tahirnaseem
According to party position for opposition, PML(N) has the right to nominate 2.8 person say 3. and one for all two major parties (MQM and JUIF)
Detail is given below based on (Elected seats not reserved)
Pakistan Muslim League(N)..............91Nos........75%.....3
Muttahida Qumi Movement Pakistan..........25Nos........21%.....1
Pakistan Muslim League (F)..............05Nos........4%.....0
Here is the question speaker may ask MQM and JUI F for one name...
Bawa
مبارک ہو - مبارک ہو - مبارک ہو - سب کہو مبارک ہو
مسلم لیگ نوں کو پہلی کامیابی مبارک ہو
:) :)
مولوی فضلو، بھتہ خوروں اور زرداری مکاری کی حکمت عملی ناکام
.
.
short life endless plans
looks like the matter is heading for EC.
Arain
As I recall the constitutional amendment correctly, it's the opposition leader's prerogative to name four members from the opposition side. Moreover, since when MQM joined the opposition? Their governor is still healthy and functioning well. And, lastly, if you were PMLN, would you ever trust JUI completely? No, nobody can. Fazl is a two-faced thug who can do anything for Zardari in exchange for some benefit.
khanamer
But MqM was in govt for four years 11 months and few days... So they should ask govt to provide them seats in PC...
Bawa
allahbanda
Arain71
جی ہاںآپ بالكل درست فرما رہے ہیں ۔پارلیمانی كمیٹی كے حزب اختلاف كے ممبر اپوزیشن لیڈر نے مقرر كرنے ہیں اور چوہدری نثار علی خان جانتے ہیں كہ اصل میں اپوزیشن كے لوگ كون كون سے ہیں۔ایم كیو ایم ، اور مولانا صاحب كے بارے میں كون نہیں جانتا كہ وہ كس كے خدمت گزار ہیں ۔مولانا تو اس سے پہلے بھی سینٹ كے قائد حزب اختلاف كے منصب كے لئے ایك ڈرامہ كر چكے ہیں جس كے بعد بھی ان كی ہمدردی زرداری سے ہی رہی ۔ آج بھی پورے پانچ سال اقتدار میں رہنے كے بعد بلوچستان میں نگران سیٹ اپ كے لئے آخری گھنٹے میں خزب اختلاف بن بیٹھے ہیں ۔ اور ایسا ہی گھنائونا كردار سندھ میں ایم كیو ایم نے ادا كیا ہے ۔ كیا ایسے لوگوں پر اعتماد كركے انہیں كمیٹی میں شامل كر دیا جائے كہ ایك بار پھر اپوزیشن كی پیٹھ میں چھرا گھونپ سكیں ؟
د
mawan1971
When PPP has given Chaudari Shujat's name in Parliamentary committee for Caretaker set up it looked like matter will go to EC now. PML(N) will never be comfortable with Ch. Shujahat and consensus is unlikely to be achieved although if they decide on majority vote say 5 out 8 members agree on one caretaker PM name then I expect a conclusion but if you need 8/8 member agreed on one name it is almost impossible and matter will go to EC.Now Parliamentary committee have PML(N), PPPP, ANP and PML(Q) participation so IK can not blame muk mukka.
tahirnaseem
I mentioned very clearly word "Comedy" not committee because this is all well plan by PML(N). Three days for this committee is only for TV comedy.
Because no consensus will be achieved there so go to ECP, there three members are PML(N) supporter(may be member). So write down here Mr. Nasir Aslam ZAHID will be next prime minister.
@ BAWA i am the one at this forum pointed out your "MUNAFAQAT" under "LUCH TALL party". Can see my posts, I did not consider you comments for reply even.
tahirnaseem
In last three days did Ch. Nisar met with P.M.
No No No No No No
Because if met may be problem solve, What a golden quote by Tariq AFZAL Chudhar (PML-N) MNA, accept our name and consensus will be achieved.
