<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: Should Musharraf be allowed into Pakistani politics without past accountability?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adonis</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-324702</link>
		<dc:creator>Adonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-324702</guid>
		<description>Entering into politics is secondary. First mush should enter Pakistan and go to any public place.  Pakistanis will take care of him for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entering into politics is secondary. First mush should enter Pakistan and go to any public place.  Pakistanis will take care of him for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAWA</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-324698</link>
		<dc:creator>KAWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-324698</guid>
		<description>Somebody should put the link of this poll on Musharraf&#039;s face book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody should put the link of this poll on Musharraf&#8217;s face book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAWA</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-324131</link>
		<dc:creator>KAWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-324131</guid>
		<description>NO ACCOUNTABILITY OF BENAZIR OR ZARDARI, ACCEPT NRO, LET THEM RULE WITHOUT CHECKS SO THAT THEY CAN CONVERT THE REST OF THE COUNTRY AND BRING THE SAME PROSPERITY AS THEY HAVE BROUGHT IN &quot;LARKANA&quot;, THEIR MECCA!

INDUSTRY IS FLOURISHING IN LARKANA, UNEMPLOYMENT IS LESS THAN 5%, BEAUTIFUL BRIDGES, FLY OVERS, BYPASS, FREEWAYS CAN BE FOUND EVERY WHERE AND WHY NOT? PEOPLE OF LARKANA HAVE SERVED THE BHUTTOS LIKE SLAVES, THEY DESERVE IT. 

SO IF LARKANA IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT PPP IS CAPABLE OF DELIVERING, I THINK PAKISTAN HAS A GOOD FUTURE BUT ONLY IF WE ALLOW AND GIVE PPP A FREE HAND FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS.... SHAME ON ALL WHO UTTER A WORD AGAINST THE BITCH OF EAST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO ACCOUNTABILITY OF BENAZIR OR ZARDARI, ACCEPT NRO, LET THEM RULE WITHOUT CHECKS SO THAT THEY CAN CONVERT THE REST OF THE COUNTRY AND BRING THE SAME PROSPERITY AS THEY HAVE BROUGHT IN &#8220;LARKANA&#8221;, THEIR MECCA!</p>
<p>INDUSTRY IS FLOURISHING IN LARKANA, UNEMPLOYMENT IS LESS THAN 5%, BEAUTIFUL BRIDGES, FLY OVERS, BYPASS, FREEWAYS CAN BE FOUND EVERY WHERE AND WHY NOT? PEOPLE OF LARKANA HAVE SERVED THE BHUTTOS LIKE SLAVES, THEY DESERVE IT. </p>
<p>SO IF LARKANA IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT PPP IS CAPABLE OF DELIVERING, I THINK PAKISTAN HAS A GOOD FUTURE BUT ONLY IF WE ALLOW AND GIVE PPP A FREE HAND FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS&#8230;. SHAME ON ALL WHO UTTER A WORD AGAINST THE BITCH OF EAST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pakistani.Tujhe.Salam</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-240667</link>
		<dc:creator>Pakistani.Tujhe.Salam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-240667</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know the names of  Musharraf’s top legal eagle and the spymaster mentioned in the story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know the names of  Musharraf’s top legal eagle and the spymaster mentioned in the story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pakistani.Tujhe.Salam</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-240664</link>
		<dc:creator>Pakistani.Tujhe.Salam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-240664</guid>
		<description>Reversal of Nov 3 verdict gets through Justice Dogar 
 
Updated at: 0952 PST,  Friday, July 31, 2009

ISLAMABAD: A recorded conversation of November 5, 2007 between a top legal aide and one of the key spymasters of Gen (retd) Musharraf has exposed how the reversal of historic November 3, 2007 decision of a seven-member bench, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, was manipulated.

The top legal eagle of the ousted dictator is heard telling the spymaster that the then PCO Chief Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar had informed him about the existence of the formal and duly signed decision of the seven-member bench handed down on November 3, 2007 but that he (Dogar) had concealed it. Dogar, according to the legal aide, had also assured him that the next day ( i.e on Nov 6) he would get the Nov 3, SC order reversed by a bench comprising eight judges (one more than the earlier seven-member bench headed by CJ Iftikhar) and behold, the next day, things proceeded exactly according to plan as Dogar proved to be a ‘man of his words’. The eight-member Dogar court handed down a verdict that set aside the historic Nov 3 order of the seven-member bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

In its Nov 3 decision, the Supreme Court had declared Musharraf’s PCO as illegal and unconstitutional besides directing the judges of the superior judiciary not to take oath under the PCO. However, the PCO judges led by Mr Dogar showed their allegiance to the then dictator and took oath under the Musharraf PCO.

