Hameed Gul admits he formed IJI
Sunday, August 30, 2009
ISLAMABAD: Former chief of the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) Lt-Gen (retd) Hameed Gul on Saturday disclosed that the PPP could have got landslide victory in 1988 elections, if the Islami Jamhoori Ittehad (IJI) had not been formed.
Talking to a private TV channel, he said: ìYes, we had such reports and apprehension of massive PPP victory.î Gul said they feared that the PPP was returning to power after the execution of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. I take the responsibility of forming the IJI, though it was not my idea,î Hameed Gul said.
He said that even during Benazir Bhutto’s first visit to the ISI headquarters he told her about his role in forming the IJI. “We wanted the PPP opponents who had affiliation with the GHQ to unite them on one platform,” Gul said. He said ‘emergency’ was one of the options in 1988 after General Zia ul Haq’s plane crashed, but it was decided to go ahead with November 16 election despite request from opponents of the PPP to postpone it.
He disclosed that even former Soviet Union sent a message to Pakistan that the 1988 elections could be sabotaged. Gul said: “This is for the first time I am disclosing that former Russian president Mikhail Gorbachev sent his envoy with a message regarding apprehensions of sabotaging the 1988 election through foreign intervention.”
He said he was not aware of the conditions to hand over power to former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, but said he was asked to brief her before she was handed over the power. “Benazir wanted a briefing from the Establishment so I was sent for this purpose and the meeting took place at her friend’s house in Karachi, which lasted over two hours, and I told her that the Afghan Jihad had not ended yet. There were two or three other things, which I briefed her and she said she understood the situation,” he said.
He denied “Midnight Jackal” as intelligence plot and said it was Imtiaz’s personal plan. “No agency was involved but Imtiaz himself,” Gul said. The ex-ISI chief denied he ever sent a message to MQM chief Altaf Hussain to join IJI and rejected the allegation of former Intelligence Bureau director, Brig (retd) Imtiaz.
“I never sent Imtiaz to Altaf with a message to join IJI but to express concern over allegations of collection of ìBhattaî by some elements,” he said. He predicted the victory of Afghans in Afghanistan and the US exit, but expressed concern over post-US Afghanistan situation and said a weak government was going to be set up there. “We failed to give up political system in Afghanistan after Soviet Union left and now I don’t see much will happen after the US exit, but Afghans will win,” he added.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=24196
This is more than enough evidence for a court martial.
Hamid Gul, Aslam Beg etc. are a small group of generals who got stuck in 80s. Why did that happen. Well these dimwits got married to Wahabi Islam. That aspect is not different from bunch of Pakistani Shia leaders who became married to Khomeni's Islam. Both Wahabi Islam and Khomeni Islam are imported and thus foreign to Pakistan. Either of them cannot serve Pakistan's interest, and thus utterly dangerous for Pakistanis. When Hamid Gul defends Taliban he in fact is defending Wahabi Islam at the cost of Pakistan.
Similarly when some Pakistani-Shias defend Ahmade Nejat they are in fact defending Shia Islam.
As long we have zameer farosh Pakistanis who import foreign religions, we will remain in the mud just like Afghanis.
The problem of importing Wahabi Islam and Shia Islam started with Iranian revolution. When Khomeni toppled Shah of Iran. Khomeni used oil money and a virluent propaganda against everything non-Shia. Pakistani Shias had the religious duty to follow the "Imam Khomeni" while some non-Shia Pakistani-socialists followed Khomeni because of his anti-Americanism.
The result was the formation of Shia-militant organizations who openly challenged Sunni majority. Sunni majority responded by relying on Wahabi Islam imported from Saudi Arabia. While the two sects fought their proxy wars in Pakistan, another war was being fought in Afghanistan, namely anti-communist war. Hameed Gul is the product of these proxy wars that were fought in Afghanistan and Pakistan. His analysis point emanates from pro-Wahabi pro-Taliban stance.
Sad thing is that both Pakistani-Wahabi supporters and Pakistani-Shia supporters forget that they should not be the pawns in the proxy war between Saudia and Iran.
The problem with Hameed Gul is that he has been two long of a leash by Pakistani army. The reason is that there are other generals who are closet sympathizers of the imported Wahabi-Islam.
Hameed Gul should have been put in jail from day one for inciting anti-Pakistan hysteria. Other proxy fighters both Wahabi and Shia should have been sent to Pakistani gulags too. We didn't do that, and the result has been horrible in the form of Sunni-Shia violence and suicide bombings.
Posted 2 years ago on 05 Jan 2010 16:51
# 
