<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parliament Endorses Nizaam-e-Adl Regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConcernedAmericanPak</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-195795</link>
		<dc:creator>ConcernedAmericanPak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-195795</guid>
		<description>@AClarionCall 

You dumb person, why the hell you can only think of right wing and left wing? Are you a bat or some   freaky bird. I am a humanist and no right wing, left wing Western brain wash effects me. I have my own point of view and you little brainless follower of the Bhutto ghosts and worshipper of the Billionaire Bhutto dynasty cannot think for yourself. Why are you keep bringing up Taliban’s, as a talking point. You are only trying to call people terrorist sympathizers if they do not agree with your point of view. These group of people were creation of Banzier Bhutto, the so called mother of Taliban’s with the help of Saudis and American agencies. You have inferior reasoning and prospect of life, If you voted for PPPP, that shows your inability to differentiate a grave worshiping cultist  group of shameless people from a political movement. I feel sorry for you that you keep coming back for more abuse. I as a person has no right to criticize peoples way of living and their choices they make in life, but grave worshiping and fallowing  a compulsive lire and know psychopath is a character flow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AClarionCall </p>
<p>You dumb person, why the hell you can only think of right wing and left wing? Are you a bat or some   freaky bird. I am a humanist and no right wing, left wing Western brain wash effects me. I have my own point of view and you little brainless follower of the Bhutto ghosts and worshipper of the Billionaire Bhutto dynasty cannot think for yourself. Why are you keep bringing up Taliban’s, as a talking point. You are only trying to call people terrorist sympathizers if they do not agree with your point of view. These group of people were creation of Banzier Bhutto, the so called mother of Taliban’s with the help of Saudis and American agencies. You have inferior reasoning and prospect of life, If you voted for PPPP, that shows your inability to differentiate a grave worshiping cultist  group of shameless people from a political movement. I feel sorry for you that you keep coming back for more abuse. I as a person has no right to criticize peoples way of living and their choices they make in life, but grave worshiping and fallowing  a compulsive lire and know psychopath is a character flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AClarionCall</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-195300</link>
		<dc:creator>AClarionCall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-195300</guid>
		<description>@ConcernedAmericanPak

Your views are extremely morbid and you are spreading right wing propaganda on this Blog. We live in a democracy so it is acceptable; imagine what would have happened had you and I lived in Swat. A lefty, voter of PPP like me will be hung on the very first day if I ever visited Swat. You will have to convince those (Talibans) that you are a conservative right wing Blog user and supporter of a terrorist network known to the world as Talibans. Ask yourself whether you can move to Swat or not with your own family/kids. I certainly can’t risk my life. People are migrating from Swat to escape the terrible atrocities talibans have committed and you are trying to prove that Taliban system is the best in the world. Shame on you for supporting a terrorist organisation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ConcernedAmericanPak</p>
<p>Your views are extremely morbid and you are spreading right wing propaganda on this Blog. We live in a democracy so it is acceptable; imagine what would have happened had you and I lived in Swat. A lefty, voter of PPP like me will be hung on the very first day if I ever visited Swat. You will have to convince those (Talibans) that you are a conservative right wing Blog user and supporter of a terrorist network known to the world as Talibans. Ask yourself whether you can move to Swat or not with your own family/kids. I certainly can’t risk my life. People are migrating from Swat to escape the terrible atrocities talibans have committed and you are trying to prove that Taliban system is the best in the world. Shame on you for supporting a terrorist organisation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adonis</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-195289</link>
		<dc:creator>Adonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-195289</guid>
		<description>As for people entering parliament without money*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for people entering parliament without money*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adonis</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-195288</link>
		<dc:creator>Adonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-195288</guid>
		<description>@ Amir Hameed

Corruption is not only usurping public funds.  Corruption is also getting undue favours through contacts and getting government contracts without due process.

I cannot say how corrupt or honest Javed Jabbar is but I can surely say that his business grew leaps and bounds after he became senator.  

But the issue is not whether he is corrupt or not.  The issue is what he has written in this article.  I gave you the relevant clauses of constitution that in my opinion prove that Javed Jabbar has no idea what he is talking about.  I still don&#039;t see any thing from your side explaining how I am wrong on this.