In the audio tape, Musharraf’s top legal aide is heard assuring the spymaster that Dogar is his man and would do everything as per their desire. It may be recalled that Dogar was approached in Court No 1 on Nov 5 with the query to clarify the standing of the Nov 3 order if any. Dogar was also asked if there existed any Nov 3 order of the seven-member bench. If yes, he was told to get it reversed through a judicial verdict.

At this point the legal eagle tells the spymaster that Dogar asked him (the legal aide) to come to his chamber where he was told that yes there was a Nov 3 decision duly signed by the judges. But then Dogar was quoted as saying that he had kept it to himself. Dogar was further quoted as saying, “It is a decision of the seven-member bench and we would get it reversed tomorrow by an eight-member bench.”

The recorded conversation apparently was the legal aide reporting to the spy chief about his talks with Justice Dogar, the government’s efforts to buy the loyalties of deposed judges and the new inductions into the Supreme Court to overturn the seven-member bench decision which had set aside the imposition of emergency and promulgation of PCO on November 3, 2007 by a pre-Nov 3 independent judiciary judges bench.

The tape unambiguously establishes that the military dictator General (retd) Pervez Musharraf enjoyed absolute control over the PCO judiciary and got decisions of his own choice.

It was following the Nov 6 fixed judgment of the Dogar court that another seven-member bench under Dogar was constituted, to hear petitions of Iqbal Tikka and others, challenging the Nov 3 unconstitutional actions, but it all ended up to the entire satisfaction of General Musharraf, whose Nov 3 actions were validated on Nov 21 the same year.

The legal aide, who is caught unguarded in the audio tape, when approached by The News admitted that on Nov 5 Dogar had told him in his chamber that the Nov 3 order would be overturned. He, however, said that he does not remember if he had talked to the spymaster.

