Baby make your move ... step across the line ...
Mansoor Ijaz in some crazy, nasty, NSFW music video... 2 min 35 sec onward...
Mansoor Ijaz and his cheap thrills...show this one to Mr. Akram Shaikh..hehehe..silly boy "P"
Baby make your move ... step across the line ...
Mansoor Ijaz in some crazy, nasty, NSFW music video... 2 min 35 sec onward...
Mansoor Ijaz and his cheap thrills...show this one to Mr. Akram Shaikh..hehehe..silly boy "P"
Ab koi poochaay iss tarah kaa kirdaar rakhnay walay aadmi kee gawahee qabool kee jaani chahiyay yaa nahi..
Ab samajh aaya kay qurbani daynay wala jurnail kion bhaaga bhaaga london kay aik "hotel" mein " meeting" kay liyay jaa pohchaa
This t@rd lives in Monaco, one can easily guess he isn't doing Tableegh e Deen there!!
BTW, I think this strategy will backfire for PPP because if Ejaz was so bad than why was Hussain Haqqani his langotia yaar?
Just imagine if a democratic government was calling this person a witness against qurbaani daynay walaa idaara.
Imagine the kind of arguments coming out from ansar abbasi and other rakhails of establishment.
پاکستانی نزاد ،قادیانی نزاد امریکن ،اسامہ کو سوڈان سے بیدخل کر کے پاکستان بجھوانے والا شخص آج کس کا چہیتا ہے
He is being promoted and called by establishment against Pakistan .
محترم جناب منصور اعجاز کی ذات پر گستاخی برداشت نہیں کی جا سکتی ہے ، یہ ویڈیو جعلی ہے ،اور اگر اصلی بھی ہے تب بھی حضرت منصور اعجاز کا یہ بتلانا مقصود ہے کہ ان کے سامنے دنیا برہنہ ہے اور یہ غدار پاکستان کو ساری دنیا کے سامنے برہنہ کر دینگے
جناناب منصور عجاز کیا اس ویڈیو میں جو کچھ کہ رہے ہیں سچ نہیں ہے ؟ کیا پہلی عورت دوسری عورت کے اوپر چڑھی نہیں تھی ؟ منصور ایک سچا اور کھرا انسان ہے .ویسے بھی یہ ویڈیو جعلی ہے جس طرح اسامہ کی ویڈیو جعلی تھیں
Aik kazzab, murrtidd, shaatim.e.rasool, munkar.e.nabuwwat aur ailaaniaa budd kirdaar aadmi kee gawahee kionkarr qabool kee jaey.....
Iss liyay kionkay iss kee nisbatt oss hustee se hai jiss kee qaum kay liyay bay hudd qurbaniaa hein...
Jiss ko chaaha zarray se aftab bana daala
Yeh sab tumhara karam hai aaqa
Kat baat ab takk.......
@bsobaid
اگر منصور عجاز قادیانی ہے تو کیا ہوا ؟ یہ شاتم رسول کیسے ہو گیا ؟ یہ اس کا مذہبی عقیدہ ہے اور ہر ایک کو اپنے مذہبی عقائد پر چلنے کی آزادی ہونی چاہیے .
@bsobaid ... i agree with Zalaan on that one, Qadiani or not, that is his faith ...
but seeing the video you can well imagine...the kind of cheap thrills n cheap publicity he is into..n the sort of nasty nancy this guy is, he couldnt be Ms. double D for sure...hehe
... and silly boy 'P' has put all his weight behind him...as Najam sethi rightly said in his program last nighht ...they have opened a can of worms ... our ISI is not that clever ..is it!!!... it is being further maligned and ridiculed ...great service to the nation
@bsobaid
Imagine the kind of arguments coming out from ansar abbasi and other rakhails of establishment.
well said ... :)
Mansoor Ijaz may be the alleged interlocutor of the PPP memeogate Scandal and his evidences and the testimony in the court may make PPP or the Military fall to their knees but this shady Character has many faces as one is shown as a compare in a abhorrent ladies bout.
But I hope this video in not made up by some PIPLas prior to Mansoor Ijaz arrival in Pakistan.
Believably this video is in vide circulation
Thats was alot more than Just Mansoor Ejaz
Is Mansoor Ijaz the only Interlocutor employed by the PPP to inflict the injuries to this nation or its armed forces; every single person of PPP in chair is a synbol of disgust and bad omen for this nation.