It mean by hook or by crook we want our care taker set up. Please someone give detail definition of consultation, consensus, agreements
mawan1971
@tahirnaseem
If parlimentary committee is a comedy than good that matter will go to EC. PTI cannot say muk mukka if EC forms a caretaker set up. I think EC can bring any new name for caretake PM outside of current circulated names.
tahirnaseem
@mA
did you read my first comments, please sometime first think and then post.
Because no consensus will be achieved there so go to ECP, there three members are PML(N) supporter(may be member). So write down here Mr. Nasir Aslam ZAHID will be next prime minister.
please read again..... EC is PML(N) portal
tahirnaseem
who will be blame again request please think once neutrally
In last three days did Ch. Nisar met with P.M.
No No No No No No
tahirnaseem
To ALL PML-N
Still no government but only forecast, see the change in attitude of Ch. NA KHAN.
mawan1971
@tahirnaseem
It looked like you have concerns over EC and the name of Nasir Aslam Zahid as caretaker PM. Why you think EC is biased to PML(N) and Nasir Aslam Zahid is PML(N) supporter? Please clarify if you don't think Nasir Aslam Zahid is not a supporter of PML(N), then how he is controversial?
tahirnaseem
First
All four members of provincial EC is nominated by PPP and PML-N agreement. Two names by PMLN and Two names by PPP.
From Punjab and baluchistan by PML-N and Sindh and PKP by PPP.
Mr. FJ Ibrahim is un-bias but leaning towards PML-N. That why i have reservation on ECP.
2nd.
Murder case of B-I-L of Nasir Aslam Zahid against Asif Zardari. This is very serious issue if you really thinks neutrally.
Why not PML-N agree on ex-state bank governer Mr. Ishrat Hussain. He is not Belong to PPP and PML_N.
Please logical reply against Dr. Ishrat
Arain
Haven't we had enough bankers running the country? First Moeen Qureshi, then Shaukat Aziz, and now Ishrat Hussain.
I wouldn't mind giving the treasury job to such person but the PM slot? Haven's no. Plus this guy was Musharraf pick for the state bank in the previous decade. I've no issue about Musharraf loyalists joining other parties but, for crying out loud, don't install them to the top position. No wonder, Musharraf is thinking about coming back to Pakistan; he would have a friendly government in case of Ishrat.
Khan
Infamous prophetic one minute call from Mian to Chaudhary can decide this in favor of PMLN (5-3). Payback time for "Qur'an and Hadiths" moment plus a glamorous rebuttal of Muk-Mukaa accusations. Another move of killing two birds in one stone.
The idea is not farfetched in the light of current PPP-PMLQ disagreement over seat bickering.
mawan1971
I do not understand why PML(N) is concerned over Ishrat Hussain, may be they are concerned that he is IMF nominee or US supported. To me it does not make difference whoever caretaker PM is as he will be PM only about 40 days and as long as he does not make any critical decisions on economy. Ishrat Hussain is the best among all and neutral as well, but if IMF want him to deliver a hidden agenda during his tenure I am concerned. I would rather not prefer Ishrat as his backing of IMF+World Bank is doubtful.
bechari-awam
This is the reason ;)
http://www.express.com.pk/epaper/PoPupwindow.aspx?newsID=1101788845&Issue=NP_LHE&Date=20130320
tahirnaseem
Now it is clear from the Ch. Nisar press conference, It is difficult to decide for caretaker prime minister in committee.
Please see below link
’اب فیصلہ نہ ہوا تو کمیٹی میں بھی نہیں ہو گا‘
khanamer
No Wonder PTI was pushing for Ishart Hussain...
Adonis
I would say that all 5 members of Election Commission including the Chief Election Commissioner are supporters of PMLN as all their names were recommended by PMLN and PPP had no choice but to agree to these.
And please don't ask me for any evidence for this nonsense because it was revealed to me in a dream.
