{ 355 comments... read them below or add one }

  • 5Rivers said:

    What else would you expect from a gutless parliament — shame on this parliament.

    From now on it will be perfectly legal for any violent cave man to experiment his own version of sharia on a subjugated group of people. I salute Ayaz Amir and MQM for standing up to these goons.

  • rasheed said:

    @5Rivers,

    Shame you on.

  • Blackhawk12 said:

    @5Rivers
    I salute Ayaz Amir and MQM for standing up to these goons.

    Wow…good jokes MQM for standing up to these goons
    Keep em coming

  • justice4all said:

    Lets hope it work and peace prevail.

  • pak007 said:

    so it means the Supreme Court of Pakistan has no legal say in swat anymore!is this true or i am having difficulty in understanding this regulation?

  • Brampton said:

    When Chaudhry/Mian and Dakoo like Zaradri are the leaders what you can expect….

    We all know Zardari is dcaiot he will do antyhing to reamin on power until he has sniffed/stolen $4-5 billion from Pakistan
    but Where is his brother “Nawaz Sharif” — what the f**k just happened?
    How some so easily PML-N and PPP Jointly passed this bill? No parliamantry debate?

    Nawaz Sharif – Voice of Justice and Judiciary????
    where the f88k is he on this bill????
    How PML-N can vote for it ? we know PPP is just bunch of looters and killers and thieves.

    They voted for it, handed over Swat to Taliban
    Civils courts gone, told to stay home…
    Polive already disppeared
    School allowed upto 5 grades
    women can’t go out without accomapaying Man
    Women can’t work
    Ta;iban will give heavy ammo like rocket launchers, but will keep AK47 and other weapons to deal with local populations.
    Taliban will denounce suicide bombers (for PR reason on Media) but never SAID that they will stop suicide attacks.

    Peoples struggle 2 years for Judciary – Where are those Motherfuckers Nawaz Sharif, Ch Nisar, Hassan Iqbal and others with Imran Khan and thier pimps on GEO TV.

    This country is fucked-up, and being prepared for India and US to carry out thier future plans…..

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    ANP has done this being a secular party

  • shandana said:

    @all

    I don’t understand, what’s wrong with this regulation?

    If the people of Swat are happy and that it is not against the constitution and on top of that parliment is endorsing it then why people are against it (I am not considering MQM the mafia), my question is just from an ordinary Pakistani, please enlighten us.

  • msohail83 said:

    Implementation of Sharia shouldn’t be a problem for us being Muslims, but the way this came about is a matter of serious concern. It begs a question whether this governmnet is capable to maintain law and order in rest of country. For now this was probably the best thing to do in order to prevent the loss of innocent lives. But in the long run govt has to reestablish its writ in the area and take back the land from the de facto rulers of area called Taliban.

    Caving in to a few hundred armed militants is not what any govt should be doing under any circumstances. This will encourage others to take up arms to have their demands met. I understand we have to look at things in a bigger picture as it is a very convoluted matter where we have several power players involved due to foreign presence in the region.

    We all know that battle is about to rage on this year in Afghanistan and after this deal focus will be shifted across the border with new alliance of Talibans which will bring back temporary relief in our region but we shouldn’t settle for that instead we should use that time and all of our energy to reorgainze state machinery in the region.

    Sufi Mohammed’s days are numbered and after his death Fazlullah will most probably take over. He’s a hardliner and fanatic that believes in bloody movement and will not budge when it comes to negotiations.

    Who will bail us out next?

  • fareed said:

    It is a good deal to bring peace in the valley. I hope it will give freedom to pakistanis from the indian and foreign mafias who were using the name of Islam to kill fellow muslims.

    Everyone knows these are not only talibans who are fighting in tribal areas(some of them are working on the enemy agenda,some are motivated,some of them are real fighters and offcourse some criminals.) int that scenario this peace deal was the best option. It is very easy to condemn this deal here on the internet and sitting in the drwaing rooms.
    Pakistan is our country and the deal has been approved the parliament.

    shame on MQM which calls rallies for gunda singh tafoo every second day and don’t dare to call even a single rally against the killings of innoccent Pakistani by their masters.
    All who are opposing the deal come with the better idea if you have or just sit here and listen tafoo actor all the time who is against our Pakistan.
    Pakistan Zindabad.

  • agrana75 said:

    what is wrong with this Sharia Regulation? If any one being muslim is afraid of sharia rules then he should better change his name to some non-muslim name.

    Just to remind you people that , Taliban in Swat area established after massacre in Lal Masjid , just for the sake of getting revenge from the security forces. We should salute sufi muhammad by bringing them on the peace deal. And this peace deal has nothing wrong , instead we should greet each other that it contains all the good things. Can any body point anything wrong?

  • rasheed said:

    @pak007,

    Are you talking about the Supreme Court that was itself jailed by Army less than 2 years ago?

  • nuzhat ahmad said:

    It is all over. Swat is officially now an Islamic Emirate run by illiterate Mullah Taliban. The next step is handing over Baluchistan to the BLA. The army is at fault here. They do not have the capacity or the will to fight these Taliban bastards. The people of Pakistan have fattened them up too much. All they are good for is running Real Estate businesses. Goodbye to the Pakistan that we knew and grew up in.

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    I myself is very much against Talibs. I dont believe in there interpretation.
    Having said that after trying every option if people of swat are satisfied and majority of parliamnet excluding MQM have approved it, what is wrong with some people.

    I ahve no problem with objection from MQM , it is democartic right.
    I wish they could have used this right when musharaf was in power. They could have opposed 3rd november action. Could ahve anstained from voting from musharaf.
    What today they are arguing some thing done on gun point should not be approved. What about musharaf holding gun in hand asking for votes—– Any explanations any apology.

    I have big problem with RAUF KLASRA. He seems to be in inferiority complex.
    He has done some 3 yrs stint in WILAYAT. so impressed with them always praising justice system. Critcizing zardari and nawaz Left and right. he himself is so biased , never condemend khakwanis for harassing female doctor , becuase they are from same belt. Talking about human rights. Ch nisar rightly pointed out him in speech. This dual personality jurnalsit yesterday wrote that pmln n is tight spot. See with how much ease both parties and ANP approved this, Big slap on klasra face.
    He has no guts to condemn wilayat sarkar for unjustifed tratment to pakistan TALIBILMS .

    HYPOCRACY

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    Ansar abbasi has rightly pointed out today ANP has done with big risk. PPP and ANP should be appreciated.

  • shimatoree said:

    In ref: to the issue of jurisdiction of the Supreme Court- it remains.

    The issue of appeal was added by the ANP .

    I would recommend that everyone READ the WHOLE DEAL- meaning each and every line, then store it in their hard disc with instant recall possible before letting loose with their commentary. Please keep in mind that this document has been written by good lawyers, and scrutinized by even better lawyers- after all that is what took the 7 weeks that Zardari sat on.

    I am not a lawyer and do not pretend to be one- so I defer the critical analysis to them .

    But the bottom line is that the people’s reps. have passed it and the people of Swat are for it. End of story.

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    I appeal to all

    Discuss any political move on merit.
    Please critique it. Have your personal favourite with argument.
    Stop being critical for the sake of criticism

    I hope some friend from MQM will answer logics about gun forced agreement and decisions

  • rasheed said:

    @Brampton,

    When your papa Musharraf f***ed entire Pakhtoons and Baloochis with Army and Air Force, where were sitting then? Musharraf did everything in Swat except putting nukes and you saw the results.

    You better shut up mind your own business and let people of Swat deal with it.

    We have so called civilized police and law in other parts of Pakistan, like Karachi, but everyday people are murdered and they are deprived of their properties. The crime rates in Karachi are hundreds of times higher than Swat and FATA.

    Do you want to give them same to people of Swat? First put your own house in order and before selling your bullsh!t to people of Swat.

  • democrate said:

    all credit goes to anp and ppp.

  • 5Rivers said:

    @rasheed , shame on you for supporting violent thugs and their predatory behavior.

    @BlackHawh, I am not a supporter of MQM and I am very much against it. But, the crimes of MQM pales in comparison to those of Taliban.

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    I think some people are really upset , why parliament has united on some issue.
    Has signing this gave zardari , nawaz, asfand billions of dollars.

    Brampton you will sitting in safe heaven saying bull shit about establishe dpolitical leaders.

    Answer the valid questions . Why you followed same principle to GIve your services to the scum of the earth musharaf

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    Brampton you will sitting in safe heaven saying bull shit about establishe dpolitical leaders.

    Answer the valid questions . Why you followed same principle to GIve your services to the scum of the earth musharaf

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    Can some one from PUKHTOKHWA answer MQM

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    correction PUKHTOONKHWA

  • democrate said:

    @5rivers,i agree ur point of view but just tell me what other option government has.u know when army started to clear swat from taliban whole media and majority of public was with taliban and they were criticizing army,blaming them for killing of innocent people,blaming them killing for their own people.then wy army fight with taliban.

  • rasheed said:

    @5Rivers,

    I fully support people of Swat and their wishes. It is guys like you with Busharraf mentality who just want bloodshed everywhere and having pain in their butts why their beloved army is not bombing Swat, NWFP and Balochistan anymore.

    If you don’t respect elected the decision of people of Swat, endorsed by parliament of Pakistan, then get you better get lost somewhere and find a new country.

  • 5Rivers said:

    The question is not if Sharia law is good or bad. It’s an altogether a separate debate and should be held in an open and free atmosphere and if the weight of argument and the will of the people say that we need Sharia law’s to address today’s challenges facing our societies and they so be it. And, no one would have a problem with that.

    However, this is not sharia. Fazlullah talking about Sharia is like Musharraf talking about democracy.

    Neither people of Swat nor the parliament really wanted this law. Both were under Duress.

    First, people of SWAT were taken hostage by bloody taliban thugs and only by threatening to disturb the peace of SWAT talibs have convinced the locals that the only way out for locals is to go along with Talibs. Locals want peace not Taliban’s Shariat.

    Second, In the history of Pakistan, Parliament has always been the place of who’s who’s for self serving corrupt egos. This is where the nation sends it garbage. It’s the same parliament that has – through out the history – insulated itself from the miseries and cries of common people.

    It seems like even Almighty has stopped having mercy on Pakistan. This nation would have to pay for the crime of not speaking up when and where it matters.

  • 5Rivers said:

    @rasheed : “who just want bloodshed everywhere and having pain in their butts ”

    Keep your homosexual talk to yourself. Don’t flirt with me.

    @rasheed : “get lost somewhere and find a new country”

    Only if we can send all idiots like you to India. You are nothing but a waste of oxygen. People like you don’t understand the meaning of difference in opinion. Mullah’s like you are fitna and would burn in hell for your crimes.

  • rasheed said:

    @5Rivers,

    Any Mr. Rivers, you better have something to sell to people of Swat.

    - In interior Sindh, people are enslaved like animals and forced into hard labor – this does not happen in Swat.

    - In interior Sindh, pregnant girl is fed to dogs – this does not happen in Swat.

    - In Balochistan, women are burned alive in name of pride – this does not happen in Swat.

    - In Punjab, nose, hands and legs of women are cut – this also does not happen in Swat.

    The only problem you have that people in Swat have beard versus the elites of other regions don’t have beard, even though they do hundreds of times worse crimes against Humanity.

  • geelemitti said:

    i totally agree with @5 rivers. why can people not understand that debate is not sharia law. it is the way it has been accepted and implemented. In face of utter disgrace and surrender.

  • razakhan said:

    If govt has any brains left (highly doubtful) this is the best chance they gonna get.

    If Talibaan donot mend their ways then Govt should do the following. Implement sharia then use the sharia to beat up retards like molvi fazalullah. Use a compaign and every media person should be involved, bring it upon a sustained compaign to show how govt has use the power of constitution, parliment and democracy to implement wat was the law, then use it to show how Talibaans r now (after thier demands r met) abusing the sharia n screwing the peace built a consensus against them by showing our moral superioroty. Get rid of Mullah diesel and ilk and use muslim scholors like Maulana taqi usmani, mufti muneeb, maulana rafiuddin and Dr. Israr and flood the area to moderate and educate. When Talibaan resist dun just pound them use media and ulema to show the hypocricy and the ineptness of Talibaan only then we can get rid of them by the power of public opinion behind us.

  • justice4all said:

    These MQM guys are a pain in the @$$,

    http://www.jang.com.pk/jang/apr2009-daily/14-04-2009/up02.gif

    ye log her mamlay main taang kion aratay hain?

  • rasheed said:

    @razakhan,

    Why don’t you do something yourself instead of complaining and giving lecture to other ulema to take care of this?

    Does Dr. Israr or Mufti Taqi’s version of Islam forbids things like “Stoning to Death”? You wouldn’t even accept their version of Islam if it is 100% implemented where hands and necks are cut in public.

  • 5Rivers said:

    @rasheed

    Yeah but you wont see Parliament passing resolution condoning these henious activities and turning it into a law.

  • mb said:

    This is the biggest blunder of MQM. I think it is good for JI as now they will sure be able to gain some good number of seats from Karachi.

    MQM is a Munafiq party and Altaf Hussain is a Munafiq, period.

    I urge all urdu speaking people of Karachi to vote JI in next election.

    What the f**k is Altaf Hussain doing in Pakistan when he does not support Shariah.

    He should go back to India.
    Now the whole world knows Altaf is a Munafiq and a looser.

  • rasheed said:

    @5Rivers,

    Can you just read the above resolution on this very page and let me know which part is considered heinous activities? Don’t twist the facts and speak based on the actual document that parliament passed.

    Do you even know the history of this regulation? When was it originally made?

  • mb said:

    Mubarak to people of Swat. They have done what all Pakistani should have done 60 years ago. As i have experienced in my life that people of Swat are a bit well off and quite educated in Deen and as well as Dunya than rest of Pakistan’s general population.

    And now they have proven that with lots hikmat and patience.

    May Allah support them and help all of them for this step, Aameen.

  • Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar said:

    a sad, sad day for the state of Pakistan. every state has its challenges but very few just give up like this.

    the country burns and that Kiyani khusra is off golfing when what he should be doing is learning to dance – at least he will be able to make some money that way. if the army won’t fight the Taliban because of “strategic depth”, then these army khusras should be lined up in front of a firing squad and executed. if they can’t fight the Taliban because the savage animals are too good for them, then they should turn in their arms and in exchange accept bangles from the govt of Pakistan. with all the defence money saved up, maybe we will finally be able to spend some money on important things like education and healthcare instead of feeding a khassi, impotent, shameless, useless, corrupt army of generals aka dollar-wh0r3s.

    shame on Kiyani and all his la’anti generals… first gave away half the country… now giving it away piece by piece. ashamed to think that I went to an army school and looked up to these pieces of sheet once upon a time.

    hats off once again to that brave giant from Chakwal, Ayaz Amir. you have shown more courage Ayaz sahib than the cursed, useless army of our country. please be extra careful about your personal security now… we need honest, brave men like you…

  • pak.nukes said:

    Another slap.
    I am waiting in anticipation whats next from Baboos.

  • pak.nukes said:

    Golden Words
    Apna promise tub tuk poora na kero jub tuk tumharay sath kuttay wali na ho jaey.
    Hazrat Asif Ali Zardari lanuti-ul-azeem.

  • razakhan said:

    @rasheed @5Rivers,

    ahaaa, now we come to the crux of the problem which is u dun want sharia law at all. Y dun u say so. And yes as Prophet PBUH said agar meri baiti Fatima bhi chori kartee to main oska haath kaat daita.

    Khud badaltey nahi quran ko badal daitey hain

    lol. dudes if the issue is that pak shouldn’t have sharia law at all or should have ppl say if they want it or not then there is no point to argue.

    1 – We have completed ur deen – Alquran

    2 – Constitution of Pak states that sharia law will be supreme (plz b4 u ask which fiqh or which molvi, read the article above that each fiqh will have their where it effects them in personal law and beside all these qts have been answered by Islamic nazaryati council)

    So to conclude as per Quaran and Sunnah as muslims the only law we can live under is sharia, the ijma and qayas Islam asks us to use for things not mentioned in Quran e.g the punishment for drug dealings, how to tax and how to spent that tax (main idea is that all should be for benefit of Ummah and humankind etc etc).

    To change that what u guys need is constitutional amendement. So good luck wit that. So plz temme if that is ur premise then there is nothing to argue or agree. cuz we will stand always on opposite sides. Why waste breath and then since U can’t bring that amendment leagally may i suggest 2 ways.

    1 – Leave pak and enjoy secularism in west.
    2 – Try what they doing in Thailand

  • 5Rivers said:

    @razakhan

    CCI ( Council Of Islamic Ideology ) has not approved it. And I doubt if Mr. Ghamidi , head of CCI, will ever approve Taliban’s Sharia.

    You don’t leave your home just because bees erect hive in your verandah.

  • rasheed said:

    @razakhan,

    Just to clear any misconception, I am not pro-Sharia and I DO NOT believe in the versions of Islam by any current list of Mualanas, Muftis and/or Talibans.

    My personal belief is that western societies are more closer to the core principles of Quran and our different versions of Islam are far away from the Quranic principles.

    My solution is that we fix the corrupt police and slow judicial system in civilized cities in all over Pakistan, which would not be possible in less than 10 years.

    We should accept the Swat agreement as a tactic and work hard for setting an example for people of Swat and FATA, and then offer them something better before depriving them of what they want at this time.

    There is no other solution at this time.

  • razakhan said:

    @rasheed

    well thanks for calrifying now i dun need 2 respond to u since we will never agree:)

  • razakhan said:

    @5Rivers

    what a joke ghamdi who dun believe in sunnah as constitutional pillar is the head of Islamic ideology council. Need I say more Musharraf rooshan khayali. Same as rasheed no point arguing since we will never agree.

    BTW Islamic Council can only recommend to accept or not is Parliment responsibility as it should be, since they are the elected members, the council role is to advise and recommend and thats all and that should always be like this.

  • pak.nukes said:

    @who the h3ll is Ghamidi to impose his version of Islam?
    This was needed in Swat to stop the innocent killings and insurgency. What problems do people have with this?
    Doctrine of necessity should not be limited to the notorious decisions of the previous judiciary only.
    MQM is mad..Zardari has used and discarded them…they like to build their own 1-1/2 inch ki masjid to whine until their handlers give them a shut-up call.

  • justice4all said:

    @Admin,
    This picture of POOR PASHTOON is very dishonest and thankless of you,there should a talib there brandishing his ak 47.After all it was made possible by TALIBAN after giving GREAT SACRIFICES.Me,my children and their children are going to listen and live through this for the next say 50 years.
    Credit of NIZAM-E-ADAL regulation goes to taliban and not PASHTOONS.

  • Traffic said:

    lol ghamdi is a dirty ***. are we supposed to take our Islam from him now? baboos are dreaming if they think any true Muslim will follow ghamdi’s enlightened moderate fitnah.

  • nota said:

    @pak.nukes
    “@who the h3ll is Ghamidi to impose his version of Islam?”
    Exactly. And who gives a damn if CCI has approved it or not? What fvcking authority does Mr Ghamadi have? (@5R, Don’t take this to mean I am anti G but that statement that “CI hasn’t approved it” is preposterous. NO ONE is asking them for their approval)

    “This was needed in Swat to stop the innocent killings and insurgency. What problems do people have with this?”
    Is that question rhetorical? :-P

  • pak.nukes said:

    @Traffic
    Thats exactly what they want to do.
    Haven’t you seen how Ghamdi is being promoted on all channels?
    We do not need his interpretation of Islam/Quran. Allah has given us a book with complete guidance and HE has given us brains to understand/decide/follow what HE has conveyed to us.

  • justice4all said:

    @
    pak.nukes said:14 April 2009 at 5:25 am

    This was needed in Swat to stop the innocent killings and insurgency.
    Plus ANP wanted to stop its @$$ whipping by TALIBAN.

  • pak.nukes said:

    @nota
    Use your wildest imagination to interpret my question like Ghamdi. :)

  • rasheed said:

    @pak.nukes,

    MQM is going to use this opportunity to cash against ANP & Pathans in Karachi.

    MQM has already started to label ANP as supporters of Talibans and they will use this opportunity to maximum extent and Altaf Katta will continue shouting that ANP Talibaans are in Karachi and we need to kill them to make Karachi safer.

    Their ultimate dream would be to somehow create unrest in Karachi, followed by bloodshed where they will show themselves as victims. United Nations troops would arrive in Karachi for peacekeeping while Pakistan army is engaged elsewhere. With backing of India, UN would announce a new border and put Karachi & Hyderabad in a new country. Altaf Hussain will arrive back from London and become President or Prime Minister of this country.

  • pak.nukes said:

    @justice4all
    Today Zia-ul-Haq’s bud-rooh must be dancing in hell.

  • Traffic said:

    @ pak.nukes

    you’re right. ever since Moshe hijacked our country, these fifth columnists like ghamdi, taseer, RM, zardari etc. have infiltrated into seats of power and influence. ghamdi Islam ka bara dars deta hai, has he ever criticized the Lal Masjid and Jamia Hafsa massacre while he was enjoying his seat of head of CII(probably granted to him by Moshe)?

  • Adnan Arshad Mansoori said:

    Before Javaid Ch. in Kal-Tak yesterday Javaid Hashmi of PML(N) categorically said in America almost in every 3rd State different laws are prevailing which are totally different with each other these Americans whatever is Good for them to do Immediately but for Muslims they draw the lines & create hurdles just like that.

    Therefore Nizam e Adl if it is Good for our country we must adopt the same on spur of the same moment without wasting any single minute. Interestingly our Ruling Elite so called public demand leader(s) speak their language on the behalf of Americans.

  • pak.nukes said:

    @rasheed
    Altaf kaali mata has been whining about Taliban Hawa since long now. I dread the day their drones enter Sindh.
    @nota
    What is the next scene of Act-1?
    Who will emerge victorious, Caesar or Cassius?

  • razakhan said:

    @@rasheed

    Kaliya winning seats outside karrachi, not unless they fixing elections lol and even in karachi lets have fair elections and see how mqm fairs:p. MQM wnning seats in NWFP lol good joke:p

  • @tif said:

    every one has the right to live his own life,
    good decision……….

  • mumtazsh said:

    @Traffic and pak.nukes

    I think you guys haven’t heard much about Ghamidi sahib. Do try and watch the following programmes where he talks about democracy and Lal Masjid incident:

    http://tv-almawrid.org/vd/TV%20Pro%2035.wmv

    http://tv-almawrid.org/vd/Lal%20Masjid%20kay%20baad-Pakistan%20aur%20Alim-e-Islam.wmv

  • nota said:

    Two opposing views (I know which one the Baboos aggree with)
    Zardari makes his mark By Ansar Abbasi
    ISLAMABAD: The collective wisdom of the country’s prime public representative body — the National Assembly of Pakistan — has put its weight behind the Swat peace deal to save the people of the valley from ruthless killing and complete lawlessness, which has been the hallmark of this once the enchanting tourist resort of Pakistan.

    The parochial view of NGO types, liberal extremists and confused souls has been rejected by those, most of whom are known liberals, whether belonging to the Pakistan People’s Party, the Awami National Party and to some extent even the Pakistan Muslim League. They have definitely played their role of being public representatives and thus should be encouraged and praised. Going well beyond their personal philosophies, ideologies and political thinking, these members of the Parliament supported the peace deal, which in normal circumstances would not have been acceptable to most of them. Their priority was to secure the people of Swat from being pushed back to the pre-Feb 16 situation when innocent people were beheaded, butchered, looted, harassed and even flogged at the whims of a group of armed individuals….

    An open letter to Gen Kayani by
    Col (r) Harish Puri of the Indian Army
    [I won't quote anything here because it is worth a read. It is insult after insult laid on the Army and am surprised The News printed it. Certainly an excellent example of how not to make an argument.]

    So what do you say, Baboos?

  • pak.nukes said:

    @razakhan
    Anything can happen in Pakistan. MQM may become Pakistan’s biggest political party from a terrorist group. Bas mai baap ki inayaat ki zaroorat hai.

  • pak.nukes said:

    @nota
    What is this bakwaas ‘open letter to Kiyani’.
    How could ‘the news’ publish it?
    It is very unfortunate that our army chief is being told what to do and what consequences could we face.
    Harish Puri thank you and get lost.

  • nota said:

    @pak.nukes
    Don’t forget the bakwasi’s email is given at the end:
    hbpuri@hotmail.com
    :)

  • pak.nukes said:

    @nota
    I have already started working on that….Plz copy me whatever you send him.

  • Patriot said:

    @ All….

    Please, enlighten me…. where the hell does it says that the power will go to Talibans????????

    Show me the NAME of f**kin Taliban in this whole document………… I challenge you.

