{ 21 comments... read them below or add one }

  • Avatar Image
    Noble said:

    PML (N) not ready to takeon America. It is so obvious from their measured responses that they do not want to say a single word, which could make Uncle SAM unhappy.
    So, does not matter who is in power. All our leaders intend to fall inline.

  • Avatar Image
    Qamar Saeed said:

    When one has to talk from a position of responsibility, the response must be measured and precise and not just a firefly stuff. I am not speaking in favor of any political party.

    In general if our politician are precise especially in relation to foreign affairs, it is appreciable. We should not amaze ourselves by blazing statements instead we should try to emphasize on the message of the statement.

  • Avatar Image
    Noble said:

    @Qamar Saeed

    Agreed. But don’t you feel that when it comes to US, one finds it very difficult to find a clear cut party position on issues that concern our national security. If security of Pakistan is in danger or Pakistani civilians are being killed on one pretext or the other, one should see a very definite party position. Even on issues like fate of those Pakistani national handed over to US, it is so painful that PPP/PML (N) despite domocratic parties have not taken up this issue with the US government. If Musharraf has done all this dirty work, what has been done to correct the direction.

  • Avatar Image
    adilhussain said:

    There should be a detailed assessment by the Parlieamentary committee and defence forces of the situation and security policy for Pakistan should be approved and implemented. Next 8-10 months would be very crucial in this context. Harmoney and peace at home is required to face this situation.

  • Avatar Image
    Wajahat said:

    @adilhussain
    If such maturity is shown by these poor politicians then the system would start to function. But perhaps its about time that they join hands for the sake of people of Pakistan to protect their lives.

  • Avatar Image
    Wajahat said:

    Gilani says Baitullah killed Benazir Bhutto. Then why PPP went to UN? Why Zardari never took his name?

  • Avatar Image
    mian mazhar said:

    admin pa g

    why putting ahsan iqbal in pml(q)????

    Corrected – Thanks – Admin

  • Avatar Image
    Muhammad Faisal Raza said:

    Wajahat please this also,

    Why the Govt. Of Pakistan paid more than 100 million US dollars to UN for investigation from the money of poor peoples of pakistan, even they know that Baitullah killed Benazir?

    Why dont they pay from there swiss accounts?

  • Avatar Image
    sadiqahmed said:

    Amriki pitho hein. They will never dare to challenge their masters.

  • Avatar Image
    mazloomlog said:

    To,
    Noble said:
    PML (N) not ready to takeon America. It is so obvious from their measured responses that they do not want to say a single word, which could make Uncle SAM unhappy.
    So, does not matter who is in power. All our leaders intend to fall inline.

    You are absolutely right about that the only thing both parties are agreed on is to be fawning towards America.There was not single hot argument.Both of the CHAMCHA,S had common point of view on American issue.

  • Avatar Image
    sherdilmuslim said:

    To,
    Wajahat said:
    Gilani says Baitullah killed Benazir Bhutto. Then why PPP went to UN? Why Zardari never took his name?
    Muhammad Faisal Raza said:
    Wajahat please this also,

    Why the Govt. Of Pakistan paid more than 100 million US dollars to UN for investigation from the money of poor peoples of pakistan, even they know that Baitullah killed Benazir?

    Why dont they pay from there swiss accounts?

    Very good point.I thought Zardari paid 100 million dollars to UNO to make some money out of that for himself.

  • Avatar Image
    sadajeopakistan said:

    Qamar-uz-Zaman kaira is such a presumptuous personality that he has answer of every question. He will deny impudently a clear fact like he was trying to deny the use of Pakistan,s airports bluntly.That is the reason why Zardari chose him for information ministry because he is the best lier in PPP government.

  • Avatar Image
    sohnidherti said:

    Shah Mahmood Qureshi in a statement showed concerns on beefing up American troops in Afghanistan and kaira said in last night show that increase of troops is good for Pakistan,so who we should believe?

  • Avatar Image
    mazbootchatan said:

    PRESIDENT Obama’s much awaited policy on Afghanistan really turned out to be a whimper of a statement rather than a new policy commencing with a bang. This is appropriate because Obama seems to have opted to go with the old Bush policy while giving it a more realistic hue. Instead of a grandiose expectation of military victory and a new Afghan nation state construct, the US is now clearly seeking a respectable exit within eighteen months. Clearly this involves pressuring all sides to come to the discussion table so that a situation can be created which allows this face-saving exit to the US.

  • Avatar Image
    azadpakistan said:

    Additional American troops in Afghanistan are going to create more problems for Pakistan.It is not a good news next 6 months are going to be very very crucial and they will set the way for the future of this region.

  • Avatar Image
    mohibewatan said:

    Threats and lure

    ON the intensely complex question of adopting a strategy that could somehow break the current stalemate in Afghanistan and reverse the almost certain prospects of defeat for the US-led forces, the Obama administration has, in the fashion of powerful states dealing with weaker allies, decided to use the carrot-and-stick approach towards Pakistan. A letter from President Obama to President Zardari, personally delivered by US National Security Adviser General Jones last week, offers an expanded strategic partnership to Pakistan, including additional military and economic cooperation, but only if it stops hobnobbing with insurgent groups that the US believes it continues to do. The General is supposed to have bluntly told his interlocutors that if Pakistan could not deliver the US would be impelled to use any means it considered suitable to rout insurgents along the border with Afghanistan.

    Above is the excerption of a article in THENATION. In my opinion Pakistan should tell Americans to go and rout out Talibans if they could because when ever they had any face to face encounter with Talibans in the past they ran away from the battle field leaving their dead ones behind.

  • Avatar Image
    roshanpakistansara said:

    Our leaders are so scared of Americans or better put this way that they are so obedient to Americans that they are not dare to utter a word against America in their own country infront of their own people.If one of the participant of last night show had said o word against top leader ship of both parties they were really going to jump on each other contemptuously.But about America they work on a policy of bi-partisan ,policy of fawning ,impudicity,relenting and coaxing.

  • Avatar Image
    jaagpakistanijaag said:

    Qama zaman kaira said that it is the success of PPP government that Obama wants to keep Pakistan aboard on Afghanistan. Let me tell you Mr Kaira either you are foolish or ignorant.Obama wants Pakistan aboard to help America not to help Pakistan.He very clearly said that if Pakistan will not take appropriate action then American forces will go after them even inside Pakistan if they have to.Now you tell me you should take credit for that or you should by worried about it.I do not know you understand you just do not have vision.

  • Avatar Image
    sherepunjab said:

    THE revelation by Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, Babar Awan, about corruption is quite shocking and proves the point that the menace is endemic. He told the reporters that from 1985 to 2003, six families took loans from several banks amounting to billions of rupees and had them illegally written off largely during the rule of President Musharraf. Though he fought shy of mentioning the names of beneficiaries, the report presented by him shows that they were members of the military, political and industrial class who had got off scot-free. Though he referred to the loan scandal as the ‘mother of the NRO’, which is not entirely false, yet the way he has linked this to the ongoing NRO controversy is not encouraging. Two wrongs don’t make a right. His argument that the NRO is now a part of history and that it is a hostile section of the media that is engaged in slinging the mud on the PPP leadership is not valid.

  • Avatar Image
    Desi People said:

    Yeh hey hi kair. But I don’t understand what type of politics n-league is doing. Zardari and Nawaz have one thing in common clearly. Follow london and washington to keep their political hopes alive. at least this what they believe in.

  • www.nadeemmalik.pk « PK NEWS TODAY said:

    [...] Islamabad Tonight – 2 December 2009 20 Comments [...]

Leave your response!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Username


Password


Recent Comments
Blog Comments
Search