PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Limits to Imran’s magic

(10 posts)
  1. khanseena1
    Member

    Would be interested in what fellow pkpolitics members think of this article.
    ---------------------------------------------------------

    http://www.dawn.com/2011/12/27/limits-to-imrans-magic.html
    Limits to Imran’s magic

    SPEECHES made at the Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaaf (PTI) rally in Karachi on Dec 25 were a perfect “motley mixture of high-sounding phrases … [and] adherence to the old routine”. It will hardly endear Imran Khan and his party to ordinary Sindhi and Baloch publics.

    The issues speakers zeroed in on and the topics they did not touch upon offer an interesting insight into the ethos of the PTI and how out of touch it is with the Sindhi and Baloch political pulse. Both in terms of content and form there was little on offer for Sindhis and the Baloch in the vicinity of Jinnah`s mausoleum.

    Start with what Imran Khan had to say about Balochistan. He quite correctly, and I am assuming sincerely, apologised to the Baloch for the wrongs done to them. Who was he apologising as? Was he doing it as a Punjabi? If so, he did not make it obvious. Nawaz Sharif did the same in a meeting with Sardar Ataullah Mengal only a few days back. Instead of echoing what Nawaz Sharif had said to Sardar Mengal, Imran Khan should have paid attention to the veteran Baloch leader`s response in which he considered such apologies hollow and minced no words in conveying to Mr Sharif that the Baloch youth viewed the army as a Punjabi army and not a national one.

    Unless politicians from Punjab are willing and capable to rein in the army there is little hope of winning over the hearts and minds of the people of Balochistan. Imran Khans answer to Baloch alienation is to bringdevelopmentto the province. Mentiondevelopmentto a Baloch and she/he immediately thinks of boots on the ground and men in khaki hunting down Baloch nationalists.Developmentin the Baloch perception means systematic exploitation of Balochistans natural resources and a denial of political rights spanning half a century.

    Imran Khan quite naively invoked West Germany`s example of helping East Germany in the reunification of the two. He wants to play West Germany to Balochistan, conveniently forgetting that it was the East Germans who brought the Berlin Wall down to be one with their West German brothers.

    In the case of Balochistan, the situation is almost the exact opposite where there is an ever-increasing aspiration to get out of Pakistan instead of an urge to be part of it. When it comes to Sindh, the PTI bowled, to use Imran Khan`s favourite cricketing analogy, a wide on Sindhis in both form and content. topi

    Let us look at the form first. The team that Imran Khan chose to surround himself with on the stage did not even have a token Sindhi among them. Sindhis have not patented the Sindhi (cap) and it would have done no harm to adorn one when attempting to put up a mega political show in Sindh.

    If you are going to punctuate speeches with songs then not having any Sindhi song on the playlist only sends a wrong message. Whether or not you appreciate Shah Abdul Latif`s poetry, it is customary to pay tribute to Latif when politicking in Sindh.

    Tsunami may be a nice and thunderous word elsewhere but in the coastal areas of Sindh people associate it with misery not merriment. The list of such symbolic follies is too long for a newspaper column.

    In terms of content there was little that Sindhis could identify with but a lot that would keep the PTI on the political margins in the province.

    Shah Mehmood Qureshis speech was, again using cricket analogy, akin to Misbah-ul-Haqs innings against India in the 2011 World Cup semi-final. Misbah scored only 17 runs during the first 42 balls he faced thus contributing to the cost incurred by Pakistan.

    Qureshi did the same for Imran Khan in Karachi as far as PTI`s immediate fortunes in Sindh are concerned. Qureshi chose to play the nuclear nationalism card and accuse President Asif Zardari of being not as strong a nuclear nationalist as an ideal Pakistani president should be. He went on to educate, or rather bore, those attending with concepts such as no-first-use, Cold Start and asymmetric warfare.

    The speech sounded more like a pitch to secure the slot of foreign minister in any future government than connecting with the masses in Sindh. Simply put, you don`t talk about that stuff in public rallies in Sindh. It finds little resonance with Sindhis.

    Imran Khan was equally off the mark if one purpose of the show was to win the support of Sindhis. His road map was a motley of generalities guided by political naivety that made him look up to England as a model welfare state when he first set foot there as a teenager.

    His solutions to complex socioeconomic and political issues are sought in simple steps like computerising the land records because a computer does not accept bribe or aspiration to provide free legal advice to 80 per cent of the population.

