@pakistani47
1. Situation is far better than 2008.
Right! Drone strikes have trippled, the theater of war has been moved from Afghanistan to Pakistan (not my words but those of Mullen, Zbignew, Petreus, Obama, etc), US troops are roaming freely, Swat/FATA/Waziristan destroyed, Balochistan and Karachi burning, economy in tatters, rampant corruption, lawlessness rampant, loadshedding, flooding, etc. Now who could ask for anything more?
2. Situation is far better than 2008.
I agree with you regarding the problem of drone attacks. But do you think we are in position to challenge US might directly.
Yes! No doubt about it. BTW: I'd rather Pakistan be like 'Iraq' than what it is today.
Our army is the only institution because of which we are not going through the situation of Iraq.
Indeed. Those b@stards sold out long ago.
4. Abusing somebody can not strengthen your argument
Calling zia/mush/kiyani p!gs is hardly being 'abusive'. It is a statement of fact. And sorry but I DO NOT interpret "Ulu 'l-amr" as 'the rulers from among yourselves'; There is no way a Zardari equates to say Khulfa-e-Rashedeen, no matter how much you or Babar Awan insist.
System does not mean Zardari or PPP Govt. System means cvilian setup. Can you qoute any PM other than ZAB completed his term in history of Pakistan? We should give chance to civilian set up to work and correct itself. Other wise we will have another military intervention and then again fragile and corrupt civlian setup and so on.
Oh so we have a civilian setup (the same one that just happened to give Kiyani a 3-year extension -- of course there was "no foreign pressure")? Are you implying it is also not corrupt? (BTW: Didn't Mush/PML-Q make a big deal about their PM (Shauki) completing his term? Oh I am sure you'd say that was a 'dictatorship' and you are talking under 'democracy') Fantastic!
Posted 1 year ago on 25 Jul 2010 7:26
#