l Najam Sethi Special – 5 December 2009 | Pakistan Politics
{ 6 comments... read them below or add one }

  • mir munsif said:

    One of the best program ever..very candid and straight analysis of Nejam.His analysis of current situation,NRO,the role of certain Media forces and Establishment is worth listening.The way Establishment forces are using their cards against democratic govts to discredit them in order to retain their supremacy and authority is shameful.Neither PMLN nor PPP led govt were ever allowed to work freely and Military Economic Alliance (Military+Agencies+Certain biased Media+ Pseudo Politicians n Intellectuals+Certain Bureacratic class) assert their control over state of Pakistan,to a quote “Countries have their armies but in Pakistan,Army has country”.PPP led Govt may have weakness but this should not be execuse to derail democratic system.Shame for Anti democratic forces.Finally I would say Nejam’s analysis is such an opening,straight and thought provoking.Keep it up Nejam.

  • cheguevara said:

    I have never seen such dishonest analysis. He justifies one wrong with another,compares apples with oranges.This Munib guy just sists there and nods in affirmitive whatever Najam Sethi says.

  • javaidiqbalkhalid said:

    On every issue, Sethi sahib says, “it is half right and half wrong”. What a comment! Come on sethi sahib, either something is right or wrong. It cannot be half right and half wrong. Our media should always support the right and condemn wrong, no matter who is involved in that case. Nothing but truth can lead us to the path of prosperity.

  • Adonis said:

    LOL…….

    This sethi guys is so in love with himself. He thinks that by trying to pose as an ‘intellectual’, those who are not familiar with his background will take him seriously.

    But obviously he has succeeded in fooling only a few.

  • hypocrite said:

    Najam Sethi is so out of synch with the trend at least on following counts.

    a) Poor fellow thinks judiciary, journalist, generals and all politicians are corrupt and not only some politicians.

    b) Doesnt thave a clue on creating sensations and tries to communicate the message in simple manner. How can we believe in something that is not sensational.

  • Imtiaz said:

    Most rational interpretation of the affairs. Showing consistent unbiased analysis is his distinguishing mark.

Leave your response!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Username


Password


Recent Comments
Blog Comments
Search