PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Alert...Prospects of Youth Radicalization of Pakistani Youth by the US

(14 posts)
  1. Given Pakistan’s strategic importance and its potential to disrupt South Asian peace, the international community has a high stake in ensuring a positive turnaround. Key policy interventions required in the immediate future, while maintaining a broader objective, must specifically target the younger generation. Youth specific interventions by the U.S. should include:

    • Enhancing the quality of Pakistan’s public education rather than retaining a disproportionate focus on the madrassah system.

    • Intervening in terms of the educational content, with modest agenda of simply returning the textbook contents to the pre-Islamization period.

    • Making socio-economic aid conditional upon Pakistan’s ability to spread benefits to the masses instead of tying it solely to terrorism.

    • Revising U.S. visa and immigration policies for young Pakistanis in order to provide them with a constructive outlet, perhaps through a formal protocol that allows disproportional access to young Pakistani citizens belonging to lower socio-economic classes.

    • Consciously attempting to expose young Pakistanis to U.S. culture by reopening information and cultural centers throughout Pakistan.

    Broader measures by the U.S. that bear relevance to young Pakistanis should include:

    • Playing a constructive role in nudging India and Pakistan towards normalization. Barring normalization, Pakistan will be tempted to maintain a link with extremists, which in turn will allow the militant enclave to continue operating and recruiting young men from Pakistani society. In essence, the state’s support to extremism will have to cease before the specter of youth violence can be laid to rest.

    • U.S. officials need to be sensitive to the conservative nature of Pakistani society and their diplomatic jargon needs to be tailored accordingly.

    • The language of western liberalism must not be used to communicate with Pakistanis. For example, by conflating the notions of conservatism and extremism (which carry entirely different connotations for Pakistanis)and dismissing both, the U.S. inadvertently supports ‘secular’ ideals in a country where an overwhelming majority abhors them. This leads to further resentment against the U.S., which is in turn exploited by extremists to win recruits.

    • Exhibiting patience with regard to its Afghan policy and understanding that any efforts to produce short-term results risk a social implosion within Pakistan.

    This is an alarming account of the long term US policies for Pakistan, specially focusing on the radicalization of our youth and thus steering us away from our Islamic norms, gradually towards a slow but certain westernization of our culture.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 14:48 #
  2. Potohari
    Blocked

    We shouldn't rely on US for everything even Allah doesn't help ones who don't help themselves. Pinning our all hopes to US tax payers is unrealistic.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 14:51 #
  3. Tkese are the future designs regarding the radicalization of our youth. If you take our youth as our future assets than it translates into, 'radical change from Islamic beliefs to total westernization' of our future. Looks like the saying 'If we cannot convert you, than we are not going to leave you as a true Muslim also'.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 15:23 #
  4. Potohari
    Blocked

    Well that is your paranoia, I am not sure Americans will invest billions of dollars needed to implement this so called goal, while their own tax payers suffer.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 15:26 #
  5. This clause seems quite dangerous with deeprooted consequences:

    'Intervening in terms of the educational content, with modest agenda of simply returning the textbook contents to the pre-Islamization period.'

    They want our textbooks to contain anything but Islam!

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 15:52 #
  6. Anonymous

    I think what they meant by pre-islamization is pre-Zia-ul-haq era.

    You look at the primary and secondary curiculum, we teach similar topics in urdu, islamiat and social studies. This does not make sense and was probably introduced by Zia. I remember teaching little school children and I was taken aback by the redundancy. We need more stories and more pictures in Urdu. We need stories about Raheemullah, about Zulekha, about bala, about ali dino. We need beautiful little children cartoons and pictures in our textbooks. We completely lack these. Similarly, in social studies we need to raise general awareness of the children about social issues. We also need to instill a sense of nationalism among children. We need to tell them of our ancient civilization. Texila, MoenJoDaro, Harappa. Simply speaking, PAkistaniat is not given much importance. There has been unnecesasry attention give to religion in irrelevant subjects. I do not oppose Islamic education. Make Islamiat more intense. No problems with that but comeon, Urdu is a language, we need different topics in Urdu and Social Studies.

    Also, curriculum and exams are loaded with Questions and Answers. Children memorize and memorise. Their whole academic year is spent in memorizing questions and answers.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 16:07 #
  7. Now when you have brought this topic of Texila, MohanjoDaro, and Harappa-my weakness. I simply love all what is written about Indus Valley Civilization except the association of the mythical vedic name 'sarsawati' to it. May be I will open another thread on this topic covering the mythical topic of IVC 'the language of IVC'.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 16:12 #
  8. Anonymous

    This does not just plague our children but this is an epidemic and by this I mean memorizing. I remember some of Phd candidates were memorizing questions answers to defend their thesis. I felt like slapping them on their face.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 16:14 #
  9. Anonymous

    mirza sahab, worse of all, our children do not even know there were two civilizations in the sub-continent. Sindh and Hindh. Sindh was mostly comprised of Pakistan and beyond. We need to know this to build a sense of nationalism and identity. Anyways, this is going a little off-topic so I will stop.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 16:16 #
  10. I fully agree with you. I am working on these subjects since the last 25 years. I firmly believe that what has been written about IVC is not the whole truth. There is more to it when I see IVC connected to Afghanistan, Iran, Mesopotamia, Bahrain, Yemen, Oman, Egypt, Ethopia more than anything eastwords. There are confirmed links with todays Sri Lanka also.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 16:23 #
  11. There had been news about some insertions in academic text books under US influence/compulsion, that are about some historical and some recent political from America. On the same lines why not, like you said, include Raheemullah, about Zulekha, about bala, about ali dino as they are part of our own culture.

    Posted 2 years ago on 03 Jul 2009 17:34 #
  12. How should we know that by 'pre-Islamization' the Americans actually mean the times when General Zia-Al-Haq was in power. What exactly did he managed to have included in text books that the American are so hellbent to get is excluded for our books?

    Posted 2 years ago on 04 Jul 2009 13:30 #
  13. Heather_Ali
    Member

    Semirza
    do u have any link to your initial posting please?

    Posted 2 years ago on 05 Jul 2009 0:47 #
  14. We have that in mind but as things come our ways we may discuss them, but we also remember the initial thread. Thanks.

    Posted 2 years ago on 05 Jul 2009 13:46 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.