For the moment the identities of the cited legal aide and the spymaster have been withheld by the Jang Group Editorial Board as further investigations are being carried out in the light of information revealed by the contents of the tape and once these investigations are concluded then the new information along with the identities of the two gentlemen shall be made public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reversal of Nov 3 verdict gets through Justice Dogar </p>
<p>Updated at: 0952 PST,  Friday, July 31, 2009</p>
<p>ISLAMABAD: A recorded conversation of November 5, 2007 between a top legal aide and one of the key spymasters of Gen (retd) Musharraf has exposed how the reversal of historic November 3, 2007 decision of a seven-member bench, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, was manipulated.</p>
<p>The top legal eagle of the ousted dictator is heard telling the spymaster that the then PCO Chief Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar had informed him about the existence of the formal and duly signed decision of the seven-member bench handed down on November 3, 2007 but that he (Dogar) had concealed it. Dogar, according to the legal aide, had also assured him that the next day ( i.e on Nov 6) he would get the Nov 3, SC order reversed by a bench comprising eight judges (one more than the earlier seven-member bench headed by CJ Iftikhar) and behold, the next day, things proceeded exactly according to plan as Dogar proved to be a ‘man of his words’. The eight-member Dogar court handed down a verdict that set aside the historic Nov 3 order of the seven-member bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.</p>
<p>In its Nov 3 decision, the Supreme Court had declared Musharraf’s PCO as illegal and unconstitutional besides directing the judges of the superior judiciary not to take oath under the PCO. However, the PCO judges led by Mr Dogar showed their allegiance to the then dictator and took oath under the Musharraf PCO.</p>
<p>In the audio tape, Musharraf’s top legal aide is heard assuring the spymaster that Dogar is his man and would do everything as per their desire. It may be recalled that Dogar was approached in Court No 1 on Nov 5 with the query to clarify the standing of the Nov 3 order if any. Dogar was also asked if there existed any Nov 3 order of the seven-member bench. If yes, he was told to get it reversed through a judicial verdict.</p>
<p>At this point the legal eagle tells the spymaster that Dogar asked him (the legal aide) to come to his chamber where he was told that yes there was a Nov 3 decision duly signed by the judges. But then Dogar was quoted as saying that he had kept it to himself. Dogar was further quoted as saying, “It is a decision of the seven-member bench and we would get it reversed tomorrow by an eight-member bench.”</p>
<p>The recorded conversation apparently was the legal aide reporting to the spy chief about his talks with Justice Dogar, the government’s efforts to buy the loyalties of deposed judges and the new inductions into the Supreme Court to overturn the seven-member bench decision which had set aside the imposition of emergency and promulgation of PCO on November 3, 2007 by a pre-Nov 3 independent judiciary judges bench.</p>
<p>The tape unambiguously establishes that the military dictator General (retd) Pervez Musharraf enjoyed absolute control over the PCO judiciary and got decisions of his own choice.</p>
<p>It was following the Nov 6 fixed judgment of the Dogar court that another seven-member bench under Dogar was constituted, to hear petitions of Iqbal Tikka and others, challenging the Nov 3 unconstitutional actions, but it all ended up to the entire satisfaction of General Musharraf, whose Nov 3 actions were validated on Nov 21 the same year.</p>
<p>The legal aide, who is caught unguarded in the audio tape, when approached by The News admitted that on Nov 5 Dogar had told him in his chamber that the Nov 3 order would be overturned. He, however, said that he does not remember if he had talked to the spymaster.</p>
<p>For the moment the identities of the cited legal aide and the spymaster have been withheld by the Jang Group Editorial Board as further investigations are being carried out in the light of information revealed by the contents of the tape and once these investigations are concluded then the new information along with the identities of the two gentlemen shall be made public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raorizwanali</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-240251</link>
		<dc:creator>raorizwanali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-240251</guid>
		<description>Edgware Road Flat has no comparison with Surrey Palace.And how  MR.%99.9  managed that and swiss accounts money MR Nawaz had been explaining for  many years.If he is a Killer then what  is  going on now they should pull out the force from NWFP areas .Actually we all pakistanis are  worshiper of tombs and  graves .WE only value the died leader.If Musharraf would have died in any accident like Benazir he would be declared the greatest of all Shaheeeds.
All the car used by Lal Masjid Administration was non custom duty paid and if the police asked them they used the name of Islam to threat them.They stored unlicensed weapon in the masjid violating the rules of our state.Masjid is not a fort it is place of mercy and blessings.Does Islam Allow this?  


If Mush was a dictator then what NS and AZ are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edgware Road Flat has no comparison with Surrey Palace.And how  MR.%99.9  managed that and swiss accounts money MR Nawaz had been explaining for  many years.If he is a Killer then what  is  going on now they should pull out the force from NWFP areas .Actually we all pakistanis are  worshiper of tombs and  graves .WE only value the died leader.If Musharraf would have died in any accident like Benazir he would be declared the greatest of all Shaheeeds.<br />
All the car used by Lal Masjid Administration was non custom duty paid and if the police asked them they used the name of Islam to threat them.They stored unlicensed weapon in the masjid violating the rules of our state.Masjid is not a fort it is place of mercy and blessings.Does Islam Allow this?  </p>
<p>If Mush was a dictator then what NS and AZ are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kambohguy</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-240169</link>
		<dc:creator>kambohguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-240169</guid>
		<description>@raorizwanali and the likes.

Absurd and ridiculous arguments in Musharaf&#039;s favour. An army general bought a flat in  London&#039;s expensive edgeware road, where has the money come from.....not to mention his farmhouse in Islamabad... He is the killer of hundreds of innocent lives, I wonder how you will react if one of your own flesh and blood had died in lal masjid..

