PKPolitics Discuss » Video Links

Disdainful of luxuries (Hazrat Umer bin Abul Aziz)

(8 posts)
  1. kingsalah
    Blocked

    Umar bin Abul Aziz (Rehmatullah alihie) was extremely pious and disdainful of worldly luxuries. He preferred simplicity to the extravagance that had become a hallmark of the Umayyad lifestyle, depositing all assets and finery meant for the caliph into the public treasury. He abandoned the caliphate palace to the family of Suleiman and instead preferred to live in modest dwellings. He wore rough linens instead of royal robes, and often went unrecognized.

    According to a Muslim tradition, a female visitor once came to Umar's house seeking charity and saw a raggedly-dressed man patching holes in the building's walls. Assuming that the man was a servant of the caliph, she asked Umar's wife, "Don't you fear God? Why don't you veil in the presence of this man?" The woman was shocked to learn that the "servant" was in fact the caliph himself.

    Though he had the people's overwhelming support, he publicly encouraged them to elect someone else if they were not satisfied with him (an offer no one ever took him up on). Umar confiscated the estates seized by Ummayad officials and redistributed them to the people, while making it a personal goal to attend to the needs of every person in his empire. Fearful of being tempted into bribery, he rarely accepted gifts, and when he did he promptly deposited them in the public treasury. He even encouraged his own wife—who had been daughter, sister and wife to three caliphs in their turn—to donate her jewelry to the public treasury.

    At one point he almost ordered the Great Umayyad Mosque in Damascus to be stripped of its precious stones and expensive fixtures in favor of the treasury but he desisted on learning that the Mosque was a source of envy to his Byzantine rivals in Constantinople. These moves made him unpopular with the Umayyad court, but endeared him to the masses, so much so that the court could not move against him in the open.
    (from Wikipedia)

    Posted 2 years ago on 31 Aug 2009 8:59 #
  2. amin1924
    member

    A great and noble Khalifah:

    Though he had the people's overwhelming support, he publicly encouraged them to elect someone else if they were not satisfied with him (an offer no one ever took him up on).

    Posted 2 years ago on 31 Aug 2009 9:09 #
  3. kingsalah
    Blocked

    In his age the wolf and the lambs walk together. One day a wolf take the lamb (and eat it). The person watching this said that the great man(hazrat umer) left the world
    later on he find that it was actually his last day.What we muslim r doing we have created a mind that wealth is the prize of Allah but actually the wealth is very difficult test. Look at those people the are the king of their age but still living a life with no wealth what we people r doing

    Posted 2 years ago on 31 Aug 2009 9:19 #
  4. kingsalah
    That is really eye opening! Due to the piousness of the caliph the wolves became vegetarian or were they still carnivores but didn’t eat lamb while cows and buffalos were fair game. That is what I call showing respect.

    Posted 2 years ago on 31 Aug 2009 10:13 #
  5. shahzad1924
    member

    tarbooz! it was metaphorical!

    Posted 2 years ago on 31 Aug 2009 14:05 #
  6. Shahzad
    I understand it was symbolic but I am not sure if everyone else is not taking it literally.

    Posted 2 years ago on 31 Aug 2009 14:17 #
  7. baba_ji
    Member

    Allah has given us aesthetic sense, sense of ambience,architecture and so on.
    There is no harm in living a luxurious life,provided that luxury is not based on loot and corruption.
    Muslims are respected for Alhamra and taj mahal,and not for living a pitiable life.

    Posted 2 years ago on 31 Aug 2009 18:47 #
  8. chechen
    Member

    baba_ji says There is no harm in living a luxurious life.

    This kind of life style is bound to breed corruption and desire to loot. All great men in history from Prophet SAS to Gandhi to Mandela lived a simple life. No one attained the status of a role model by living in luxury. There was no use for Alhambra and a grave called Taj that was built by slave labor that toiled for months for a Emperor's wish. That kind of example set by corrupt Kings in India paved the downfall of Muslims and created very bad impression on local Hindus who could not be shown the light of Islam due to those corrupt Kings living a luxurious life. Muslims are more respected for their tolerance and brotherhood and civilization than by structures. Please See the artilceby Carly Fiorina that I just posted on Science thread.

    Posted 2 years ago on 31 Aug 2009 19:01 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.