    It says, the Qazi shall be a judicial officer having completed a course in Shariah… so basically a “judge” with an additional course in Quran, Hadith, Ijma’ and Qiyas. They will not be some “maulvis” as expected by some people here.

    The interpretation of Quran and Hadith will be done in accordance with the sect of the Muslims involved in the case.

    The courts will be setup by the GOVERNMENT … I dunno how this is read as Taliban…

    According to peace deal, Taliban are to surrender power…. whether they will do or not is a seperate debate but there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG with this Regulation and the peace deal.

    Besides, there IS already a Shariat court operational in Pakistan. As far as this regulation is concerned, the only new thing is the time constraints and provision of sul’h. I dont think there is any problem with that.

  • Traffic said:

    @ nota

    Ah the Indian colonel speaks the same language of our baboos. It is laughable to read him saying that India cares about some imaginary Swati girl being flogged while these b*st*rds are the ones funding terrorism in Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. The similarity between his arguments and those of baboos and NGO’s is so great that its not even funny.

  • razakhan said:

    @nota and Pak.nukes

    Our problem is that our so called danishwars and media personalities are so enamoroed with indian media and so called intellectuals, Pak media (read geo hamid mir specially) keep giving indian writers and intellectuals space and they use it to spout their ideology. REemeber the great debate geo sponsored wasnt even shown in India, this friendship with India is an illusions. India is out enemy #1. To give u an idea, when gandhi started politics in India he has already made his name in SA, so Quaid-e-azam gave a dinner in his honor at his residence. Addressing the dinner Gandhi said (dun remember exact words) A Mohammadan has honored me, to which quaid replied we are indian not mohammadan (that was when Quaid was in congress and was a fervent indian nationalist). Then when Allama Iqbal proposed the idea of Pakistan, Gandhi said creation of Pak is like tearing up Gao mata. Now we all know gao mata is sacred to hindus and u can look at mindset of Gandhi the so called secular Indian. We have to stop living this illusion, of India-pak freindship. Once again am not calling for perpetual war and would like to see noramlize relationships but we must remember India dun accept Pak and will do nething to harm us, WE have to stop this nonsense of letting Indian use Pak media until unless the reciprocate.

  • pak.nukes said:

    @Traffic
    Yes and I am surprised that people haven’t already started supporting this bl@@dy Indian guy in this forum.
    Indians care for Pakistanis….joke of the century.

  • SnrCtzn said:

    @ All.
    The ‘treatment’ to be given to the ‘fence-sitters’ like MOM is that Sharai h should be implemented immediately in whole of Sindh, INCLUDING Karachi. Only then it will be ‘killing of two birds with one stone’ i.e; erasing of : 1. crimes/criminals 2. MQM, the thug mafia.

    @ shandana. I am sorry to inform you that MQM is certainly a ‘thug mafia.’ Ask any non-MQM Karachite & he/she will explain to you the details.

    @ shimatoree/others.
    If the majority of residents/dwellers are in it’s favor, THEN THATS IT !

    @ rasheed. Do you call police of Pakistan as ‘civilised’? No sir,not possible.

    @ Traffic/pak.nukes. Ghamdi is a product of Mush regime. Day after day, he sounds more like a Qadiyani. Dont you agree?

    @ All.
    1. It is again my REPEATED request, to all here that let us NOT, (i.e; the members of/on this forum) get personal against each other. If we so desire to discuss a topic, then let us do so in a mature manner, while staying within the bounds of decorum, propriety in, manners & conduct.
    2. Getting personal with each other breeds animosity & acrimony. Everybody get nasty in return, but let us not wash our ‘dirty (Pakistani) linen’ in full view of the world’s public.
    2. Apart from it’s browsing by Pakistanis within & outside Pakistan, I feel this website, i.e; PkPolitics is also read by each & everyone the world-over. So let us also not make us Pakistanis, a laughing stock in the world. Otherwise people from other nationalities will treat us with contempt & ridicule, that it deserves.
    3. With the poor conduct abroad of/by SOME of our un-educated classes,we Pakistanis, generally & as a whole, are known to be derided/bemocked with contemptuous laughter, especially by the educated classes of the West.
    4. So much so that I still remember Peter Sellers mocking the spoken English of the natives of our Indian sub-continent in one of his films, the ‘Pink Panther.’
    7. If anybody wishes to disagree with what I have elaborated as above, he/she is welcome to state so; BUT SHOULD PLEASE DO SO WITH PROPRIETY IN MANNERS & CONDUCT.
    8. Some of our visitors in the past have tried to be ‘nasty’ against me, & for NO RHYME OR REASON, WHAT-So-EVER. I tried my best to complian about the matter to Admin PkPoliticks, with a request to them to caution such visitors to abide by their own (PkPolitic’s) Do’s & DONT’s.
    9. After I found out that my requests to pkpolitics fell on their ‘deaf ears’ then I had no other recourse than ‘TO PAY’ THOSE FALLIBLE GUYS ‘BACK IN THE SAME COIN’ that they deserved.
    10. I only hope somebody does not try it again, or otherwise DOES NOT COMPEL ME TO RESPOND in the same manner?

  • pakcitizen said:

    History will no doubt record this day as a dark one…when the Pakistani state surrendered to a handful of illiterate barbarians. In any case, I wish the people of Swat well, and pray for their safety. This will serve to embolden the Taliban, their territory will continue to grow, and writ of the state will continue to recede.

    On the positive side, at least a small portion of Pakistan is now officially Dar-al-Islam, whereas the rest of us devil worshippers, are clearly residing in Dar-al-Harb. But worry not friends, soon the saintly sufis and fiery Fazlullahs will come to us, bringing with them, our salvation.

    I leave you with a simple thought. Granted that it is pathetic to be America’s bit**, I wonder how being Fazlullah’s bi*** is any different?

  • razakhan said:

    @SnrCtzn

    surprise surprise I think the 1st time I agree with all ur points – see the benefits of sharia nizaam we all agreeing lol

  • nota said:

    @pakcitizen
    Since you can’t think beyond being someone’s bitch, let me make a simple suggestion:
    Be whosoever’s b!tch you want to be. Hell, you can even be Col(r) Puri’s if you so desire. ;-)

  • pakcitizen said:

    @nota
    How about I make you my b!tch…I’ll treat you nice, that’s a promise

  • urazzaq12 said:

    Good…

    Atlast something good comes out of the parliament and some good news for the people of Malakand division especially for swat.
    Now “Maghrib Zada” people must be having nightmares. Go hide the shariah is gonna get you.

  • razakhan said:

    lets get back to the topic.

    God have mercy on us he has given us one more chance are we smart enuff to grab it. By comparision to rest of Pak malakand division is small. Lets use this oppurtunity to achieve peace and prosperity the FALAH that Quran commands us not the FALAH of west.

    1 – We can be smart and honest and use sharia system and expand it in malakand division, lets appoint God feearing qazi (in english a qazi is called a judge :p), we will stumble but lets make it a true islamic part in the image of quran and sunnah. Use the occassion to route out psuedomullah’s extremist who use the name of religion for thier own ways. Use the justice and Islamic sharia to bring order in the area and then use that model which once perfected to slowly implement in res of Pakistan.

    2 – Economic development of the area, education are to be made 1st priority in that area. The ppl have suffered a lot and should be compensated for that. Take away the reason for extremism make so call Talibaan understand they wanteed sharia and what sharia demands from them.

    Most imp be patient and keep vigil on govt who under pressure might try to sabotage this deal. There are already forces working to destroy the deal, they are open enemies and those who use Islam’s name to achieve thier goals and devieve us. Be watchful and resist any outside influence. Thats why I suggeested that Govt should use the likes of maulana rafiuddin usmani, taqi usmani dr. israr to flood the area and use them to deny those who claims 2 be muslim yet distort Islam. ALLAH bless us all and guide us to the righteous path.

    Above all donot let any liberals in the area:p

  • nota said:

    @pakcitizen
    “I leave you with a simple thought. Granted that it is pathetic to be America’s bit**, I wonder how being Fazlullah’s bi*** is any different?”

    Ooh — just the pathetic response I expected. But you forgot: being someone’s bitch is your aim in life. Remember? :-P
    (G@ndu, tu kisi ko kiay bitch banaay ga? Bhool giya apni asliat?)

  • democrate said:

    indians cared for muslims for centuries.even todays muslims are ruling in india.just think who is shaw rukh ,dr,kalam,sania mirza.i can give a long list these muslims are as popular among hindues as in muslims.we muslims has to change our mantality.

  • urazzaq12 said:

    http://www.jang.net/jm/4-14-2009/pic.asp?picname=31.gif

    May God bless the people of Swat.

    And Swati’s don’t worry, I know there are too many liberals, and not enough circuses, but we sure will find a way to keep em busy.

  • democrate said:

    iran supports terror groups in balochastan not india.in history more wars are bettween muslims than with non muslims.

  • urazzaq12 said:

    @ democrate

    haha, man I like your jokes.

    http://thecurrentaffairs.com/index.php/muslims-of-india-sachar-commission-report-2006/

  • zahidbinmustafa said:

    @SnrCtzn said:
    “@ Traffic/pak.nukes. Ghamdi is a product of Mush regime. Day after day, he sounds more like a Qadiyani. Dont you agree?

    I second to you regarding “Ghamdi is a product of Mush’s rigime. “Though I don’t like Ghamdi because of his flip-flop personality, being consider himself “Mujtahid e Fee zamana” and present Islam with “tarkaaa” of “Mush’s enlighten moderation” but i think “qadiani” is not suitable word to label him.
    anyhows, your analysis sum up all points of entire discussion and I appreciate it.

  • pakcitizen said:

    @nota
    LOL…tu nay to rona shuru kar diya hai…LOL!

  • pakcitizen said:

    Ghamdi is actually very good…indeed an enlightened progressive scholar…

    As far as being a product of Mush’s regime, the free media was also a product of Mush’s regime, doesn’t mean it was a bad thing…

    Some things just surface because their time has come, and they coincide with adverse prevailing conditions (like Mush’s regime), but we must be careful not to read too much into those coincidences and accept a good thing for what it is.

  • urazzaq12 said:

    The parochial view of NGO types, liberal extremists and confused souls has been rejected by those, most of whom are known liberals, whether belonging to the Pakistan People’s Party, the Awami National Party and to some extent even the Pakistan Muslim League. They have definitely played their role of being public representatives and thus should be encouraged and praised.

    http://thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=21502

  • pakcitizen said:

    Ayaz Amir, a liberal intellectual and columnist, was the only parliamentarian to shout, “This agreement was signed under the shadow of guns and most importantly the guns of Taliban had turned out to be more powerful than the guns of our Pakistan Army.”

    It was crystal clear that the serious threats of Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan, carried by all the morning newspapers on their front pages, were very much on the minds of all the scared looking parliamentarians. So except for those in favour of the deal, no one from the Punjab or Sindh spoke out.

    Salute to Ayaz Amir!

    http://thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=21505

  • jamil said:

    “democrate said:

    indians cared for muslims for centuries.even todays muslims are ruling in india.just think who is shaw rukh ,dr,kalam,sania mirza.i can give a long list these muslims are as popular among hindues as in muslims.we muslims has to change our mantality.

    WTF, democrate have you ever talked to a ordinary indian Muslims? I have had interaction with more than a dozen and every one of them said that muslims are completely marginalize by hindus.
    Atleast think before writing bu11sh1t.

  • nota said:

    @jamil

    It’s not just ordinary muslims…see how those “ruling muslims” fare

    I know @dem and @pakcitizen will scream this is a lie and that they love us there…. ;-)

  • nota said:

    @urazzaq12
    “The parochial view of NGO types, liberal extremists and confused souls has been rejected”

    And did you catch the other one?

  • pak.nukes said:

    @jamil
    democrate is a declared pagal like his demented leader so don’t waste time on him/her.

  • jamil said:

    “An open letter to Gen Kayani by
    Col puri”

    Why The News printed this crap? There can be no justification of printing this load of sh1t.
    Call mushi back so he can kick their ar5e once aagin :P

  • razakhan said:

    @pakcitizen

    Ghamdi views r not new they been there 4 centuries and have been rejected by majorityof muslims. Dude use some brain and read Islamic thoelogical history and different scholors and thier point of view. Ghamdi is old wine in new bottle just being pushed down on masses by the same liberal elites who thought Mushy was the elightened one and Barak Obama is the messiah. Next u gonna say u agree with democrate that India cares abt muslims, wait a minute i might be wrong but wasn’t that you who said in other posts usa wanteed to help veitnamese but they didn’t appreciate and threw usa out? if u agree with that why am wasting my time lol

  • jamil said:

    @nota
    send @dem and @pakcitizen to Gujrat for sight seeing, they are waiting for them, lovely weather I heard :D

    Oooh elections are near aswell time for another muslim massacre?

  • pakcitizen said:

    @razakhan
    Nope, I didn’t say anything about US-Vietnam in any post. Seem to be mistaken

    @jamil @nota
    I’m not sure how I got dragged into this Indians love Muslims thingy…I smell a nota :)

    And since unlike nota, I don’t live under a rock, and don’t need to google everything to make a point, I too have Indian Muslim colleagues, and I second what jamil says. They are indeed outnumbered, overwhelmed and highly marginalized.

  • supercreature said:

    @Admin PKPolitics

    I am not sure why my comments has been moderated and removed from this thread that I posted 2 hours ago. I didnt posted any offensive language or inflamatery comments.

  • Shirkuh said:

    @Patriot

    ” I dunno how this is read as Taliban…”

    That’s because the disgraceful baboo tola WANT to.

  • supercreature said:

    The big risk behind this deal is there is no gaurantee that Talibs will put down their weapons. There is no gaurantee that they will not infeltrate to other areas and will not blackmail at gun point again and again.
    I bet you guys talibs will not infeltrate to other areas like they did in Bunair and will carry on and on. They will keep on pressing government by saying we will break the peace deal if yu will stop us. I am supporter of talks and deals. I am just worried that there is no win-win for government at other end, where talibs will not do what they need to do now. “Layoffs weapons, let the security (police, rangers, army)” take control. Do no spread in other areas like they are doing.

  • Awaam said:

    Now everybody should pray for peace as well. This Nizam Adl was being sold as the last condition for end of bloodshed. Still doubt the intentions of Zardari and Rehman Malik.

  • razakhan said:

    @supercreature

    and ur right, but as I mentioned b4 in my above post, Govt should use the brains and use same sharia law to mariginalize talibaan by showing what true sharia law can do. But Like other ppl have mentiiooned I fear govt serving usa inetrests will find a way to break the deal and then blame it on talibaan. I have np as long as they do it wisely unlike all the last times and in the end talibaan gets stronger cuz they turn around and say see we were ready but govt keep breaking thier promise. So key is use brain.

  • urazzaq12 said:

    @ supercreature

    If the talibans don’t abide by peace agreement, the government can anytime disown the agreement and start a army operation against them. And then the people of swat will also stand by the army.

  • abuzarghafari said:

    HI TO ALL
    WHATS WRONG WITH SHARIAH LAW AND WITH U GUYS OPPOSING IT? THERE IS A UCOURT IN ISLAMABAD. WOULD U PEOPLE LIK TO PROTEST IN FRONT OF IT?? I THIK ITS GOOD . WE ARE WITH SHARIAH LAW BUT THE WAY THEY IM[OSED IT IN SWAT THRU PRESSURE I OPPOSE IT. BUT THERE WAS NON E OTHER WAY TO STOP INNOCENT KILLINGS. I CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHY OUR ARMY FAILED THERE IN SWAT?? WHY OUR GOVT IS WEAK?? I CANT BELIEV ON THIS MYTH THAT TALIBAN HAVE TAKEN CONTROL OVER THERE. ITS VERY EASY TO STOP THEM, WITHOUT KIILING INNOCENTS IN SWAT. WE HAVE MI, ISI, FIA ETC. WHAT ARE THEY DOING?? IF OUR ISI CAN BREAK USSR OR CAN CREATE INSURGENCY IN KASHMIR. WHY CANNOT THEY PULL OUT TALIBANS FROM SWAT?? WE CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT THE REAL GAME IS. WE ALL PAKISTANIS CAN UNDRSTAND WELL. AGAGIN ARMY AND CIVIL GOVT IS CREATING SITUATION LIK 1971. AND WE HERE BUSY IN WRITING LONG USELESS POSTS

  • abuzarghafari said:

    SORRY ITS SHARIAH LAW COURT IN ISLAMABAD

  • nota said:

    Who needs Indian press when you’ve got (Baboos’ Guru) Sethi/DailyTimes ;-)
    Editorial: Getting parliament to endorse Swat laws
    “…The warlord son-in-law of Sufi Muhammad is not only swelling the ranks of his army, he is also putting together an economic base for his satrapy that will serve as the future backbone of the Taliban invasion of the NWFP. He has taken control of the Mingora emerald industry and will soon be in the international market selling precious stones….”

    Taliban recruiting anew in Swat
    …“As long as we were there enforcing peace, they were not recruiting,” Rizwanullah Farooq, son of Sufi Muhammad, told Bloomberg on Monday. “Now recruitment is going on even in Buner because they don’t see a chance for peace. The government must understand this….

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan @urazzaq12
    The solution is not by breaking the peace deals, the solution is to abide the deals from both ends. I am a big critic of the PPP govt, but if Govt has shown good gesture now talibs need to do similar things.

    Beside that no one should be allowed to force by gun their own version of islam. If peace deal is chalked out to stop the bloodshed and spreading of talibs there and then then talibs should not dare to spread in other areas and do the same like in swat. If they will do it, it will show every one their intentions …

    EU has many countries and they implement Europe wide laws, but by referendum. if Talibs want to enforce sharia in other areas, they MUST let alone those areas, should NOT make then hostage and just ask the government to held referendum in those area’s. They they want well enough if not still should be well enough for them.

  • jamil said:

    @pakcitizen
    yeah blame nota, i was just following his lead. Just read my earlier post dont now why you end up in it. must be nota .. lolzzz

  • urazzaq12 said:

    @ nota

    That puri’s letter is not worth the read..

    He’s just urging the army to kill their people, and repeat the mistakes that happened in East Pakistan.

    What he was actually trying to say is:

    “The New York Times predicts that Pakistan will collapse in six months.” Do you want to go down in history as the man who acted against their objectives? So just abide by their rules and kill your own d@mn people.

    If that Puri had a bit of sincerity in him he should have pointed out that Raw is funding Baloch liberation movements, so find the agents and bl0w there heads off.

    Anyways I don’t think except a handful of baboos, there is anyone else who agrees with that halwa puri.

  • Shirkuh said:

    @pakcitizen

    “and don’t need to google everything to make a point, “

    Off course not, “Oracles” don’t need Google :-)

  • nota said:

    @pakcitizen
    ““and don’t need to google everything to make a point, “

    Ah, at least you admit I made my point :-P

  • zahidbinmustafa said:

    @democrate said:
    “indians cared for muslims for centuries.even todays muslims are ruling in india.just think who is shaw rukh ,dr,kalam,sania mirza.i can give a long list these muslims are as popular among hindues as in muslims.we muslims has to change our mantality.”

    Are you in “sleeping mode”? WTF
    Read “Sachar report on Muslims” , how the poor condition is of Muslims!!!!
    http://www.milligazette.com/dailyupdate/2006/200612141_Sachar_Report_Status_Indian_Muslims.htm
    AND
    BBC Urdu published it today!!!
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/india/2009/04/090413_azamgarh_votes.shtml
    Further
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/india/2009/04/090413_raigarh_elections.shtml

    come out from dreams and face the reality rather to watch Shah Rukh, Amir , Salman and Frhan’s movies and portraiting “shanti hi shanti” about muslims in india

  • kashif5095 said:

    Malakand is a region in the North West Frontier Province of Pakistan. Named after Malakand Agency, a part of this region, it covers one third of the total area of the province.The area of Malakand Region is 29,872 sq. Km and its population is 5.52 million. The region is further divided into Chitral, Dir upper,Dir Lower, Swat, Buner, Shangla Districts and Malakand Agency. Although the bill of Islamic Law (Sharia) for Malakand division in Pakistan was passed almost unanimously by the parlimant, there were few voices against it: “This agreement was signed under the shadow of guns and most importantly the guns of Taliban had turned out to be more powerful than the guns of our Pakistan Army.”

    In addition to issue of imposing the law at gunpoint, there are concerns about the very nature of laws itself blamed for brutality and violations of basic human rights. But there is an alternate view as well (.) Further for West, it means providing help to militants in the region which would not be inline with war against terror. . Implementing law in one region of the country can escalate the demand for implementing it in other regions which can result in complete takeover of Islamists in the country with dozens of nuclear weapons. West recently started blaming Pakistan Army and ISI for purposefully remaining silent against Islamic extremists. In fact they blame army to support these factions. “The risk of an Islamist takeover in Pakistan is a myth invented by the Pakistani military to consolidate its hold on power. In fact, religious political parties and militant organizations are manipulated by the Pakistani Army to achieve its own objectives, domestically and abroad. The army, not the Islamists, is the real source of insecurity on the subcontinent. Sustainable security and stability in the region will be achieved only through the restoration of democracy in Pakistan. The West should actively promote the demilitarization of Pakistan’s political life through a mix of political pressure and capacity building. Enlarging the pool of elites and creating alternative centers of power will be essential for developing a working democracy in Pakistan.” .

    Being a Muslim and Paksitani, I seek answers to the following questions.

    1. Is Islamic law really horrific? What makes it unacceptable to the West? Are they afraid of potential of an alternate system?
    2. Is Talibnization of Pakistan possible? Does majority of people of Pakistan support Islamic Law in its current form? Does majority of people of Pakistan support Talibnization of Pakistan?
    3. What is wrong with accepting the will of people of a region?
    4. Does not Pakistan has right to safeguard its own interests i.e. neutralizing the insurgency in a region by accepting demands of its majority?
    5. What is war against terrorism?
    6. What is the importance of Pakistan’s nuclear assets and Pakistan Army in the whole scenario?
    7. What is the role of India, Iran and Russia as common stakeholders in the region along with USA?
    8. What is the policy of China?
    9. What should be the policy of Pakistan in current circumstances?
    10. What is the future of Pakistan? Are we able to survive internal and external issues we are facing?

    Being an active community with diverse point of views, I seek your participation to answers these questions. Maybe we can compile it and float it on the Web.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    Taleban ‘kill love affair couple’ :
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7997749.stm


    …”Three Taleban mullahs brought them to the local mosque and they passed a fatwa (religious decree) that they must be killed. They were shot and killed in front of the mosque in public,” the governor said. …

    Now this may be the Governor’s side of the story but if this is true then this is how judgements will be made in Swat as well.

    In the context of the Nizam-e-Adl, the question that what will be the qualification of the Qazis of the Qazi courts? We all know that we have not produced any scholars of Islam but Mullahs whose view are extremely narrowed and therefore, can not be trusted to interpret Shariah.

  • gv said:

    @abuzarghafari

    The problem with ‘Shariah’ law is that the muslim community is fragmented into a many sects/schools/subsects etc etc who do NOT agree on a single interpretation of Shariah.

    Therefore imposition of shariah law in this case, will pander to the the whims and interpretations of the dominant political force which happens to belong to a fairly rigid, orthodox and inflexible school (i.e. wahabi) which many other muslims may not agree with.

    anytime ’shariah’ has been implemented in the past it has benefited one group,sect,school over another – which logically implies it is not a universally applicable legal system.

    @ NOTA and the incoherence of incoherence

    dude!!!!!!! once upon a time you were easily the most rational commentator on this site…. what happened??? you seem so focused on tripping up the ‘babu’s’ that you’re losing the plot here…

    our country is on the verge of imploding and you’re too busy point scoring instead of using your (considerable) writing ability to get people to focus on the real issues at hand…

  • razakhan said:

    @Amir Hameed

    and we should trust ur interpretation of Islam? U claim we haven’t produced any scholors? fine prove it?I can name u scholors after scholors produced by Pak, did u know banori town fatwa is considered even in Jamea azhar and in Saudia? Did u know the work done btween Iranian scholors and Pakistani scholors? Do u know Justice Taqi Usmani? Muftee muneeb? Have u heard of dr. Israr Ahmed?

    Plz dun give false info. Pakistan has produced eminent schoolors in Islamic teachings. Maulana Muadudi’s deenyaat is consider a text book on Islam and is taught all over the world.

  • razakhan said:

    fauzia wahab on In session, sadar sahib nahi chahtey thai ke akailey boojh uthain (translation main sab ko phansana chahta tha) wat a brave prez we have lol

  • urazzaq12 said:

    @ razakhan

    I agree with your post, but the example’s you quoted are not so good.