    And no such talk is complete without customary tribute to Lee Kuan Yews ways ofdeveloping` the tiny island of Singapore. These propositions resonate with the urban middle classes of Punjab and possibly Karachi but have little to do with various segments of the Sindhi population.

    For Imran Khan the only hurdle in the way of exploiting coal deposits in the desert Sindh may be the law and order situation in Karachi but for Sindhis the issue is more complex and requires provinces having a greater say and decision-making powers when it comes to natural resources.

    Imran Khan and his party have an attractive platform for the urban middle classes of Punjab but his slogans have little appeal where the Baloch and Sindhi political path is concerned, at least for now.

    The writer is a Canada-based author.

    hnizamani@hotmail.com

    Posted 5 months ago on 27 Dec 2011 3:35 #
  2. khanseena1
    Member

    Any one willing to comment?

    Posted 5 months ago on 27 Dec 2011 15:54 #
  3. aliasghar
    Member

    Dear Imran Khan, I beg to differ…

    I have observed Imran Khan’s recent meteoric rise with mixed emotions. On the one hand, he is scrupulously honest and seemingly sincere in his desire for a new Pakistan. This is in stark contrast to the political cretins who inhabit our legislature and executive. And as my sister would confirm, I am somewhat predisposed to a positive view of Imran based on years of boyhood hero worship (she labelled it a man-crush).

    On the other hand, thoughtful liberals can only cringe as he invokes a heady mix of right-wing ideology, jingoism, Islamic nationalism, and anti-American vitriol – dangerous follies that tap into and reaffirm a distorted narrative that is accepted as fact by younger generations of Pakistanis. Khan, with his seemingly simple solutions (I will get rid of “big” corruption in 90 days) and absolutist statements (“we need to stand up to America”) is the Sarah Palin of Pakistan.

    But I digress.

    The throngs of people and the sea of red-green flags waving in unison to patriotic songs in Karachi at the recent PTI jalsa were a sight to behold. Electrifying atmosphere, I can understand, but it was surreal to read Facebook statuses dedicated to IK’s ‘great’ speech from seemingly sensible friends of mine at the rally. Truth be told, it was pretty ordinary, and the only thing new was the inclusion of a new lota.

    My advice to the Kaptaan’s supporters – dote less and question more, feel less and think more, demand a detailed manifesto, policy specifics, and democratic party infrastructure. If Khan were assassinated tomorrow, would you vote for a PTI led by Shah Mahmood Qureshi? If not, then Imran Khan has fashioned a personal cult and not a genuine political movement.

    Demand an explanation for Imran’s recent endorsement of feudal-based patronage as his electoral strategy. Hurry up, lest you find yourself in the awkward position of defending Pervez Elahi and his son’s candidature on a future PTI ticket. I know the bar is low, but our expectations need not be. Stop excusing everything with the tired ‘he is better than the alternatives’ argument. In short, get real!

    Now, without further ado, let’s get on with my top 10 gripes with Imran Khan’s Karachi rally:

    10) It started many hours late. Is it too much to expect a jalsa to start on time? From a political party that talks about heralding change, starting a much-anticipated rally late is especially appalling.

    9) He was straddled on stage by new entrants and political heavyweights, Shah Mahmood Qureshi and Javed Hashmi, with the old loyal PTI guard aka political novices, seemingly sidelined. Not a good sign at all.

    8) He had to be reminded about the people of Punjab when calling out upon the different provinces and ethnicities.

    7) His cricket analogies are becoming increasingly lame.

    6) What’s with the indiscriminate music every 90 seconds of his speech? Granted his monotone needed to be tempered by interruptions, but they could have at least waited for natural cues.

    5) Too many Aafia Siddiqui signs! Look people, the woman was an unhinged fanatic and al Qaeda member. Try to get that!

    4) No Karachi specific issues. Why is Imran Khan (read: Taliban Khan) reluctant to talk about terrorism and its deadly toll on the average Karachiite and Pakistani? No mention of MQM’s bhatta operation either – political expediency has led to Altaf Bhai and the MQM being forgiven for the mayhem in May 2009.

    3) Still no specifics. No, generous man-hugs for our Baloch brothers and a fleeting reference to East-Germany-style special development status for Balochistan doesn’t count folks.

    2) He lived up to his reputation of “Im the Dim” by claiming that computers would end corruption. Ahem yes, it is impossible to cook the books on Excel.

    1) As a general rule, revolutionary leaders (especially of the self-proclaimed variety) should avoid flying in to rallies on private jets.

