be a bit embarrassing for PML-N?

By: nota

nota — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:57:17 +0000

@sif65

I was looking somebody from PPP with some character. In this program I found this person. i.e. Justice Fakhar-un-Nisa Khokhar saheba!

I hope she can convince the ZPP to restore CJ otherwise ZPP will be changed!!!

Excellent panel indeed. But tied to the ball-and-chain named Zardari, Khokhar was reduced to offering only “more talks” and as both Justice Tariq Mehmood and Brst. Akram Sheikh rightly pointed out, it’s not a matter of talks because all sorts of talks and agreements have already taken place and have come to naught. What would “talks” lead to? Another agreement? What good is that with a person who swore on the Quran he would restore the CJ and others in 24 hrs and reneged?