    Dr. Israr ahmed was recently banned on Qtv and you might be aware why it was done. And everyone is aware of Maulana Maudoodi’s comments about Prophet Muhammad(pbuh).

    But even then scholars from all schools of thought must be respected, but when they give twisted interpretations of Islam, this act should be condemned.

    Anyways Mufti Muneeb was a good example.

    @ Amir Hameed

    “We all know that we have not produced any scholars of Islam but Mullahs whose view are extremely narrowed”

    You couldn’t be more wrong…

    I know Saudi Arabia is pumping money into Pakistan, to promote their interpretation of Islam, but majority of Pakistani’s have not bought it.

  • urazzaq12 said:

    @ razakhan

    Did you catch the “Mubahisa” :p between hamid mir and Saeed ahmed jalalpuri in jang…

  • razakhan said:

    @urazzaq12

    I dun know what objection u have on Maulana Maududi or dr. Israr, dun know what is QTV and its thier loss if they banned Dr. Israr. Once again if Ghamdi and liaqut amir can be on tv and not Dr. Israr is not we r ourselves to be blame.
    If u talking abt the book fitna-e-mauduiyaat, i have read it and I can assure u that it was taken wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy out of context.

    regarding Hamid Mir adn his mubahisa they all missing the point of contention by most uleman, including eminent quranic scholor, 1st prez of India abulkalam azad, that obtaining a country dun neccessarily means Islamic state. The points raised by ulema n what they said will happen has happened in Pak, so history stands corrected that they were right. With all thier reservations and objections they supported Muslim League becausse of personality and character of Quaid-e-azam, the same mullahs supported Mohaterima fatima ali jinnah for president against Ayub. It was the character of quaid and mohaterima fatima ali jinnah that amde them follow. Another point of contention was what quaid called meri jaib ke khotey sikkey.
    Anyho thats a different debate but I suggest u read up the objections against Pak, and I confidently ask anyone to show even one thing that hasnt come true in today’s pakistan.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @razakhan said:

    …and we should trust ur interpretation of Islam?…

    What do you know about my interpretion of Islam? but you are willing to give fatwa on my believes. bravo!


    …U claim we haven’t produced any scholors? fine prove it?I can name u scholors after scholors produced by Pak, did u know banori town fatwa is considered even in Jamea azhar and in Saudia? Did u know the work done btween Iranian scholors and Pakistani scholors? Do u know Justice Taqi Usmani? Muftee muneeb? Have u heard of dr. Israr Ahmed?…

    Okay, so in a nation of 160 million people and in the last 60 years, we have successfully produced a handful of scholars!! wow, now that is an achievement that we should be proud of, especially considering that we are an Islamic Republic. As for Dr. Israr, I grew up listening to him and I always admired him for his knowledge and style of speech. But, when Imran Khan was getting married to Jamima, he gave a statement that how it was a Jews conspriacy and all that BS and for me, he lost the respect that I had for him because his hatred or prejudice clouted his judgement.

    Plz dun give false info. Pakistan has produced eminent schoolors in Islamic teachings. Maulana Muadudi’s deenyaat is consider a text book on Islam and is taught all over the world.

    You jumped the gun before reading my question, so read it again and give your opinion:
    –…In the context of the Nizam-e-Adl, the question that what will be the qualification of the Qazis of the Qazi courts?…

    I was asking for the qualifications of the Qazis who will be running the Shariat courts and if you believe that the Talibans way of life is Shriah then I rest my case because there is nothing to argue here.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @urazzaq12 said:

    …You couldn’t be more wrong…

    I am open to your comments and criticism and listening if you have a point to make.


    I know Saudi Arabia is pumping money into Pakistan, to promote their interpretation of Islam, but majority of Pakistani’s have not bought it.

    I hate the Saudies, primarily because I believe that even though they hate the US but they do not have the balls to stand up to it and that they always use our shoulder to fire the guns. I agree with you that they have been pouring all the money into the country for a long time to promote their view but I have no regards for them.

  • razakhan said:

    @Amir Hameed

    I just gave u some name there are many more scholors, so ur argument is mute.

    Regarding what Dr. Israr said abt Imran and Jamaima is his personal opinion I dun have to agree with it. I dun agree with some of his explanations and some of his ideas dun mean his knowledge is any less he is still more knowledgeable then me., I wil just follow some other interpretation. U just pissed cuz he said something abt IK, what IK is Obama :the messiah” that noone cna said nething abt him? lol thats just show ur maturity.

    To be qazi u dun need to be scholor of law, most cases they will be dealing are common sense cases, not some constitutional interpretation, as long as they not corrupt all well and good. Its the basic premise of judicial system, common sense is required for regular cases, the Islamic law in casses of zina, murder, inheritance is crystal clear, if they follow common sense rule of evidence then whats the problem. Surely they can’t do worst then last 60 yrs of Pak supreme court judges who gave us such wonderful gifts as nazarya-e-zarooriiyat:p

    I have never given a fatwa I asked u qts if u can’t udnerstand that difference when there is a qts mark at the end of sentence I guess nothng to argue:p

  • jazoo said:

    A scholar who can not provoke your thought, is not a scholar.
    Dr. Israr perhaps need another 40 years to bring results
    The parroting is not the scholarship, it needs conviction & thought provoking philosophy.

    Molana Maududi in a sense was a scholar, even without bringing results, at least he was thought provoking, he was among first few including Hasan Bana who interperet Deen in Quran in its true spirit

    As we do not know much about our unsung hero Raja Sahib Mehmoodabad,we also do not know much about our another unsung hero Dr.Kalim Siddiqui, a true scholar.
    Daily Guardian was honored to have an association with him.

    Kalim Siddiqui was born in British India on September 15, 1931. His family were small land-owners in the United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh), but his father worked as a sub-inspector of police. He first became politically aware and active as a teenager at boarding school in Faizabad in 1944-45. At this time, he became a student activist of the Muslim League during the Pakistan movement.

    The Islamic symbolism the Muslim League used to mobilise the Muslim masses of India was one of the major attractions to him. He had received a six-volume set of Seerat-un Nabi by Shibly Nomani and Sayyid Sulaiman Nadwi as a gift from a teacher when he was 12, and considered the life and example of the Prophet as his inspiration from that time onwards.

    He moved to Karachi in 1948, a few months after the partition of British India and the establishment of Pakistan. There his political maturity grew and he realized that the new State was little more Islamic than British India had been. As a student, he was active in a Khilafat Group dedicated to establishing khilafah in Pakistan, and founded and edited a popular political newspaper The Independent Leader.

    http://www.israhaber.com/dr-kalim-siddiqui-607-news.html

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @razakhan said:


    …U just pissed cuz he said something abt IK, what IK is Obama :the messiah” that noone cna said nething abt him?…

    What gave you the impression that I got pissed at Israr because he said something about IK? I was disappointed because his comments were illogical and clout his gudgement.


    …Its the basic premise of judicial system, common sense is required for regular cases, the Islamic law in casses of zina, murder, inheritance is crystal clear, if they follow common sense rule of evidence then whats the problem….

    The problem is that common sense is not used and has never been used and Mullah-ism is used instead. Do you think that if a boy and a girl want to get married against the wishes of their families then they should be gunned down becaus they “humiliated Islam”? If this is common sense then I don’t know what you call non-sense.

  • razakhan said:

    @jazoo

    Raja sahib gave everything 4 pak and he couldn;t even spend his last days in pak, he lived in londo, shame on us, for treating our true heroes like this while the likes of gormani enjoyed miinisterships :( didnt read kalim siddiqi will try getting his material so read must be thought very highly as two great scholors of Islam thought so high of him i.e allama shibli naumani and syed nidvi.

    @ Amir Hameed

    my answer to u is this

    javad jahilaan bashad khamoshi

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @razakhan,

    …javad jahilaan bashad khamoshi….

    Yeah right, I expected this from you because you had no “logical” answers.

  • supercreature said:

    After watching Live with Talat yesterday I got a clear impression that peace and stop of bloodshed now will come, why becuase these talibs will stop the bloodshed of hostage swati’s …. they will not give up arms and now start taking hostages to other places and do the same game …

  • nota said:

    @Amir Hameed
    “Taleban ‘kill love affair couple’ ”

    I saw this earlier in the day but did not post it but I knew it would make it’s way here. Was just curious as to how long it takes and who posts it.

    1. I would like to point out clearly that this happened in Afghanistan (and not Swat).
    2. Even if there were no Taliban, I doubt the outcome would have been different being where they were. Let us not enforce our morality/customs on these people. What would have been the punishment for the “crime” of “An unmarried young boy and an unmarried girl who loved each other and wanted to get married had eloped because their families would not approve the marriage” ? I know where I come from, some family members would probably killed them, fatwa or no fatwa, and without being under Taliban rule.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @nota,

    …Let us not enforce our morality/customs on these people….

    This is not about imposing our morality on the Swaties. Remember, there was an event a few months ago when a few girls were buried alive. Why was there a hue and cry; may be based on their custom, it was a justifiable act. Do you believe that the public flogging of the young girl (assume for a moment that the video was not fake) was an “Islamic” act?

    My problem is that these people puts a label of “Islam” on every illogical act that they commit.

  • vampire cLutch said:

    This is a good sign, apparently, our parliament has finally stood up & taken a decision which is anti-US. Though they had been arm-twisted by the Taliz and made to pass the bill :P but still..

    Deep down somewhere, i smell some consipracy. The way zardari threw the ball @ parliament & the way Kiyani has kept silent & been visiting Saudi king & NS disappearing from the scene as if he is out of town..all this seems to be a part of a bigger conspiracy in future.

    I wonder what these guys are doing in U.A.E .. asfand yar wali, NS, Kiyani, & zardari is also reported to drop in.??

    Are they preparing some sort of ground for future actions of U.S / India in this malakand division/ swat area ? Are they all key players or say ‘MOHRAY’ ?

    Setting up the scene for U.S to step in say .. 8 to 10 months down the lane by giving us some shitty excuse?

    I say.. if U.S sends one more drone to attack us.. pak army should respond ?

  • SnrCtzn said:

    @ razakhan/z.b mustafa.
    Thnx for your comments. It is nice to know that you both had time to understand my line of argument. I presume that’s what happens when we think & pay attention cool y & consider each others points of view in condescending manner.

  • mumtazsh said:

    I don’t see how people got the impression that Ghamidi sahib is somehow linked to Musharraf. In fact, during Mush’s time, he was one of his strongest critics, he even labeled his coup as high treason and ‘Gunah-e-Kabeera’ and thinks he should be tried under Article 6. Note that this is what he said during Mush’s time, at the peak of his power.

    People here should really take a look at the following video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAP9DM8VTGc

  • Shaz said:

    All credit goes to ANP only!

  • rajaahmad said:

    its good to c finally our parliment did according to wish of swatis , thats good sign ,every

    thing should b in parliment, people who r against this try to understand what is happening

    in swat, if westerns gov can give rights of muslims in their country (even there is

    hypocracy exists) why not peolple in pakistan have thier say, So thats what people in

    swat wants, good luck , In democracy people power is every thing , i personally dont like

    ZPP but Zardari done good work by listening people of swat.

  • iamsowise said:

    Are we going back to 7th century?

  • abuzarghafari said:

    @gv

    I DO AGREE A BIT WITH U. IN PAST MUSLIMS DID THIS TO THEMSELVES, BUT CANT U SEE JEWS CHRISTIANS AND FOLLOWERS OF OTHER RELIGION TOO DID THE SAME PRACTICE. WE KNOW WE NEED IJTEHAD. WE NEED MORE SCHOLARS LIK DR ZAHEER AHMED AND GHAMIDI. WE HAVE TO OPEN OUR MINDS . I THINK ITS A LONG DEBATE WHAT IS SHARIAH LAW?? BUT RIGHT NOW WE HAVE TO BEND A BIT IN FRONT OF TALIBANDS. WHICH IS WRONG WE ALL KNOW, BUT OUR ARMY N GOVT IS NOT TAKING SERIOUS THIS PROBLEM THATS WHY THEY ARE GETTING WORSE. NO BODY REPLIED ME .WHAY OUR ARMY N GOVT IS NOT HANDLING THEM WITH FORCE N OTHER TACTICS?? WHAT IS THE TRUE REASON BEHIND ALL THIS??

  • Kashif said:

    I am glad Zardari took parliment on board. Its a temporary patch (I won’t even call it a fix). I am certain this won’t work. I am not surprised that this so called nizam e shariat is coming through force. Historically Islam spread by force. There is nothing peaceful about Islam (except the name) or for that matter any religion.

    On one hand I am glad it is providing temporary peace to people in Sawat on the other hand I am worried it will agravate this militancy issue. All those who are praising this deal today will come out tomorrow and say what were they smoking? How can they ratify this crap under public pressure?

    Politically I can understand why MQM opposed it. I do not approve or endorse every thing that MQM does but I commend them on this issue. Ayaz Amir’s opposition is much more meaningful and significant. He went out of the party line to oppose it. I salute him for that.

  • revolution said:

    Excellent decision, finally NAR has been signed.

    As much as I hate zardari, he was very smart in bringing the parliament into this, so that our liberal fascists, and the US, could not blame one party, and put pressure on pakistan about NAR.

    Now, we know what the people of Pakistan want, since it was approved unanimously, with MQM abstaining.

    This is the benefit of democracy. There isn’t one center of power. And now, who will the US pressurize? Not the whole parliament ha

  • Adonis said:

    Seems like many people are criticizing this Nizam-e-Adl Regulation without even bothering to read it.

    Would these critics make an effort to actually read it (it is on top of this page) and then educate the rest of us how is it bad or against the constitution of Pakistan?

  • democrate said:

    i just wondering what has happened to people.why we think every one is our enemy.hindus,chiristians jews all are our enemies.interestingly non believers are our friends.now just compare china,s muslims to indian muslims.then u will see the differience.india is the only non muslim country where muslims can live according to their religous customs.even a muslim man can marry more than one woman at a time.this is not allowed even in west.5% kota is allocated for muslims.this sort of kota is not even allocated inwestern countries.indian muslims had more rights than muslims living in muslims countries.if muslims are behind in india,blame goes to muslims.they want to stick with urdu.they dont want to learn english.they dont want thier women work outside with men.they want to live old traditional way.we muslims have the habit ,always blame others but never admit their own failures.

  • listen said:

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172290

    Agree with every word of this indian colonel……

    shame on this napak army

  • pak007 said:

    @ Rasheed

    yes the same Supreme Court that was jailed by a dictator but we Awam struggled long and hard for its supremacy.

  • pak007 said:

    i as a muslim dont have any problem with Shariat. But the way it has become a tool in the hands of the militant is not justified.we should have an open debate in the parliament to discuss whether we are ready for Shariah Laws. As Islamic laws are not only for punishment but also to teach us the way of life in all respect. i personally dont think that this bill will bring peace as you can see from the following ;

    Sharia for other parts of Pakistan also: TNSM

    Tuesday, 14 Apr, 2009 | 03:07 PM PST |

    BATHKELA: The Tehrik Nifaz-i-Shariat Muhammadi (TNSM) said Tuesday that after Swat and Malakand, Sharia will be implemented in other parts of the country as well.

    While talking to the media in Batkhela, the TNSM chief Sufi Mohammad said that the Taliban and TNSM will work alongside the government for the implementation of Sharia and will maintain peace in the region.

    Sufi Mohammad also said he will not abolish the peace camp he established in Malakand and will continue the peace process in the Swat valley.

    The TNSM chief added that once Sharia is implemented in Swat and Malakand it would soon after be extended to other parts of the country.

    He also urged all TNSM loyalists to work towards furthering the peace process.

    Earlier, Sufi Mohammad had welcomed the signing of Sharia bill as a positive sign.

    I stress again , is this the real Shariat( in its true spirit) that they are trying to implement???

    plus, the confession from the taliban spokesman that they will keep weapons for their defence. Defence from whom? from empty handed and helpless Awam????

  • pak007 said:

    another News;

    Schisms surface in NA over Nizam-i-Adl
    Tuesday, 14 Apr, 2009 | 04:10 PM PST |

    ISLAMABAD: The implementation of Sharia law in Malakand came up for discussion in the National Assembly on Tuesday with a number of senior lawmakers raising concerns on the issue.

    Former information minister Sherry Rehman Rehman said the manner and timing of implementation of Sharia in Malakand were matters of grave concern. She sought a guarantee for peace in the post-Nizam-i-Adl Swat and said the Taliban may not stop their inhuman practices such as the flogging of women.

    Aftab Sherpao, leader of PPP-Sherpao and interior minister in the Musharraf government, said the government signed the agreement from a position of weakness. He expressed doubts if the peace deal would yield any positive results.

    PML-Q MNA Marvi Memon said the Taliban are recruiting young people and advancing towards Islamabad.

    Meanwhile, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) continued its boycott of the National Assembly proceedings in protest against the Sharia in Swat.

    Information Minister Qamruzzaman Kaira reacted to Ms Rehman’s reservations by saying that Sherry Rehman does not represent the 160 million people of Pakistan. He said there was nothing wrong with the Nizam-i-Adl regulation and that it was signed to stop the extremists from exploiting the issue.

    Regarding the Taliban in Buner, he said the situation in that region is almost under control.

    thoughts and suggestions please…

  • Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar said:

    a humiliating reminder from across the border. http://thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172290

    Kiyani doob kay mar jaa…

    ——————————————

    An open letter to Gen Kayani

    View from the other side Col (r) Harish Puri

    Tuesday, April 14, 2009

    Dear Gen Kayani,

    Sir, let me begin by recounting that old army quip that did the rounds in the immediate aftermath of World war II: To guarantee victory, an army should ideally have German generals, British officers, Indian soldiers, American equipment and Italian enemies.

    A Pakistani soldier that I met in Iraq in 2004 lamented the fact that the Pakistani soldier in Kargil had been badly let down firstly by Nawaz Sharif and then by the Pakistani officers’ cadre. Pakistani soldiers led by Indian officers, , he believed, would be the most fearsome combination possible. Pakistani officers, he went on to say, were more into real estate, defence housing colonies and the like.

    As I look at two photographs of surrender that lie before me, I can’t help recalling his words. The first is the celebrated event at Dhaka on Dec 16, 1971, which now adorns most Army messes in Delhi and Calcutta. The second, sir, is the video of a teenage girl being flogged by the Taliban in Swat — not far, I am sure, from one of your Army check posts.

    The surrender by any Army is always a sad and humiliating event. Gen Niazi surrendered in Dhaka to a professional army that had outnumbered and outfought him. No Pakistani has been able to get over that humiliation, and 16th December is remembered as a black day by the Pakistani Army and the Pakistani state. But battles are won and lost – armies know this, and having learnt their lessons, they move on.

    But much more sadly, the video of the teenager being flogged represents an even more abject surrender by the Pakistani Army. The surrender in 1971, though humiliating, was not disgraceful. This time around, sir, what happened on your watch was something no Army commander should have to live through. The girl could have been your own daughter, or mine.

    I have always maintained that the Pakistani Army, like its Indian counterpart, is a thoroughly professional outfit. It has fought valiantly in the three wars against India, and also accredited itself well in its UN missions abroad. It is, therefore, by no means a pushover. The instance of an Infantry unit, led by a lieutenant colonel, meekly laying down arms before 20-odd militants should have been an aberration. But this capitulation in Swat, that too so soon after your own visit to the area, is an assault on the sensibilities of any soldier. What did you tell your soldiers? What great inspirational speech did you make that made your troops back off without a murmur? Sir, I have fought insurgency in Kashmir as well as the North-East, but despite the occasional losses suffered (as is bound to be the case in counter-insurgency operations), such total surrender is unthinkable.

    I have been a signaller, and it beats me how my counterparts in your Signal Corps could not locate or even jam a normal FM radio station broadcasting on a fixed frequency at fixed timings. Is there more than meets the eye?

    I am told that it is difficult for your troops to “fight their own people.” But you never had that problem in East Pakistan in 1971, where the atrocities committed by your own troops are well documented in the Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report. Or is it that the Bengalis were never considered “your own” people, influenced as they were by the Hindus across the border? Or is that your troops are terrified by the ruthless barbarians of the Taliban?

    Sir, it is imperative that we recognise our enemy without any delay. I use the word “our” advisedly – for the Taliban threat is not far from India’s borders. And the only force that can stop them from dragging Pakistan back into the Stone Age is the force that you command. In this historic moment, providence has placed a tremendous responsibility in your hands. Indeed, the fate of your nation, the future of humankind in the subcontinent rests with you. It doesn’t matter if it is “my war” or “your war” – it is a war that has to be won. A desperate Swati citizen’s desperate lament says it all – “Please drop an atom bomb on us and put us out of our misery!” Do not fail him, sir.

    But in the gloom and the ignominy, the average Pakistani citizen has shown us that there is hope yet. The lawyers, the media, have all refused to buckle even under direct threats. It took the Taliban no less than 32 bullets to still the voice of a brave journalist. Yes, there is hope – but why don’t we hear the same language from you? Look to these brave hearts, sir – and maybe we shall see the tide turn. Our prayers are with you, and the hapless people of Swat.

    The New York Times predicts that Pakistan will collapse in six months. Do you want to go down in history as the man who allowed that to happen?

    The writer is a retired colonel of the Indian army who lives in Pune. Email: hbpuri@hotmail.com

  • Kashif said:

    The concerns raised by Col (r) Harish Puri are legitimate and more than our politicians its the failure of our armed forces.

  • Mir Munsif said:

    @ M Tarar,

    Bro,thanks for sharing this open letter and its really thought provoking and at the same time..shameful for us as nation because our only respectful institution is also loosing its grip and due to its constant role in governance and all sort of businesses,they are unfortunately loosing their respect and professionalism.Wish our army learn from Indian Army,which never intruded into indian politics and democracy has flourished and india today is part of strongest 20 nations(G20).

    It is wishful thinking though that our Army will not be intruding into politics but there is no harm to be hopeful.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @pak007
    You have raised from good and legit questions.

  • abuzarghafari said:

    @ Mtarar
    we call indians our enemies ,but after reading this letter, we as a nation shud demand the same from kayani lik a retired colonel of indian army. its true stable pak is in favour of india. thanx for sharing mr tarar

  • aftab said:

    the indians should first get they own house in order before they give this kind of advice, i hope they get rid of those lunatic’s first who killed a thousand people in gujrat a few years back.

  • razakhan said:

    to al who dun like the nifaz-e-adl and r so inlove with this indian letter why dun u all move to india:p jaan choro dafa ho lol

  • georgebillo said:

    QAZI HUSSAIN AHMED (Retired Chairman JI) is free now and looking for a JOB.
    Can some one consider his credentials for appointment as QAZI in swat.

  • Kashif said:

    @razakhan

    All those who are in love with Nizam e adal pls first move to land of adal, Sawat, raise your families under Taliban rule and then spread Shariat.

  • urazzaq12 said:

    @ razakhan

    Yeah, it’s funny how some people are whining about the muqadas article written by retired indian colonel.

    If that colonel is so sincere, then why doesn’t he just write a letter to his COAS or the PM and tell them to stop f**king around in Balochistan.

  • razakhan said:

    @georgebillo

    will make him qzi of khi, mqm ke under tum logaan ke gunah buhat ho gaye hain lol

  • ConcernedAmericanPak said:

    “1971 surrender was the price we Pakistani’s paid due to the Arrogance, selfishness ,pigheadedness and shortsightedness of our political elites and the Army brass. My best friend’s father spent many years in Indian camps and I experienced his pain along with him. One has to recognize that the great Bhutto family, even from their graves, they are a curse for Pakistan. holly father, the Son (murdered by the family)and the virgin from Urdu language and morality ”political marry”, the “Dasi Kutti Tay Walti Cheekaa”, Banzier Bhutto and now her criminally and literally insane’ “smiling baboon” husband and her demonic Son, in training from the enemies of Pakistan, Brest fed by the Neo-Satan Hussain Haqquni” and their grave worshipping goons and the MQM types in East Pakistan were the cause of the surrenders to the USSR, India the two largest countries and armies of the world. There is no shame to surrender, rather than continue the massacre of millions of your countrymen who wanted to be separated from an unnatural creation of two countries with more than 1000 miles of ocean in-between.

    “But much more sadly, the video of the teenager being flogged represents an even more abject surrender by the Pakistani Army“.

    Now the second part is hilarious, this Indian, cow urine drinking, cows and monkey worshipping occupier of Kashmir, should be ashamed of himself, what his kind are doing in India to several places and to all the minorities. This Hindu loony does not remember in Hyderabad riots, how the Hindu gangs in the protection of Indian government raped, burned, pillaged, gang raped women and children, and killed their loved ones in front of them. One recorded case the Hindu mob in the protection of Hindu police, gang raped a pregnant Muslim girl and the ripped her open and played soccer with her fetus.