@arif and Zala...
heard of sarcasm?
چیف جسٹس صاحب ڈبل بی بھی میمو کی طرح ایک حقیھقت ہے . جنرل کیانی
How many of you are envy of Mansoor after watching this video?
منصور اعجاز خواتین ریسلرز کے ساتھ پاکستان تشریف لائیں گے.غیور عوام شاندار استقبال کریں گے (روزنامہ غیرت
ghayyur awam nahi, ghayyur afwaaj.
He is landing on chaklala air base according to dawn news.
حضرت منصور اجاز نے انتہائی مجبوری میں یہ کام کیا تھا اور یہاں لوگ اس کا مزاق اڑا رہے ہیں .شرم آنی چاہیے
One clip features bikini-clad women wrestlers 'Double D' and 'Nasty Nancy,' who end up grappling on a mat in a sexually provocative fashion. The other is the same until the final 30 seconds, when the women remove each other's clothes.
Ijaz's scenes and dialogue feature in both versions.
"She's giving it to her good now! You've got some real tumbling going on here. Nancy's got that mean look," he says, as the two women wrestle in front of him. At one point, Ijaz's eyes widen and his mouth gapes as the video cuts to the women ripping each other's bikinis off.
Ijaz said he had not known he would appear in the version containing full nudity.
"I did this as a favor for my wife's best friend, whose planned actor for the part did not show up for the shoot that day," he said in a telephone interview from an undisclosed location, citing alleged threats to his life as a result of his role in the memo scandal. He said the shoot took place in Brussels, and that there was no other person available with an American accent.
"I was never present for any part of the video where those naked girls were shown. My wife was present at all times."
Ijaz provided the AP with 2004 email correspondence between him and the producer of the video in which he threatens legal action unless the producer removes him from the clip that contains nudity.
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/pakistan-scandals-latest-twist-1306699.html
See, qurbaani daynay wala idaara does the proper investigation first. The women were bikini clad, not nude.
Secondly,
"Ijaz provided the AP with 2004 email correspondence between him and the producer of the video "
This guy is a black berry freak.
He saves all the data and reads it like a book in his pastime.
@bsobaid
more Drama more lies
http://cafepyala.blogspot.com/2012/01/umis-that-who-we-think-it-is.html
o mann..this is getting funnier and look at the scums like MI's attorney Akram Sheikh ex Jamati, ex N-LEague, eternal etablishment rakhail. He becomes the custodian of everything moral and now he is defending this guy...
He will eat the dirt if establishment asks him to and will shamelessly say.."hmmmm, mazaydaar!"
Finally he has applied and been issued a visa, lets see if he shows up, for the sake of our chota salar, silly boy 'P' ...I doubt it...there are many a slip between the cup and the lip...
I feel he will but there is a possibility that in the mean time bloody civilians and qurbani daynay walay will reach some agreement.
This is the biggest non-issue our nation have wasted time on and qurbani daynay wala aur qurbani kee qadar karnay wala are the main culprits.
Drop scene for MI cheap publicity stunt today...
Really interesting...american perspective on the con artist MI ... silly boy "P" ...
he is responsible for wasting 180 millions ppls valuable time since Oct 9th 2011, 106 days ... that 19080 miliion man days ... or 457,920 million man hour...
that is criminal for a poor country like pakistan...it is about time instead of keeping the nation embroiled in controversies ...we work towards it progress...the media ghairat brigade should have the think about what was the opportunity cost for the wasted time...is it not moral corruption... time not well spent ..tsk tsk...i cry for u Pakistan
Mansoor Ijaz, instigator behind Pakistan’s ‘Memogate’
By David Ignatius
Behind the “Memogate” affair that has embroiled Pakistan’s former ambassador to the United States. and the civilian government he represents, there is a quixotic accuser named Mansoor Ijaz who seems like a character in a fanciful spy novel of his own design.
Ijaz is an American businessman of Pakistani descent who lives in high style on the French Riviera. He made money as an investor, but his fame has come as a writer of op-ed pieces and a sometime intermediary with Pakistani and American officials. He has alleged that Husain Haqqani, the former ambassador, encouraged him to write a memo to Adm. Mike Mullen last May urging tighter controls on the Pakistani military.
