PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Frayed ends of sanity

(7 posts)
  1. zia m
    Member

    "But this can be expected from this unfortunate republic’s many TV channels. There is now not an iota of doubt left about the level of sheer cynicism, sensationalism and demagoguery that they operate on. Most of them have become a reckless reflection of some of the most obnoxious, conspiratorial and chauvinistic sections found within the country’s convulsing middle-classes.

    That said, one however does expect some semblance of decency and reason in the polished corridors of the companies that advertise their brands on these channels. Couldn’t any of these companies that always claim to be ‘good social citizens’ have the presence of mind and heart to ask TV channels to stop running their ads during the coverage of blood-splattered events?

    Can’t they see how strange their ads look and sound when squeezed between images of blood, gore and tragedy? Don’t these ads with an unending series of plastic smiles and jingly material-worshipping actually end up mocking the tragedy that is unfolding live on the TV screens?

    I don’t think such a thought even crosses their minds. And how can it when a number of the same companies so nonchalantly end up sponsoring TV shows run by utter hate-mongers. It’s quite a sight, really, watching macho, loud demagogues and so-called TV anchors spiting venom against the West and then asking for a break that are riddled with commercials of Western multinationals.

    ""
    Can’t we see that much of what is being preached and ‘debated’ on our channels in the name of religion, justice, reform and politics (and cynically being sponsored by multinationals), is one of the major reasons behind the confused and ravaged state our middle-classes (especially its youth) have come to suffer?""

    read the whole article......

    http://blog.dawn.com/2010/05/29/frayed-ends-of-sanity/

    Posted 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 22:06 #
  2. @zia m
    The consumer can drop the channels that are spreading hate and not buy products that place ads on hate filled talk shows.

    Posted 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 22:15 #
  3. zia m

    I am completely agree with you, that this media is overplaying their role in the presence of weak ppp government and allied with constitutional rebel judiciary. this media ignore all international rules and regulation and morality.

    Posted 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 22:25 #
  4. zia m
    Member

    lota,
    They can't drop all the channels but they should boycott their products.

    http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/Boycotts/successfulboycotts.aspx

    Posted 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 22:26 #
  5. @zia m
    A consumer should not pay for spread of hateful ideas. Paying for hate content is supporting it.

    Posted 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 22:32 #
  6. zia m
    Member

    lota,
    Don't you think if multinationals stop sponsoring such programmes, the tv stations will be forced to stop hate mongering.

    Posted 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 22:39 #
  7. Organization is needed to stop multinationals from sponsoring hate speech. That is the right way to go about it but if there is no organization than the consumer should vote with his wallet. The best option would be to have your own outlet to voice your ideas and counter hate.

    Posted 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 22:44 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.