    I have attached a paragraph from Amnesty International USA report about 18-year-old Mubina Gani – Now this merciful, vegetarian, believer of non violence Col (r) Harish Puri
    should go and fuck himself after reading this.

    RAPE AND SEXUAL ABUSE:
    Torture and Ill-treatment of Women in Detention

    Just before midnight on 18 May 1990 a bus carrying 27 members of a family wedding party approached a roadblock manned by soldiers of the Border Security Forces (BSF) near Badasgam village in Kashmir, India. As the bus rolled to a halt, the soldiers opened fire, killing the bridegroom’s brother and wounding at least nine others, including the bride – 18-year-old Mubina Gani – and her husband. “We lay down under the seats and pretended to be dead,” she said. “After the shooting they came inside and started to beat everyone.” Some of the soldiers dragged the new bride and her heavily-pregnant aunt into a nearby field. “We were crying bitterly. I told them that I had not yet seen my husband. But they didn’t listen. They took off our clothes…and then we were raped. Four to six men raped me, I think.” Suffering from shock and gunshot wounds, Mubina Gani was taken away and held in military custody for 48 hours. Indian officials initially claimed that the bus had accidentally been caught in a cross-fire. However, the Superintendent of the Anantnag police later confirmed that the BSF had fired on the bus indiscriminately and that the two women had been gang-raped. Four BSF soldiers were apparently suspended from duty, but no further legal or disciplinary action appears to have been taken.
    http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&id=4FBAFB18141BB186802569A600601C5F

  • razakhan said:

    MQM kaliya we reject sharai bill. aab shariyaat maulana altaf sikhaingain lol

  • aftab said:

    mqm don’t care either way, they probably want some more ministires.

  • Traffic said:

    lol the creepy crawlies are out showing their strength again. the indian colonel’s letter has been like rain to these worms. someone should pack them up and gift them to bharat mata. they dont belong here in a Muslim country.

  • Traffic said:

    and MQM munafiqs have officially become murtads after opposing Shariah. they should also be packed off and sent off to either india or if the UK is willing to accept them, they should be sent to Kali charan. but who will collect bhatta in Pakistan to finance Altaf’s lifestyle in London then?

  • pak.nukes said:

    @Traffic
    Granted on MQM…lolz.
    Yes bhatta job can be given to Nazir Naji, Abbass Ather and all other lifafa journos who will be out of work after their masters back off.
    I don’t think UK wants more rubbish after accepting Kali Charan who has already polluted the North West of London with his stinky presence..yuckkkkkkk.

  • razakhan said:

    Those who think usa has best interst of Pakistan

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172292

  • pak.nukes said:

    @razakhan
    Hey Raza whats up?
    Iss jahan mein bewaqoofon ki kumi nahi…

  • fsg.93200 said:

    I will say that if this law brings justice and peace in the region its not a big deal. but there are some problems like the state have let down in the front of arms but if talibans leaves there armes then it will be an achievement, but we musnt get army out of the region even if the peace is installed, and we should halt talibans from growing and spreading to other areas like BUNEER, and police and army should take action against them.

    in seconde option we must rapidly grow our POLICE give them arms, train them against terroristes, this must be done immediately,army is not trained to operate inside the country and they cant, no army can and operate inside the country, no where in the world, so our POLICE should be made capable of doing things alone, if they need some backup from army thats ok, but if we want that police should stay behind and back army this wont work at all,, the gov should immediately transfer our defence budget into interior or even half of it. when our police WILL BE strong we will be able to demantel and destroy terroristes save heavens.

  • Tauqeer Akbar said:

    @ “dumb-o-crate”. I don’t know how many Indian Muslims you have come across in your miserable existance but I have come across a few and I can tell you of one of my Indian Muslim friend. We used to argue on the merits of creation of Pakistan till the day of Babri Mosque demolition. That day he came up to me and appologised profusely for having argued with me for years and he said something that has summed it forever for me “NOW WE WILL HAVE TO CREATE ANOTHER PAKISTAN IN INDIA”.

    As usual Nota’s link of Shabana Azami incidence is an eye opener for those who keep their head in a dark hole!

  • Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar said:

    @Traffic

    who died and made you the dispenser-in-chief of certificates of patriotism? I’m a kaafir/liberal fascist/creepy crawlie and Pakistan is my homeland. I don’t have to have your permission to have an opinion on the affairs of my country.

    one doesn’t have to be a retarded beardo to qualify as a Pakistani. so, go shove your beard and Islam up your behind. I don’t give a flying flux…

  • syed1508 said:

    Pakistan is a Islamic state and should be governed by Sharia. But not people from Madarsa who are not qualified to implement Sharia.
    If Swat is a part of Pakistan then assembly should have taken the responsibility of imposting the pure Sharia by the elected members of parliament.
    But unfortunately the champions of judiciary PLMN and CJ Iftekhar Ahmed both are quite on this matter and they can not excercise their authority in Swat.
    The next step would be to give liberation to Baluchistan in the name of Baluchi rights then Pakistan would be shrinking to Punjab and Sindh only.
    God help us and save Pakistan from corrupt leaders.

  • The Giant Squid said:

    Any one has any bright ideas?

    1. Army and intelligence can triangulate and pinpoint Bugti from a sat phone intercept in a cave, a CAVE mind you, in Kohlu, but can’t find Mulla FM’s transmitter?

    2. People, ORDINARY people from Buner surround and fight the Taliban intruding from Swat, the whole media carries the news, and NO ONE from the ARMY/GOVERNMENT comes to help?

    3. Most of you are bashing each other or personalities and not concentrating on the issue.

    WHO CONDUCTED A REFERENDUM IN SWAT AND CONCLUDED THAT 90% PEOPLE WANT SHARIA/NIZAM-E-ADL IMPOSED ON THEM BY GUN TOTTING BEARDED YAHOOS?

    4. A couple of hundred thugs bring the largest Muslim army, supposedly the 4th-5th best army to its knees. So how exactly do they plan to fight a million strong indians?

  • democrate said:

    @tauqeer akbar,after lal mosque incident u should,nt talk about babri mosque.u know how many schools,how many churches and how many mosques and tombs were burnt in pakistan.u even cannt count.indians are friends.india pakistan zinda baad,insaniat kai dushman murda baad

  • urazzaq12 said:

    @ Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar

    you have a really rotten personality. If your outside is as ugly as your inside, you are bu.tt a$$ ugly !!!

    And don’t bother replying, cuz I ain’t got no cow-pi$s to appease ur kaali maata.

  • Irshad.Shehzad said:

    By this agreement we just to prove the west that Islam was spread with sword. As per littile knowledge of Islam, all the prophets brought the Islam through preach. If doubt please check Surah Al-Asr.

  • JavedKhan said:

    @The Giant Squid

    First of All give yourself a sensible and a decent Title so that people reading your article could make something out of it. Your comments are just as stupid as your name title.

    Secondly Zardari is a root cause of ALL THIS MESS, because He continued with Musharraf policies and have allowed American to continue with the Drone Attacks. As you said most of us are bashing each other on personalities…………..
    Try to understand it is the personalities who create the issues and problems……and the biggest problem we got on hand is Z A R D A RI.

  • swat yosufzai said:

    Salam to all brothers and sisters

    I have an advise for DR Amir Liaqat to stop his ALIM ONLNE program it is not needed becasue all the Ulama are Here on this Form

    Look how these Ulma on this form Enterpret ISLAM

    those who are oppsing this bill should not cross the limit e,i critisize Islam ot its Law

    One thing is Cleare If we See All the points Shown above are imposed, if it is the right version pass in NA yesterday, then there will be Peace and writ of govt as well/

  • Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar said:

    @urazzaq12

    boy, you too are welcome to shove your beard up your behind. inshallah and mashallah…

  • rasheed said:

    @The Giant Squid,

    The Tehreek-e-Nifaaz-e-Shariyat in Swat and Malakand started from 70s and there were no guns involved at that time. Repetitive broken promises by government made this mess.

    Mushie sent all Army it could to fix the problem with gun, and it did not work. The ultimate solution is political.

    Secondly, haven’t you seen the news where thousands of Swati protesters have come out in street in favor of the above peace agreement. How can you dare to speak on behalf of people of Swat that they don’t want this?

  • swat yosufzai said:

    @TheGiant Squid said:
    You said strong indian

    same as 1965

  • A Mehmood said:

    all these people who are saying against this shria law.

    Definately they are against the islamic sharia law in pakistan.

    They are saying its sharia of taliban.., if they can contribute in it, why they are not pointiing out the things constructive things of sharia islam instead of going totally against shariat.

    This ILTAF of MQM is ghdaar…… ARY is also gone in these list.

  • A Mehmood said:

    allah help kare allah is agreement ko successfull kary

  • JavedKhan said:

    @rasheed – Re: The Giant Squid

    I have already given him a bolllocking……….pls read my reply above.

  • munna said:

    I am trying to post a comment which is not comming up on board. Is it a whole sale issue of just me ?

  • JavedKhan said:

    @munna
    I think there is a issue with YOU…………… start praising Zardari—day and night, start praising policies of Peoples Party and make sure that every time you mention Bhutto’s you MUST add Shaheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed with it. Show disrespect to Qazi Sahib and keep praising Musharraf and Zardari and keep saying Ya NRO Ya NRO Ya NRO thousand times every day.
    Inshallah there will no be any more moderation of your comments and they will be put on board promptly. You must understand there is democracy in our Country and every one has the right of free speech……and that’s why these comments are appearing on Board. You see………….

  • savage said:

    @swat yosufzai said:

    “same as 1965″

    Same as 1971.

  • Baluchi said:

    @A Mehmood

    I add to your duaa………..Ameen suma Ameen.

    Let’s give it a try……….ask those who have lost loved ones in this senseless killings.

  • Baluchi said:

    @Muazalzaman…Tarar – posted/5.09pm

    I do not see anything wrong with your comments but your reply to Urazaaq12……’boy, you are welcome to shove your beard up your behind………’ does leave a bad taste. Take it easy man……Let’s not move away from the main topic we are discussing here.

  • Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar said:

    Baluchi, I have put up with a lot of abuse on this forum. and now I am going to pay people back in the same coin. seems like this is the only language understood around here.

  • pak007 said:

    Dear All,

    please find the links below and decide on your own.Think who is right and who is wrong? who should be punished and who should get immunity? It seems even the taliban millitants are getting DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY and a possible pardon under NRO!!

    1) Militants enjoy immunity from law: TNSM

    ISLAMABAD: The chief of Tehrik Nifaz-i-Shariat-i-Muhammadi came up with an audacious interpretation of the Nizam-i-Adl regulation on Tuesday, asserting that the law would protect militants accused of brutal killings from prosecution.

    shocking isnt it? i nearly jumped on the sofa.click the link for the full report;
    http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/swat-deal-gives-taliban-immunity-sufi-ts?pagedesign=Dawn_PrintlyFriendlyPage

    2) Taliban gun down three ‘accused’ in Kohat

    KOHAT: Local Taliban killed three men who were accused of assaulting an eight-year-old boy and threw their bodies in Arakhel square in the Kohat Frontier Region on Monday.

    A Taliban spokesman said the ‘accused’ had admitted before their shura and tribal elders to have assaulted the boy. The shura sentenced them to death before a firing squad.

    The Taliban had announced last month that they would enforce religious laws in the region.

    3) March of the Taliban

    ON Saturday, March 11, a convoy of 10 double-cabin four-wheel drive pick-up trucks loaded with Taliban armed with every description of portable weapons – Kalashnikovs, rocket launchers, heavy machine guns – drove from Daggar the headquarters of Buner district to the villages of Sohawa and Dagai in Buner.

    It entered Swabi district at Jhanda village, drove through the district headquarter (the town of Swabi), drove on to the motorway, exited at Mardan, drove through the cantonment of Mardan and, showing their weapons for all to see, went on towards Malakand.

    In doing the above, the Taliban broke many laws of the state of Pakistan not least those that prohibit the possession of heavy weapons; showing weapons publicly and so on.

    a must read, follow the link;

    http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/columnists/kamran-shafi-march-of-the-taliban?pagedesign=Dawn_PrintlyFriendlyPage

  • pak007 said:

    dear pakistanis!!

    wakeupproject.com!

  • Amir Hameed said:

    Sufi wants Sharia in rest of Pakistan


    BATHKELA: The Tehrik Nifaz-i-Shariat Muhammadi said Tuesday that after Swat and Malakand, Sharia will be implemented in other parts of the country as well. …
    …. The TNSM chief added that once Sharia is implemented in Swat and Malakand it would soon after be extended to other parts of the country. He also urged all TNSM loyalists to work towards furthering the peace process….

    lo, hun kar lao gal!!!

  • Haqueeqat said:

    Guys .. Pakistan is F***D with this.
    1. Notice the absurdity .. Taliban would denounce (not renounce) suicide bombers!
    2. No date for turning heavy weapons .. it could be after they take over rest of the country
    3. No restrictions on women working — but nothing said about them leaving home alone !

    This is not an agreement – it’s a shameless willful surrender of the national sovereignty – it’s affects will be evident in the days ahead.

    This is not a peace process .. but a “piece” process — piece by piece Taliban will control Pakistan.

  • zaheer said:

    my views.

    - Taliban are also Muslim(except very few who might be external agents), human beings, Pakistani(majority) so we should treat them with respect and care, but at the same time no one could be allowed to force or propagate his/her own designed Islam. It is work of Scholars to define Islam and not of Talibans or Liberals or any other!

    - I have time and again mentioned this point that Taliban should be handled carefully and best way to deal them is by their regular interaction with learned and sincere scholars of Islam. If someone thinks that they could be handled through cheating then he/she is playing with fire as cheating gets exposed one day. Let the Scholars of Islam sit with them and talk openly.

    - It is good to have peace and also rules/regulation which bring peace but it also does not mean that anyone one gets total free hand! Taliban and everyone else are not beyond Law of Allah. Taliban want to solve every problem through force which is definitely not the way of Islam! We really need to make sure that Taliban are not being used by any enemy against us!

    - As Muslims Shariah is the way of rule for us and if Taliban want to bring this system then they are most welcome but first they will have to talk to the people and scholars to convince if their way is really Islamic! Not everything could be Islamic! Bring the Taliban to light, let them talk and bring their points in front of the people, it will show what really their motive and goal is!

    - Our faiths and actions should be so strong that Taliban or any other could not dictate us for anything wrong but our rulers are so weak in this regard that they are unable to take even little pressure. They sit in beautiful and comfortable offices but want to solve the problems in Swat and other areas, and that mostly result in an extreme and wrong conclusion or decision!

    - As a good solution Taliban should be asked to talk to scholars and that must be done as quickly as possible. They should neither be sidelined nor should be given total free hand! There are some elements who want to that there be misunderstandings and conflicts so people need to remain careful.

    - In any case peace deals should be encouraged.

  • pak007 said:

    @ Zaheer

    talibans caanot be rated as Pakistanis! they are not even worthy of calling themselves humans. they can be called ” creatures” in my opinion.a human being and a muslim cannot slaughter a fellow human being regardless of his/her religious belief.all these creatures should be punished and sentenced according to the True Shariat and Pakistani Laws. i challenge these “creatures” (if they are so Islamic and their hands are clean) to face charges and stand trial in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

    did i mention they are claiming to have an immunity against any possible prosecution!!

  • Adonis said:

    Paksitani constitution promises the implementation of shariah. It requires the government to implement Islamic edicts in the country. The difference is that the right to interpret shariah vests with the parliament.

    During the last ten years we have seen a complete reversal of this role of the government. Instead of implementing shariah, steps have been taken to remove its influence from the state. This is in contravention of the constitution. Either the constitution should be changed or it should be implemented.

    The mob rule we are seeing today is the result of the unwillingness of successive governments to implement constitution. Constiitution is the manifestation of aspiration of people. This deliberate abrogation of constitution has created an environment in which groups of vigilantees have taken things into their own hand imposing their own brands of shariah.

    The secular ‘elite’ governing thsi country needs to realize that they cannot continue in this state of denial. Pakistan cannot be made a secular nation against the express wish of the overwhelming majority of Pakistanis. The constitution needs to be implemented in letter and spirit. This is the only way to stop this blight of extremism.

  • pak007 said:

    @Adonis

    totally agree.

  • urazzaq12 said:

    Awesome article by Dr. Shahid:
    http://www.jang.net/jm/4-15-2009/pic.asp?picname=05_07.gif

    The last Paragraph is a must read. :P

  • Haqueeqat said:

    @Adonis

    Is bowing to guns going to stop or encourage “extremisim”.

    If Constitution does promise Shariat – then why did Zia issue ordinances ? There is a flaw in your understanding of law and constitution.

    The argument is not Islam or Shariat — it’s goondagardi, it’s acceptance under the guise of religious tolerance.
    Who is going to defend killing people and leaving their bodies to rot in the name of Islam?

    Who believes that Pakistani Army that claims they are better than 1 Million Indian Army can’t root out 5,000 nut jobs?

    Pakistani Army has found it convenient not to fight these guys in the name of failed strategic policies – this will only hurt the country further.

    Average person who supports these in name of Islam are playing with fire. Don’t encourage morons like Imran Khan – he is the same Imran who was distributing mithai when Musharaf took over.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    NWFP govt must protect human rights in Swat: Sherry
    http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=21522

    I wonder why she did not speak in the parliament and preferred to stay quiet.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    For the sake of ‘justice’
    http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172493

    I am sure that if this article is read by the Talibans, this poor chap would either be labeled as a “Kafir” or killed.

  • razakhan said:

    @Admin
    Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar has a right to abuse anyone he wants but he shouldn’t be allow to abuse Islamic symobol of beard,. Beard is a sunnah and his swearing at beard is getting way out of hand. I dun believe in this freedom of speech, and he should learn to make his arhument without insulting to Islam.

  • razakhan said:

    @Adonis

    Bravo, thats wat I have been saying, lets implement 1973 constitution fully and negotiate a new deal with FATA and SWAT where they become instead of territories administered by federal govt a full fledge province. Otherwise no peace deal with accomplish anything and while we at it time to distance ourselves from USA and reevaluate our foriegn policy.

  • pak.nukes said:

    The way shias consider Hazrat Ali and his family their personal property,exactly the same way Taliban consider Shariah…Are we not responsible for this disaster? Have we not given the impression that we are against Shariah? We oppose Taliban Laws NOT Shariah…..

  • Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar said:

    there’s something about daaktars in Pakistani politics… be it Babar Awan, that MQM badmaash Aamir Liaqat or this daaktar Shahid Masood Qiyamati – every single one is for sale. some are more expensive than others though.

    so, the following is dedicated to pseudo-journalist and analyst-for-rent daaktar Shahid Masood Qiyamati:

    aik ropaa… aik ropaaa…

    do dhar wala bacha dekho…
    bandar ka tamaasha dekho

    aik ropaa… aik ropaaa…

    fraudia daaktar dekho…
    pseudo-journalist dekho

    aik ropaa… aik ropaaa…

    do ropaay day kay apni marzee ka article likhwaa lo…
    teen ropaay day kay apni shaadi per bulwaa kay nachaa lo… with jhankaar…

    aik ropaa… aik ropaa…

    http://sheddy73.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/shahid-masood1.jpg

  • Adonis said:

    “Haqueeqat said:
    @Adonis

    Is bowing to guns going to stop or encourage “extremisim”.

    If Constitution does promise Shariat – then why did Zia issue ordinances ? There is a flaw in your understanding of law and constitution.”
    ————————————-

    Zia issued ordinances because he had suspended the constitution and there was no parliament at the time.

    As for my understanding of law and constitution, I am sure that you are an expert on law and cosntitution. So would you care to enlighten me where is the flaw in my understanding?

  • abuzarghafari said:

    @M TARAR
    THERE ARE GOOD PPL IN PAK. N DR SHAHID IS ONE OF THEM .GOVT WAS TRYIBG TO MAKE HIM CONTROVERCIAL. BUT STILL HE IS MOST POPULAR AMONG PAKISANIS. NO DOUBT HIS ANALYSIS IS OUTSTANDING. HAVE U ANY PRSONAL PROBLEM WITH DR?? IF NO PLZZZ STOP POSTING SUCH COMMENTS N DONT WASTE THIS FORM. AND IF YES GO TO DUBAI AND SAY ALL THIS IN FRONT OF HIM IN HIS OFFICE ..IF U HAVE COURAGE

  • nota said:

    @Amir Hameed
    I think that is a cheap shot at Taliban.

    But thanks for giving me the opportunity to talk about something that I have been meaning to talk about but forgot. This article too repeats one of the favourite lines of anti-Talibs always use in their attempt “put them down” as “Jahils” of sort:

    “The Taliban are the same people who think that polio vaccines are a form of birth control and need to be banned.”

    Ever consider maybe there are some legs to this belief?

    There concern is nothing new and the same has been expressed for years all over Africa (e.g. read Polio Vaccination and Population Control: Some Food for Thought, Polio Vaccine in Banglorek and Kano link, Nigeria Still Fighting False Rumors About Polio Vaccine, )

    And are you aware (the Taliban aren’t) that it is widely accepted that Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) CAN cause poliomyelitis i.e. polio (and some believe today it is the leading cause of polio). And are you aware that OPV IS NOT USED in France, Germany, Canada and USA, Scandinavian coun-
    tries and The Netherlands because of it’s safety issues alone
    ?

    Never been curious about it, have you? Ever wonder Who certified that OPV was safe for the rest of the world, and when? is an excellent question to ask, isn’t it??

  • razakhan said:

    @nota

    ur wasting time mate, these not the talking points issued to them by usa and india lol – All prooblems r simple, black and white there are never grey areas and other person point of view must be rejected cuz what do they know stupid talibaan lol.

    Anyho lets get back to teh topic guys, I think Adonis made a very good post, I think we should all return to basics, I dun see this peace deal standing up until unless we make fundamental change i,e constitutional restoration and new deal with FATA and swat couple with ofcoz bye bye to yankee morons

  • iamsowise said:

    @ syed1508
    Pakistan is a Islamic state and should be governed by Sharia. But not people from Madarsa who are not qualified to implement Sharia.

    Do you think people who governed pakistan in last 60 years they were qualified?
    Health , Education , Justice system , security for civilian , Drone attacks, Balouchistan BLA , Kashmir , Fata , Swat, Karachi killing/burnings and now Lahore attacks , this shows totaly failure of ‘Qualified People’ in all fields , in this country people need long march against ‘elected govt’ to restore free judiciary. lolz
    Please try to understand why Taliban are getting growing papularity in ordinary people.

  • nota said:

    @razakhan
    “I think Adonis made a very good post”

    Fully agree :)

  • munna said:

    @nota

    polio vaccines is believed to gave birth of HIV, no doubt contents are changed now.

    In UK, children are vet with MMR vaccination and there is a lot of controversy association with it also. A lot of parents are saying no to it.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy

    The problem is in our social order. We don’t trust politations. Taliban and other fundamentals are just a by product of it.

    Our police system don’t work neither do our justice system. Elite is corrupt, Our parliamentarians can not take decisions at there will. They wail orders either from Presidency or from Jati omra. They only act on peoples wishes when Army forced them to do. With 85 minister in federal cabinet they are discussing more inductions. We don’t have any national interest, PPP govt are treating us as an impotent and pimps in world arena and then we are thinking that we can going to get rid of Taliban. For me both are same, One kills on the name of religion and other sells our souls on the basis of national interest. We need a social order. I am proud to be Muslim and Pakistani. Change is bound to happen, its upto us either to resist to it or become part of it.

  • munna said:

    One of my friend mention something like western laws are driven from Quran I respect his believes, but I dare not to agree with them. Archbishop of Canterbury purposed to implement Islamic laws in UK last year with one reason of “they are Just” btw This implementation was on top of Muslim Sharia courts and the Jewish Beth Din which already exist in the UK. More or less its Jirga or PANCHAYAT in Pakistan

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7232661.stm

  • munna said:

    @JavedKhan
    Day aur dil un ko jo na day mujh ko zubaaN aur

  • jazoo said:

    Ansar Abbasi in his narrow minded wahabi shell started to see something good in Zardari.
    Ansar Abbasi thinks Zardari plesantly stunned the nation with his good move.

    This wahabi did not bother to see other angle of story.
    Zardari to please American has repeatedly told these extremist are killer of his wife and not only in Pakistan but all over the world, a strong opinion exist that Zardari is behind killing of his wife, so
    Ansar Abbasi should not be pleasantly stunned if he had been keeping in mind that this President already in collaboration with these extremists to allegedly have his wife killed.

