Quaid e Azam and secular Pakistan?
-----------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
If, by secular he meant that Pakistan is a state where the political, religious and economic rights of minorities would be preserved and taken care of by the Muslim majority government, than he is right, but if, like a state where literally secular means, religion or religious bodies should have no part in political or civic affairs or running public institutions, he is absolutely wrong as far as Pakistan is concerned. Secularism, in its true meanings is a Machiavellian, kabbalish Jewish invention of the 18 th century, whereby the nations, states and people were to be divided politically, economically and socially, in a bid to establish, the international government of freemasonry, illuminati and Rothschild ideology.
Because religion could be (in its true revolutionary form) a hindrance in the consolidation and foothold of such chaotic dogmatism, it has no place in the political system as propounded by the Machiavellian outlook.
The western democratic norms are one form of it whereby people are divided, segregated and isolated in groups and communities, with growing tendencies of hatred, aversion and a deceitful abhorrence leading to a hypocratic society where, though revolutionary, minority forces have no share in the state affairs. Because religion is the only binding force, for diverse races, with different cultural values, languages, attitudes, heritage, a political culture based upon religion does not suit to the absolute minority forces, yet ambitious like international Jewry.
Ideas like nationalism, extreme right wing ideologies, National Socialism, the liberal centralism and political leftism have taken their birth from secularist principles in their extreme form, leading to secular extremism.
EncartaAccording to the dictionary (Encarta Dictionary) the word Secularism has two meanings,
1. Rejection of religion: the rejection of religion or its exclusion from a philosophical or moral system.
2. Exclusion of religion from public affairs: the belief that religion and religious bodies should have no part in political or civic affairs or in running public institutions, especially schools.
A Muslim, how ever staunch liberal he might be, but cant is secular at all. Because, as a Muslim, he or she has submitted his/her will to the laws of God, and on oath. Since Islam is a way of life, it encompasses all institutions of life and state like political, social, and economic. Once you are secular, you are no more Muslim, which is the foundation for one’s dogmatic belief, beyond rituality, and monasticism.
Thinduhe creation of Pakistan is a direct consequence of the fascist, racist and Hindu extremist attitudes of RSS and Sangh Parewar who never believed in the rights of the minorities in India, and always tried to impose extreme Hindu ideology on the non-Hindu population of undivided India. Not only this but, the Sangh parewar came out to “Hinduise” the nonhindu population of India, with its staunch belief in hindutva and Hindu extremism. Even before partition, of united India, anti minority riots were common throughout the country in which tens of thousands of Muslims, Christians and dalits (low caste Hindus) died, which again highlights the filthy class system of the Hindu society, which even cant bear the existence of lower cats (schedule cast) Hindus.
The main tenet of the hinduvtva philosophy embodies, targeting non Hindu minorities, especially Muslims, being the largest minority, their economics, lives, and property, so to crush them so much, as they should never rise again economically or politically. These riots still continuing in India, and with every riot the justification for the creation of Pakistan is further consolidated and proved.
TAIMLhe chanakya, mentality behind hindutva, denies the right to exist of any minorities, because it is based upon, exploitation, denigration, molestation and harassment, extortion and exaction, all kinds of terrorism, torture and assassination tactics against the minorities, especially against Muslims, who the Hinduva deems its arch rivals. Since its inception in 1906, All India Muslim leagues were not a separatist party to begin with, but vowed to fight for the civic rights of the Muslims of India. But after the general elections of 1935, which brought the hindutva extremists powers forward to unveil their real face, and their real line of action harbouring Golwalkar’s hindutva and “Hinduisation” paradigm. Wth the triumph of hindutva forces in different states of India, Urdu was replaced with Hindi, gao-mata ‘s slaughter was declared illegal and all measures were take to implement the norms and cultural values of Hinduism and the minorities were coerced to adopt the Hindu way of life. That was the decisive moment when at last All India Muslim league decided to think about the concept of creation of states based upon the concept of Muslim nationhood.
ABDULLAH HAROONSir Abdullah Haroon in 1938 propounded that the Muslim majority states of north west and east be freed as separate states from India and it was Rehmat Ali who gave these the name Pkaistan.But since he believed in many Muslim states, his doctrine of several Muslim states remains an incomplete agenda of creation of several “Pakistans” out of India, and not a single Pakistan. Geographically speaking, Kashmir is not the only part of incomplete agenda of partition of undivided India, rather it was Juna Garh, Assam, Hyderabad Dekkan, three eastern districts of state of Bihar, i.e. Bhagal Pur, Pornia, and Aara and Saharan Pur Division, Manadar which were included inside Indian boundaries despite their Muslim majority. Similarly parts of east Punjab and Bikaneer state, like Firozpur, zera, Batala, Ajnala, Jalandhar, etc. were included in India in order to pave the way for Indian occupation of Kashmir, wider hindutva strategic interests and to foment Kashmir issue, to seed permanent rivalry between the two states, and to future economic, educational, and social infrastructural devastation of the two newly born states.
