PKPolitics Discuss » Video Links

Quotes praising Islam by non-Muslims !!!!!

(37 posts)
  1. Revivalist
    member

    The following are some quotes:

    “I have always held the religion of Muhammad (saw) in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness.” [Sir George Bernard Shaw in ‘The Genuine Islam’ Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936]

    “Our use of phrase ‘The Dark ages’ to cover the period from 699 to 1,000 marks our undue concentration on Western Europe... From India to Spain, the brilliant civilization of Islam flourished…To us it seems that West-European civilization is civilization, but this is a narrow view.” [Bertrand Russel in ‘History of Western Philosophy,’ London, 1948, p. 419]

    “The Islamic teachings have left great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behavior, and inspire people with nobility and tolerance. These are human teachings of the highest order and at the same time practicable. These teachings brought into existence a society in which hard-heartedness and collective oppression and injustice were the least as compared with all other societies preceding it....Islam is replete with gentleness, courtesy, and fraternity.” [H.G. Wells.]

    “…Science owes a great deal more to Arab culture (Islam), it owes its existence” [Robert Briffault in the “Making of Humanity”]

    “I have to deplore the systematic manner in which the literature of Europe has continued to put out of sight our obligations to the Muhammadans. Surely they cannot be much longer hidden. Injustice founded on religious rancour and national conceit cannot be perpetuated forever. The Arab has left his intellectual impress on Europe. He has indelibly written it on the heavens as any one may see who reads the names of the stars on a common celestial globe.” [John William Draper in the “Intellectual Development of Europe”]

    “History makes it clear, however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated” [De Lacy O’Leary in ‘Islam at the Crossroads,’ London, 1923]

    “Islam is a religion that is essentially rationalistic in the widest sense of this term…and the dogma of unity of God has always been proclaimed therein with a grandeur a majesty, an invariable purity and with a note of sure conviction, which it is hard to find surpassed outside the pale of Islam....A creed so precise, so stripped of all theological complexities and consequently so accessible to the ordinary understanding might be expected to possess and does indeed possess a marvelous power of winning its way into the consciences of men.” [Edward Montet, ‘La Propagande Chretienne et ses Adversaries Musulmans,’ Paris 1890. (Also in T.W. Arnold in ‘The Preaching of Islam,’ London 1913)]

    Regards

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 12:56 #
  2. mylove-Pakistan
    Member

    http://www.badwanpk.com/ebooks/religion_amazing_quran.pdf

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:02 #
  3. shikra
    Blocked

    Did these Great personalities embrace Islam?
    It was their greatness to appreciate and give a message of mutual Tolerance.
    Did ever any Muslim scholar acknowledged and expressed any good about other Religions?
    Did any good Muslim ever requested the Imam Sahib not to curse and wish 'Death to Infidels' after every Jumma Prayers?

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:37 #
  4. Red-Scorpion
    Blocked

    @Revivalist

    What do you think about following excerpt from G.B.Shaw

    """The apparent multiplicity of Gods is bewildering at the first glance; but you presently discover that they are all the same one God in different aspects and functions and even sexes. There is always one uttermost God who defies personification. This makes Hinduism the most tolerant religion in the world, because its one transcendent God includes all possible Gods… Hinduism is so elastic and so subtle that the profoundest Methodist and the crudest idolater are equally at home in it.
    Islam is very different, being ferociously intolerant. What I may call Manifold Monotheism becomes in the minds of very simple folk an absurdly polytheistic idolatry, just as European peasants not only worship Saints and the Virgin as Gods, but will fight fanatically for their faith in the ugly little black doll who is the Virgin of their own Church against the black doll of the next village. When the Arabs had run this sort of idolatry to such extremes ... they did this without black dolls and worshipped any stone that looked funny, Mahomet rose up at the risk of his life and insulted the stones shockingly, declaring that there is only one God, Allah, the glorious, the great… And there was to be no nonsense about toleration. You accepted Allah or you had your throat cut by someone who did accept him, and who went to Paradise for having sent you to Hell. Mahomet was a great Protestant religious force, like George Fox or Wesley…""

    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Bernard_Shaw

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:40 #
  5. amin1924
    member

    Why are you pasting anti-islam comments, it is against the rules of this forum.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:41 #
  6. msohail83
    Member

    @Red-Scorpion

    Don't push it, OK? Mind your business and leave the Muslims alone, would you? Rubbish!

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:41 #
  7. Revivalist
    member

    RS,
    Any book reference!!!!!

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:42 #
  8. DeadlyHonest
    member

    mods,
    ban the RS for postings anti Islam.....have you any such rule out their??