    Mr. Adonis
    No need to find anything wrong in agreement
    Everything is wrong with parties involved

  • supercreature said:

    @nota,

    I respect your views but some time i contradict them too. I could not get few things

    1. why democracy is haram? where it is written?
    2. how in islam a Khalifa must be choosen, by majority vote? or by gun point?
    3. In Islam if sharia government misinterprete law of islam and some one objects that, what will be the process to raise the issue, is there a way in talibs where,is there any scholar council there who will listen to you argable ?
    Rest will follow but i will keep my question simple and precise for people here to make it easy.

  • nota said:

    @munna
    “@nota
    polio vaccines is believed to gave birth of HIV, no doubt contents are changed now. In UK, children are vet with MMR vaccination and there is a lot of controversy association with it also. A lot of parents are saying no to it….”

    Certainly. There are many other horror stories that I did not touch upon (BTW: I am a strong anti-childhood-vaccine guy, and I did not get my own kids vaccinated …)

    Regarding MMR: Just want to add: Before MMR: Autism almost non-existant; Since MMR: Autism sky-rocketing. Draw your own conclusions.

    And do read this “rant” by Talib by the name of Robert Kennedy Jr. in the Talib Journo called Rolling Stones. And here is a more recent one.
    (I know some doctors are going to get on me for this…)

  • razakhan said:

    @supercreature

    Lemme get this right abt democracy where it says simply put govt of the ppl, by the ppl, for the ppl, in that sense watever ppl decide how they would like to be govern and by whom is democracy (plz correct me if am wrong). Under Islamic idea of govt, ppl dun decide which laws to be govern under, as ALLAH has already prescribed what law i.e sharia law. So the soverignity belongs to ALLAH SWT not the ppl.
    Agar tum par ek nakta habshi ghulam bhi musallat kar diya jaey aur voh tumhain ALLAH ke bataey hoey rastey par lay kar chaley tum oski Itaat karna – Last sermon of Prophey PBUH .

    Lemme put it this way, under democracy’s majority rule, tom if 99% of Pak population decides that alcohol should made legal, it dun change the fact that alcohol is haram and drinking is punishable under Islamic law. So once again what ppl want doesn’t matter when it comes to Islamic law they have to obey if they are muslims, if they not then they free to live according to thier faith.

    What democracy in Islam is what Quran explains as shura i.e govt of Muslims should be run by consent and advise, what we call mashura. Consent is mentioned by bait in old days today will be through elections. advise i.e mashura will be parliment and President (Kaliph) will take advise but is not bound by that advise. The best example of Khliafah is the idea of US govt structuure (plz note that I am not saying hwo it is running or ran but how its suppose to be where executive, legislative and judicial barnces are seperate and indepent).

    How to address the difference of islamic interpretations, is to be done by Parliment when the make law and reviewed by judiciary. So say e.g Talaq = 3 talaq at one time is talaq complete(hanafi)or dun matter how many talaq in one setting will consider still one talaq(shafi, shia etc). Parliment will choose which talaq process they want to make the law, where then populace will have to obey that law (again with personal religious belief taken into consideration e.g shia wont be forced to acccept something thats not in thier fiqh) and judiciary job is to interpretate this law.

    The electiosn are neccessary cuz except zakat Islam dun mention any taxes, and one need taxes to run govt, and without represenatation there can’t be any taxation. Then the election process has to be strigent. No tom dick and harry can stand in elections and win it cuz he has more money then his opponent. Any candidate has to fullfill the basic criteria of a good muslim i.e He appears to be good muslim, not a liar cheat a charlatan, of a good character, is known by the ppl of his area etc etc. This is to stop someone who dun believe in a system or use cheating or money or power base to get into the parliment or to get power.

    I can really go on but am trying to keep it simple and ofcoz thier are many nussiance in criteria to be a candidatee and much more qts we need a seperate discussion 4 that. But I hpe am able to give u a general overview.

  • jazoo said:

    Why I think Zionist powers behind this deal

    This is always the policy of Zionist think tank to make the war without being part of it.
    That means do not fight the war but exploit the rival factions to fight each other.

    When two rival factions fighting each other and both are enemy or not friendly with USA, they will make sure none is victorious, so they keep balance of power among fighting factions.

    Make no mistake Taliban are weakest party in Pakistan because it is not Afghanistan.
    Pak Army can root them out within days but to do so they need permission of Masa.
    Masa is out there to break this country, it does not suit Masa to finish Taliban, a flourishing & prospering Pakistan is not in their favor.

  • The Giant Squid said:

    @ Javed Khan,

    1. My title has got nothing to do with the content of my response. Please read it again. It is simple English.
    2. Zardari is not the ROOT CAUSE of the problem, however he is part of the problem. So I do agree partially. Actually it is the Generals who are the ROOT CAUSE of our problems.
    An old friend once quipped that in in Pakistan, no General should retire, so as soon as you make anyone a General, you should hand him over to a firing squad. A bit extreme, but I do see the point.
    3. There were no Drone Attacks is Swat, EVER. So please don’t confuse one with the other. FATA is a separate issue.
    4. If Entity A kills the family of Entity B living in Area B1, how does that give the Entity A to attack area C1? Or to kill the family of A1, C1, D1 — Z1?
    5. wtf is bollocking?

    @Rasheed,

    1. You have raised an interesting historical point. Can you please cite your source about the movement from 70s?
    2. I have heard from you that thousands of Swatis have come out. I disagree that they were in favour of this peace deal. Most of them, if not all of them, including the Maulvis have not even read this agreement. They have come out just because there is a ceasefire. And they want to get on with their lives. When these b@st@rds of Taliban started their attrocities and the army was first moved in, they showered the army with rose petals, or have you forgotten conveniently. It is the incompetence/unwillingness of the army to do the job that has caused this stalemate. So yes, I DARE !

    @Swat Yousufzai,

    What about 1965? Are you suggesting that 1965 was a victory? Do you really believe what the text book boards publish for our children’s digestion? I suppose you also believe the myth that it was India that started the war?

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan
    What is Islami Jhamoori Pakistan ?

    You put government by the people for the people, under Islamic laws isnt?
    ofcourse under your definination the defination of Pakistan is wrong? it has a haram element associated with it…. isnt?
    kindly be brave enough to answer my other 2 questions instead of just first one.

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan

    You are trying to be complex and loosing in the middle, creating many question in your own, who will decide the a Right Candidate for election? would that athority be a dictator or a elected one? Govt job is not just to collect Zakat and distribute…

    Kindly stay simple and straight

  • zaheer said:

    @pak007 said:

    “talibans caanot be rated as Pakistanis! they are not even worthy of calling themselves humans. they can be called ” creatures” in my opinion.”

    I think it is also an extreme opinion. Taliban (majority) are muslims and all of them are human beings, although there are some problems in their way and thinking. If they at first are labeled as creatures instead of Muslims and Human beings then they will react abruptly, i think any person would react abruptly at such a label! To reach the heart and mind of a person it is necessary that he/she should be respected and cared of! and Taliban are very tough/rigid mentally and physically so they should be changed through love and reasoning and not by force. I don’t think they will bow down to force ever!

    “a human being and a muslim cannot slaughter a fellow human being regardless of his/her religious belief.”

    It is true, a Muslim will not kill another Muslim! Allah Almighty in Quran has mentioned displeasure at such an act in extremely strong words!! Yes a Muslim is also not allowed to kill innocents of any other religion! BTW do you know there are groups in Pakistan who have been equally brutal but they try to present themselves as liberals, enlightened and moderates!

    “all these creatures should be punished and sentenced according to the True Shariat and Pakistani Laws. i challenge these “creatures” (if they are so Islamic and their hands are clean) to face charges and stand trial in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.”

    Well, it will be ideal if people are Judged fairly but to achieve that goal is not easy! We still as Muslims are weak at faith, understanding and practice of Islam and without that problems will not get fixed.

    - In my opinion there are some elements in Pakistan and outside who are supporting Taliban, and they not doing it for the sake of Allah Almighty or Islam, rather they are doing it for their own vested/dirty interests.

    - Never be fooled by Mr. Zaradari and Co. he is playing game of others and is making his ground for further attacks on Pakistan. He is trying to develop a trust and good name, but in reality he is opposite. Natures don’t change and that too at such an old age!

    - There is very much possibility that among Taliban are agents of enemies who provoke them for violent actions and force by convincing them that it is will of Allah. That is the reason why i say that this problem needs to be tackled very carefully and intelligently! Don’t trust on external factors and don’t be emotional in the name of Islam/Shariah. This is a trap to make us fight with each other, to hurt Muslims, as our enemies know that only way to break us is by internal strife!

    my opinion.

  • razakhan said:

    @supercreature

    I gave u examples and tried to give u an overview of democracy as explained today and democracy as explained by Islam.

    Aey Nabi, tumharee jaan ki qasam yeh os waqt tak musalmaan nahi bun saktey jab tak yeh os cheez se na ruk jain jis se tum inko rok do aur maan lain os cheez ko jis ki tum inhain ijazat day do (Al-Quran Paraphrasing aaya)

    even after such a clear authority given by ALLAH swt, Prophet PBUH always consulted with sahaba on almost every matter except what has been prescribed, so democracy has been taught to us by Prophey PBUH and sahaba’s subsequent govt till it became malookiyaat instead of Khilafat. I hope now u clear abt what am saying abt democracy.
    I dun understand bro wat u mean by defination of pak is wrong sorry could u plz clarify? If u mean currently the way we running the govt and the prresent laws we have, then yes there is element of haram in it, I will give u one specific example, forget that the govt dun establish salat, or do lot of islamic thing etc etc I will give u 2 specific example.
    In Quran when the inheritance laws have been described, the whole thing ends with the verse, “Aur yeh ALLAH ki banai hoi hudain hain inkey qareeb bhi nahi phatakna”, this is serious warning to us that inheritance should be divided as has been prescribed to us by ALLAH SWT, and what does this govt do it has estate taxes, where in Quran the state has become an inheritee of a deceased? we r in clear violation of ALLAH’S order. 2nd alcohol is sold in Pakistan to non-muslims under law(4get that all muslims could get it too, and 4get why should it even be allowed) and govt charge tax on that, when alcohol is haram so tax on that is haram too, so yes there are elements of haram in the current state but that dun mean the govt is haram for simple quranic principle that once a govt is established then for sake of peace change it with dawa 1st and lastly with khurooj.

    As for who will decide the correct candidate is ofcoz an independent election commissionar or panel who will be given the law and regulation and will judge accordingly and will have the same appeal process except taht laws will have teeths and best effort will be make to stop corrupt ppl from taking the power.

    I just answered ur qts b4 and am answering it now bro, so if u need a specific answer feel free to ask, i wasn’t trying to muddle the queries just trrying to answer u to the best of my ability.

  • zaheer said:

    I tried to compare Islam and Democracy!

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/7564226/Islam-and-Democracy

  • aaizaz said:

    can someone guide me that what type of Sharia is this, Is it pure Islamic or some traditional things are included as well?

  • zaya qoum said:

    just to clarify who ever is quoting of Rasool Karim SAW saying kay agar Fatima RA bhi chori karay tu unkay hath kat diya jain ,, That was said in the background of welfare state where you provide food shelter justice and everytihng and then if someone still doesnt mend his ways then there is punishment for him and same like in other scenarios but who ask for repent and mercy i think Muhammad SAW have showed it with many examples i hope we learn from that as well .

  • razakhan said:

    @zaheer
    May ALLAH reward you 4 this good work excellent composition to the point and true reflection of islamic political system.

    @zaya qoum

    Ur absolutely right, and its the basis of Islamic punishment that a state must take care of its citizen and remove all temptations when and if someone after this break the law then he/she should be punished severly. The point was that Islamic punishment are not barbaric as claimed by liberals on this forum. It was to refute the argument that Islamic sentences are barbaric and human right violations (Nauzobillah)

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan

    Indeed, perhaps this is the same i am talking about. but tell me can you fit what you have sit on Talib’s in swat?

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @nota,

    …This article too repeats one of the favourite lines of anti-Talibs always use in their attempt “put them down” as “Jahils” of sort…

    …Never been curious about it, have you? Ever wonder Who certified that OPV was safe for the rest of the world, and when? is an excellent question to ask, isn’t it??…

    Let me ask you this, do you really believe that the Taliban’s refusal to allow the polio vaccine is based on some scientific research and findings either of their own or of Europeans? What you have described and I have not read it completely has nothing to do with the context in which the Taliban’s have disallowed this vaccine in their areas. And btw, if it is really that bad then how come it is given to the children in the rest of the country? And please don’t tell me that Taliban’s are more scientifically advanced than the rest of the country.

  • razakhan said:

    @supercreature

    qts is not what talibaan can sit on, qts is what as a state pakistan should do. Like I have been repeating over and over and what noone is listening to is go back to basics i,.e 1973 cconstitution implementation then u can deal with all forms of extremism.

    Parliment shall not make any law contrary to sharia and shall implement sharia, its stated in constitution. When SC ruled abt 10 yrs ago that interest is haram and Govt should start with non interest banking why its taken 10 yrs to not even draft a legislation. We all know how bad interest is. Middle eastern economies been doing without the interest good, London is becoming the hub of Islamic banking imagine just on economic level what we have been loosing.
    What Talibaan doing is same as what MQM doing in karachi, or what happening all over Pak, just substitute name of Islam with liberalism and secularism. There is a culture aspect of frontier or int sindh. I remember all these waderas daughter who were lucky enuff to study in karachi uni woiuld go one without burqa but in village the whole jeep will be covered lol So lets go back to basics which everyone agrees and then go 4 economics and education.

  • listen said:

    http://www.jang.com.pk/jang/apr2009-daily/15-04-2009/update.htm#56

    i knew it from the day one…it was just a propagnda stunt

  • zaya qoum said:

    problem doesnt lie with Islam it lies with its followers . Rasool Karim SAW was the best exempler and we are worst follower .
    Lashing if you dont have beard it means many japanese or chinese cant be muslims or if you are in cold weather and you cant wear shalwar kameez you cant be muslim.
    Discrimination on basis of religion that my God is superior than yours so ive to kill you so thats how ill make my God happy. I think if we just look we have made more athesit with this approch rather than muslims. I m pointing to new generation
    Hazrat Muhammad SAW never used force or even loud voice to convince any one to become muslim .He spent all His life to prove that point that patience and politness and we are trying our best by doing those kind of jabar in religion to prove Him wrong.
    pai i see worse future of our country and its people. to summarise all this bitter ness.

  • Muhammad Usman said:

    I am wondering if some new found democrats liberals and rally renters will say some thing about this unjustice to paksi in their DESH

  • zaya qoum said:

    i forgot to mention parda , if you read quran and sunnah you will know it was different for Rasool Karim wives and for other womens , then its different in different cultures . kepping the minimum requirment . But with this talib approch a girl cannot become doctor becuase when she will go to operate someone she wont be able to see what is she operating. I think it would be right to say that we really need to educate ourselves . On which Rasool Karim SAW have emphasised much. Religion was made for eliminating discriminations of everykind but i think we are trying our best to use religion to amplify this .

  • sic5770 said:

    “(OPV) CAN cause poliomyelitis i.e. polio (and some believe today it is the leading cause of polio). And are you aware that OPV IS NOT USED in France, Germany, Canada and USA, Scandinavian coun-”

    Nota,

    One of the reason for not giving Polio vaccine in these countries, the disease has been eradicated for long time in these countries.

  • altf_0011 said:

    Let me tell you, today every Pakistani is suffering except he/she belongs to elite class, why there is hypocracy and double standard of so-called Pakistani human rights (humanity rights of indian minority doesn’t come under humanity? We talk about the flogging of a girl but we don’t give a damn about the widows, helpless poor women and poor class people of our country to get food, medicines and other daily necessities of lives. That women is only repectable when she is flogged, but when she and her entire family dying little by little of lack of food and basic human need, then that very same woman is irrelivant? Why this hipocracy?

  • altf_0011 said:

    ***correction***That woman is only respectable when she is flogged? But…….

  • altf_0011 said:

    Kerry of Democrate party is talking about financial aid to Pak civilian. What a joke? Who is going to make sure that aid money this time will reach to deserving people (pit of poverity) Zardari & Company? It is like telling beast to take care of floc (bakeriyu ka raywer) of sheeps.

  • Kashif said:

    @razakhan

    Taliban and MQM may share their roots at GHQ and some militancy approaches but any comparision beyond that is highly unfair. Kidnapping, ransoms, torture is probably common but Taliban is much more than that. Our military and police are not attacked at this scale before by anyone as Taliban is doing now. MQM targets political opponents but nothing like Taliban. Their indiscriminate suside bombings have no political boundries. Last but not the least we like it or not MQM has been consistently winning since mid 80’s and Taliban believes this whole election process is kufur.

  • nota said:

    @sic5770 said:
    “Nota,
    One of the reason for not giving Polio vaccine in these countries, the disease has been eradicated for long time in these countries.”

    Sorry but that makes no sense. If that were reasoning was true, then why continue to give IPV??

    @Amir Hameed
    “Let me ask you this, do you really believe that the Taliban’s refusal to allow the polio vaccine is based on some scientific research and findings either of their own or of Europeans? What you have described and I have not read it completely has nothing to do with the context in which the Taliban’s have disallowed this vaccine in their areas. And btw, if it is really that bad then how come it is given to the children in the rest of the country? And please don’t tell me that Taliban’s are more scientifically advanced than the rest of the country.”

    I think you missed my point completely — and intentionally ;-) .

    – NOWHERE did I state that “Taliban’s refusal to allow the polio vaccine is based on some scientific research”
    – It has EVERYTHING to do “with the context in which the Taliban’s have disallowed this vaccine in their areas.”

    Regarding “if it is really that bad then how come it is given to the children in the rest of the country?” Because WE ARE TOLD it is “GOOD” for us. I certainly don’t buy it but most doctors/government officials do and WHO demands it. (BTW did you know even in America — by law — one has the right to refuse these vaccines? I found that out after much effort — all the doctors knew but tried their best to hide the info)

    You cannot deny that “Polio Vaccination Used For Population Control” is a belief held by many all over, and not just the Taliban (and I thought I provided pretty clear evidence of that.) Just because you don’t want to believe it doesn’t make the truth go away…

  • Mutazalzaluzzaman Tarar said:

    @abuzarghafari,

    make me.

  • ash110 said:

    Today again the government has failed to show the courage to face these cowards who have imposed their own brand of islam on the entire division , and i must salute MQM and the sole voice of Ayaz Amir from Pml(n) who raised their voice against these henious criminals of swat.

    I dont understand why the armed forces of Pakistan are giving up to these terrorists if it is only for strategic reasons than let me assure them than in case of a crises the whole nation will be standing with them but for now they will have to take firm actions aganist these taliban terrorists because they are the real threat to the intergrity of the country.

    Infact the Pak army should launch an operation the way Srilankan army has doing against tamils and i am pretty much sure that it will not take more than 6 months to exterminate these terrorists because the whole nation is aganist them and they will be eliminated in a matter of months.

    So i think we should pray and atleast speak up aganist them openly because silence at this moment will amount of cowardice and an acceptance of the demand of terrorist of swat and their allies.

  • imran25 said:

    @all. suicidal attack in charsada. 15 dead. hidden hands active to fail the peace deal.

  • imran25 said:

    @all
    zardai says he will review the bill,if np peace. i think theywant to make this deal a faiure themselves and then go for a big operation.

  • Nonaligned said:

    It was appalling to see the spineless parliament passing the Nizaam-e -Adal bill without having any debate. Now that Genie’s is out of bottle it will be very interesting to see Taliban’s knocking at the doors of Islamabad to implement their Sharia.
    Our much loved cowardly and selfish leaders are busy in filling their pockets, why they care; they will move back to US, UK or UAE and live in their luxury palaces with lot more stolen money to spend.
    Again the loser will be the poor public.

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan

    “What Talibaan doing is same as what MQM doing in karachi, or what happening all over Pak, ”

    2 wrong or 3 wrong can not make 1 right … wrong will not create a good deed and will create more evil indeed.

  • razakhan said:

    @supercreature

    sorry u keep missing the point nothing further could be gained by arguing so good luck.

    @Kashif

    MQM did targetted the security forces and has been targetting them from beginning, during operation clean up they targeted them as ruthelessly as Talibaan doing today. When there is an operation launched against some segment they will retaliate. The degree of retaliation is meaningless the point is retaliation.

  • munna said:

    In my opinion.
    I want Sharia in my country. No more no less. Do the right fear no one.

    Bros.
    Instead of cursing each other we should move to do something. Don’t we? before its too late.

  • munna said:

    @Nonaligned

    The change is bound to happen. The current social-political system has to go now.

  • Nonaligned said:

    @munna
    I do not have any problems if the change is Iranian type where my brother and sisters can go to college and universities and I am not forced to change my appearence. I myself hate the current social and political system in Pakistan and it must change. Thank you.

  • ash110 said:

    This massage is aimed at munna and the likes of him , that if you called the barbaric system of taliban as shariat than go and live in their areas we cant allow these barbaric tradition to prevail in our country. This is not shariat and they are only giving bad name to islam as they are the agents of world power who are minting their money by committing terrorist activities and those who are willing to accept this terrorist sort of shariat can follow it in their own life but dont ever try to impose it on us otherwise we wont sit and wait for them to come . WE WILL GO AFTER THEM AND TELL THEM THAT IF WE ARE NOT SAYING ANYTHING TO THEM IT DOESNT MEAN THAT WE ARE SCARED OF THEM.

  • munna said:

    The world is never be a safest place to Live. Only the fittest survive. It’s a challenge posed to us either take it or die. To live like a respectable nation there is a price to pay. We got independence 1947 from British raj and now we need to get freedom from this elite.

    I respect others opinion but its time army should be set asides and we as a nation should change the way we look towards the things.

    The fundamentalism is a by product of our injustices. Doing military operations is not a solution. We need to change things now and its time to do otherwise we will push our children in that hell where might is right.

    Whatever games are played with us, we must play no games with ourselves.

    Please Take the challenge, we need to trust ourselves and we can bring the change. The discussion should be how …

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan

    ofcouse a big good luck to you too as you kept avoiding my actual questions …

  • Awaam said:

    The issue of who is going to define Shariah is going to be very painful if Taliban lay their claim on this issue. Since it has been done, now they should move very carefully.

  • munna said:

    @ash110
    Respectfully, overcome you emotions, its not me, my blood son or my blood sister. Its us. Its we. Its Pakistan united against all those barbaric forces either they come in a rob if MQM or Taliban for a specific goal of respect of each other. Proud to be Muslim and Pakistani.

  • razakhan said:

    @ash110
    then bring it on. Ghar baith kar computer par likhna asan itna he sadma hai to go fight with pakistani army in FATA.

    What is the objection here?
    1 – Is the nifaz-e-adl regulation unconstitutional?
    2 – Didn’t the Parliment passed the bill?
    3 – FATA n Malakand division are autonomous area not part of Pakistan like sindh, punjab etc and r guaranted thier own laws as per pact to join Pakistan?

    So I fail to understand ur objection? Nothing has changed what was guaranted to them to be part of Pakistan is being done after so many years. They are autonomous region. If u so love law and order then why double standard?

    6 years Pak army has done operations 100 of 1000’s of ppl have been displaced from the area. But u want more bloodshed. Tell u wat Lets do operation and lets do till all talibaan are wiped out on one condition. Same operation must be done all over pakistan in Baluchistan, in sindh specially in Karachi. Against JSSF, MQM, all Baluchistan nationalist parties.

    If not then u guys are hypocrites. U accuse of Talibaan of imposing thier point of view and what abt u guys imposing ur point of view now even saying Pakistan shoudl be secular state. I would rather see pak destroyed then be a secular state. Dun like Islamic Pakistan get the hell out and go live in India.

  • munna said:

    @razakhan
    Secular state over my dead body.

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan
    yaar you can not simply answer basic questions and trying to quote Quran and justifying taliban’s and trying to tell about MQM. I hate MQM, as they do evil things, same go with talibs. Is burning and blowing girls school islamic? is destroying people’s houses Islamic, is making state in state islamic, is using computer un-islamic?

    why after peace deal the killing and blood shed will stop as per local people? didnt you clearly see all the interview of locals those clearly saying just do what talibs want and the killing will stop. means talib will stop killings … wt-f

    The issue with taliban’s is that they just just taking sharia for political purpose… there are so many basic issue missing from their version of islam.

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan

    “I would rather see pak destroyed then be a secular state. Dun like Islamic Pakistan get the hell out and go live in India.”

    You wishes are getting there because of your talibs, they are already destroying Pakistan, they bringing the culture where your wife can not go out with your father … and name it islam …. and don’t dare to justify this because this is what the spokeman of talibs admitted on tv interview openly.

