PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

16 Dec again ,and we are still in 70s situation

(65 posts)
  1. it was 16th of Dec 1971 ....38 years ago ,it was a PPP govt and we lost our biggest province East Pakistan ,now known as Bangladesh.

    its 16th Dec 2009 ...38 years after ...and its a PPP govt again and our biggest province Balochistan is really really unhappy with the federal Govt ...it has almost the same complaints as East Pakistanis had .

    foreign elements and cunning neighbor is still in action ,the same way ,it was in 71 .

    PPP Govt is as useless and helpless as it was in 71s.
    maybe more than that .

    what u ppl think on this tragic day of our history ?

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 9:36 #
  2. toamin
    member

    Regarding "foreign elements and cunning neighbor are still in action", because it is with full consent from Civilian/Military bureaucracy.

    Kayani, Pasha and Majeed have become untouchable 'gods' deciding single handedly for not only army/air force but also the entire nation.

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 9:46 #
  3. @JJ Khan ,
    and what do u think about federal Govt of today as compare to there of 71s Govt?

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 9:59 #
  4. toamin
    member

    As far as I know from people like Dr. Mubashir Hassan that the govt was not financially so corrupt as we see today. Massive looting and plundering of people wealth is so open today which I think was not the issue back then.

    In 70s it was more of power struggle between East/West and Army...

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 10:26 #
  5. Beenai Bibi,

    Please don't distort history.

    It was not PPP govt on 16 th Dec,1971.

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 11:18 #
  6. Anonymous

    I am not supporter of PPP but 'asif khan' is correct in stating that it was not PPP government at the time of fall of Dhaka. It is gross mistake on part of the initiater of the thread.

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 11:23 #
  7. Please don't get emotional.
    To accept a section of East Bengal, lying 1000 miles away from the West Pakistan, as part of Pakistan , was not a wise step by the Muslim League.
    The demand for whole of Punjab and Kashmir would have been much better solution.

    آغاز سے تھا موت کا کھٹکا لگا ھوا
    اڑنے سے پیشتر ھی میرا رنگ زرد تھا

    http://i48.tinypic.com/2v8jxiu.jpg

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 11:49 #
  8. JS,

    How do u see distorting of history ?

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 11:50 #
  9. toamin
    member

    To accept to run British Legacy system on newly created Pakistan on Ideology of Islam and Muslims was not a wise step by Muslim League!

    They should have discarded the colonial rule and replaced with what people of the region had faith and believe in.

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 11:53 #
  10. BaliMA
    Member

    Bangladesh was made by the military + mullah alliance. Misguided youths funded by Cia and mi5 are now trying to fool Pakistanis about why and how this country was created. These shameful creatures would sell their own mother for money so everyone must keep a watch on these merchants of deception.

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 12:50 #
  11. toamin
    member

    Why do you let these foreign intelligence agencies establish their 'centers of excellence' on your land?

    Purge them and terminate their networks first and then formulate policies per desires of the people.

    Posted 2 years ago on 16 Dec 2009 13:10 #
  12. Binai Bibi ghalat biyani kar kaaey ghaaib ho gaayi haain :)

    Afsoos . Saad Afsssos.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 5:59 #
  13. @Asif sahib,
    Noop.i am very much here to answer your obejctions.
    just busy with cleaning too many threads on NRO issue ,merging and closing them ...

    Now as long as your objection is concerned .
    yes ,it was NOT a PPP govt .
    but who was the party other than PPP ,who was competing with Mujeeb's party and was NOT willing to give up the power ,for the sake of the country.

    PPP is a power hungry party .
    no matter ,how much u are in love with PPP .
    u can not deny the fact that PPP has a major role in Dhaka Fall ...

    for doing that ,u need to burn out thousands of books ,has been written on Dhaka Fall .
    u need to be a Nadir Shah or Changez khan to burn history .
    in order to defend your favorite party in Dhaka Fall case.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 6:09 #
  14. @Sheikh sahib,
    i have heard this logic only from PPP defenders that ,whats the big deal if East Pakistan got cut from the body of Pakistan ...it was geographically never been a reality to be a part of Pakistan .

    i disagree with the thought .
    if india has too many provinces ,some are really far from New Dehli and major cities ,that allows us to eat them up ?

