Yesterday, on Nov 25, 2009, Mr President has used a word or term “Political Actor” (Siasi Adakaar) repeatedly in his address to the party workers. Now people are assuming abt this term that who were the addressee of this? There are two-assumption:
• Political parties /leaders who are not in the parliament
• TV anchors /journalists /media groups
The second one seems more close to reality in view of present scenario and specific mentality of rulers.
Now a question is there any conspiracy against present govt or it is just his assumption? Moreover, if there is a conspiracy that how to handle it?
I think there may be a campaign by a group of media with their personal agenda but:
• No media group can change ur power position if establishment, parliament and public with u (as Mr Zardari mentioned that all stakeholders with him... Phir kia darna pyaray ?)
• ur bad governance and corruption provides opportunity to media groups/anchors/journalists to highlight and create a hype against u and ur govt.
• all wrongdoings like governor Raaj in Punjab, KL bill, Rental Power plants, land scandal, NRO bla, bla bla were ur decisions and actions NOT media or jang group’ s actions. Yes, they used these all for their interest, might be for revenue generation, ratings height, popularity race, or something else.
• u may replace bad news /negative coverage with ur good performance, good governance, positive things not rebuttals, denials, conflicts and allegations
• President’s stature require a mature approach and language, he should not fight straightaway with TV anchors or media group.
• Media (each segment) should not over board, should not be a part of dirty game to destabilize the system, behave mature and sensibility, and avoid spreading rumors. Just point out wrongdoings of authorities but not be a judge. Media dictatorship is also not acceptable in a civilized society.
What do u think friends?