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan

    Ofcouse no one who has some sense want secular pakistan. but ofcourse not that version of pakistan either that taliban want to impose on country and perhaps you will not need any evidence about BIG loopholes of their version

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @nota,

    …I think you missed my point completely — and intentionally ;-)

    Well, contrary to your belief, I did not miss your point, but I can not do anything about paranioa!!!


    …Because WE ARE TOLD it is “GOOD” for us….

    Not a convincing argument at all.


    …BTW did you know even in America — by law — one has the right to refuse these vaccines? I found that out after much effort — all the doctors knew but tried their best to hide the info.

    Yes, I do know about it but it has got nothing to do with the nature of these vaccines and everything to do with constitutional rights.


    You cannot deny that “Polio Vaccination Used For Population Control” is a belief held by many all over, and not just the Taliban (and I thought I provided pretty clear evidence of that.) Just because you don’t want to believe it doesn’t make the truth go away…

    Only if a belief can be validated with a hard evidence, otherwise it is merely a belief and nothing more. If you can show me a scientific evidence or research findings indicating that these vaccines are or have been related to pupulation control then I am willing to accept it, otherwise, they are merely stories.

  • AClarionCall said:

    Now since the Talibani gun-waving shariat has been officially enforced in Swat; supporters of Taliban and Shariat on this forum and elsewhere in Pakistan should move to Swat immediately and live under the world’s best government system. Now khuda hi hafiz hai is mulk ka. Though I am not supporter of MQM but I salute them for opposing an unjust bill which will further destabilise the region and divide this country and people.

  • ConcernedAmericanPak said:

    For your information a western legal view of the Sharia, just as a refrance.

    The word “sharia” means “the path” or “the path to water”.

    Muslim or Islamic law, both civil and criminal justice as well as regulating individual conduct both personal and moral. The custom-based body of law based on the Koran and the religion of Islam. Because, by definition, Muslim states are theocracies, religious texts are law, the latter distinguished by Islam and Muslims in their application, as Sharia or Sharia law.

    The sacred law of Islam; Islamic law.

    So thorough is the integration of the justice system and Church under Sharia law that Sharia courts are essentially religious courts; judges are usually local church (Mosque) officials.

    Also spelled Shariah or Shari’ah and, in the USA, Shari’a. Because of the religious origin of the word, some prefer to capitalize it and others not.

    The word “sharia” means “the path” or “the path to water”.

    Sharia as a source of law, is, by definition, arbitrary and discretionary – some would prefer to describe it as flexible.

    The Oxford Dictionary of Islam proposes a distinction between sharia and fiqh as follows:

    “Whereas shariah is immutable and infallible, fiqh is fallible and changeable.”
    Opportunistic jurists will defer to the distinction only when convenient; to propose that an unfavourable tenet of Islamic law is mere fiqh and must cede to a more favourable tenet issue from shariah.

    But that distinction – which limits sharia to the divinely provided law, and fiqh to the interpretation of sharia – is not universally followed. Many sources refer to fiqh as synonymous to shariah.

    As an example of the scope of confusion, note that the English language Oxford Dictionary of Islam is of no assistance, defining shariah using a deep Muslim tone:

    “Shariah: God’s eternal and immutable will for humanity as expressed in the Quran and Muhammad’s example. ”

    Sharia law – Islamic law involves not only tortuous and mostly literal interpretations of ancient Muslim traditions and Arab tribal customs, and of a religious book written in about 632 (the Koran) which took – but also modified – many of those customs.

    To that mix, there have been several subsequent religious texts and schools of thought (such as the Sunna), which is itself an interpretation of the Koran.

    Even more: to this is added a plethora of alleged sayings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad (530-632) and his successors.

    Each of the approximately 50 Islamic states and countries that have, to varying degrees, Sharia law, has applied layers of doctrine upon the original religious texts resulting in a multitude of different interpretations and different legal results.

    In The Legal Companion (2005), author V. Powell writes:

    “Muslim countries enforce the Sharia to different extents.

    “Iran and Saudi Arabia apply it to all areas of life….

    “The Sharia is also interpreted differently within different branches of Islam.”

    Further, in the context of Sharia law practitioners or courts which operate outside of Muslim or Islamic states but within other jurisdictions, the practice of Sharia law is consistently represented as flexible and reconciliatory in nature; a far cry from the protestations of Muslim jurists in states which are primarily Muslim.

    Some countries, such as Tunisia, have hybrid systems, rejecting Sharia law in most instances yet relying it in others, such as in the area of divorce and family law, inheritance, contracts and banking.

    To some Sharia jurists, the Sharia applies only to Muslims and does not technically apply to non-Muslims such as Christians (eg. Malaysia and Indonesia as of 2008). In other jurisdictions, such as Sudan (as of 2008), the application of the Shari law to non-Muslims – with all the attendant punishments – is considered unfair and unjust.

    Thus, it is difficult to speak of Sharia as a distinct or cohesive body of law.

    One consistent feature is that, by design of the Islam prophet Muhammad, and his Koran, Islamic or Sharia law reaches far deeper into the control of the personal and moral life of the people who are bound to it than, for example, those jurisdictions governed by civil law or common law systems.

    For example, in Sharia law, it is forbidden for post-pubescent women to expose their faces in public.

    The use of alcohol and the consumption of pork are prohibited.

    Because the governments are often theocratic, any criticism of the government is taken as blasphemy, for which the Sharia prescribes prison or death.

    Sharia law is often taken to task by common law or civil law jurisdictions for the perceived cruelty and gender-bias of its content. For example, this extract from a 2006 article published in the international law review of Loyola Law School at Los Angeles:

    “In 2002, a Nigerian Sharia court sentenced Amina Lawal to be stoned to death for having a child out of wedlock; in contrast, the man named as the father denied responsibility, and as a result, the court dropped charges against him.

    “In another case, teenager Bariya Magazu asserted that she was raped by three men and became pregnant as a result. Because she had sex outside of marriage, a Sharia court sentenced her to one hundred lashes, even though seven people corroborated her story. The men accused of the rape received no punishment.

    “The extreme bias against women is apparent in sentences of adultery or fornication under Sharia. A woman is convicted simply by becoming pregnant, but a man is not condemned unless four people can testify that they witnessed the normally private acts of adultery or fornication.

    “Countries such as Nigeria impose flogging, stoning, or severing off a hand … all of which are deterrent punishments for serious crimes mentioned in the (Koran).”

    Some other common features of Sharia law, some taken from the Koran, some from subsequent legal texts:

    While in public, women must cover their faces with a Hijab.
    Men can have up to four wives and can divorce (called talaq) at their option. If they do not divorce their first wife but just abandon her, she is obliged to carry on as a married woman and cannot seek out another spouse without risking the traditional punishment for adultery: stoning. Stoning is done in public by first wrapping a person in a blanket and burying them in a deep hole exposing their head and the population gathered around is invited to throw large stones at the adulterer, the size of which Sharia law prescribes, and a sentence always fatal.
    The penalty after a fourth conviction of a homosexual act is death.
    Adoption is not allowed. Adults can become guardians of the children of others but not the legal parents through adoption.
    Sharia law prohibits dating and marriage between a Muslim and a non-Muslim and it is practically impossible for a Muslim (even a recent convert) to renounce the Muslim faith.
    Any abandonment of the Muslim faith is itself a serious crime (apostasy) with severe punishment.
    Sharia law has a stringent evidentiary requirement for eye witnesses, preferably from men. Convictions for crimes cannot be based on circumstantial evidence alone.
    Vagrancy can carry tough penalties such as jail and caning.
    Generally, a person alleged to have violated Sharia laws in the states governed by them would not be pursued, or apprehended, in states not governed by Sharia laws.
    Many states which implement Sharia law have blasphemy statutes which punishes by prison or death any person who such as preaching Christianity or the distribution of Christian items.
    Adherents of Sharia law believe it to be divinely inspired; as the word of God (Allah).

    Muslims or adherents of the Muslim faith, often resent the portrayal of Sharia as medieval. If a statement of law is set out their great book, the Koran, that, to them, is a full response.

    Muslims point to “social problems” they say are endemic to countries with other systems of law (such as tolerance of non-traditional sexual orientation, personal crime and divorce rates) and add that the invasive and deterrent features of Sharia law are merited as this arrests those “problems” and thus frees the people and society to attain their true potential, as God aspires.

    As with most theocracies, Sharia law is difficult if not impossible to reconcile with the fundamental principles of democracy. One of the features of Sharia is that, in theory, it is invariable and stable. Democratic principles such as political pluralism and the constant tug towards expanding individual freedoms are incompatible with Sharia.

    In Refash Party v Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights adopted these words:

    “It is difficult to declare one’s respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia, which clearly diverges from values (of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms), particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervenes in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts….

    “In the Court’s view, a political party whose actions seem to be aimed at introducing Sharia in a State party to the Convention can hardly be regarded as an association complying with the democratic ideal that underlies the whole of the Convention.”

    http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/S/ShariaLaw.aspx

  • razakhan said:

    @AClarionCall

    actually now u leave pak, next stop shariat all over pak, so u liberals better start moving lol

    @supercreature

    Bro I have been very polite with u. Simply I dun understand ur qts I have answered ur qts and the gentleman above provided u a link so u can understand the Islamic political govt prinicple here it is again

    {zaheer said:
    I tried to compare Islam and Democracy!
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/7564226/Islam-and-Democracy}

    Could Be I simply am not understanding ur qts. Is it that Talibaan r wrong? Is that ur qts? If it is what I have stated several time will state again. I agree with talibaan on the principal of sharia but not the path of implementation. If thats not ur qts then feel free to ask away but plz do a qts a time thanks.

  • AClarionCall said:

    @razakhan

    Why don’t you first move to Swat and send us letters and pictures of beautiful Swat valley. But you are warned that your kids (girls) will not be able to continue their education after 4th grade. Your wife will not be able to leave house. I don’t know what restrictions will be forced on you? You better try this Swat experience. I wish you and your family all the best.

  • supercreature said:

    @razakhan

    I am also polite with you, ofcourse I am clearly saying talibans are wrong the way they are imposing and trying to implement their own version of sharia, I am not against sharia, but its white like milk that Taliban’s is only putting half and bit wrong sharia, half of islam is not islam either.

    and ofcourse when you tell people about running off the pakistan, can you first think about swat sharia that you love and defend in many hidden ways, put you and your family in swat as that (taliban’s version) sharia will be your saviour. Earn the heaven man. :)

  • Adonis said:

    In the Capital Talk today, an NGO activist Farzana Bari was vehemently attacking the Nizam-i-Adl regulation. Shireen Mazari asked her one simple question, “Have you read this regulation”? and she had not.

    Seems like many people here are doing exactly the same. I would request them to read this regulation first. It is at the top of this page and is not too long. This little effort on their part would be very much appreciated and perhaps then they would be better able to enlighten the rest of us regarding what is so bad about this regulation.

  • JavedKhan said:

    Give this peace deal a chance to work.
    I don’t think that Taliban or Sharia Law is the problem. The real porblem is Zardari and Rehman Malik. This peace deal was signed on 16 Feb and for nearly 2 months, Zardari was sitting on it and never presented to the Parliament. It is only after Sufi Ghulam Mohd threat to cancel the deal which got Zardari by noose.
    And also earlier Zardari was playing with the written singned agreements for one year, and again when Qazi Sahib and Imran Khan announced that they will support the Long March, and moreover on the day of Long March, Nawaz Sharif ’s daring attempt to come out of his Model Town home got Zardari to sign the Judges Restoration Executive Order.
    In fact Zardari has got the habit of taking Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamba Dunda, and only when he feels the pain He signs the agreement.
    Has anyone got a bigger Dunnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnda for Rehamn Malik and Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarder Dunda for Babar Awan.

  • Baluchi said:

    I got it and READY as well

  • mjkk86 said:

    now criminal will give us justice.i feel sory for people of swat. we all agree with what quran says but, there are only few who understand it and apply it logicaly without being discriminatory. wisdom is not inherited anyone can get it as long as he or she really wants to. as a socitey we are breaking in pieces because of our beliefs, faiths and casts. spend life according to sunnah but, bear in mind don’t expect this world to be what it was 1600 years ago. times changes, our priorty changes always look forward to work for betterment of our socitey.

  • mjkk86 said:

    now criminal will give us justice.i feel sory for people of swat. we all agree with what quran says but, there are only few who understand it and apply it logicaly without being discriminatory. wisdom is not inherited anyone can get it as long as he or she really wants to. as a socitey we are breaking in pieces because of our beliefs, faiths and casts. spend life according to sunnah but, bear in mind don’t expect this world to be what it was 1600 years ago. times changes, our priorty changes always look forward to work for betterment of our socitey.

  • jazoo said:

    Those who are signatory of Nizam e Adl does not qualify
    Just today Sufi Mohhammad declare all the previous crimes are forgiven that means all those Talibans who slaughter human beings like animal are given immunity.

    Who gave him rights under sharia to forgive the murderers.

    Please do not quote Prophet had given immunity to all the killers in conquest of Mecca.

    Prophet(saw) has more rights on believers Nafs than believers themselves as per Quran.
    Nafs is compose of body & soul, this is exclusively Prophet’s prerogative to forgive killers, Sufi Mohmmad is not Prophet.

    This all sharia holler under criminals is nothing but a joke

  • JavedKhan said:

    @mjkk86

    As I just said earlier that please please give it try for at least 4 weeks and let us hope for the best. Think of those who have lost loved ones.
    Today the Governor of NWFP has also signed the Agreement and there was a collective ‘Duaa’ , so let us wait and see what happens.
    Remember that ANP is a double face bastards because all their life they have promoted secular views and have taken bumper packages from Russians in the past, and now they are talking about Isalamic Sharia. All they want is to extend their rule by hook or crook.
    I have said in my comments earlier that there is a secret deal between ANP and Zardari that the Govt will not press ahead for the construction of Kala Bagh Dam project and in return ANP will keep favouring Zardari in the Parliament should there be any resolution for the removal of Zardari. And please also note that the ANP has also forgotton the movement to change the name of NWFP ot Pukhtun Kwah. Zarari is really playing a very very dirty politics.
    In the end I repeat, please give it a try…………what do you think?

  • AClarionCall said:

    Now all the thugs of Swat have license of ghunda gardi. Taliban thugs will get immunity from past criminal acts and may be future as well. May God bless on this country.

  • sam33r said:

    Nizam -e -Adal lol@ adal

    Adal with Ak-47 damn man

    Taliban mullah’s be a Qazi to give Justice !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • supercreature said:

    Muslims are generally obliged to abide by the laws of the land and the country they live in, whether it is a Islamic state (al-khilafa), Muslim countries, or non-Muslim countries such as those in the west, as long as they are not ordered to practice something that is against Shariah. If they are forced by the law to commit a sin, then in such a case, it will not just be unnecessary to abide by the law, rather impermissible.

    Some Muslims are under the impression that it is permissible to violate the laws of countries that are not an Islamic state (al-Khilafa), which is totally incorrect. Muslims must adhere to the laws of any country they live in, whether in the west or the east, as long as the law is not in contradiction with one’s religion.

    Ofcourse if you are living in europe and no one stop to practice your beliefs then whats the issue? Talabs spokeman muslim khan first of all said we do not follow and accept pakistani constitution … can I right to say he does not abide the state law that has allowed them to put sharia in swat, arent they voilating Allah’s commands???

    @razakhan perhaps your taliban’s version of faith will put some light on this. even you are living in secular state or islamic or democrative one, you CANNOT fight against state if they let you practice your faith…

  • Shah said:

    After going through most of the posts, I am getting the feeling that perhaps we are missing the larger picture.

    1. I think we should look at the problems of Pakistan from the larger perspective of a A STATE whose institutions as a whole are in crisis. The fundamental question of the state structures, functions and composition not only stirs controversy and opposition in its present form, but also on the way forward. For instance, the Federal-Provincial question of authority, Checks and balances between state institutions, etc.

    2. The crisis itself is manifold and ranges from issues of legitimacy to efficiency, corruption and patronization.

    3. The situation in the region has affected the existing crisis of the state of Pakistan in two distinct ways:

    a. The foreign element has accentuated the state-society divide and further alienated the people from the state.

    b. The local issues have found foreign support in some cases, but regardless, the long-stadning local grievances have found a new way of expression in militant approach towards their redressal.

    Before we settle the issues fundamental to the state-society relationship, we will remain prone to treat symptoms rather than the underlying causes. I see the situation in Swat, FATA and Balochistan as indicative of failure of the idea and presence of the state as we know it and the filling up of the counter idea of the state by elements estranged from the current dispensation. The space for the counter ideas is provided by the lack of legitimatcy, inclusiveness, and efficiency of the current state aparatus.

  • mjkk86 said:

    i agree we should give a try and hope for best but, here is my question if a rapist or a killer wants to be a chief justice would you vote in his favor or you got courage to say no you are not fit for purpose?
    most of us have no problem with sharia law rather have some concerns about it’s implementation by well known criminals.
    as i said earlier our beliefs and casts are breaking us in pieces all we think about is our muslim brother or our choudry, jutt, malik ,..etc..alot of bollox and shite.
    zardari is not even a politician like many other in our political trade. politics is easiest way to become famous and rich. whoever thinks they came in politics to serve their country is living in fool’s paradise, politics is a part time activity for our rich to earn some extra money, fame, abuse of power and few luxry trips on our money.
    why waderas don’t let their farmer’s son to get education because they know if he got education they won’t have any1 to exploit for their personel motives.all need to change but, i cannot see any1 in pakistan who can change it, unfortunate but, true.

  • mjkk86 said:

    i agree we should give a try and hope for best but, here is my question if a rapist or a kill*r wants to be a chief justice would you vote in his favor or you got courage to say no you are not fit for purpose?
    most of us have no problem with sharia law rather have some concerns about it’s implementation by well known criminals.
    as i said earlier our beliefs and casts are breaking us in pieces all we think about is our muslim brother or our choudry, jutt, malik ,..etc..alot of boll*x and sh*te.
    zardari is not even a politician like many other in our political trade. politics is easiest way to become famous and rich. whoever thinks they came in politics to serve their country is living in fool’s paradise, politics is a part time activity for our rich to earn some extra money, fame, abuse of power and few luxry trips on our money.
    why waderas don’t let their farmer’s son to get education because they know if he got education they won’t have any1 to exploit for their personel motives.all need to change but, i cannot see any1 in pakistan who can change it, unfortunate but, true.

  • Kashif said:

    @sam33r

    Please don’t be surprised Islam spread through wars. There is nothing peaceful about the Islam except the name. In the name of spreading peace, brotherhood and God’s words Islam allows Jihad and promotes bloodshed. Islam is not alone all religions are tools of violence. I am glad they are not as effective as they were 400 years ago.

  • Kashif said:

    Religion is an art of controlling brains. When the goal is to control the brains the process is bound to be violent. My only problem with religion is the “divine” nature of it makes it very effective.

  • mjkk86 said:

    @kashif
    though religion was contributing factor in all wars and civil wars but i expect you to be realistic and tolerent about islam it was’nt islam who spread bloodshed, it was race of supermacy which spread the bloodshed. think about it.

  • Kashif said:

    @mjkk86

    What do you mean by ‘race of supermacy’ ?

  • mjkk86 said:

    who is superior

  • swali said:

    JOB VACANCIES IN SWAT
    April 15, 2009 by islamabadobserver

    Emirate of Ameerul Momeneen
    Sufi Muhammad, Khalifah-i-Awal, Sawat

    JOB VACANCIES IN SWAT
    ABOUT US
    Emirate was founded and funded in September 2004 by various international intelligence agencies in Sawat and is recently recognized by National Assembly of Pakistan. Our group takes pride in our tradition of successfully delivering numerous projects of Suicide Bombing, School Demolitions, Public Flogging, Closure of Barber and Video Shops, Truck Bomb Attacks, Military Encounters and Gorilla Warfare.

    We have a deep understanding of Terrorism industry dynamics, coupled with solid experience in applying emerging technologies like FM Radio, Wireless Communication and IED’s . Anchored on the premise of delivering practical, yet economical Terrorism solutions, our dedicated team of experienced Terrorists ensures that foreign interest are protected at all costs.

    Our dynamic team consists of experienced professionals with extensive experience across multiple terrorism techniques. We are committed to helping our foreign clients solve strategic challenges and create opportunities to drive desired goals through Terrorism technology. We are proud to be strategic partners of USA, India, Saudi Arabia and several international intelligence agencies, and will continue to seek value added partnerships in our endeavor to sharpen our Terrorism focus.

    As a responsible Terrorist organisation, Emirates is running various community developments and training project for under privileged children in fields of guerilla war, self exploding, use of weapons, taking over public building, speedy justice through public flogging and indiscriminate shooting. A large number of our trainees are successfully running their enterprises of kidnapping for ransom, bank robberies, and cash van lootings, roadside dacoits, vehicle theft, drug and arms smuggling and bomb blasts for foreign clients.

    With our expansion plans in progress, we are seeking talented, creative, result-oriented, self-managed and proactive candidates to fill the following challenging and career-building position:

    Qazi cum Flogging Experts

    Responsibilities

    It is a full time multiple role responsibility, the successful candidates shall act as a Qazi/Justice during normal court hours and in after hours carry on flogging, beheadings and guerilla warfare duties as assigned by Ameerul Momeneen. They will report & assist Head Qazi to achieving the vision, mission, objectives & target set for punishments of poor helpless citizens by TNSM Shoora to create an environment of terror and fear. The successful candidates will order hanging of bodies with polls for any period as to their discretion, blowing up shrines, digging graves and punishing dead and alive without mercy. Sharia shall remain a major cover but any order of Shoora shall be treated as a law even if it is against teachings of Islam and Sharia,.

    Requirements:

    Candidate must have a certificate of training from Taliban recognized Madrassah or group backed by CIA/RAW. No formal education or knowledge of law is required;
    The candidate must have at least 10 years practical experience of terrorist activities in Afghanista, Pakistan or successfully undergone RAW’s training program;
    Candidates with Experience in public flogging, beheading or punishing women in Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan will be given preference;
    Candidates should be expert in use of light and heavy weapons, developing suicide jackets, IED, Truck bomb and conducting road blocks;
    All candidate should demonstrate their willingness to abide by Taliban dress code and rituals;
    Ability to implement laws of Emirates without application of mind and in disregard of Islamic teachings. The focus should be on maximum and harsh punishments to terrorize people, religion or humanity are not important

    Selection Process;

    Candidates should walk in for interview with their application written by hand on dry leaves or hides in head office of Emirate, applications written on paper shall not be considered;
    Do not attach photo’s, applications with a photographs shall not be considered;
    At time of interview candidate must cover face with black cloth or use medical mask dyed in black color;
    Practical test includes demonstration of skills of live shooting, beheading and flogging, Emirates will provide living women and children for tests;
    Weapons test includes an excellent speed of killing and accuracy of hitting girls schools with RPG’s. Half hour test will be carried live any city of Pakistan;
    All candidates should demonstrate ability of assembling suicide jackets, IED and exploding bridges, cars and public buildings.

    We Offer:

    Free stay in a any house candidate wishes to occupy after killing or ejecting the residents;
    A luxury stolen 4×4 with facility of free fuel from any gas station, successful candidates can also take away cash on gun point from gas stations;
    This job is purely commission based, the successful candidates will get 20% commission from robberies or kidnapping for ransom assigned to them after ‘court’ hours;
    All successful candidates will be allowed to choose any women in area for marriage, in case; women is already married, her husband should first be killed or forced to divorce her as required by Emirates law;
    All successful candidates will be allowed to smuggle arms and drugs under protection of Emirate and will share 50% of revenue;
    All successful candidates will be allowed to run part time business of stolen cars or smuggled electronics.
    Best performing candidates will be assigned ‘overseas projects’ opportunities by Ameerul Momeneen as empire expands;
    Top 100 performers of the year will be blessed with a ‘one way ticket to havens’ through suicide missions.
    A comprehensive social security plan includes recruitment of suicide bomber’s or dead employee’s children in force and complementary marriage with his widow by a fellow terrorist.
    All assignments for successful candidates are legal and covered under Nizam Adal Act passed by National Assembly of Pakistan and duly signed by President.

    For further information contact;

    Mullah Rockety;

    Secretary Recruitments;

    Emirate of Ameerul Momeneen Maulana Sufi Muhammad;

    Khalifah-i-Awal Sawat.

  • swali said:

    why mine is awaiting moderation. Be fair and lets every body have the right to express. You never showed any thing about the thugs.

  • Kashif said:

    Great job swali. I can’t think of better words to describe Talibanization..