Any politician NS or AZ is a 1000 times better then gun wielding dictators..... only a slaved mind will vouch for a dictator......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@raorizwanali and the likes.</p>
<p>Absurd and ridiculous arguments in Musharaf&#8217;s favour. An army general bought a flat in  London&#8217;s expensive edgeware road, where has the money come from&#8230;..not to mention his farmhouse in Islamabad&#8230; He is the killer of hundreds of innocent lives, I wonder how you will react if one of your own flesh and blood had died in lal masjid..</p>
<p>Any politician NS or AZ is a 1000 times better then gun wielding dictators&#8230;.. only a slaved mind will vouch for a dictator&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raorizwanali</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-239893</link>
		<dc:creator>raorizwanali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-239893</guid>
		<description>If anyone compares the  corruption done by Mush with zardari and Nawaz,he may declare Musharaf  innocent.Zardari used to be called Mr. %10 but now he is %99.9.Zaradari has no proper educational record and what a nice English accent our PM shows when there is no other way and he has  to speak English.Nawaz only served his own workers during both of his ruling periods.All the former and current pakistani leaders negeleted Blochistan that is our backbone.And Musharraf just carried on the tradition.
By the way what Musharraf has done? Lal Masjid ... these so called molivies using name of islam to threat the people they deserved more than this ,if you check the criminal record of these MOLVIES  you may conclude Musharraf is nothing as  compared to these.All these judges if you check their job history they all are involved in massive corruption cases.And the last objection Swat war it is right, Musharraf takes the honor here he started this and all pakistanis are agreed now that it is right descision.
Economically pakistan was  going extremely good during his time you can check the foreign exchange rates and also the foreign investment during his time.
Can anybody tell me who is better than Musharraf in pakistani politics ?  the answer is obviously &#039;No&quot;.So  he deserves to rule the country again like many others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone compares the  corruption done by Mush with zardari and Nawaz,he may declare Musharaf  innocent.Zardari used to be called Mr. %10 but now he is %99.9.Zaradari has no proper educational record and what a nice English accent our PM shows when there is no other way and he has  to speak English.Nawaz only served his own workers during both of his ruling periods.All the former and current pakistani leaders negeleted Blochistan that is our backbone.And Musharraf just carried on the tradition.<br />
By the way what Musharraf has done? Lal Masjid &#8230; these so called molivies using name of islam to threat the people they deserved more than this ,if you check the criminal record of these MOLVIES  you may conclude Musharraf is nothing as  compared to these.All these judges if you check their job history they all are involved in massive corruption cases.And the last objection Swat war it is right, Musharraf takes the honor here he started this and all pakistanis are agreed now that it is right descision.<br />
Economically pakistan was  going extremely good during his time you can check the foreign exchange rates and also the foreign investment during his time.<br />
Can anybody tell me who is better than Musharraf in pakistani politics ?  the answer is obviously &#8216;No&#8221;.So  he deserves to rule the country again like many others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khayal</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-239875</link>
		<dc:creator>khayal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-239875</guid>
		<description>People who live in glass houses shouldnt throw stones at others.
Shouldnt Zardari be prosecuted for kidnapping and looting the industrialist.
Shouldnt Nawaz be prosecuted for sending goons to attack the supremem court
Shouldnt Iftikhar Chaudrie be prosecuted for using his influence to get his son pass the english paper.
Shouldnt Hameed Gul be presecuted for his extra curricular activities in Jalalabad
Shouldnt General Chisti be prosecuted for running over the capital with his 111 brigade
Should Aslam Beg be prosecuted for creating IJI as an army chief.
Lets not kid ourselves and pretend as if Musharraf is the only one who didnt play by the rules.  Just look around and see if the country is moving in the right direction or not. 
1. It was always known that India was interfering in Baluchistan but now the Government has internationalized the issue, which means Baluchistan can debated on international forum, similar to Kashmir. I dont like this.
2. The Finance department is forcing the banks to give loans for rental power. This money is simply going down the drain.  The main reason why none of the KESE owners invested in power production was because 50% of electricity is stolen. There is no return on this money.
3. By waging a full fledge attack on the northern areas the military has driven itself into a precarious position. Can they every cleanup the area?. Now Afghanistan wants to talk peace with Taliban. Where doesnt that leave the military in the northern areas. Dont like that.
4. India is comfortably moving on with its arms development ( nuclear sub) and its pursuit of security counsel seat. The Pakistani media and the government is fat, dumb and happy with munching on Musharraf.  By the time they are done enjoying the roast, India may be in a position to burp them.
Dont kid yourself. Wake up and smell the roses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who live in glass houses shouldnt throw stones at others.<br />
Shouldnt Zardari be prosecuted for kidnapping and looting the industrialist.<br />
Shouldnt Nawaz be prosecuted for sending goons to attack the supremem court<br />
Shouldnt Iftikhar Chaudrie be prosecuted for using his influence to get his son pass the english paper.<br />
Shouldnt Hameed Gul be presecuted for his extra curricular activities in Jalalabad<br />
Shouldnt General Chisti be prosecuted for running over the capital with his 111 brigade<br />
Should Aslam Beg be prosecuted for creating IJI as an army chief.<br />
Lets not kid ourselves and pretend as if Musharraf is the only one who didnt play by the rules.  Just look around and see if the country is moving in the right direction or not.<br />
1. It was always known that India was interfering in Baluchistan but now the Government has internationalized the issue, which means Baluchistan can debated on international forum, similar to Kashmir. I dont like this.<br />
2. The Finance department is forcing the banks to give loans for rental power. This money is simply going down the drain.  The main reason why none of the KESE owners invested in power production was because 50% of electricity is stolen. There is no return on this money.<br />
3. By waging a full fledge attack on the northern areas the military has driven itself into a precarious position. Can they every cleanup the area?. Now Afghanistan wants to talk peace with Taliban. Where doesnt that leave the military in the northern areas. Dont like that.<br />
4. India is comfortably moving on with its arms development ( nuclear sub) and its pursuit of security counsel seat. The Pakistani media and the government is fat, dumb and happy with munching on Musharraf.  By the time they are done enjoying the roast, India may be in a position to burp them.<br />
Dont kid yourself. Wake up and smell the roses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikekahn</title>
		<link>http://pkpolitics.com/2009/07/16/poll-should-musharraf-be-allowed-into-pakistani-politics-without-past-accountability/#comment-239443</link>
		<dc:creator>ikekahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkpolitics.com/?p=10925#comment-239443</guid>
		<description>The blackest day in the history of Pakistan was May 2000 and not Nov 3, 2007 -- The dark night for eight years sustained, once the doctrine of necessity was mercilessly used by the Supreme court to legitimise the Generals&#039; long night. Instead of standing for freedom, they helped subtraction of an elected PM. In May 2000 judgement, the Judges unanimously accepted something that they have been doing for 52 years of our survival. To accept all mistakes of the past as lawful but one of Nov 3 action as exception is vendetta gone wild by Justice of Iftikhar Chaudary&#039;s court. Pakistan&#039;s Supreme Court had ruled that last October&#039;s military coup was legal but set a three-year deadline on a return to civilian rule. 

