PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Benazir killed by whom and for what?

(54 posts)
  1. Revivalist
    member

    Asalamo Alikum,
    Release of two new videos showing the assassin of Benazir Bhutto firing shots with a hand gun just feet away from her vehicle and the impact of the bullets upon the head of Benazir Bhutto prior to the explosion corroborate the testimonies of eye witnesses who saw shots being fired at the former Pakistani premier as she left the fatal election rally in Rawalpindi. In addition, testimonies from close aides to Bhutto who witnessed her wounds at the time of the attack and when her body was washed for burial confirmed that her death had been caused by shots to the neck/head.

    This new evidence coupled with the scenes of Pakistani security forces washing the crime scene just hours after the assassination and conflicting statements from the Interior Ministry claiming that Benazir's death was caused by shrapnel wounds to the head, later revised to "had bumped her head on the sunroof" have fuelled speculation that Musharraf's regime is involved in a cover-up!

    The unfolding events are a severe indictment of the dictator Musharraf, his US sponsors of the Bush administration and the Islamaphobic media of the west who lost no time in confirming the notion that Bhutto had been targeted by "Islamic militants" linked to the Taliban commander Baitullah Mehsud without a shred of physical evidence being presented to substantiate the allegation. Both Bush and Brown claimed that Benazir's killing was another chapter in the war against "Islamic extremism" and that she was a martyr for democracy and moderation in Pakistan. However, Mehsud stated that his forces were not involved in any way with the assassination claiming that it was the work of Musharraf and the intelligence agencies and that his forces did not target women.

    Further credibility for this view has been Bhutto's own statements via e-mail to a US journalist in which she claimed that Musharraf was deliberately not supplying adequate security arrangements indicating she had received only two of the four police escort vehicles she had requested to shield all four sides of her campaign vehicle. The video released yesterday demonstrates how the assassin got within point blank range of Bhutto from the exposed side of her vehicle!

    The question that remains is why would state forces undertake the assassination of Bhutto when it was Musharraf who had allowed her to return to Pakistan at the instruction of the US and Britain in order to save his ailing government? Several scenarios could explain such a high-risk action by the state apparatus of the embattled dictator. Firstly, in the aftermath of the assassination Benazir's husband Asif Zardari called for a UN investigation and notably, help from the British government. Such a statement excluding the Americans clearly shows that the pro-British Bhutto camp do not hold confidence in the US agencies to act transparently. It also suggests that the original plan brokered by the US and Britain to forge a "secular democratic alliance" between Musharraf and Benazir against the "Islamic fundamentalists" may not have been going according to plan with the complication of cooperation between Benazir and Nawaz Sheriff which looked sure to remove the power base of Musharraf's PML-Q party in the Punjab. The potential routing of the PML-Q in the January national elections would severely weaken Musharraf's presidency and his power, a problematic scenario for the dictator and his US sponsors whose courting of Bhutto had been merely to ensure Musharraf's survival and prosecution of the war on terror. Despite her anti-Islamist rhetoric, a powerful Bhutto government could threaten US dominance in Pakistan and hence their interests in the region.

    Another possibility, is that elements in the PML-Q whose power felt threatened by Bhutto's emergence on the scene took action independently of Musharraf, although such a scenario seems unlikely in view of need to compromise security arrangements in order to prosecute the operation. A third possibility is that Musharraf brought back Nawaz Sherrif after initially sending him unceremoniously back to Saudi Arabia following his recent two-day visit to the kingdom to counter the influence of Bhutto, With Bhutto gone, the PPP has been weakened and the rapid appointment of her 19 year old son as heir to the throne seems aimed to prevent fragmentation of the party through the emergence of internal power struggles in the vacuum left by her assassination. Bhutto's assassination has also left Nawaz Sheriff as the main opposition figure to Musharraf which could see him now emerge, in the coming weeks, as a rejuvenated political force galvanising the pro-democracy movement. This would suite the interests of the US, as historically, Sheriff was a loyal ally during the Clinton administration as his treachery over the Kargil crisis demonstrated. Sheriff is also viewed by many to have stronger "Islamic credentials" that could be an important factor in forging alliances with Islamic parties to try to stop cooperation of tribal elders with al Qaeda and the Taliban militants in the tribal regions. Only time will tell over the coming weeks which way the political power will shift in Pakistan in the run up to the elections.

    Thus, the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, like the killing of her father and the assassination of General Zia after him would appear to be the work of state forces embroiled in a power struggle and not the work of Islamic militants as the dictator Musharraf and his western backers would like us to believe. Such is the dirty politics of Pakistan, which like other Muslim countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan, are plagued by the continual interference of external colonial states like the US and Britain who enact their foreign policy objectives as if playing chess on a board comprising of the resource rich Muslim lands.

    The Muslim Ummah realises that for every Benazir and Saddam, whose services to the west are rewarded with liquidation once they outlive their usefulness, tens of thousands of innocent people must pay with suffering and death through their treachery. This is why such rulers like Musharraf, who betray Islam and the Ummah of Muhammed (saw), are despised by the vast majority of people who long for an independent, sincere Islamic leadership. The time has come for the influentials and elites of Pakistan and other Muslim states to look to return this Ummah to a state of dignity, security and strength by rejecting once and for all the dirty politics plaguing our countries and restoring the Khilafah (Caliphate) that will bring a new era of unity and progress.