    Geographical boundaries has been drawn by human beings .

    if you stand on Wahgah border .
    u can see only a huge GATE between two countries ...
    but one side of the gate is a different country then the other side of the gate .

    it does NOT means that we are NOT two countries ,just becasue we are two closer borders .

    and East Pakistan should be a different country from day one ,coz it has a huge geographical gape from West part of Pakistan ....

    sorry ,this is no logic .

    though ,i am NOT from Bengal but have read a lot of material on East Pakistan ,and in university days ,one of my professor was Bengali origin and he told us about Dhaka Fall ,he was the witness of that historic defeat of Pakistan ,he has records of Daily Jang and Dawn editorials of that year too.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 6:49 #
  15. aristotle
    Member

    beenai

    Yes, we have pain for Dhaka fall but I feel (its my personal opinion, u can differ) that there is a little changed and better scenario in our country comparatively 70s era. Now we have two influential institution that holds a power to change the entire scenario that r Judiciary and Media, these institutions r our hope..Hope for civil society. No matter there, r still black sheeps but we can trust them to convey our voice here and there and protect our rights...our country and its citizen’s rights. unfortunate Pakistanis of 70s era did not have these sources.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 6:52 #
  16. @Aristotle ,
    i agree with u to a certain extend but the problem is same PPP with the same desire of power and not letting anyone to make them listen ,what the need of the hour as long as Balochistan situation is concerned .
    Aghaz e Haqooq e Balochistan ,like his name is redundant and just a cover up for all that federal Govts has been doing with Balochistan from eating royalty of Sui Gas to killing Bugti.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 7:18 #
  17. toamin
    member

    Right, the logic of distance is invalid, Pakistan is and was Muslim Majority areas.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 7:27 #
  18. aristotle
    Member

    @beenai
    Do not worry, time is up for these culprits right now and we r moving ahead, slowly but steady. There be no another Dhaka fall inshallah. Balochistan issue, it will take a little time but will be resolved, the credit will go to...where Allah wants to give.
    the ppl of Pakistan would not give more time to these culprits for ruining the country. Time has been changed and its biggest reality of today.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 7:41 #
  19. Bilal Tarar
    Members

    major difference: independent judiciary
    Chief tere jaannisaar!

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 7:43 #
  20. Beenai bibi ,

    First , thank u for conceeding that u distorted the history by saying that it was PPP's federal government.

    NOw, regarding PPP role i never denied that PPP had a role into the debacle. IF i said so , plesae quote .

    So , i don't need to be changeez khan or nadir shah. Right ?

    But again i can't hold pointing out the gross misstatement u have made.
    '
    but who was the party other than PPP ,who was competing with Mujeeb's party and was NOT willing to give up the power ,for the sake of the country
    '

    Bibi , aap kii qareeb kii nazar agar weak nahi haai tu hamarey mulk mein eik party haai jiss kaa naam haai 'BRAVE ARMY'. it was 'BRAVE ARMY' who was ruling the country and didn't hand over power to bengalis.

    To deny this fact , u have to become 'Changhaiz Khan' or 'Nadir Shah' to burn thousands of books of history. (Sorry i don't know the 'mooaenis' of these men).

    For your kind memory

    The country was being ruled by then COAS under martial law since 25 March 1969. The CMLA promugulated LFO under whcih elections were held and under the same LFO , CMLA was supposed to convene new elected parliament within 120 days and hand over power to elected representaives.

    Bibi , its a forum where almost everybody is well-educated and has read fair bit of history . So , please refrain from making gross mis-statements. It would just result in loss of your credibility.

    On a personal note , i m a staunch opponent of PPP.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 9:24 #
  21. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    I was part of a protest organized by JI in Lahore today.

    We protested against the same. The same conditions as they were in 1971 are being created. Pak Army is killing its own people. People will rise against Pak Army. The state will become unstable as a result.

