l One Day We All Will Be Terrorists! | Pakistan Politics
{ 9 comments... read them below or add one }

  • SAZA said:

    We are TERRORIST, no doubt at all, but for those who wage war against us, for those who undermine our sovereignty and Kaffirs of the world who want to eliminate us. This is the WORD OF ALLAH, ” and strike terror in to the hearts of enemies of Allah and your enemy, whome you know not but Allah does know” (Alquraan). Let the West Call us the terrorists.I am proud to be a terrorist.

  • superdad said:

    Assalam U Aaleakum

    · WE are NOT TERRORIST as AMERICA and WEST claimed, WE are FREEDOME FIGHTERS and we have moral rights and duties, no doubt at all, BUT We are TERRORIST for those who wage WAR against ALLAH and MUSLIM UMMA, for those who UNDERMINE SOVEREIIGNTY and KAFFIRS through out the WOLRD, who want to ELIMINATE MUSLIM UMMA from PLANET EARTH. We MUSLIM have seen in AFRICA, BOSNIA, GAZA, LABELON, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN and now in PAKISTAN.
    · NO body talk about these TERRORIST CONTERIES, like AMERICA, ISRAEL, EUROPE and INDIA, not to mention the UN. HOW they are creating TERRORISAM in other MUSLIM COUNTERIES. WHY?
    . BEWARE YOU LOTS time is running out for YOU, SOON ALLAH(SWT) WILL PUNISH YOU ALL for this HORRAFIC and BARBERIC ACT.
    · INSHAALLAH, YOU will never be SUSCEED IN YOUR MISSON, because ALLAH (SWT) said, Several Places in QURAAN that HE will, HIMSELF safegaurd the DEEN E ISLAM AND MUSLIM all over the WORLD. DO NOT worry about ENEMY PROPAGENDA.
    · This is the “WORD OF ALLAH (SWT), ” AND STRIKE THE TERROR IN TO THE HEARTS OF ENEMIES OF ALLAH (SWT) AND YOUR ENEMY, WHOM YOU DON’T KNOW, BUT ALLAH DOES KNOW”. AL-QURAAN.
    · O! MUSLIM UMMA, TIGHTLY hold the STRING of ALLAH (SWT), DO NOT DIVIDE among youself, be UNITED. AL-QURAAN
    . LET the USA and WEST Call us the TERRISTS. I am PROUD to be called as a TERRIST. IT is my duty as a MUSLIM to fight against the enemies ALLAH and MUSLIM UMMA by writing the truth against them.
    · Finnaly I humbly request all MUSLIM COUNTRIES to PULL OUT from UN, because UN ALWAYS working against MUSLIM COUNTRIES and helping TERRORIST CONTERIES, against MUSLIM COUNTRIES.

  • hadi26 said:

    Bravo!
    One of the best Articles I have read in a while.

    God Bless you Dr saab.

  • ammarisb said:

    “This war is against a people, a faith, a history, and an existential reality, an entirety of a civilization, an actual formidable historical presence and an enduring spiritual entity. They, the US and its allies (which include collaborating political elites in Muslim countries), cannot win this war. Indeed, they can unleash havoc, a wave of destruction (as they are doing now), but they cannot and will not win!”

    The logic that the Taliban represent a civilization and they a formidable spiritual entity is grossly inaccurate, The Taliban do not even represent the Afghan nation as they derive their forces from phustuns which are proportionate of 45% of ethnic population of Afghanistan.
    Moreover Dr, Haider’s and many like him would like to quote Huntington’s theory of “Clash of Civilizations” which is an academic paper not a foreign policy doctrine as implied over here. The proponents of such theories also exist is the Muslim world.
    This war will not end as suggested if we disengage ourselves from the coalition, for the ultimate goal of the extremists is to topple the regime and to radicalize the Pakistan society.

    Dr Sahib fondly recalls the multi-cultural and fashionable traits of Karachi correctly! My question however is would hustle and bustle still be there if these extremists are in power?

  • fmk said:

    @ammarisb
    Ammar, what you represent here is a very common phenomenon of fear of the unverified, and extrapolation of the events to something you do not know of. Have you ever analyzed the plausibility of what you say, like many others, that the extremists’ agenda is to conquer Pakistan and form a radical rule over 170 million people, without their will? Has it ever happened in the human history ever? That 170 million people with such a big spectrum of cultures, languages, and even views, understanding and practice of religion will be subdued by a group whose only action so far is violence? And that violence too at the support of the foreign nations who provide them weapon, explosives, money and equipment? (of course, these are not manufactured in Pakistan) Let us try to be somewhat rational about it.

    When did these extremists decide to conquer Pakistan? See, we need to have a proof or some level of certainty before we jump ourselves into a journey which will only bleed us to death if we do not win? Why only in the last 3-4 years do we see all this? Why is West and the other forces pushing us more to fight it? Why every political problem, such as Balochistan, every ethnic issue, such as in Karachi, and every sectarian knot, such as sunni versus shia, being lumped all into one word, terrorism?

    Fear based on violence can lead to masses drawing conclusions like the one you have done. Then we do not care to verify the facts and not even analyze the cost and benefits, or to think what options do we have at hand. You do not have to listen to Huntington’s thesis, but at least in a very local sense, you have to understand the dynamics of the problem Pakistan faces today; of course, with attention paid to historical events of the last decade, and the contribution of external intervention. Because, even if the answer comes out to fight a war, we still have to ask why would the US and West give us resources to fight; no nation fights other nation’s war. If it happens, such a coalition is bound to lose. Whether the West gives us resources/aid to fight against our enemy, as Zardari and his team has been asking for, or we pledge and send our troops to fight against the US’s enemy, this is a logically flawed scenario and is bound to fail in both cases.

  • ammarisb said:

    @FMK I appreciate your insightful comment, but I was in no way trying to imply that Pakistan is under an imminent threat from extremist elements, the nuclear arsenal is not candy that can be snatched away.

    I completely endorse your view that no nation fights another nation’s war, and for this winning this war we need to take ownership of this war, until then we will be clueless

  • fmk said:

    @ammarisb
    Thanks!

    Exactly, the day when we start to take the ownership, this problem of internal violence and extremism will be defeated. When our government and its people at the positions of responsibility stop showing off their “progress report” to the US, and wishing to receive a pat at their back. When they rather tell them that we do not want your intervention in our internal matters, that you also have to follow our laws and constitution; and that we will not take dictation from you on who to consider our enemy and do an operation, nor who to sign an NRO with, or execute via judiciary.

    Unless that happens, the external forces will keep having a party at diverting their enemy to Pakistan at one hand, and keep twisting our arm to bend, and stretch, to do the insane things, posing threats to our very existence.

  • ammarisb said:

    @FMK! The ownership bit is crucial and as you said we should stop showing the “progress report” as it does put undue pressure on the armed forces and a hasty operation has its own repercussions. The operations must continue but we have to set the goals and to devise the means to achieve them.

  • ammarisb said:

    The Denmark government is providing a 12 million $ grant to Pakistan for rebuilding the 473 schools destroyed by the Taliban, a kind gesture indeed but as responsible citizens we must ensure that the money is spent in the right area. Education has long been a neglected domain and this aid should not be spent upon buying fancy protocol motorcades!

Leave your response!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Username


Password


Recent Comments
Blog Comments
Search