As for people  entering parliament without many, there are many many examples.  In the last parliament, there were many MMA members who were dirt poor.  Their leader may be Maulana Diesel but their entry into parliament was not due to money.

In the current assembly, theer are several people like Javed Hashmi, Raja Zafarul Haq, Zafar Ali Shah, Ahsan Iqbal, Raza Rabbani, safdar Abbassi etc, who are middle class people.

Money comes into play when people with no background in politics try to buy their way into power corridors like Javed Jabbar, Nisar Memon, Dadabhoy, Senator Gulzar and his sons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Amir Hameed</p>
<p>Corruption is not only usurping public funds.  Corruption is also getting undue favours through contacts and getting government contracts without due process.</p>
<p>I cannot say how corrupt or honest Javed Jabbar is but I can surely say that his business grew leaps and bounds after he became senator.  </p>
<p>But the issue is not whether he is corrupt or not.  The issue is what he has written in this article.  I gave you the relevant clauses of constitution that in my opinion prove that Javed Jabbar has no idea what he is talking about.  I still don&#8217;t see any thing from your side explaining how I am wrong on this.</p>
<p>As for people  entering parliament without many, there are many many examples.  In the last parliament, there were many MMA members who were dirt poor.  Their leader may be Maulana Diesel but their entry into parliament was not due to money.</p>
<p>In the current assembly, theer are several people like Javed Hashmi, Raja Zafarul Haq, Zafar Ali Shah, Ahsan Iqbal, Raza Rabbani, safdar Abbassi etc, who are middle class people.</p>
<p>Money comes into play when people with no background in politics try to buy their way into power corridors like Javed Jabbar, Nisar Memon, Dadabhoy, Senator Gulzar and his sons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir Hameed</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-195176</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir Hameed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-195176</guid>
		<description>@Adonis,
---
...How is this a good piece of writing?...
---

Because he tried to prove his point with arguments, right or wrong does not matter and that is up to the reader to decide. To me it made sense. To you it did not, so what? As for your comment about his money showing, etc.; tell me who has ever come to this parliament without showing money? At least he does not have any corruption associated to his name, has he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adonis,<br />
&#8212;<br />
&#8230;How is this a good piece of writing?&#8230;<br />
&#8212;</p>
<p>Because he tried to prove his point with arguments, right or wrong does not matter and that is up to the reader to decide. To me it made sense. To you it did not, so what? As for your comment about his money showing, etc.; tell me who has ever come to this parliament without showing money? At least he does not have any corruption associated to his name, has he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir Hameed</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-195174</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir Hameed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-195174</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Divine Logic &lt;/strong&gt;http://dawntravelshow.com/dblog/2009/04/15/divine-logic/

This is Taliban&#039;s version of NRO. The fact is that this Sufi guy does not have the balls to tell Fazlullah or his millitant followers that the could be tried in the courts or the Qazi courts (whatever that means) for their atrocities because knows it well that they will not accept it or may even turn against him.
---
...Asked on Tuesday in a television interview whether the new courts would hear complaints from Swat residents about Mullah Fazlullah or his followers, Sufi Mohammad said they could not.

‘We intend to bury the past,’ the TNSM chief told a private television channel, sitting off-screen. ‘Past things will be left behind and we will go for a new life in peace.’...
---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Divine Logic </strong><a href="http://dawntravelshow.com/dblog/2009/04/15/divine-logic/" rel="nofollow">http://dawntravelshow.com/dblog/2009/04/15/divine-logic/</a></p>
<p>This is Taliban&#8217;s version of NRO. The fact is that this Sufi guy does not have the balls to tell Fazlullah or his millitant followers that the could be tried in the courts or the Qazi courts (whatever that means) for their atrocities because knows it well that they will not accept it or may even turn against him.<br />
&#8212;<br />
&#8230;Asked on Tuesday in a television interview whether the new courts would hear complaints from Swat residents about Mullah Fazlullah or his followers, Sufi Mohammad said they could not.</p>
<p>‘We intend to bury the past,’ the TNSM chief told a private television channel, sitting off-screen. ‘Past things will be left behind and we will go for a new life in peace.’&#8230;<br />
&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adonis</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-194944</link>
		<dc:creator>Adonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-194944</guid>
		<description>@ Amir Hameed

How is this a good piece of writing?  A news reader cum advertising man who once became a senator in a non-party elections due to his money shows his complete lack of understanding of constitution.  