    I heard a man say yesterday in Capital Talk dated 16 Dec 2009, that Pakistan should publish Hamood-ur-Rahman report. That report hasn't been published by Pakistan Govt. yet. It needs! to be published.

    When the state becomes unstable, US shows this in ALL the world and changes world opinion to take control of Pakistan's nuclear assets, and then disposes of them.

    After Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is gone, Israel starts war against Iran or Pakistan which means, ALL the Muslim World + the entire world goes to war on Pakistani or Irani soil.

    Muslims will INSHALLAH win the war, but a lot of damage will have been done, because the war will have been fought on our! land.

    Even so, when the damage is done by war, then US thinks it will be a race between east and west in regard to who recovers first ? Naturally since US thinks it will recover faster, US thinks it will revive its hegemony in the entire world ALL over again, after it witnesses the current unavoidable collapse.

    US doesn't want any hegemon to rise from East of the world. If that were to happen, US's interests would be harmed and US recovery might take longer than expected.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 9:28 #
  22. @Asif ,
    denying facts ,just because they are NOT suiting you ,is no way to create any good will about your favorite party .

    who made the slogan ;Adhir Tum ,Idhar Hum .

    if PPP wanted to avoid ,it could have been refrain itself from power hunger race and would be considered a party of great integrity ...
    rather a country breaking party .

    power lust is still with PPP and results are there .

    BTW,i dont need to be Nadir Shah or Changaiz Khan to burn the history ....

    as history defends my arguments then yours .

    was PPP involved in Dhaka Fall?

    history says ;
    a very ,very Clear YES .

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 9:54 #
  23. Beenai Bibi,

    U started this thread with gross mis-statement which u have already conceded.

    What was the law at that point of time ?

    Where it required 'BRAVE ARMY' to consult PPP to hand over power to winners ?

    and if u can't read , nobody can help u .

    i wrote

    '
    NOw, regarding PPP role i never denied that PPP had a role into the debacle. IF i said so , plesae quote
    '

    I again challenge that quote where i said that PPP didn't play a role.

    Note:
    As a matter of principle , u should have apologized to forum members for your gross misstatement in the opening sentence of the thread.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 10:09 #
  24. @Asif ,
    u never comment on the topic of the thread .
    rather busy commenting on me and my abilities as a mod .

    it would be good idea ,that i share ur own views about Dhaka tragedy ...as u seems like more knowledgeable than anybody else at the forum.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 10:19 #
  25. Musician
    Member

    It is my humble opinion that Moderators should never actively participate in any discussion or to even start a thread. They should stick to Moderation only. I beleive Moderators' role to be like a Speaker in a National Assembly.

    If they do want to actively participate and I do not see any reason why not, then they should do so as Member only and not as a Moderator. It is a conflict of inerest. This is a case wehre double ID will be acceptble.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 10:28 #
  26. bibi

    Jhoot aap boolain , aur khamoish humm raahain. Theek haai , aap monitor haain class kii but it doesn't allow gross lies.

    Again please read my last msg which included.

    '
    What was the law at that point of time ?

    Where it required 'BRAVE ARMY' to consult PPP to hand over power to winners ?
    '

    HOw its related to your abilities , im unable to comprehend.

    Note
    Again , a member doing gross misstatements (and especially he/she conceeds it , should apologize to forum members).

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 10:30 #
  27. If the Creation of Bangla Desh was a result of Conspiracy by Mujeeb, Yahya, Bhutto, Indira Gandhi and Mukti Bahini, against the wishes of the people of East Pakistan,
    Then,
    WHY,
    It could not be Re-United back to Pakistan by, Anti-Bhutto (Zia-ul-Haq) Anti-Mujeeb and Anti Indira Gandhi regemes in Bangla Desh and Inida?
    Did any Leader ask the People of Bangla Desh, if they want to re-join Pakistan?
    Unfortunately, people of Pakistan are more attracted by Conspiracy Theories and Illusions, rather than Historical, Geographical, Political, circumstantial, Intellectual and Realistic conclusions.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 10:30 #
  28. toamin
    member

    Let us not generalize and ridicule people of Pakistan by saying that they are more attracted by conspiracy and illusion.