The day, when after nearly 12 years of uninterrupted civilian rule, the Supreme Court unanimously validated the October 1999 coup and gave Musharraf legislative and executive authority for three years. In June 2001, Musharraf declared himself president and is sworn in. The unanimous opinion of the 12-member court was that the overthrow of the government had been justified because of corrupt and ineffective &#039;&#039;one-man rule&#039;&#039; by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. 

The decision was read by Chief Justice Ershad Hassan Khan, that included Justice Iftikhar Chaudary, the present Chief Justice who, like the other judges, swore a loyalty oath to the military government two months ago, just before hearing arguments in the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blackest day in the history of Pakistan was May 2000 and not Nov 3, 2007 &#8212; The dark night for eight years sustained, once the doctrine of necessity was mercilessly used by the Supreme court to legitimise the Generals&#8217; long night. Instead of standing for freedom, they helped subtraction of an elected PM. In May 2000 judgement, the Judges unanimously accepted something that they have been doing for 52 years of our survival. To accept all mistakes of the past as lawful but one of Nov 3 action as exception is vendetta gone wild by Justice of Iftikhar Chaudary&#8217;s court. Pakistan&#8217;s Supreme Court had ruled that last October&#8217;s military coup was legal but set a three-year deadline on a return to civilian rule. </p>
<p>The day, when after nearly 12 years of uninterrupted civilian rule, the Supreme Court unanimously validated the October 1999 coup and gave Musharraf legislative and executive authority for three years. In June 2001, Musharraf declared himself president and is sworn in. The unanimous opinion of the 12-member court was that the overthrow of the government had been justified because of corrupt and ineffective &#8221;one-man rule&#8221; by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. </p>
<p>The decision was read by Chief Justice Ershad Hassan Khan, that included Justice Iftikhar Chaudary, the present Chief Justice who, like the other judges, swore a loyalty oath to the military government two months ago, just before hearing arguments in the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 452/480 objects using disk

Served from: pkpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 11:23:04 -->