Besides, the gentleman who stated that ECP members from Punjab and Blochistan are PMLN supporters and their names were proposed by PMLN, seems to have got this "breaking news" through a dream as well. If he can get away with such drivel without any evidence, anybody can.
tahirnaseem
As i Told before in lot of my mails if you will say something logical and expose some one, then you be the mouth piece of
-PML-N if against PTI
-PTI, PML-N if against PML-N
-PPP if against PML-N but in favor of PTI
-Liberal if against Taliban
-Taliban if against Liberal
To get proof of what i said just go back the time of nomination of ECP you will find the dreams in reality.
khanamer
-PML-N if against PTI
-PTI, PML-N if against PML-N
====================================
yeah we see your logic
Shirazi
@Bawa Jee
مبارک ہو - مبارک ہو - مبارک ہو - سب کہو مبارک ہو
مسلم لیگ نوں کو پہلی کامیابی مبارک ہو
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ادھا کام ہو گیا باقی کا ادھا کل ہو جائے گا
:) :)
Adonis
@ tahirnaseem
Thanks for confirming that you dreamed up the whole thing without having any evidence.
I should have known by the title that it was indeed a "comedy" thread.
tahirnaseem
I think everyone know that only consultation process was adopted by parliament for CEC post not for members. Whereas require for both please see the link and rest hope you will do some work if intrested
APPOINTMENT OF CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER (CEC) & MEMBERs ELECTION COMMISSION (MsEC)
Adonis
And where does this link say that ECP members from Punjab and Balochistan were recommended by PMLN and those from Sindh and KPK were recommended by PPP?
tahirnaseem
that i said go back to those days news papers.
Adonis
I have read all the newspapers and there is nothing even remotely supporting your theory, this is why I reached the conclusion that you must have dreamed up the whole stuff.
For next time, please start such a comedy thread in the "Humor" section so people may not mistakenly think that it is based on something serious.
tahirnaseem
@adonis
this prove my claim
I hope you will consider me not jaoora, matwala, or Jaiala now
i try to be always realistic and logical
Voting in election commission
tahirnaseem
@adonis
this prove my claim
I hope you will consider me not jaoora, matwala, or Jaiala now
I try to be always realistic and logical
Adonis
Link not working ...
tahirnaseem
Adonis
Still not working...
Can't you paste whatever is in that link?
tahirnaseem
i think no need to paste again it is working if you dont want to see, i have no problem.
This is in express news, below the head line in 2nd columns.
Here why i said PML-N support of Punjab and Baluchistan, because JUI-F is in alliance with PML-N now.
Adonis
OK. Now it is working.
So how does this link support what you wrote?
What you wrote was:
"All four members of provincial EC is nominated by PPP and PML-N agreement. Two names by PMLN and Two names by PPP.
From Punjab and baluchistan by PML-N and Sindh and PKP by PPP."
Now please take a look at the link you posted and tell me where does it say that Punjab and Baluchistan members were nominated by PMLN?
tahirnaseem
I think try to read my posts first
"Here why i said PML-N support of Punjab and Baluchistan, because JUI-F is in alliance with PML-N now."
JUI_F from Baluchistan and now they are in alliance with PML_N. right or wrong
2nd Mr Roshan member of Sindhi already boycott the session, so as i said before
"So write down here Mr. Nasir Aslam ZAHID will be next prime minister."
hope now you come up with some logical not just blowout my words.
Adonis
I had already reproduced what you had written.
As for JUI-F, still there is no alliance with PMLN even though both have agreed to discuss possible electoral co-operation. So you are wrong on this account as well.
This news item clearly mentions JUI-F is unhappy with PML-N due to dropping of Shakirullah Jan's nomination. In fact Maulana Fazl ur Rehman met zardari just three days ago and JUI-F has a history of supporting this government in all committees of parliament. So obviously your claim that Punjab and Balochistan members were nominated by PMLN is plain wrong.
Most importantly, being nominated by any party does not mean that the members are obliged to support that party. All these members and CEC Fakhruddin Ibrahim were approved with consensus precisely because they were considered honest and neutral. They are not beholden to anyone. Otherwise there could never have been consensus on these names.
You must log in to post.