PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Mubashir Lucman abusing Ch Iftikhar and Lawyers

(26 posts)
  1. GOOGLE
    Member

    Posted 2 years ago on 23 Dec 2009 19:27 #
  2. uovervinnelig
    Member

    Musharraf, top generals, ISI Chief, MQM, PPP, PMLQ etc tried their best to proof that Iftikhar Ch was culprit but couldn't succeed because Iftikhar Ch. is a honest person. How can we belief this guy Mubashar Luqman. Like Naeem Bukhari he can go ahead and write letter against Iftikhar Ch to the president !!!! He is just an actor.

    Posted 2 years ago on 23 Dec 2009 22:56 #
  3. GOOGLE
    Member

    Agree!

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 7:50 #
  4. toamin
    member

    He is known as Zardari's Lickman.

    Actually he is a Qadiyyani mouth piece in the media.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 7:56 #
  5. blinko
    Member

    Mr.Lucman,may or may not be a Zardari man,but yes he has confessed on one of his shows that he is certainly a very good friend of Dictator Musharraf.And this statement was not very long ago,probably it was about a month back.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 8:16 #
  6. Mr.Lucman has already a bad repu as a journalist .
    and serious journalists wont even count him journalist .

    by taking this route of cursing judiciary ,just to please Zardari ,wont help him much ,rather will damage anything (if )he has in the name of repu and viewer ship .

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 8:30 #
  7. jaypk
    Member

    he was my likeness..uptill a specifc time..but i think i shud deviate my likeness now...i dont know why ppl do this...just to prove tht they are different...he started well..but thn...may be a plot..i dont know...anyways..i think he ll lose all the repu he had...thr was no need to bash CJ and praise mush...!! may be a plot in isloo..who knows..!!

    @jj...He is known as Zardari's Lickman.
    Actually he is a Qadiyyani mouth piece in the media.

    how thoughtfull of a so called intellectual person like you.!!

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:30 #
  8. toamin
    member

    @jaypk

    Why are you getting personal with me? I thought you adhered to respect and tolerance?

    I've witnessed him on many occasions charging on behalf of jamaat-e-ahmadia. I've also witnessed him defend zardari by lying when anchors called him as witness to zardari's saying of "international guarantor" episode.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:33 #
  9. tipuS65
    Members

    Cj is try to defend the rights of khusra's in supreme court. Does that make CJ a khusrha?
    Flawed stupid logic being used in the post above!

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:36 #
  10. jaypk
    Member

    @jj...i was more emphasizing on the word lickman...do you think tht is respect and tolerance? i admit he is a loser..but whn senior and respected ppl like you use these words ...it doesnt suit you....sorry if i sound personal...!! my apologies..!!

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:39 #
  11. toamin
    member

    Mr. Stupid Logic

    I said being mouth piece of jamaat-e-ahmadia, i didn't say that he is qadiyyani.

    read it carefully before siding with khusraas :)

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:39 #
  12. tipuS65
    Members

    cj is mouth piece of khusras?

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:42 #
  13. toamin
    member

    Did he conduct public programs to invite them to give their views?

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:44 #
  14. tipuS65
    Members

    Yes he did a nationwide registration of khusras in pakistan. They must have left you out of it otherwise you would already know about it.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:49 #
  15. toamin
    member

    @jaypk,

    I used lickman for Mubashir because of his public activities and in political term. Nothing personal. He supports zardari so I said he is zardari's lickman.

    I hope you would understand that.

    thx

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:49 #
  16. tipuS65
    Members

    yeh public activities app kaie kise bohat close person nahie tum ko batain hain?
    phir tu such ho ga.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:53 #
  17. aristotle
    Member

    choor group and thier fans r in trouble

    and in reaction they have been united against SC and CJ
    ppl of pakistan should be united for thier rights that r protecting by SC Only
    if parliament and govt will not play thier role then any other player/instituion would play thier role.
    why govt/parliament/political parties r giving a chance to other players? its just becoz of lack of governance, weakness of political class and nothing...........

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:56 #
  18. toamin
    member

    chor group and their fans in trouble!

    arastu's one sentence says it all!

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 10:57 #
  19. tipuS65
    Members

    haie maie lutt gaee group has been crying like a beewa for the last 2 years. Abhie 3 saal aur aise tarha rouna paree ga. Hossla karo pyaraie bachoun.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 11:00 #
  20. toamin
    member

    cheer up, now looted money is coming back!

    chief justice will help get the money back from looters!

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 11:11 #
  21. He has already been served with a contempt of court notice, and I hope CJ puts him behind bars.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 11:14 #
  22. tipuS65
    Members

    Cj should give the collection of looted money to khusrahs. This way you will get a job.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 11:15 #
  23. toamin
    member

    @Umer

    Wow, i didn't know about that! Thanks

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 11:17 #
  24. Raza76
    Member

    Yar,
    Lets take Luckman's words on face value. I just think that luckman wants to say, every person that has been ever killed is guilty as he was the motive for the killer. Thus this incident took place.
    What a stupid logic to pose CJ guilty of KHI killing. Guilty, are those who committed crimes, guilty are those who were in the Govt. Plus I recall Wasim Akhatar admitted a couple of days after the incident that the Containers were placed on his order, but in this conversation he said the words which are in sharp contrast to this.
    I dont know man how these people to speak black lies like these.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 20:11 #
  25. zingaro
    Member

    First I thought not to comment on this nonsense show hosted and participated by nonsense people. I know on whose Agenda this Mubashar is working but definitely what he is trying to prove with his foolish arrogant style is not digestable for the people who have any minor level of common sense. Even Fauzia Wahab and Wasim Akhtar played a criminal role on their part. Mr. Mubashar in his anger forgot that to maintain peace, law and order is always a duty of government. A person who was himself sorrounded in
    the airport can't be held responsible for that violance for which the then president himself confessed same day evening in Islamabad. Secondly I think Mubashar will go ahead and will demand that Quaid-e-Azam should also be declared culprit becuase he lead to establish a new country which caused rapes of thousand women, killing of hundred thousand people, loss of precious properties, etc. What the hell this man gives nonsense logics.

    Fauzia ...she is a very well known personality to everyone and we know what is her mental level.She also forgot that for the restoration of the same CJ,their leader BB herself went to his home. and said Ch. is her CJ. But this lady knows only to encash the popularity of BB and has nothing to do with her words. She also forgot that how many ppp workers lost their lives in the movement of restoration of the same CJ.

    Should I say something about Wasim Akhtar.. I know personally a case in which he pressurized the police for a case. He is part of that group which installed obstacles in the city and killed dozens of people.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 22:40 #
  26. msohail83
    Member

    The most despicable person on TV.

    Posted 2 years ago on 25 Dec 2009 5:16 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.