He speaks of bringing Nizam-i-Adl regulation to senate while it did not even need to go to the National Assembly.  Article 246 and 247 of constitution clearly demonstrate that.



Actually article 246 of constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan clearly defines tribal areas. Clause 246 (b) mentions Dir, Chitral, Swat, Malakand protected area etc as PATA or provinciallay administered tribal areas.

Article 247 describes that no act of parliament or provincial assembly shall apply to tribal areas.
Clause 4 of article 247 says, ” Notwithstanding anything contained in the Constitution, the President may, with respect to any matter within the legislative competence of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)], and the Governor of a Province, with the prior approval of the President, may, with respect to any matter within the legislative competence of the Provincial Assembly make regulations for the peace and good government of a Provincially Administered Tribal Area or any part thereof, situated in the Province.  ”

Article 247 clause (7) further mentions that “Neither the Supreme Court nor a High Court shall exercise any jurisdiction under the Constitution in relation to a Tribal Area …………….”

Therefore the Nizam-i-Adl regulation is completely according to the constitution and the president could simply issue it without even bringing to the national assembly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Amir Hameed</p>
<p>How is this a good piece of writing?  A news reader cum advertising man who once became a senator in a non-party elections due to his money shows his complete lack of understanding of constitution.  </p>
<p>He speaks of bringing Nizam-i-Adl regulation to senate while it did not even need to go to the National Assembly.  Article 246 and 247 of constitution clearly demonstrate that.</p>
<p>Actually article 246 of constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan clearly defines tribal areas. Clause 246 (b) mentions Dir, Chitral, Swat, Malakand protected area etc as PATA or provinciallay administered tribal areas.</p>
<p>Article 247 describes that no act of parliament or provincial assembly shall apply to tribal areas.<br />
Clause 4 of article 247 says, ” Notwithstanding anything contained in the Constitution, the President may, with respect to any matter within the legislative competence of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)], and the Governor of a Province, with the prior approval of the President, may, with respect to any matter within the legislative competence of the Provincial Assembly make regulations for the peace and good government of a Provincially Administered Tribal Area or any part thereof, situated in the Province.  ”</p>
<p>Article 247 clause (7) further mentions that “Neither the Supreme Court nor a High Court shall exercise any jurisdiction under the Constitution in relation to a Tribal Area …………….”</p>
<p>Therefore the Nizam-i-Adl regulation is completely according to the constitution and the president could simply issue it without even bringing to the national assembly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir Hameed</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-194882</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir Hameed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-194882</guid>
		<description>A good piece of writing from the ex-senator Javed Jabbar.
&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Nizam-e-Adl Regulation — a breach of parliament’s privilege&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172809</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good piece of writing from the ex-senator Javed Jabbar.<br />
<strong>&#8220;Nizam-e-Adl Regulation — a breach of parliament’s privilege&#8221;</strong><br />
<a href="http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172809" rel="nofollow">http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172809</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c hussain</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-194758</link>
		<dc:creator>c hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-194758</guid>
		<description>Tauqeer stop condemning Pak Army OK. Just because Musharraf used it to its own purposes that doesnt mean that all the soldiers are to be blamed. We are proud of Pak Army and its the Army which has stopped Hindus and Jews from Afghanistan infiltrating into Pakistan and that is why they are against ISI. Why doesnt anyone demand banning CIA, Mossad , KGB or RAW. 