    Regards

    Posted 4 years ago on 01 Jan 2008 11:22 #
  2. ARCANE
    Member

    Assalam o alaikum 2 all,

    Gr8 thing you guys got going here! It is unfortunate when anyone is murdered, regardless of who they were and BB is no exception. Pakistanis first of all I feel need to mature and love Pakistan and eachother. This is one thing that I feel Pakistanis lack!. I see some posts discrediting our gr8 nation and mentioning "laws of the jungle"....et all, but that exists everywhere. All you have to do is travel to witness it! ;-) Then there are the people who call Musharaf a dictator yet they support feudal-lords like the Bhutto family who think Pakistan belongs to their father and so they rape the opportunities of life and growth that belong to the people of Pakistan. How can a feudal-lord(s) bring democracy to a country? Its like having the wolves protect your sheep! Anyone who has met or knows these land-lords, knows that they are essentially small dictators that oppress the poor and the weak. They simply want to extend their dictatorships beyond their land and force it upon the entire country. Sure not all of the land-lords are oppressors because I personally know a few that are decent human beings. But I also know the many that are selfish, arrogant, intellectually retarded, and devoid of any form of patriotism. Their main goal is self-glorification and to enslave as many people as possible by any means necessary. No person, family or clan is bigger than Pakistan, and inshaAllaah soon the people will realize it. How can anyone worry about who the next heir is, who cares! What heir anyways? If we are going to sustain a democratic establishment, then surely we need to abandon such childish fairytales that tickle our funny bones. Reality is that no family or clan owns Pakistan and inshaAllah they never will. Bhuttos have tried, and they continue on this struggle for a self-proclaimed dynasty. But all praises be to God that such endeavors have only fetched failure and disgrace.
    I would like to ask the Leadership of PPP, what they are doing to rebuild all that they have destroyed because of one person's death? How does Asif Z. have the audacity to hold a press conference and not apologize to the people of Pakistan for the appalling carnage and devastation that resulted from the PPP sponsored riots. And please dont tell me Mush did that too! We need to hold people like Asif Z. accountable for these actions. If he cannot manage a political party then how in the world is he or anyone from such a degenerate party expect to lead a country? And not to mention a NUCLEAR power, mashaAllaah, for that matter!
    Asif Z. holds this conference, doesnt take responsiblity for any of his miscreants' CRIMINAL behavior and expects the people of Pakistan to act as his slaves/subjects by ignoring their own pain and loss for his sake. He wants them to put aside the murders of their own family members, the loss of their property and livelihood, and wipe away his tears. (Dude you claim to be a so-called leader...grow some friggin baxxs!) If thats not arrogance then I honestly dont know what is! Leaders dont expect or make the people serve them! THEY SERVE THE PEOPLE! Ironic that these people and their ignorant supporters claim to pursue democracy-highly unlikely!
    I have met many Pakistanis that support these feudal-lords-politicians and asked them to define democracy. And their answers at best have been of the understanding and intellect of a nine year old. But thats not the strange part. What's funny is that they claim to be the "educated" people of Pakistan! :-)
    Thank you all for giving me this opportunity to share my thoughts. My brothers and sisters, if I offended any of you, please 4give me for my intention was not to do so. I hope we will move forward and learn to tolerate and respect eachother's views and respect all human beings (as Muslims it is our duty to do so). InshaAllah soon PPP will love PML, PML will love MQM, MQM will love PPP, and so on. I cant wait to see the day when we will forget about being punjabis, sindhis, pushtoon, muhajir....... and embrace our true identities: Muslim and Pakistanis!

    Posted 4 years ago on 01 Jan 2008 12:54 #
  3. irfanx
    Member

    1. If Al Qaeda can take the blame of 9/11 why cant they admit they killed Bhutto?
    2. I Mushrraf can himself drag Dr AQ Khan in mud why would he kill BB if she wants to do the same. Instead the blame is gonna shift on BB isnt that good for MUSH?
    3. Q League cant stand Nawaz not BB i dont think so they can even stand Qazi and i seriously doubt they have the gutts and intelligence to do such an act.
    4. Why would US want to get into Pakistan we don't have oil we don't have skilled people we don't have anything and besides we are always ready to do US dirty work so why would they even bother?
    5. Seriously RAW killed her after she gave away the list of Sikh Freedom fighters?

    Posted 4 years ago on 01 Jan 2008 18:01 #
  4. secular_pakistan
    Blocked

    It could be ANYONE. There are tons of options. It could be Zardari, elements within PPP itself, Musharraf, Army, India, Israel, US, Russia, China, Chaudhries, MQM, Taliban, Al Qaeda, other independent terrorist/extremist cells, other terrorist/extremist groups, rogue elements within agencies and armies. The list and their possible motives are countless. For every claim, there are 2 dozen arguments, and, then 2 dozen counter arguments, this goes on forever.

    1. Al Qaeda isn't one coherent organisation. It's a vast network of independent cells. Who knows who made the claim, who denied. Perhaps someone is trying to create further unrest by denying on behalf of Al Qaeda. Perhaps Al Qaeda itself feels their objectives are better achieved by creating confusion, denying it.

    2. There is a big difference between A Q Khan apologizing on PTV, and, him being handed over to IAEA, and, being questioned by Israeli, Indian, American spies, exposing Pakistan's nuclear program, hurting army etc.

    3. Q League may join up with Nawaz again. Pervez Elahi may have seen BB as the biggest obstacle to PMship.

    4. Pakistan has nukes, Pakistan occupies an important geo-strategic position. US may want to sit on China's doorstep from yet another country.

    5. Raw may want to see Pakistan further destabilised.

    As you can see, it could be done by anyone, for a countless no. of reasons.

    PPP should demand someone from their own party like Aitzaz Ahsan or someone else who can undertake the job to head the inquiry. I think the govt. asked them but Zardari asked for a UN sec. council inquiry, which is stupid, because, UN sec. council is run by 5 countires, and, is anything but impartial. Sadly, I think Mr. 10% (Zardari) is explioting the situation for political gains.

    Posted 4 years ago on 01 Jan 2008 21:48 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.