    PS: Shhhh! Don’t mention this to the kaptaan’s fans/cultists. The cult of personality, that they have succumbed to, renders them incapable of tolerating any criticism of their great leader, Kim-ul-Imran. They are, thus, rather prone to apoplectic paroxysms of rage.

    http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/9562/dear-imran-khan-i-beg-to-differ/

    Posted 5 months ago on 27 Dec 2011 16:07 #
  4. gv
    Member

    @khanseena

    Is IK the long awaited messiah who will act as a panacea to all of pakistan's ills and solve all our problems with a wave of a magic wand?

    The answer is 'its relative' !

    The questions (in my opinion) to be asked are

    1) is he striking a chord / resonating with the general public ?

    2) does he sound more believable than the competition?

    3) Will more people come out to vote during election day due to his participation?

    I think you will find the answers to the above are all 'yes'

    He is not perfect. He does not have all the answers.. He will make mistakes, he will dissapoint, he will let people down, he will choose the wrong deputies.. etc etc he is only human and inexperienced to boot

    However given the competition he is miles ahead of them and is more likely to deliver some stability to us which is what we need to continue down the path of social and economic progress for the entire nation.

    Posted 5 months ago on 27 Dec 2011 16:46 #
  5. scandinavian
    Member

    Sorry, Khanssena. This article has no significant point and is criticizing for the sake of criticism.

    Imran is excusing in the capacity of being a leader of Pakistani party.

    East-West Germany issue. Who broke down the Berlin wall was not the issue. It was about getting Balochistan into main stream Pakistan and giving them access to equal resources. Balochistan has been neglected and need resources shifted from the rest of Pakistan towards Balochistan hence the comparison with East Germany (Balochistan) and West Germany (rest of Pakistan).

    I will not use more time on this baboo(n) fella. Only a last thing.

    "5) Too many Aafia Siddiqui signs! Look people, the woman was an unhinged fanatic and al Qaeda member. Try to get that!"

    Does Imran control what banners people should bring?
    What is wrong in bringing the banner of Aafia S. She has been tortured and unfairly handled, mistreated, abducted and I don't know what. Sorry, but this bloody sh!t author calls her a Al-Qaeda member. How dare he, this baboo(n).

    Posted 5 months ago on 27 Dec 2011 17:13 #
  6. khanseena1
    Member

    @Scandnavian
    "Sorry, but this bloody sh!t author calls her a Al-Qaeda member. How dare he, this baboo(n). "

    there are many unanswered question on Afia, however it is clear that she was involved in antistate activites i.e. her ex husbands statements regarding her. Magnitude of her sentence may be unfair, but her conviction is not.

    Posted 4 months ago on 27 Dec 2011 18:19 #
  7. scandinavian
    Member

    @Khanseena

    Please don't defend what is obviously wrong. Some points to ponder on:

    - Why she was abducted and not arrested?
    - Why she was not tried and sentenced in Pakistan?
    According to which she was abducted?
    - Why they abducted her children too?
    - Why her family didn't get any message?
    - Why the claim that a little tiny woman could wrestle a firearm out of a MARINE SOLDIER?
    - Why she was shot IF she the one carrying firearm and no other US soldier got harmed.

    So, please spare us for "fairness" of her conviction. No sane person should claim that!

    Posted 4 months ago on 27 Dec 2011 18:35 #
  8. khanseena1
    Member


    Posted 4 months ago on 27 Dec 2011 19:48 #
  9. Adonis
    Member

    This "article" is pretty childish and not worthy of much comment. The 'writer' seems totally removed from the hot issues in areas of South Pakistan, something he accuses Imran Khan of. These arm chair "analysts" are dime a dozen spreading their "pearls of wisdom" on the pages of English language press in Pakistan during their semester break from McGill or Rutgers University.

    In 99% of cases, the opinion pieces published in English language Pakistani newspapers have zero relationship with what the common man on streets of Pakistan thinks.

    Imran Khan may indeed be an idiot and hypocrite, but this article writer is a much bigger idiot.

    Posted 4 months ago on 28 Dec 2011 6:15 #
  10. TanoliMns
    Member

    It will be little premature to say that people joining PTI have not good character. These people will be held accountable before their CEC. Imran Khan will have choices at the end of the day to either keep those corrupt people with him or kick them out of his party. A wave of positive change can be seen in shape of IK or else Military dictatatorship seems to be a better option, where history suggest growth rate was not that skyrocking as it used to be in countries where true democratic system exists but they will be moving slowly but surely toward better growth.

    Posted 4 months ago on 28 Dec 2011 8:03 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.