Was it as a reaction to journalists exposing by pkpolitics?
Means the channels might have started to require to buy copy rights or something?
I am not able to see any video in archives any longer or is it my browser?
:)
Was it as a reaction to journalists exposing by pkpolitics?
Means the channels might have started to require to buy copy rights or something?
I am not able to see any video in archives any longer or is it my browser?
:)
Due to the policies pkpolitics loosing reputation and getting popular for scandalise repoting........OR black mailers.This is due to one-way traffic that they are going with..But repo is difficult to gain but easy to loose..they should mind it...
Another thought could be they've gone commercial too I guess asking for premium account only and who knows what triggered it cause its not that much cost as they are protraying it to be and yes for dedicated moderators or editors it is a job but the same editors were doin' it before as well.I can definitely tell you that hosting video files in unlimited databases on hosting servers is no longer an expensive venture.Though it use to be at the time when youtube was launched.So again I would say cost of bandwidth is no excuse for removing videos,cost of labour could be but then again thats where it made pkpolitics different from corporate sell out media channels.Now I guess they are looking for the same sponsor as "khabrain" editor got after he black mailed lot of people.
Well...it could all be a guesture on my part but I dont think its a positive step cause even most commerical music companies,software developers and film makers are generatin revenues through advertisement.
but anyway....like people say " As you wish"
:)
You must log in to post.