  • Jutt kharak said:

    Our Military’ Pak fauj’ created this menace Taliban. Very proudly.
    They told us to ‘gain strategic depth’ in Afghanistan’.
    Now that was a Hoax, if you have not noticed, because they are here now,this Pak Fauj is run by F.A pass Generals, who have no sh**t clue about the world they live in. They are Zia trained recruited hard core islamists,in thousands, who are bent upon making youa ’sharaii Muslim’, whether you like it or not.
    Remember Kargil, this misadventure should always be remembered as the ultimate folly of our Army commanders.
    A civilian PM was left totally unaware of this bogus Shahadat venture. Defeat brought it to a hulmiliating halt. General Musharaff was elevated to the President’s job by this Army mafia. The General responsible for this fiasco. In a civilised country he would have been court martialed for his illegal acts.
    This same Army is ruining this country once more.
    There is a strong support among Army commanders for the Taliban.
    If you look the way ‘Nizam-e-Adle ‘ is drafted , it is obvious it is done by the ISI.
    Sufi Muhammad’bechara ‘ has no clue.
    You think they will now lay down their Arms?? Kid me not.
    Zia-ul-Haq’s ghost is back, with a vengence

  • Baluchi said:

    @swali – posted/10.31pm & @Jutt Kharak

    What a load of crap both of you have put on here, because one of you is Jutt anyway….
    I think JavedKhan’s comments @ 8.01 pm evaluates the situation more correctly and pertinently and I want you to read it.
    Zardari is the root cause of ALL the problems. This is true he was sitting on the deal for two months, and only after the threat of Sufi Ghulam Mohd, he signed the deal otherwise he was going to linger on for another year.

    Today this bloody idiot is in Tokyo and He has no clue about the financial matters, fiscal policies or no idea whatsoever of Liqudity ratios……..all He wants is 10%.
    The sooner we git rid of this man……better for all of us.

  • Jutt kharak said:

    @Baluchi

    Hey I forgive you for your ignorance
    afterall you are a baluchi

    You live in a fools world ,Zardari has just arrived on the scene
    seeds for this b.s were sowed when you were still f **ing the goats in Zhob or Turbat

  • Amir Hameed said:

    “Qazis’ verdict can’t be challenged in SC”
    —-
    …. Sufi Muhammad said challenging the Qazi courts’ verdicts in the high court or the Supreme Court of Pakistan would be tantamount to betrayal of Islam….

    These nut case Talibans have already started dictating things.

    —-
    …“The ANP proved that it is an Islam- and people-friendly force,”…
    —-

    Wasn’t ANP the same party who was against the restoration of the judiciary, which was the demand of the majority of Pakistani people? Now, all the sudden, because it could not stand up to the nut-case Talibans, it became a people-friendly party. WTF.

  • Kashif said:

    @Baluchi

    Our problems are much deeper than replacing one individual after another.

    “Zardari is the root cause of ALL the problems.” BALLONY

    Do you even know what are you talking about? Zardari came into prominence after BB’s death on Dec 27th 2007. Before that he had absolutely no role in our national affairs. Talibanization started after Baitullah Masud was released from gitmo in early 2004. Pakistan was dragged in this mess after 911 and before that in 1979 when Afghan-Soviet war started. Our energy, economic and politial problems are much longer. You are tracing roots to Zardari as if everything started last year. If you know ABC of Pakistan’s state affairs you ‘d know role of GHQ and limitations of politiians espeially on national security issues. Both you and Javed Khan have Zardari and Rehman Malik phobia. You can bash them as long as you want no body is going to defend them.But please don’t tell us your go Zardari go and go Rehman Malik go is solution of our every problem.

  • Baluchi said:

    @Amir Hameed

    Mr Hameed are you based in Pakistan or outside…….
    ANP wasn’t just backing the Govt for NOT restoring the Judges, in fact ANP was also keeping quite on those 65 poor innocent people, ANP also kept quite on NRO, ANP also supported the (last) Govt on Lal Masjid Action, ANP did not object for the Benazir (not shaheed) case to be taken to UNO, ANP is not prsessing hard to Rehman Malik on Sri Lankan Cricket Team investigation, ANP also kept quite on dismissal of Shahbaz Sharif, and in return Zardari’s Govt is not pressing ANP for the construction of Kala Bagh Dam Project……..which we very badly need to conserve the water and to produce Electricity to overcome Load Shedding.
    Taliban’s are not problem…….Zardari is the Problem, in fact main problem.

  • pak007 said:

    look these criminal creatures calling themselves taliban are already backing away from the deal!plus they are so afraid of CJ and the Supreme Court.

    Swat Taliban refuse to lay down arms
    Wednesday, 15 Apr, 2009 | 05:10 PM PST |
    ISLAMABAD: Pakistani Taliban will not lay down their arms in a northwestern valley as part of a deal that included the introduction of sharia law but will take their ’struggle’ to new areas, a militant spokesman said on Wednesday.
    President Asif Ali Zardari, under pressure from conservatives, signed a regulation on Monday imposing sharia law in the Swat valley to end Taliban violence.
    The strategy of appeasement has alarmed US officials, while critics say the government has demonstrated a lack of capacity and will to fight the Taliban and al Qaeda.
    Details of the deal have not been made public but government officials backing the pact have said part of it was that militants would give up their arms.
    But a Pakistani Taliban spokesman in the scenic valley, a one-time tourist destination 125 km northwest of Islamabad, said they would be keeping their guns.
    ‘Sharia doesn’t permit us to lay down arms,’ Muslim Khan said by telephone. ‘If a government, either in Pakistan or Afghanistan, continues anti-Muslim policies, it’s out of the question that Taliban lay down their arms.’
    Some Taliban fighters last week moved out of Swat and into Buner district, only 100 km from Islamabad, and Khan said his men would push into new areas.
    ‘When we achieve our goal at one place, there are other areas where we need to struggle for it,’ he said.
    Earlier on Wednesday, the Tehrik-i-Nifaz-Shariat-i-Muhammdi, which Sufi Mohammad heads, announced a public rally in Mingora on April 19, DawnNews reported.
    Sufi Mohammad said the rally is ‘intended to appreciate the sincere efforts and cooperation of the government which has ensured the enforcement of Sharia.’
    He reiterated that laws under the Nizam-i-Adl regulation will be tailored for the common man and will provide amnesty to militants.
    He further said ‘the decisions of Qazi courts will not be allowed to be challenged in any other court of the country, including the Supreme Court.’
    The TNSM Chief asked the people of Swat to work together with the government to maintain peace in the region and praised the Awami National Party for its efforts in implementing the Sharia regulation.
    Militants infiltrated into Swat in 2007 from strongholds on the Afghan border to the west to support cleric Sufi Mohammad.
    Khan said militants would go to Afghanistan to fight US-led forces if Afghan Taliban called for help.
    ‘Our struggle is for a cause and that’s to enforce Allah’s rule on Allah’s land. We will send mujahideen to Afghanistan if they demand them,’ he said.
    One security analyst, retired Brigadier Syed Mehmood Shah, said peace could be found if the government disarmed the militants: ‘The agreement should be given a chance.’
    But another said the Swat militants were part of an expanding network.
    ‘There is no comprehensive counter-insurgency strategy from the military or government. They are not taking it seriously,’ said Khadim Hussain of the Aryana Institute think-tank.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @Baluchi,
    I agree with your assessment of ANP and about Zardari and that is why I have always called him a “snake” because this is what he really is, a MoFp slithering creature.
    Our problem is that our leadership is and has always been corrupt. Every time the poor masses have put their trust in them via polls in the hope that their issues would be attended to, these MoFo have done nothing but deceived the Pakistani people. Remember what Fazlu and his MMA did in 2002 when they voted for the 17th ammendment and gave the SOB Moshe unlimited powers and as a consequence, the entire country went further into abyss. Is that why they, MMA, were sent to the parliament by the people?

    We are an unfortunate unfortunate nation, that has all the potential to stand beside some of the progressive nations in the world but we have always been held back by the self serving actions of our corrupt leadership.

  • jakram said:

    Hi everyone, i just found this interesting video on frontline world regarding talibanization in pakistan and how they are recruiting school going kids into their camps. and how the US and Pak army operations are affecting the mindset of the ppl. I dunno if this has been posted here before.

    http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/pakistan802/video/video_index.html

  • razakhan said:

    @Admin

    How these comments are allowed here? Do we have to take these kinda a comments and if so plz be kind and advise that this is the policy of this blog which allows these kinda comments. Thanks

    Kashif said:
    @sam33r

    Please don’t be surprised Islam spread through wars. There is nothing peaceful about the Islam except the name. In the name of spreading peace, brotherhood and God’s words Islam allows Jihad and promotes bloodshed. Islam is not alone all religions are tools of violence. I am glad they are not as effective as they were 400 years ago.

  • Kashif said:

    @jakram

    Very powerful video. Picture speaks thousands words. I hope it will open eyes of pro-militants. But I know what they will say this video is western/indian conspiracy to derail peace deal in sawat. There should be a peace deal with these barbarians. They should be dealt with force as brutally as they are targeting innocent civilians and kids. I couldn’t believe Qari sb hs his suside training starts with 5-6-7 years old kids. I don’t care how religious you are but how can you defend this absolute non sense. After watching this video I hate more and more an Oxford graduate Imran Khan whose kids are studying in Engalnd but he expalins/defends suside attacks. For political reasons for wining conservative votes he is defending/explaining this absolute non sense. We need Mustafa Kamal Attaturk kind of leader in Pakistan who not only hang IK but all these right wing propogandist inmedia Hamid Mir, Javed Ch, Mushtaq Minhas, Ansar Abbasi etc and all right wing pro Talibs supporters in real and cyber world.

  • abuzarghafari said:

    @M TARAR
    NO U CANT OPEN UR MOUTH…U R SHER ONLY HERE . U KIND OF PEOPLE CANT FACE ANYONE. WHY R U WASTING UR ENERGY BY WRITING SUCH COMMENTS. B POSITIVE . U SEEMS TO B A MATURE GUY. BEHAVE MATURELY

  • abuzarghafari said:

    @ KASHIF
    I DONT THINK SO IK EVER DEFENDED TALIBANS SUICIDE ATTACKS. HE SAID THIS IS THE REACTION OF WHAT GOVT IS DOING THERE. N I THINK HE IS RIGHT. FOR EXAMPLE WHY BALOCHISTAN AND NWFP ARE POPULAR AS DEPRIVED PROVINCES?? WHY OUR CURRENT N PREVIOUS GOVTS NEVER GAV IMPORTANCE TO THESE PROVINCES?? BUT EVEN THEN I DISAGREE WITH BALOCHIS N TALIBANS MILLITANT GROUPS. THEY SHUD PROTEST BUT SHUDNT B ALLOW TO MAKE A STATE WITHIN A STATE .NO DOUBT THIS IS ALARMING SITUATION.
    WELL YESTERDAY ZARDARI SAID HE CAN SUSPEND THE NIZAM E ADAL IF THE SITUATION IN SWAT WORSENS.

  • AClarionCall said:

    @Kashif

    Very well analysed assessment and of course this video should open eyes of right wing politicians and media thugs (you mentioned few names). I feel sorry for people of Swat and NWFP as Taliban thugs of Stone Age are committed to destroy their lives at all cost. Our criminal silence is also responsible for the ongoing plight of people of these areas. Imran Khan a pro-Taliban Tanga party leader of PTI is not alone in sending his kids to good schools; there are number of my own relatives/friends who send their schools to expensive private schools but shamelessly support Taliban efforts in Swat and other parts of NWFP. I have been labelled Kafir for opposing Talibans but these double-faced people would not move to Swat with their families/kids. Enforcement of Taliban gun-waving Shariat is now another step forward for Taliban thuggery and a defeat for a common person. Unfortunately our country is sinking and sinking fast. We as a nation have failed; it is now matter of time when the rest of the world declares us “A Failed State”. Time is running out for Pakistan and is running out fast.

  • msohail83 said:

    @Kashif@AClarionCall @Jutt kharak

    Hatred spewed here by few folks against Imran is unprecendented. You guys are acting like he’s in chrage of black and white and is the country’s PM.

    Are you forgetting the current govt is run by your favorite LIBEARL alliance. What a bunch of pathetic losers you are. Get a life guys!!!!

  • munna said:

    Raza
    Stupidly has no limits. I would suggest ignore those comments.
    If islam is spread by war how the indian spanish and central euorpen get escaped?

    @Jutt kharak
    Open your eyes.
    Taliban are a by product of Afghan War, The spread in Pakistan is because of our elite injustices, as a nation take some responsibilities, turning back to the issues doesn’t make the problem go away.
    Its very easy to blame Army and believe these so Nawaz, Zardari and Bhutoo.
    Did any one address the Have and Haven’t, in our society. There is nothing common in 99.5 peoples and there rulers. Our social political system don’t deliver, no education, no health care, govt jobs with bribes only, merit is only for powerful and rich if we alienate people like fundamentalism bound to raise. The problem of Taliban solution is not with Army action it lies somewhere else. Are you in mood of addressing it? No .
    Pakistan will survive InshAllah but current social economic political system got to go.

  • jazoo said:

    swali has some good points in his outstanding sattire.

    I see alot of similarity in Taliban & hardline Jews and Israeli Army, how they think its their God given right to occupy any house of Palestinians and poor Pakhtoons.

    Taliban are a notch better(worse) than Israelis, they can marry any girl they like in their occupied territory.

    Their forced illegal occupation of Masajid is another enlightend example of their Islam.
    I wonder how they can pray in a Masjid which is illegally occupied.

    Imam Hussain has to pay for the land of Karbala because he knew his grave would be there.
    We do not worship people, we learn the straight path from them.
    People are known for what they believe and in whom they put their ideals.

    Khalid bin Walid who is Saifullah of Taliban & Wahabis, was the one who killed a husband because his wife was very beautiful, first thing Umar(ra) did in his khilafat to remove him from Governorship.

  • The Giant Squid said:

    This is the Taliban Shariat and Nizam-e-Adl. I couldn’t sleep last night after watching the anguish writ large on the child’s face.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @Kashif,

    …After watching this video I hate more and more an Oxford graduate Imran Khan whose kids are studying in Engalnd but he expalins/defends suside attacks….

    Do you have a proof that IK has defended the suicide bombings/killings? If you do then I ask you to produce it here.

  • msohail83 said:

    @Amir Hameed

    These guys are out on a propaganda campaign. Their job is to malign people and tie them to Taliban to demonize their character. This is the best they could come up with to hide the incompetency of their fav. govt in power.

    Kashif was claiming he voted for Imran. I was too innocent to believe his words.

    Don’t ask for any proofs that’s when they change the subject to divert attention. Remember in Capital talk when Ms. Bari was asked if she read the document she was criticizing so much and istead of answering the question posed to her she kept on with her rants.

    I’m getting familiar with these people’s nature more and more everyday and feel sorry for these blokes.

  • jazoo said:

    swali has some good points in his outstanding sattire.

    I see alot of similarity in Taliban & hardline Jews and Israeli Army, how they think its their God given right to occupy any house of Palestinians and poor Pakhtoons.

    Taliban are a notch better(worse) than Israelis, they can marry any girl they like in their occupied territory.

    Their forced illegal occupation of Masajid is another enlightend example of their Islam.
    I wonder how they can pray in a Masjid which is illegally occupied.

    Imam Hussain has to pay for the land of Karbala because he knew his grave would be there.
    We do not worship people, we learn the straight path from them.
    People are known for what they believe and in whom they put their ideals.

  • supercreature said:

    @Kashif,

    …After watching this video I hate more and more an Oxford graduate Imran Khan whose kids are studying in Engalnd but he expalins/defends suside attacks….

    These are really baseless…

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @msohail83,
    I have no problem with people criticing IK because I consider criticism as a healthy thing. What bothers me is that when people start criticizing others on made-up/make-belief and baseless stories and just for the sake of criticism with no tangible proof to back up their claims.

  • Shirkuh said:

    @Msohail83

    “I’m getting familiar with these people’s nature more and more everyday and feel sorry for these blokes.”

    Don’t feel sorry for the baboos like Kashif. They are carrying a self inflicted virus. The characteristic of this virus is to find each and every fault in their OWN people and ignore the gross faults and human rights violations of their mentors from the West.

  • msohail83 said:

    @Amir Hameed

    I totally agree with you buddy even I dont have any issue with anybody criticizing him but I never see any constructive criticism here.

    They find refuge in all that rubbish about Sita White and labelling him Talib apoligst. It’s getting old now guys! Find something new ???

  • Shirkuh said:

    @Amir Hameed

    “What bothers me is that when people start criticizing others on made-up/make-belief and baseless stories and just for the sake of criticism with no tangible proof to back up their claims.”

    And be sure that they will continue to do so in the future to satisfy their masters and their virus hit brains.

    Btw: I think we have rare disagreement on the SWAt situation. I agree that “Taliban” is not the ideal solution, but i would choose the lesser of the evils at the moment and deal with Taliban in another way i.e. Pakistan MUSt offer something better to convince the local people.

  • msohail83 said:

    Talat has interivewed harbyar Mari today and he’s another freedom lover. I’m wondering if Talat enjoys the freedom of airing anything w/o censorship? Wouldn’t the Army be saying something to him or his management? Or is it a set up to win popular support and then take the bull by the horns?

  • Traffic said:

    @ Kashif

    Would you like to explain which Muslim army went to Indonesia, which is the most populous Muslim country in the world today?

  • Shirkuh said:

    @Kashif

    “We need Mustafa Kamal Attaturk kind of leader in Pakistan who not only hang IK but all these right wing propogandist inmedia Hamid Mir, Javed Ch, Mushtaq Minhas, Ansar Abbasi etc and all right wing pro Talibs supporters in real and cyber world.”

    Now we know that Moshe and you have the same ideals and “democratic” mindset i.e. kill all them who oppose you.

    I think I have told you before that Pakistan is a country mainly inhabited by Muslims. We want to give rights to minorities, BUT the LAW of the land is to be decided by the MUSLIMS and not some baboo cockroach!

    Btw: To be a supporter/not supporter of IK in political terms is altogether another story. If anyone dares to kill him then I think even most of his opponents will be ready to take revenge! I am not sure that any baboo will survive if anything like that would happen!

  • swat yosufzai said:

    GEO tv
    Altaf did not eat for 4 days because of this nizam adal bill…Baber ghuri or H rizwi

  • AClarionCall said:

    I have a clear message for all the supporters of Talibans on this forum and elsewhere that now you have enforcement of Talibani Shariat in one part of the country. It is high time for you guys to move to Swat and live under the best governance of savage talibans and help them take this country to Stone Age. It has surprised me that how many supporters of talibans are present on this Blog. Imagine how many more will be in Pakistan. May God bless on this country.

  • AClarionCall said:

    Those who have not yet watched this documentary, please double click the link and watch it. It will open your eyes and may be brains too.

    http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/pakistan802/video/video_index.html

  • Shirkuh said:

    @ACC

    “It has surprised me that how many supporters of talibans are present on this Blog”

    He..he.he, we are not only “supporters of Taliban”, but we are in fact “Taliban” ;-)

  • Shirkuh said:

    @ACC

    Why are you baboos not so keen about showing all those innocent Pakistanis who have been killed and molested by your masters in the West? Why only show the one sided story?

  • rasheed said:

    @AClarionCall,

    Our media is much strong and knows the regulation better than any foreign bullshit.

    I suggest you check the Saudi Laws and the authorities of parallel police called “Motawa Police”, which is worse than the NAR regulation, but West will not have any problem with oil rich country.

    Thanks God Altaf Bhaee went against NAR. Anyone who was even against NAR bill now got into thinking that since Altaf Bhaee is against this bill, it must be definitely good.

  • AClarionCall said:

    @Shirkuh

    Why don’t you see your doctor quickly and ask hin to double your dose? Your current daily dose is not working.

  • ConcernedAmericanPak said:

    @AClarionCall

    You are a disturbed individual, your strength of the argument is that you liberal jackA$$ is better than the so called Taliban and any one who talks about the issue is labeled Taliban sympathizer or a religious loony. You are a sick individual with the intellectual value of a turnip….

    I am very much disappointed in the so called claim to be ‘Muslim” liberals rants and raves about the “Islamic fundamentalist” life style chosen by the people of Swat. No one person can dictate his or her wish upon any group of people’s freedom to chose. If MQM can chose a Psychopath, emotionally deranged, cry baby Altaf Husain, a foreign citizen and an agent , as their leader and allowed his little minions to be elected in the Pakistan main stream political setup, why cry about the people, the majority of them want to live with the strict moral code of ethics of Islam. Americans have no right to interfere and muddle in Pakistani internal affairs.

    Look at the example of Amish people in the USA, have they turn all the American in to Amish?

    U.S. Supreme Court Case: Is There Religious Freedom in America — for the Amish?
    By the Reverend William C. Lindholm

    Background
    If the Old Order Amish must partake of the value system in a regular high school “their religion will be destroyed,” said an anthropologist from Temple University at the trial of three Amish fathers in Wisconsin who refused to send their children to high school.
    The Wisconsin Supreme Court last January in a landmark decision overturned the arrests of the Amish saying that “no liberty is more important … than religious liberty,” and the Amish “will not be required to attend school beyond the eighth grade” because the state had shown no “compelling state interest” that would justify the overriding of the freedom of religion guarantee of the Constitution of the United States.

    Moreover, the court said that Amish “education produces as good a product as two additional years of compulsory high school.”

    Compulsory education laws in Wisconsin require attendance to age sixteen.

    The State of Wisconsin claiming that religious liberty is no defense against compulsory education laws appealed to the United States Supreme Court, and this court heard oral arguments on Wednesday, December 8, 1971.

    The U.S. Supreme Court will probably issue this term their ruling on whether the Amish can be forced into high school, which is against their religious beliefs and which will apparently result in the destruction of their church-community. The questions involved in the Amish case are significant ones. May the government require a religious group to perform an action that they believe will send them to hell? Specifically, is the government’s policy required a certain type of secondary schooling so important that it can command that policy against the religious conscience of the Amish young people and their parents to produce the effect of destroying their church?

    The Old Order Amish — a minority religious group known for their shunning of modern conveniences and the driving of horses and buggies, who were among America’s earliest settlers — are supported in the high court by many of America’s religious denominations.

    Filing friend of the court briefs in support of the Amish were the National Council of Churches of Christ in the U. S. A. representing thirty-three Protestant and Orthodox denomination, the Seventh Day Adventist Church, the Mennonite Central Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the synagogue Council of America and the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs.

    The U.S. Catholic Conference (although not filing legal briefs) also supported the Amish.

    The three Amish fathers — Jonas Yoder and Wallace Miller of rural New Glarus, and Adin Yutzy, now of Elsinore, Missouri — were arrested for failure to sent their high school age youth to the two years of required high school attendance and instead gave them what the Amish always give their adolescent youth — vocational training in the community. Wisconsin law requires attendance until age sixteen.

    All three courts in Wisconsin were unanimous in their findings: “The Wisconsin compulsory education law does interfere with the freedom of the defendants to act in accordance with their sincere religious beliefs.” Said the Wisconsin Supreme Court, “Any high school — public or private — represents a deterrent to Amish salvation.” “To the Amish secondary schools not only teach an unacceptable value system,” said the court, “but they seek to integrate ethnic groups into a homogenized society, resulting in psychological alienation from their parents and cause great harm to the child.”

    Defense attorneys for the Amish were William B. Ball, chief counsel and Joseph Skelly, both of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania and Thomas Eckerle of Madison, Wisconsin. Assistant Attorney General John W. Calhoun handled the prosecution.

    Since the Amish will not defend themselves, believing literally in the Bible — “turn the other cheek,” it says — their defense was paid for by public donations through an interfaith group call the National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom, 30650 Six Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan 48152.

    http://www.holycrosslivonia.org/amish/case.htm

  • Shirkuh said:

    @ACC

    Thanks for your “concern” :-)

  • Shirkuh said:

    @Swat yosufzai

    “Altaf did not eat for 4 days because of this nizam adal bill…Baber ghuri or H rizw”

    I suppose he is ready for cannibalism now i.e. he could eat a whole “katta” after his “suffering”.

  • swat yosufzai said:

    Altaf nay 4 din khana nahin khaya … geo reports from Babar Ghuri…
    The only lover and true Pakistani,,,,,? why he sits abroad//??

  • AClarionCall said:

    @Shirkuh

    Did the West (NATO) come to Afghanistan for sight-seeing holidays? Of course it was land of Afghanistan and Pakistan which was used to attack targets in the West. NATO and USA are in Afghanistan and Pakistan because they want to protect their citizens from the terrorist attacks and 90% terrorists have used FATA region either to gain training or plan attacks in the West. It is not a rocket science to understand the difference between Govt of Pak and USA. Govt of Pakistan does not care about their citizens as much as USA Govt does.