I want to ask one simple question. Where do these suicide bombers get their jackets - each jacket costs around 1000 dollars because it has sophistated system of mechanism of creating blast. Who is finiancing that. Its no one but America, India, USSR and Afghanistan because they have infiltrated Taliban and they are using them to destablise Pakistan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tauqeer stop condemning Pak Army OK. Just because Musharraf used it to its own purposes that doesnt mean that all the soldiers are to be blamed. We are proud of Pak Army and its the Army which has stopped Hindus and Jews from Afghanistan infiltrating into Pakistan and that is why they are against ISI. Why doesnt anyone demand banning CIA, Mossad , KGB or RAW. </p>
<p>I want to ask one simple question. Where do these suicide bombers get their jackets &#8211; each jacket costs around 1000 dollars because it has sophistated system of mechanism of creating blast. Who is finiancing that. Its no one but America, India, USSR and Afghanistan because they have infiltrated Taliban and they are using them to destablise Pakistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c hussain</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/04/14/parliament-endorses-nizaam-e-adl-regulation/#comment-194757</link>
		<dc:creator>c hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=9458#comment-194757</guid>
		<description>The Jews, The Hindus and the Christians plus Munafiqs like MQM are opposed to this deal saying its against human rights and democracy. Can I ask them what they are doing in Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq and Afghanistan is about supporting human rights and establishing democracy. 

All those opposing this deal - can you give us an alternative to this. They condemn right and left and the only reason is that they are doing so is because they didnt want bloodshed to end and they wanted more deaths and killings. They would prefer people to be killed and then score points rather than that lives are saved. 

Guys in a country like Nigeria about 25 provinces out of 37 have sharia. In Malaysia there are some states or provinces which has sharia. What is the big deal about it. Doesnt Scanadavian countries have cross in their flags. Doesnt countries like Italy, Ireland and others have Pope as their spiritual leader and dont these countries ban woman from wearing head scarf in universities and places of work. If they do that that is fine but if we put any limitation we violate human rights. 

Publishing cartoons of prophet in the name of rights and making fun of Islam in the right of having an opinion - we dont have guts to oppose that and we are condeming when ANP and others have made peace. 

Look its them who are living there and not MQM or Ayaz Amir - so let Pathans make their own decisions the way they want to - who are we to criticise them. 

MQM talks about human rights - on May 13 the way they ruthlessly killed innoncent people on TV cameras and then got the innocent lawyers burnt alive in courts - is in front of everyone and now they talk about human rights. 

If Britian is so worried about war on terror and terrorism they should first stop their British national Altaf Hussain to stop issuing sermons in Pakistan over the phone and fanning hatred and terrorism. 

Altaf Hussain recently held a rally against murder of Baloch leaders but he didnt walk out of Musharraf&#039;s government when he killed Bugti because he is so greedy that for money these MQM can even sell their mothers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jews, The Hindus and the Christians plus Munafiqs like MQM are opposed to this deal saying its against human rights and democracy. Can I ask them what they are doing in Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq and Afghanistan is about supporting human rights and establishing democracy. </p>
<p>All those opposing this deal &#8211; can you give us an alternative to this. They condemn right and left and the only reason is that they are doing so is because they didnt want bloodshed to end and they wanted more deaths and killings. They would prefer people to be killed and then score points rather than that lives are saved. </p>
<p>Guys in a country like Nigeria about 25 provinces out of 37 have sharia. In Malaysia there are some states or provinces which has sharia. What is the big deal about it. Doesnt Scanadavian countries have cross in their flags. Doesnt countries like Italy, Ireland and others have Pope as their spiritual leader and dont these countries ban woman from wearing head scarf in universities and places of work. If they do that that is fine but if we put any limitation we violate human rights. </p>
<p>Publishing cartoons of prophet in the name of rights and making fun of Islam in the right of having an opinion &#8211; we dont have guts to oppose that and we are condeming when ANP and others have made peace. </p>
<p>Look its them who are living there and not MQM or Ayaz Amir &#8211; so let Pathans make their own decisions the way they want to &#8211; who are we to criticise them. </p>
<p>MQM talks about human rights &#8211; on May 13 the way they ruthlessly killed innoncent people on TV cameras and then got the innocent lawyers burnt alive in courts &#8211; is in front of everyone and now they talk about human rights. </p>
<p>If Britian is so worried about war on terror and terrorism they should first stop their British national Altaf Hussain to stop issuing sermons in Pakistan over the phone and fanning hatred and terrorism. </p>
<p>Altaf Hussain recently held a rally against murder of Baloch leaders but he didnt walk out of Musharraf&#8217;s government when he killed Bugti because he is so greedy that for money these MQM can even sell their mothers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 452/480 objects using disk

Served from: pkpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 12:00:04 -->