    Instead of generalizing, we need to assess and see if Pakistan is/was really independent in deciding it's affairs? Or we have always been a satellite state where decisions have been made against the interest of Peoples of Pakistan.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 11:01 #
  29. JS
    I agree to u that there were some fundamental differences but still the two parts could have continued.

    In my humble oponion

    a) Bengalis were politically very active and aware people where as west pakistan wasn't.

    b) Pakistan was under 'BRAVE ARMY' rule and bengalis didn't see any future for themselves.

    c) West pakistan and Bengal had entirely different cultures , language and even didn't share the same geography.

    All this led to debacle but fundamental part was of 'BRAVE ARMY' and i m glad for my bengali brothern that they won their freedom from opresser on this Golden DAy of 1971.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 11:37 #
  30. The Qauid-i-Azam advised his Personal Secretary to keep vigilant, where Sh. Mujeeb-al-Rahman, as a student of Dhaka University, demanded for Bengali as National Language of Pakistan, where Qauid-i-Azam was addressing a public meeting.

    Bengalis, being in majority, also felt uncomfortable where Urdu, language of the Minority was imposed as National Language.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 11:51 #
  31. toamin
    member

    Well, not really because if Balochi, Pushton, Sindhi and Punjabi can accept Urdu then why not Bengali?

    It wasn't about language, it was more of power struggle between East & West with missing referee.

    A neutral referee was needed to close differences.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 11:58 #
  32. JS

    Totally agree.

    Its also said that Quaid noted the motives of Ayub Khan and in one of his address to armed forces mentioned that forces would be subordainate to representatives of masses.

    ( I don't remember the occasion and exact wording but meanings were something like that )

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 11:59 #
  33. "if Balochi, Pushton, Sindhi and Punjabi can accept Urdu then why not Bengali?"
    Better put this question to Bangalis.
    East Pakistan was the Largest Federating Unit of Pakistan carrying majority of Pakistanis.
    They had a point to object where Language of Minority was imposed upon Majority.

    Bottom line is that creation of Bangla Desh was not orchestrated suddenly in 1971 but there was a long historical process and chain of events which nursed the seeds of separation.
    Pakistan was not created suddebly in 1947.
    That was an outcome of 90 years long struggle.
    It takes 9 months to deliver after the conception.
    End of the Story.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 12:21 #
  34. Bhutto won 79 seats while Awami League won 181, still Bhutto was not willing to accept his defeat. He openly said in Public in one of his addresses 'Udher tum, Idher Hum'. One may go back to speeches by Bhutto and find this famous 'slogan' that was instrumental to seal the fate of East Pakistan.
    His concept of 'Islamic Socialism' was a failure too, and so were all his promises. Roti, kapra our makan was one of them. The next was twelve and a half acres of land for each pakistani. Both were false promises.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 12:31 #
  35. Anonymous

    @semirza

    Bhutto was the populist just like today's Imran Khan and NS. Their politics were not based on political wisdom but public opinion and Bhutto's politics was solely based on west Pakistani public opinion and even worse(only Sindh and Punjab). Sheikh Mujib was also populist for Bengalis(east Pakistan) that's why situation got worse and Army was called by Yahya Khan and to further fuel this situation "jamat" played their role in the form of "al Badar" Razakar terror squad. Now a days word "Razakar" is considered as GALI for Bangladeshi people.

    "Islamic socialism" was also part of his populist strategy of mixing socialism with Islam. He also introduce quota system which was the biggest failure for Pakistan in short whole Bhutto's tenure was complete failure for Pakistan.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 13:39 #
  36. I guess we are discussing the Issue of Bangla Desh and not rise and downfall of PPP or Bhutto.

    1. A landslide victory of Awami League in the East Pakistan and zero representation in the West was not a sudden incident or accident but a result of several milestones during the past 24 years just like the victory of Muslim League in 1946 was an outcome of 90 years struggle, starting from 1857.