    Talibans have been killing Pak Police, Army and innocent citizens in large numbers through their vast network of suicide killers. Madarasas are working as nursery of suicide killers. I bet none of you on this Blog will ever send your kids to any Madarasas in Pakistan; but you guys will shamelessly continue supporting such defective madarsa system. I have argued with dozens of people on this topic during Lal Masjid operation. No one was ready to send their kids to Lal Masjid madarsa but they staunchly backed two loafer and terrorist brothers. What a double standard! One rule for others kids; one rule for own kids. Open up your eyes and brain as well which has been brainwashed with excessive reading of right wing material. Shame on all supporters of Taliban.

  • shandana said:

    swat yosufzai

    “Altaf nay 4 din khana nahin khaya … geo reports from Babar Ghuri…”

    Oh my God, Yousafzai you just have torn apart our hearts by telling us about Altaf. I can’t eat, can’t sleep now, how come? A big shame , Pakistan can not survive now, altaf didn’t eat for four days.
    People do some thing, Allah se gunahon ki maafi mango, every Pakistani must fast for at least 4 days, Altaf didn’t eat.

    @dmin please run a new thread, remove the one about parliment and Swat, run a thread about Altaf’s not eating, how come Pakistan survive if Altaf is not eating?

  • ConcernedAmericanPak said:

    Why the Americans and the liberal Pakistani’s do not talk about the Jewish Taliban? and Hindu Taliban? Let’s compare them and see who is more radical than the other. Both of these two groups are part and parcel of the politics of the two “grates democracies” in the world.

    Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel
    by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinky
    Pluto Press, 1999, paper

    The customary two-way division of Israeli Jewish society rests upon the cornerstone recognition that as a group Israeli Jews are highly ideological.

    This is best evidenced by their high percentage of voting, which usually exceeds 80 per cent.

    In the May 1996 elections, over 95 per cent of the better educated, richer, secular Jews and the religious Jews in all categories of education and income voted.

    After discounting the large number of Israeli Jews who live outside Israel (over 400,000), most of whom did not vote, it can be safely assumed that almost every eligible voter in these two crucial segments of the population voted.

    Most Israeli political observers by now assume that Israeli Jews are divided into two categories: Israel A and Israel B. Israel A, often referred to as the “left,” is politically represented by the Labor and Meretz Parties; Israel B, referred to as the “right” or the “right and religious parties,” is comprised of all the other Jewish parties.

    Almost all of Israel A and a great majority of Israel B (the exception being some of the fundamentalist Jews) strongly adhere to Zionist ideology, which in brief, holds that all or at least the majority of Jews should emigrate to Palestine, which as the Land of Israel, belongs to all Jews and should be a Jewish state.

    A strong and increasing enmity between these two segments of Israeli society nevertheless exists. There are many reasons for this enmity. The reason relevant to this study is that Israel B, including its secular members, is sympathetic to Jewish fundamentalism while Israel A is not.

    It is apparent from studies of election results over a long period of time that Israel B has consistently obtained a numerical edge over Israel A. This is ,~ an indication that the number of Jews influenced by Jewish fundamentalism is consistently increasing.

    In his article “Religion, Nationalism and Democracy in Israel,” published in the Autumn 1994 issue of the periodical, Z’ Manim (no. 50-51), Professor Baruch Kimmerling, a faculty member of Hebrew University’s sociology department, presented data pertaining to the religious division of Israeli Jewish society.

    Citing numerous research studies, Kimmerling showed conclusively that Israeli Jewish society is far more divided on religious issues than is generally assumed outside of Israel, where belief in generalizations, such as “common to all Jews,” is challenged less than in Israel.

    Quoting the data of a survey taken by the prestigious Gutman Institute of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Kimmerling pointed out that whereas 19 per cent of Israeli Jews said they prayed daily, another 19 per cent declared that they would not enter a synagogue under any circumstances.

    Influenced by the Gutman Institute analysis and similar studies, Kimmerling and other scholars have concluded that Israel A and Israel B contain hard-core believers who hold diametrically opposed views of the Jewish religion. This conclusion is almost certainly correct.

    More generally, the attitude towards religion in Israeli Jewish ~ ~ society can be divided into three parts.

    The religious Jews observe , the commandments of the Jewish religion, as defined by Orthodox rabbis, many of whom emphasize observance more than belief. (The number of Reform and/or Conservative Jewish in Israel is small.)

    The traditional Jews keep some of the more important commandments while violating the more inconvenient ones; they do honor the rabbis and the religion.

    The secularists may occasionally enter a synagogue but respect neither the rabbis nor the religious institutions.

    The line between traditional and secular Jews is often vague, but the available studies indicate that 25 to 30 per cent of Israeli Jews are secular, 50 to 55 per cent are traditional and about 20 per cent are religious. Traditional Jews obviously belong to both the Israel A and Israel B categories.

    Israeli religious Jews are divided into two distinctly different groups. The members of the religiously more extreme group are called Haredim. (The singular word is Haredi or Hared.) The members of the religiously more moderate group are called religious-national Jews.

    The religious-national Jews are sometimes called “knitted skullcaps” because of their head covering. Haredim usually wear black skullcaps that are never knitted, or hats. The religious- I national Jews otherwise usually dress in the more usual Israeli fashion, while the Haredim almost always wear black clothes.

    http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/JewishFundimentalismIsrael.html

  • swat yosufzai said:

    Shandana Most of the time MQM make fun of itself
    thedy think it is 2009 outside pakistan but in paki this is still 1960’s

  • SnrCtzn said:

    @ Swat yosufzai.
    Poor guy, this Altaf ! Doctors say a man MAY DIE the 5th day, if he goes without food for 4 consecutive days ! Better hurry & provide him food to eat ( for thought, too;) before he passes from this world, away to the next one.

  • Kashif said:

    My coments were deleted by @admin. I can’t do much about it. Pls watch IK’s Jawab Deh he justified suside attacks (29-31 mins)

  • centrino said:

    Good trick by zardari government to put the responsibility on all parties rather than taking all world over pressure on himself…… cunning move

  • Kashif said:

    Taliban are asking for Islamic system. We are llowed to beat around the bush but not allowed to discuss issues with the Islam itself. If we are moving ahead with the assumption religion is perfect we can not just blame Taliban. We all are part of problem. Suside bombers are not created around political differences between PPP and PMLN, they are not created on differences in cricket fields. They are created around ambigious religious philosphies that we are not allowed to discuss.

    Deh aur dil unn ko jo na deh mujh ko zuban aur

  • SnrCtzn said:

    @ admin.
    Please also allow to add my request to what shandana has requested you above, i.e; to run a new thread on poor Altaf’s ‘BHOOK HARTAL’ unless you are anti-MQM !

  • zaheer said:

    @AClarionCall

    “Did the West (NATO) come to Afghanistan for sight-seeing holidays? Of course it was land of Afghanistan and Pakistan which was used to attack targets in the West. NATO and USA are in Afghanistan and Pakistan because they want to protect their citizens from the terrorist attacks and 90% terrorists have used FATA region either to gain training or plan attacks in the West. It is not a rocket science to understand the difference between Govt of Pak and USA. Govt of Pakistan does not care about their citizens as much as USA Govt does.”

    How do you conclude that 90% terrorists attacks were planned from FATA? Only because International thugs, liars and blood-drinkers have been claiming so! Reality is in contrast to what you claim, i feel.

    “Talibans have been killing Pak Police, Army and innocent citizens in large numbers through their vast network of suicide killers. Madarasas are working as nursery of suicide killers. I bet none of you on this Blog will ever send your kids to any Madarasas in Pakistan; but you guys will shamelessly continue supporting such defective madarsa system. I have argued with dozens of people on this topic during Lal Masjid operation. No one was ready to send their kids to Lal Masjid madarsa but they staunchly backed two loafer and terrorist brothers. What a double standard! One rule for others kids; one rule for own kids. Open up your eyes and brain as well which has been brainwashed with excessive reading of right wing material. Shame on all supporters of Taliban.”

    There are some problems with Taliban and Madrassah system but it is being extremely exaggerated. No institution, country and group is free of problems! In reality people of the world are being brainwashed by your masters and that too by lies! No sane Muslim and Pakistani supports the wrong acts of Taliban or anyone else but blind hate and blames against them we also don’t support. Stay fair.

  • zaheer said:

    @Kashif

    “Taliban are asking for Islamic system. We are llowed to beat around the bush but not allowed to discuss issues with the Islam itself.”

    Here no one is a scholar of Islam but still if you have any logical and reasonable questions, you are welcome to ask.

    “If we are moving ahead with the assumption religion is perfect we can not just blame Taliban. We all are part of problem.”

    Islam is definitely the perfect but our knowledge and actions are not perefct, since human being itself is not perfect. Anyone who will not follow Islam is part of the probelm, be it Taliban or anyone else.

    “Suside bombers are not created around political differences between PPP and PMLN, they are not created on differences in cricket fields. They are created around ambigious religious philosphies that we are not allowed to discuss.”

    No philosophy of Islam is not ambiguous, it is our understanding and pereception that is normally ambiguous. I don’t think that the reason given by you is ground for suicide bombers! Did Taliban told you that? ;)

    “Deh aur dil unn ko jo na deh mujh ko zuban aur”

    ?

  • razakhan said:

    @Shirkuh

    lol good one may be acc will follow altaf kaliya;s example and dun eat 4 few days lol.

    Hai bhook hartaal ala politician style, fruit or juice khaoonga or piyoonga rotee nahi, burger allowed lol

  • jazoo said:

    @shandana

    In all the civilized & educated socities people form their opinion on their conscience and it varies from issue to issue and parliamanterians cast their vote on their conscience not on party line.
    In Pakistan we have primary school mentality,where our opinion must conform with party leaders we are associated with.
    This very board is a big example of our so called educated primary school mentality.

    I cast my vote to PMLN though I know it means nothing in Karachi but still I cast my vote on principle stand of NS.
    When I say something bad about NS, bro Rasheed accused me of flip flop and call me agent of establishment, no complain.

    I was very much against Altaf Hussain since May 12th incident, I use to call him Altaf Kalia.

    But recently he earned my respect on the subject issue, he may be a liar but he was not lying this time when he holler about Talibanization of whole country specailly Karachi.
    MQM also earn my respect when they demand to know what kind of deals ANP has been doing in USA,
    if you care to read my previous posts I was always very suspicious of Asfandyar Wali activities in USA when political atmosphere was elctrified in the country and all the top leaderships including Zardari were in the country.

    Altaf Hussain is very emotional leader, he feigned or he real either way this behavior has an impact on psychology,
    I will believe them when they say he has not eaten properly for the last 4 days

    At least he was not lying about Talibanization issue.

  • zaheer said:

    People i don’t know what the level of understanding and practice of Islam Sufi Muhammad does have? I have heard that he is the only person who is trusted by the Taliban. It is really a shame that in whole Pakistan we don’t have scholars of Islam who could talk with Sufi Muhammad and Taliban! Did someone really try to understand the goal and knowledge of Mr. Sufi Muhammad? We have been, so many times and by so many people, cheated in the name of Islam and Shariat! is it again the similar trap? I am not at all against peace pact but we can’t afford blind trust!

    Someone tell me also that what does he mean from Shariat-e-Muhammadi? From it does he mean Shariat of Prophet Muhammad(peace and blessings be upon him) or shariat of Sufi Muhammad? Why is his first name Sufi?

    Please someone share the info with me.

  • ConcernedAmericanPak said:

    Altaf Bhai would have shed no tear if this young girl was blown in to peaces in a fire ball and charred like a Cole with a hell fire “liberal elitist Phosphors laden bomb” , or would have survived with limbs missing and blinded for life. This racist Urdu speaking thug must get his filthy sold out hands off the Pakistani political matters….He is concerned and sleepless for a political agreement and does not care about the deaths and lives of the local people, because they are not Urdu speaking Indian migrants. This soulless and murderous individual should be prosecuted in Pak justice system for defying the will of the majority of the people of Pakistan and incite hate, thus communal violence.…..

    POLITICS: Errant Drone Attacks Spur Militants in Pakistan
    By Gareth Porter*

    WASHINGTON, Apr 15 (IPS) – The U.S. programme of drone aircraft strikes against higher-ranking officials of al Qaeda and allied militant organisations, which has been touted by proponents as having eliminated nine of the 20 top al Qaeda leaders, is actually weakening Pakistan’s defence against the insurgency of the Islamic militants there by killing large numbers of civilians based on faulty intelligence and discrediting the Pakistani military, according to data from the Pakistani government and interviews with senior analysts.

    Some evidence indicates, moreover, that the top officials in the Barack Obama administration now see the programme more as an incentive for the Pakistani military to take a more aggressive posture toward the militants rather than as an effective tool against the insurgents.

    Although the strikes have been sold to the U.S. public as a way to weaken and disrupt al Qaeda, which is an explicitly counter-terrorist objective, al Qaeda is not actually the main threat to U.S. security emanating from Pakistan, according to some analysts. The real threat comes from the broader, rapidly growing insurgency of Islamic militants against the shaky Pakistani government and military, they observe, and the drone strikes are a strategically inappropriate approach to that problem.

    “Al Qaeda has very little to do with the militancy in the tribal areas of Pakistan,” said Marvin Weinbaum, former Afghanistan and Pakistan analyst at the Bureau of Intelligence Research at the U.S. Department of State and now scholar-in-residence at the Middle East Institute.

    John McCreary, a senior intelligence analyst for the Defence Intelligence Agency until his retirement in 2006, agrees with Weinbaum’s assessment. “The drone programme is supposed to be all about al Qaeda,” he told IPS in an interview, but in fact, “the threat is much larger.”

    McCreary observes that the targets in recent months “have been expanded to include Pakistani Pashtun militants.” The administration apparently had dealt with that contradiction by effectively broadening the definition of al Qaeda, according to McCreary

    Ambassador James Dobbins, the director of National Security Studies at the Rand Corporation, who maintains contacts with a range of administration national security officials, told IPS in an interview that the drone strikes in Pakistan are aimed “in the short and medium term” at the counter-terrorism objective of preventing attacks on Washington and other capitals.

    But as they have shifted to Pakistani Taliban targets, Dobbins said, “To degree the targets are insurgents and are Pakistanis not Arabs it would be correct to assess that they are part of an insurgency.” That raises the question, he said, whether the drone programme “is feeding the insurgency and popular support for it.”

    http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=46511

  • shimatoree said:

    @ AClarioncall

    Your comment -quote ” Of course it was land of Afghanistan and Pakistan which was used to attack targets in the West. NATO and USA are in Afghanistan and Pakistan because they want to protect their citizens from the terrorist attacks and 90% terrorists have used FATA region either to gain training or plan attacks in the West. ”

    Please get your FACTS correct . Muhammad Ata and his group which carried out the September 11 attacks in USA trained in the European countries and the USA itself .
    Quote from you – “It is not a rocket science to understand the difference between Govt of Pak and USA. Govt of Pakistan does not care about their citizens as much as USA Govt does. ”

    The Govt of the USA is sending and has send it young men and women to die and get maimed in IRAQ and Afghanistan .
    And do you really believe that they are there to take care of terrorism ! George Bush himself said in 2002 that Bin Ladin was neccessary for the two wars otherwise the American people will not support the wars .

    The Govt of the USA has spend close to 800 billion dollars which they did not have and instead borrowed on the two political wars thus creating the economic fiasco that has now affected the entire world. Oh if you believe that the USA cares a great deal for the welfare of it’s citizens then you must also believe in the TOOTH FAIRY !

    You are entitled to have your views but please get the facts straight.

  • zaheer said:

    If MQM gets rid of Mr. Altaf then they might be able to think positively, rationally, openly and without prejudice! That person is working for all international thugs against Pakistan. People of MQM need to free themselves from this person.

    Well, his hue and cry against Talibanization is not for the welfare of Pakistan rather he does it for the sake of his masters! I think the main objective is present Taliban as 100% wrong and thus to create internal divisions and fights inside Pakistan. In reality MQM has been equally murderous and brutal in Karachi! I think both MQM and Taliban are playing in external hands and are following extremes; Taliban might be doing because of innocence but MQM is doing intentionally!

    I think ISI along with Pakistani nation has got challenge to SIDELINE those enemies of Pakistan like Zaradari, R. Malik, Salman Taseer, Altaf Hussain etc!!! Come on, do it!

  • Tauqeer Akbar said:

    @shimatoree Why even bother answering some MF Bast*rd? This moron can’t tell is mouth from his a***.

  • Tauqeer Akbar said:

    @zaheer MQM without Kaliya! I think Bro OBL is the only one who can ake care of him. ISI does not have the capacity to do anything uselful!

  • Tauqeer Akbar said:

    As regards Taliban’s I will distinguish TTP from the Afghan Resistance. TTP is a US false flag operation conducted to coerce Napak Army to attack the FATA inhabitants and punish them for their support for the Afghan Resistance.

  • aftab said:

    everybody needs to moderate they language when responding to each other we really don’t want to turn this forum in to youtube.

  • Tauqeer Akbar said:

    @ all. My Apologies. Completely agree with aftab. Got abit carried away with anger!

    Anyone listened to Crisis cell creature “Sana B**ch”. What is she. Really pissed me off.

  • zaheer said:

    and of course final solution against satan and his companions is…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LK79_EP4k0

  • c hussain said:

    The Jews, The Hindus and the Christians plus Munafiqs like MQM are opposed to this deal saying its against human rights and democracy. Can I ask them what they are doing in Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq and Afghanistan is about supporting human rights and establishing democracy.

    All those opposing this deal – can you give us an alternative to this. They condemn right and left and the only reason is that they are doing so is because they didnt want bloodshed to end and they wanted more deaths and killings. They would prefer people to be killed and then score points rather than that lives are saved.

    Guys in a country like Nigeria about 25 provinces out of 37 have sharia. In Malaysia there are some states or provinces which has sharia. What is the big deal about it. Doesnt Scanadavian countries have cross in their flags. Doesnt countries like Italy, Ireland and others have Pope as their spiritual leader and dont these countries ban woman from wearing head scarf in universities and places of work. If they do that that is fine but if we put any limitation we violate human rights.

    Publishing cartoons of prophet in the name of rights and making fun of Islam in the right of having an opinion – we dont have guts to oppose that and we are condeming when ANP and others have made peace.

    Look its them who are living there and not MQM or Ayaz Amir – so let Pathans make their own decisions the way they want to – who are we to criticise them.

    MQM talks about human rights – on May 13 the way they ruthlessly killed innoncent people on TV cameras and then got the innocent lawyers burnt alive in courts – is in front of everyone and now they talk about human rights.

    If Britian is so worried about war on terror and terrorism they should first stop their British national Altaf Hussain to stop issuing sermons in Pakistan over the phone and fanning hatred and terrorism.

    Altaf Hussain recently held a rally against murder of Baloch leaders but he didnt walk out of Musharraf’s government when he killed Bugti because he is so greedy that for money these MQM can even sell their mothers.

  • c hussain said:

    Tauqeer stop condemning Pak Army OK. Just because Musharraf used it to its own purposes that doesnt mean that all the soldiers are to be blamed. We are proud of Pak Army and its the Army which has stopped Hindus and Jews from Afghanistan infiltrating into Pakistan and that is why they are against ISI. Why doesnt anyone demand banning CIA, Mossad , KGB or RAW.

    I want to ask one simple question. Where do these suicide bombers get their jackets – each jacket costs around 1000 dollars because it has sophistated system of mechanism of creating blast. Who is finiancing that. Its no one but America, India, USSR and Afghanistan because they have infiltrated Taliban and they are using them to destablise Pakistan.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    A good piece of writing from the ex-senator Javed Jabbar.
    “Nizam-e-Adl Regulation — a breach of parliament’s privilege”
    http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172809

  • Adonis said:

    @ Amir Hameed

    How is this a good piece of writing? A news reader cum advertising man who once became a senator in a non-party elections due to his money shows his complete lack of understanding of constitution.

    He speaks of bringing Nizam-i-Adl regulation to senate while it did not even need to go to the National Assembly. Article 246 and 247 of constitution clearly demonstrate that.

    Actually article 246 of constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan clearly defines tribal areas. Clause 246 (b) mentions Dir, Chitral, Swat, Malakand protected area etc as PATA or provinciallay administered tribal areas.

    Article 247 describes that no act of parliament or provincial assembly shall apply to tribal areas.
    Clause 4 of article 247 says, ” Notwithstanding anything contained in the Constitution, the President may, with respect to any matter within the legislative competence of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)], and the Governor of a Province, with the prior approval of the President, may, with respect to any matter within the legislative competence of the Provincial Assembly make regulations for the peace and good government of a Provincially Administered Tribal Area or any part thereof, situated in the Province. ”

    Article 247 clause (7) further mentions that “Neither the Supreme Court nor a High Court shall exercise any jurisdiction under the Constitution in relation to a Tribal Area …………….”

    Therefore the Nizam-i-Adl regulation is completely according to the constitution and the president could simply issue it without even bringing to the national assembly.

  • Amir Hameed said:

    Divine Logic http://dawntravelshow.com/dblog/2009/04/15/divine-logic/

    This is Taliban’s version of NRO. The fact is that this Sufi guy does not have the balls to tell Fazlullah or his millitant followers that the could be tried in the courts or the Qazi courts (whatever that means) for their atrocities because knows it well that they will not accept it or may even turn against him.

    …Asked on Tuesday in a television interview whether the new courts would hear complaints from Swat residents about Mullah Fazlullah or his followers, Sufi Mohammad said they could not.

    ‘We intend to bury the past,’ the TNSM chief told a private television channel, sitting off-screen. ‘Past things will be left behind and we will go for a new life in peace.’…

  • Amir Hameed said:

    @Adonis,

    …How is this a good piece of writing?…

    Because he tried to prove his point with arguments, right or wrong does not matter and that is up to the reader to decide. To me it made sense. To you it did not, so what? As for your comment about his money showing, etc.; tell me who has ever come to this parliament without showing money? At least he does not have any corruption associated to his name, has he?

  • Adonis said:

    @ Amir Hameed

    Corruption is not only usurping public funds. Corruption is also getting undue favours through contacts and getting government contracts without due process.

    I cannot say how corrupt or honest Javed Jabbar is but I can surely say that his business grew leaps and bounds after he became senator.

    But the issue is not whether he is corrupt or not. The issue is what he has written in this article. I gave you the relevant clauses of constitution that in my opinion prove that Javed Jabbar has no idea what he is talking about. I still don’t see any thing from your side explaining how I am wrong on this.

    As for people entering parliament without many, there are many many examples. In the last parliament, there were many MMA members who were dirt poor. Their leader may be Maulana Diesel but their entry into parliament was not due to money.

    In the current assembly, theer are several people like Javed Hashmi, Raja Zafarul Haq, Zafar Ali Shah, Ahsan Iqbal, Raza Rabbani, safdar Abbassi etc, who are middle class people.

    Money comes into play when people with no background in politics try to buy their way into power corridors like Javed Jabbar, Nisar Memon, Dadabhoy, Senator Gulzar and his sons.

  • Adonis said:

    As for people entering parliament without money*

  • AClarionCall said:

    @ConcernedAmericanPak

    Your views are extremely morbid and you are spreading right wing propaganda on this Blog. We live in a democracy so it is acceptable; imagine what would have happened had you and I lived in Swat. A lefty, voter of PPP like me will be hung on the very first day if I ever visited Swat. You will have to convince those (Talibans) that you are a conservative right wing Blog user and supporter of a terrorist network known to the world as Talibans. Ask yourself whether you can move to Swat or not with your own family/kids. I certainly can’t risk my life. People are migrating from Swat to escape the terrible atrocities talibans have committed and you are trying to prove that Taliban system is the best in the world. Shame on you for supporting a terrorist organisation.

  • ConcernedAmericanPak said:

    @AClarionCall

    You dumb person, why the hell you can only think of right wing and left wing? Are you a bat or some freaky bird. I am a humanist and no right wing, left wing Western brain wash effects me. I have my own point of view and you little brainless follower of the Bhutto ghosts and worshipper of the Billionaire Bhutto dynasty cannot think for yourself. Why are you keep bringing up Taliban’s, as a talking point. You are only trying to call people terrorist sympathizers if they do not agree with your point of view. These group of people were creation of Banzier Bhutto, the so called mother of Taliban’s with the help of Saudis and American agencies. You have inferior reasoning and prospect of life, If you voted for PPPP, that shows your inability to differentiate a grave worshiping cultist group of shameless people from a political movement. I feel sorry for you that you keep coming back for more abuse. I as a person has no right to criticize peoples way of living and their choices they make in life, but grave worshiping and fallowing a compulsive lire and know psychopath is a character flow.

Leave your response!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Username


Password


Recent Comments
Blog Comments
Search