@jj khan
1-who is asking for a science rule anyway?, I am just asking for a secular rule where if any one wants to follow saudia, timbaktu, or even a lala-land for that matter, he/ she does it without becoming a laughing stock for the whole wide world by sighting an imaginary moon ;)..and where even if there is some opportunist ruet-e-hilal organization , it is only followed by people who really want to follow it and that it doesn't has the audacity of portraying those who don't wanna follow it as traitors.
But having said that, since you are the one here who are trying to commit the repeated mistake of comparing science with religion so let me tell you a couple of more things ...
2-The methods of predicting the position of moon are tried and tested and hardly controversial for any one, as far as i know
3-Yes there are a many controversial issues in science but the beauty of science is that it never claims to be perfect or a doctrine of one's salvation, neither it has any hidden agenda of reigning over people's life by telling them that it is their sole savior (which i am afraid is the case with almost all the religions in the world!)
4-Science's worth has been proven by its precession, not by preaching ;)
5-lastly, Science isn't an attention seeker like many religions who would scare you to your death by coming up with all the those surreal scenarios of here after just to ensure that they are the center of your universe till you die...Science, on the other hand, just tries to explain you different things and doesn't give a damn if you don't follow them.
Posted 2 years ago on 22 Sep 2009 14:25
#