    2. 'Udher Tum, Idher Hum' was an outcome and result not a cause.
    3. I don't blame anyone one for the Creation of Bangla Desh as Historically, Politically, Geographically, Culturally, Logistically, East Pakistan was not treated as a natural partner of Pakistan by Islamabad.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 13:43 #
  37. toamin
    member

    Right, towards late forties and then in fifties nationalist/lingual movements started to spring out on the foot steps of arab and turkish nationalist movements.

    Goal was to replace the ideological movement with nationalist movement.

    Where was the call of nationalism when Muslims were united under Ideology of Islam to oust the colonial power?

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 13:51 #
  38. Regional, Territorial and Economic realities are more dominating and appealing than emotional illusions.

    Arabs, having a common language, common religion and culture, could not stay united under one Government.

    The desire to protect regional autonomy, generated the concept of Federalism, where all the units enjoy benefits of Unity without sacrificing their identity.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 14:11 #
  39. toamin
    member

    As we see today from the example of European Union commonalities in these regional, territorial and economic realities close the differences and unite them.

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 14:42 #
  40. Mirza Sahib

    '
    He openly said in Public in one of his addresses 'Udher tum, Idher Hum'. One may go back to speeches by Bhutto and find this famous 'slogan' that was instrumental to seal the fate of East Pakistan.
    '

    Despite being convinced that bhutto played a very negative role in the scenario i just want to mentioned something about few things which i read about 'HUM IDHIR TUM UDHUR'

    a) It was reported only by daily 'AZAD' and no other newspaper.
    b) It was frontpage headline.
    c) Abbas Athar , then resident editor of Daily Azad , takes the responsiblity of this headline saying that it was not ZAB's words but mine which i infered from his talk.
    d) Abbas Athar is still alive and confirms this.

    Now coming back to 16 Dec debacle , i raised some basic questions about the legal status of that time and i raise these again.

    a) Who was ruling Pakistan then ?
    BRAVE ARMY

    b) What was the law at that point of time ?
    LFO --promugulated by CMLA

    c) Where it required 'BRAVE ARMY' to consult PPP to hand over power to winners ?

    It didn't require.

    d) Who didn't transfer power to AL? and whose duty it was ?
    'BRAVE ARMY'

    Note

    Mirza Sahib, does the COC suggests anything for member making gross mis-representations of facts (and also confessing that he/she has done so ).

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 22:18 #
  41. Anwer Kamal
    Member

    I6th December
    It was actually conspiracy of Yahya against democracy
    Now this year it is again on same time.
    By....... ?

    Posted 2 years ago on 17 Dec 2009 23:07 #
  42. @asifkhan
    I am not sure about you but allow me to say that since the early days of Ayub Khan till the downfall of Bhutto I had been a witness to many events especially Z.A.Bhutto's speeches.
    In case you deny, than denial should be based on evidence. From my side I may come up with more than enough if and when required.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Dec 2009 14:15 #
  43. Anwer Kamal
    Member

    The history has cleared many things. Yahya was trying to be president for more time so has tried to cheat everyone but failed.
    History will remember 16th December as a black day. Note it;

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Dec 2009 14:52 #
  44. toamin
    member

    Indian Army officers like Iskander Mirza were quickly promoted to hand over stick from goras to like of Iskander to preserve the power in right hands. He was promoted from Major to Maj General in 6 years!

    Yahya..Ayub etc were same breed...

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Dec 2009 15:06 #
  45. Mirza sahib

    I m neither a witness nor can be as I was born in 1975 but what isaid about Abbas ather , I read it in his own column. I m out of station , so can't give exact link at this point of time .

    Just a question, r u claiming that u r a witness and heard Bhutto sUing these words? Plz correct me if wrong?

    Note

    even my previous note wasn't, pointing finger at u but my question is still there?

    What's penality for a member who misleads the forum
    members? What our coc says? It's a more severe case since the member has confessed that it was a lie as well as the member is un- fortunTely moderator?

    What our coc says?

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Dec 2009 17:39 #
  46. quaidkamazaar
    Member

    I absolutely 100% agree with Beenai's toughts here.

    Just because East Pakistan was 1000s miles away from Pakistan does not give excuse for a nation to break in half.

    Would PAkistan even be a reality without East Pakistani huge numbers in All India Muslim League?

