Comments on: Announcement: PKPolitics Upgraded

By: dawgz

dawgz — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:18:35 +0000

The idea posted above by DirtyPolitician to include the links to major Pakistani newspapers is a very good idea. I think it should definitely be implemented.

Alongside that, I would like to add that it would be very helpful if ALL programs had the name of the guests included in the description. I know they are there for some of them but they are very helpful in sifting through so many programs and finding the people you are interested in hearing. When they are not there, one has to open the link to watch the program to find out.

Just a suggestion.

Keep up the good work!

Regards,
dawgz

By: qaisarrashid

qaisarrashid — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:59:04 +0000

In April 2007, the website was a simple template. Now, look at the appreciation the viewers/readers shower on you recognizing your efforts.
Regards,
Dr Qaisar Rashid
Lahore.

By: hariskhan

hariskhan — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:11:19 +0000

Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

I thought my posts will not go into moderation anymore. However, since pkpolitics upgrade, my posts again, go straight into moderation, while others enjoy their posts going straight out without any checks.

What kind of twisted standard is this, that you moderate comments from those who say the right thing, who present evidence, who talk logic and don’t moderate comments from those who continuously talk baseless BS?

I guess I’m not dealing with “educated” people here. If I had been, there would have been a transparent system.

How can one think of improvement, if one applies different set of “biased” rules to different set of people?

That is pure non-sense.

Haven’t we seen enough results of this kind of thinking in the past 62 years of Pakistan’s existence?

It doesn’t make sense how we keep clinging to the same failed solutions even after watching them fail over and over again

Dua go,
HarisKhan

By: Democracy

Democracy — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:16:39 +0000

Brazil vs. USA final Confederation Cup in South Africa. 8:30pm South Africa time today .
GO BRAZIL! VIVA BRAZIL

By: dreamfariy

dreamfariy — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:53:24 +0000

many many happy and booom booom pk and pk team

By: SnrCtzn

SnrCtzn — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:04:25 +0000

@admin.
1. MY comments on the performance of Superior Judiciary, made on 26/6/9 at 1.52pm (as above) were actually intended to be included under heading of your featured article:’Pakistan 2.0:Justice Revolution Taking Place’ & NOT under announcement of up-gradation of your website, as this one.
2.How these have ended here, is not understood? Can you plz explain.

By: SnrCtzn

SnrCtzn — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:43:11 +0000

@ admin.
Re: Your above mention of a ‘major upgrade of software’ powering PKPolitics, & seeking comments from Members/Visitors.
My 1st comment is as follows:-
1. Plz devise/include a system where-in, the in-coming ‘comment’ of each Member/Visitor is ‘automatically’ given a serialized number.
2.This is a very old demand/suggestion of mine, which I addressed to you a number of times before also, but I NEVER received any response from you.
3. On the other hand your ‘quick response’ within a SHORT time span of approximately half-an-hour is NOT UNDERSTOOD , as acknowledged by the member ‘Dirtypoltician’ also, (as above, on 24/6/9 at 11.35pm.)
4.Re :comments by ‘Tehseen’ made on 25/6/9 at 9.54am,above.
I also wish to know, as to HOW LONG replies/comments from various members will CONTINUE TO BE PUT UNDER MODERATION?
5. WHEN WILL you delete my user-name from your software, to which you seem to have given a PERMANENT INJUNCTION to that effect?
6.Re: Your comments to one of the members, on 24/6/9 at 11.08 pm, above;
will you plz clarify what does the term ‘RSS feeds’ stands for?
7.Re: Your question for ‘Everyone’on 26/6/9 at 2.05am, above; Yes, I for one would be interested, in sending/receiving ‘Private Messages’ to/from other members.
8. But I wish to quickly add, that there should be a certain separate/designated/permanent column for this purpose, & NOT this regular column, which should confine itself ONLY to political discussions/comments, as at present.
9.Such ‘messages’ should be restricted to a few sentences, by your permanent injunction/admonition which should be permanently displayed at the head of such column. IS IT POSSIBLE TO DO SO by your software?
10. Immediately upon submission of these comments of mine, WILL I KNOW, whether your ‘permanent command’ to your software has AS YET BEEN DELETED OR NOT, in my particular case, i.e; the moment I address any COMMENT to you by your username ‘admin’ then our ‘axe’ immediately falls upon your software, with a sentence : ‘Your comments are awaiting moderation.’

By: SnrCtzn

SnrCtzn — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:52:04 +0000

Very interesting development indeed & it was expected of our most Honorable Chief Justice, Mr. Iftikhar Ch after his recent restoration.
To begin-with I hope rest of our govt departments also follow suit.

By: Nido

Nido — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:11:24 +0000

@ Admin
its a very good idiea

By: admin pkpolitics

admin pkpolitics — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:05:09 +0000

@Everyone,

Are you interested in sending/receiving “Private Messages” to/from other members?

Admin