The important point is, Pakistan was not created on secular grounds. Secular means several nations, communities, linguistic and religious denominations that may or may not exist together, as a single nation. Whereas, the ideology of Pakistan is based upon two nation theory, i.e. Hindu and Muslim, are two different nations. This implies that all Muslims of India were one nation despite having different languages, cultures (based upon ethnicity) complexions, races., unlike Hinduism which believes in caste system and class system .
Secularism never condones, one nation based upon common values, belief system and divine inspirations, instead, it divides nations in the name of freedom, liberty, and so called personal law, because it does discriminates its citizens based upon belief system. France, Germany and some other European states are examples where, despite there claim of being secular, the Muslim women, especially have to choose between their Islamic dress code or employment, education and even medical treatment.
Quaid-e-AzamQuaid-e-Azam always, reflecting the inspirations of the Muslims of India, advocated for the creation of Pakistan on the basis of establishment of an Islamic, welfare republic. Where, the rights of minorities are equally taken care of, and speedy social justice be provide d to all. If Islamic ideology is deducted from the ideology of Pakistan, the main justification of its existence vanishes because India claims to be a secular state, i.e. only ideological grounds are valid for existence of a state like Pakistan, which was created for majority Muslims.
Quad e Azam believed in the Islamic law as the constitution of the land of Pakistan and he considered Muslims as one nation, notwithstanding separate racial, linguistic entitites. He said on one occasion.
“What relationships knit the Muslims into one whole, which is the formidable rock on which the Muslim edifice has been erected, which is the sheet anchor providing base to the Muslim Millat, the relationship, the sheet anchor and the rock is Holy Quran.”
In his eyes Pakistan is to be a Muslim state where the rights of minorities would be preserved in the light of the sayings og Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and Quran.
“Pakistan only means freedom and independence but Muslims ideology, which has to be preserved which has come to us as a precious gift and treasure and which w hope, others will share with us.”(18th June 1945,Adress to Frontier Muslim students federation).
Quaid-e-Azam wanted to create an Islamic state in the form of Pakistan where Islamic law and code of conduct would be practiced in its true spirit.
“We do not demand Pakistan simply to have a piece of land but we want a laboratory where we could experiment on Islamic principles.”(Address at Islamia College Peshawar 1946).
Qauid e Azam, in the light of his speeches, was inspired from Islamic culture and history, like political system of Khilafate Rashida, and other Islamic era’s of enlightment, progress and splendid cultural norms.
“India is not a nation, nor a country. It is a Sub Continent of nationalities.Hindus and Muslims being the two major nations. The Hindus and Muslims belongs belong to two different religions, philosophies, social customs and literature. They neither intermarry nor interdine and they belong to two different civilizations, which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspects on life and of are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Muslims derive their inspiration from different sources of history.”(Presidential address at the annual session of Muslim League at Lahore in 1940).
QA5On another occasion he said.
“The Muslims are a nation by every right to establish their separate homeland. They can adopt any means to promote and protect their economic social, political and cultural interests.”
Not only this, Quaide Azam, on 1st July 1948, in his address to state bank of Pakistan stressed Pakistani economists to develop an economic system based upon Islamic ideology and concepts. This was his most striking speech, which has been thrown to oblivion by the Pakistan’s naïve, sycophant, and westernized elite class, to hide qauid’s real ideological inspirations from the people of Pakistan He said,
I shall watch with keenness the work of your Research Organization in evolving banking practices compatible with Islamic ideas of social and economic life. The economic system of the West has created almost insoluble problems for humanity and to many of us it appears that only a miracle can save it from disaster that is not facing the world. It has failed to do justice between man and man and to eradicate friction from the international field. On the contrary, it was largely responsible for the two world wars in the last half century.
The Western world, in spite of its advantages, of mechanization and industrial efficiency is today in a worse mess than ever before in history. The adoption of Western economic theory and practice will not help us in achieving our goal of creating a happy and contended people. We must work our destiny in our own way and present to the world an economic system based on true Islamic concept of equality of manhood and social justice. We will thereby be fulfilling our mission as Muslims and giving to humanity the message of peace which alone can save it and secure the welfare, happiness and prosperity of mankind.
AO6JCOCAGOV6S5CADQQV9ICAYYZQCBCA0MM4NPCAALGFQ1CATR1CGYCATXOI2CCABF09VZCA66CKQ2CAX29T56CANA91WQCA6CAP07CA7XUD0MCANI90WFCAJDCE20CA5V2A1CCA9P6G2XCAJ3EU3R
The advocates of secularism in Pakistan always refer to Mr. Jinnah’s 11 th august 1947 speech to constituent assembly, where Quaide Azam, shunned the observance of any kind of discrimination with minorities on the basis of religion.
Now, that statement was made in the light of Prophet Muhammad ‘s code of conduct in the state of Medina, where the rights of minorities were equally taken care of by the prophet and his Kahlifas.So much so that even Jews and Muslims were equally treated by Islamic court of law in all matters of state, irrespective of their religion, but based upon the golden Islamic principles of justice.
When Quaide says Muslims and Hindus would be equal politically in Pakistan, he meant that Islam entails political system too where all citizens are dealt equally according to their personal code of law, but this is possible only in a country where the state religion is Islam.