    Would Pakistan have been a reality without the large support and agitation from Kolkata and Dhaka?

    If Pakistan was made for the muslims of subcontinent, then East Pakistanis though had a different culture were still just like us because they were muslim.

    Posted 2 years ago on 19 Dec 2009 9:49 #
  47. i appreciate this great ,well thought and focused debate on the tragic history of Pakistan ...

    in my opinion ,we should debate over it more and more so we can clarify the reasons behind this tragic incident and can make it to NOT to happen ever again .

    Posted 2 years ago on 19 Dec 2009 10:06 #
  48. M.AKRAM KHAN NIAZI
    Member

    “Fatal Failure of Dictator Yahya in East Pakistan.”

    Usually army personnel’s of any country are considered as the most devoted and trustworthy personnel of any Nation, as they have sworned for sacrificing their lives for their nation, their fore every one considered them highly selfless, as every thing will be safe and fair in their hands, in each and every condition, but in case of Pakistan the situation was reversed of this phenomena from the beginning of the Pakistan, Therefore it is necessary to analyze this situation so that to avoid any further damage to Pakistan.

    Dictator Yahya:
    Dictator Yahya Khan was well known as a loose character man, his era is full of highest victimization of Pakistani nation and Army, it is sometimes thought that government of Pakistan was handed over to this man just to penalize to Pakistani nation by Dictator Ayoub, Because it is completely unpredictable that how this man was able to become the president of an Islamic nation, this is a mystery till today. Some blunders of Yahya Khan are as follows,

    Constitution Assembly Elections 1970:-
    In the presence of 1956 and 1962 constitutions and against the advice of intellectuals of the nation that it will be very difficult to develop a new constitution for the country, elections were hold by this dictator for new constitution which led the country to an unprecedented crisis.

    Inability to handle the crisis after elections:
    After elections politicians of the country failed to reach on any consensus on new constitution as forecasted already by the intellectuals, Dictator Yahya Khan instead of persuading them to reach on some type of consensus, tried to use the policy of divide and rule for the perpetuation of his own rule and for this he had to find some reasons for which he had not to wait so long.

    Incapability of understanding to Enemy.
    • Dictator Yahya totally failed to understand the policy of India based on from first day of creation of Pakistan that how to create disunity among Muslims.
    • On the basis of this policy
    • India kept Indian Muslims at a distance from Pakistan by treating Pakistan as an enemy country.
    • India created bad relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
    • India created bad relations between Pakistan and Soviet Union so that Pakistan could not develop again their historical relations with central Asians Muslims.

    In 1970 elections Indian RAW was main instrument, which was mainly responsible for cultivation of hatred between West and East Pakistan, But Dictator Yahya failed to comprehend this policy of India.

    Indian Tactics:
    In the final stages of Indian policy to create disunity among Muslims, India used its agents for irritating Dictator Yahya and Government of Pakistan, so that in response to such irritation ,Dictator like Yahya will do some highly irresponsible and uncharacteristic acts such as military actions or any other sever reaction ,which will be very fruitful for Indian design.

    To irritate Dictator Yahya following acts were done by Indians agents in East Pakistan.
    • Burning of Pakistan Flags.
    • Burning of Quaid-e-Azam Effigy.
    • Killing of Urdu Speaking Muslim refugees from India.
    • Killing of soldiers and investors of West Pakistan.
    • Refusal to accept the writ of Federal Government.
    All these acts were being done by Indians agents to deteriorate the situation more and more, it was the responsibility of Yahya to understand the tactics of India, as the Main representative of East Pakistan Mr. Sheikh Mujib Rehman also showed his disgust about such irritating acts. But instead of taking the help of Mr. Mujib, Dictator Yahya did the uncharacteristic act of Military Action, and by a military court Death Penalty was awarded to Mr. Mujib. Which was in fact the ultimate desire of India for creating the opportunity of century for damaging the interests of Muslims of subcontinent.