That charge has snared Haqqani and triggered a crisis pitting Pakistan’s civilian government against its military. But even if Ijaz’s allegation is true, it’s reasonable to ask: So what? Haqqani doesn’t appear, even from Ijaz’s evidence, to have done anything illegal — or even outside his job as diplomatic representative of the government.
Pakistan’s supreme court is scheduled to begin hearing the case on Tuesday. But before it gets too deep into the blizzard of alleged electronic messages between Ijaz and Haqqani, the court should ask whether the fundamentals of the case make sense — and whether it will prove an embarrassment to both the military and the civilian leadership.
A review of the evidence suggests there may be less to the case than all the noise would suggest. That’s the view of Shuja Nawaz, director of the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council and an authority on the Pakistani military, with which he has close contacts.
“This is now a sideshow that is taking on importance beyond the needs of the country,” Nawaz told me Sunday. “There is no evidence that the security of the state has been compromised. Husain Haqqani has already been removed from his post. Perhaps it would be best to close this matter and move on to more serious things.”
Let’s start with the memo itself. Ijaz outed the story in an Oct. 10, 2011, opinion piece in the Financial Times in which he said that on May 9, a “senior Pakistani diplomat” had had contacted him with an “urgent request” that he convey a message to Mullen urging the U.S. to back tighter controls on Pakistan’s military and intelligence. Ijaz later identified that diplomat as Haqqani, who denies that he was the instigator.
In any event, Ijaz wrote a memo making the argument — including a statement that a new “national security team” in Islamabad would abolish the notorious “S” wing of Pakistani intelligence, which maintains liaison with the Taliban and other jihadist groups. He then arranged for Jim Jones, the former national security adviser, to send the memo to Mullen.
Ijaz’s memo was a stronger statement of arguments he had made publicly back in May, in the Financial Times and a Washington Post blog, after the death of Osama bin Laden. “Taken advantage of properly by U.S. policymakers, exposed treachery [in bin Laden’s long residence in Pakistan] could usher in a new era of transparency in Pakistan’s internal affairs,” he wrote in the Post item.
Haqqani, as a representative of the civilian government, probably shared a similar feeling that Pakistani military and intelligence had been embarrassed by the fact that bin Laden had been living for years in Abbotabad. But he hardly needed Ijaz’s help in conveying his views to people like Mullen. He was in daily contact with top U.S. officials, trying to represent President Asif Ali Zardari. The Pakistani military had a representative of its own, a respected military attaché who could speak on the generals’ behalf.
Ijaz seems to have relished his role as a freelance adviser. His relationship with Jones, who passed the memo, is a case in point: They had met in 2006, and Jones, who was then NATO commander, had asked Ijaz to join a strategic advisers group and travel with him to Afghanistan. Later, Ijaz was asked to join the board of the Atlantic Council, where Jones is a former chairman. But his stint as a board member didn’t last long, nor did he make major donations to the group.
When a government official asked several years ago for a CIA check on Ijaz’s background in international matters, he is said to have received an “orange flag” — nothing that would rule out dealing with him, but a caution that he had a taste for publicity and sometimes talked more than he delivered.
One of the intriguing aspects of Ijaz’s role is whether, in his contacts with Mullen, he was in effect acting as a representative of Zardari. Jones said in an affidavit for the Pakistani court that Ijaz “mentioned that he has a message from the ‘highest authority’ in the Pakistan government.” And in his cover letter to Jones, accompanying the infamous memo, Ijaz wrote: “This document has the support of the President of Pakistan.” (The cover note, along with all the other documentation, has been submitted to the court in Pakistan.)
Which leads some critics of Ijaz to raise the question: If Ijaz was acting on Zardari’s behalf (or Haqqani’s, for that matter) should he have registered as an agent of a foreign government? That’s just one of the wrinkles in a story so colorful and unlikely that it would have been branded unrealistic if written as fiction
The guy refuses to show up
http://pkpolitics.com/discuss/topic/amreeki-maseeha-kee-amad-aamad24th-jan#post-302530
@arif786
"he is responsible for wasting 180 millions ppls valuable time since Oct 9th 2011, 106 days ... that 19080 miliion man days ... or 457,920 million man hour..."
I really feel sorry for your decision of wasting every second from Oct 9th till now.
But, thank God 99.99% of Pakistanis are much smarter to waste even fraction of their time on things they do not control.
You must log in to post.