    Failure of Yahya as a competent General.
    It was the responsibility of Dictator Yahya being military personnel to understand that
    • East Pakistan was situated 1000 miles away from West Pakistan and was surrounded by India from all sides even in the absence of any crisis it was not possible to defend that area for a very long time against India,
    • Moreover India was not only a regional Super power but was also having support of a world super power Soviet Union, Even today it will be a matter of few hours for India to run over on Bangladesh.
    • Being a military personnel it was his responsibility to understand that if any military personnel will be expelled from his job, he will directly go to enemy side just for his survival, therefore expulsion of local army Personnel’s in East Pakistan was just a blunder on the part of a Military Dictator.
    • Being military personnel it was his responsibility to understand that any war can not be win without support of main stream and especially when the opposite side is fighting for any national, traditional, cultural or religious goals.
    • Being a military Dictator it was his responsibility to understand that West Pakistani Military who were defending the East Pakistan were having no serious interest in that region, nor their families neither their any state property was there, therefore it was totally unjustified to force soldiers of West Pakistan to flow their blood and to sacrifice their lives for a province which was having no shortage of population, but infact was the largest province of Pakistan.
    • Therefore it was the responsibility of local population to defend that area, but dictator Yahya who was belonging from the smallest Frontier Province of Pakistan, made no effort to win the heart and soul of people of that area, in fact defense of East Pakistan was in the population of that province and not in the defense of West Pakistan.
    • During War of 1971 he was not attending the meeting in war room, and at the time of surrender he was not available for communication with General Niazi and Neither with USA government, which clearly shows that how much competent and devoted General he was.
    • Even after surrender of the Army in East Pakistan this dictator was not ready to leave the post of President and Chief of Army Staff, which clearly indicates that these dictators gives how much importance to their personnel interest and how much deaf and blind are these dictators as far as interest of nation is concerned.
    Damage to Unity of Muslims World.
    • Due to conflict, all development made in previous 20 years was lost, Military and economic infrastructure was destroyed by India and army Hardware was also looted by India, This is the reason that even today Bangladesh is the least developed country, and number of its defense forces are even less than those of soldiers of Pakistan which were gone in the prison of India.
    • Due to this conflict serious damage occurred to people of Bengal ,and their future leading role being the largest Muslim population in any part of the world, for the Muslims of subcontinent and world was lost as desired by the Muhammad Ali Jinnah,The Founder of Pakistan, and now they are confined in a very tiny,densly populated place and now for their survival their political leader ship is seeking their future in ethnocentrism and regionalism.All hopes for unification between Pakistan,Malysia and Indonesia were lost.
    • Due to blunders of Dictator Yahya, Pakistani nation which was the best model in the history of mankind representing universal brother hood between two equal parts of population separated by a distance of thousand miles were separated, it took few months in separation of these two parts, but in future for very long time no country of the world will be able to present such model of Human brotherhood on the map of the world.

    Conclusion: From all above analysis it is clear that running of the country should be done by those who are specially trained for that purpose otherwise Military Generals, who are trained just to kill or destroy the enemy, when they come to the power they do the same thing with their nation and they are very fond of wars and very interested in show of power with guns, such type of people may be very dangerous for the nation, army and world at large. It is also the responsibility of Army as an institution to clarify that why so much conveniently it becomes obedient to such rogue dictators.

    Written By M.Akram Khan Niazi.
    Karachi,Pakistan
    E.Mail :akrumniazi@hotmail.com

    Posted 2 years ago on 19 Dec 2009 11:08 #
  49. During the whole debate about the Fall of Dhaka, one very crucial question is still unanswered.

    Why Gen, Yahya Khan didn't arrest Z.A. Bhutto and put a ban on his PPP where he refused to accept the verdict of the people of Pakistan in 1970 Elections, giving a landslide victory to Awami League of Sheikh Mujib al Rahman?

    Who forced Pakistan Military to side with Bhutto and fight with Mujib?

    Posted 2 years ago on 19 Dec 2009 13:09 #
  50. toamin
    member

    Because that would have resulted in shift of power center from West to East. It was in the interest of Yahya/Bhutto to suppress East's majority to keep the power center under their control -I think.

    Posted 2 years ago on 19 Dec 2009 14:09 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.