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:44 #
  9. Revivalist
    member

    Guys what is your take on these;

    “History makes it clear, however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated” [De Lacy O’Leary in ‘Islam at the Crossroads,’ London, 1923]

    “…Science owes a great deal more to Arab culture (Islam), it owes its existence” [Robert Briffault in the “Making of Humanity”]

    “The Islamic teachings have left great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behavior, and inspire people with nobility and tolerance. These are human teachings of the highest order and at the same time practicable. These teachings brought into existence a society in which hard-heartedness and collective oppression and injustice were the least as compared with all other societies preceding it....Islam is replete with gentleness, courtesy, and fraternity.” [H.G. Wells.]

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:44 #
  10. Red-Scorpion
    Blocked

    @Revivalist

    Letter to the Reverend Ensor Walters (1933), as quoted in Bernard Shaw : Collected Letters, 1926-1950 (1988) by Dan H. Laurence, p. 305

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:45 #
  11. amin1924
    member

    Revivalist

    Of course those westerners who sincerely studied/researched history were impressed with Islam!!

    Others just suppressed those facts due to their prejudice against Islam.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:48 #
  12. Revivalist
    member

    RS,

    It is simply unbelievable to see such a stark contradiction in his thinking about the same subject!!! What should we call it??????

    What about the others????

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:49 #
  13. Revivalist
    member

    Just for your information!!!!!

    Amnon Cohen, an American Jewish historian, studied the 16th century documents stored in the archives of the Shari’ah religious court of Jerusalem (commonly known as sijill), whereby he found 1000 Jewish cases filed from the year 1530 to 1601 CE. Cohen published his research in 1994 during which he made some astonishing discoveries, as he himself states:

    ‘Cases concerning Jews cover a very wide spectrum of topics. If we bear in mind that the Jews of Jerusalem had their own separate courts, the number of cases brought to Muslim court (which actually meant putting themselves at the mercy of a judge outside the pale of their communal and religious identity) is quite impressive[1]…The Jews went to the Muslim court for a variety of reasons, but the overwhelming fact was their ongoing and almost permanent presence there. This indicates that they went there not only in search of justice, but did so hoping, or rather knowing, that more often than not they would attain redress when wronged…The Jews went to court to resolve much more than their conflicts with Muslim or Christian neighbours. They turned to Shari’a authorities to seek redress with respect to internal differences, and even in matters within their immediate family (intimate relations between husband and wife, nafaqa maintenance payments to divorcees, support of infants etc.).’[2]

    Cohen further elaborates upon the Jewish condition in the 16th century Ottoman Jerusalem:

    ‘Their possessions were protected, although they might have had to pay for extra protection at night for their houses and commercial properties. Their title deeds and other official documents indicating their rights were honoured when presented to the court, being treated like those of their Muslim neighbours[3]…The picture emerging from the sijill documents is baffling. On the one hand we encounter recurring Sultanic decrees sent to Jerusalem – in response to pleas of the Jews – to the effect that “nothing should be done to stop them from applying their own law” regarding a variety of matters. There are also many explicit references to the overriding importance of applying Shari’a law to them only if they so choose. On the other hand, if we look closely at some of the inheritance lists, we see that the local court allocated to female members of Jewish families half the share given to male members, exactly as in Islamic law. This meant, ipso facto, a significant improvement in the status of Jewish women with respect to legacies over that accorded them by Jewish tradition, although it actually meant the application of Islamic law in an internal Jewish context [4]…he [the Muslim Judge] defended Jewish causes jeopardized by high-handed behaviour of local governors; he enabled Jewish business people and craftsmen to lease properties from Muslim endowments on an equal footing with Muslim bidders; more generally, he respected their rituals and places of worship and guarded them against encroachment even when the perpetrators were other Muslim dignitaries.[5]’

    And finally Amnon Cohen describes the effectiveness of Islamic law for Jewish interests:

    ‘No one interfered with their internal organisation or their external cultural and economic activities…In a world where civil and political equality, or positive social change affecting the group or even the individual were not the norms, the Sultan’s Jewish subjects had no reason to mourn their status or begrudge their conditions of life. The Jews of Ottoman Jerusalem enjoyed religious and administrative autonomy within an Islamic state, and as a constructive, dynamic element of the local economy and society they could – and actually did – contribute to its functioning.’[6]

    [1] Amnon Cohen, A World Within: Jewish Life as Reflected in Muslim Court Documents from the Sijill of Jerusalem (XVIth Century). Part One, 1994, Pennsylvania, p. 8.
    [2] Ibid, p. 17.
    [3] Ibid, p. 18.
    [4] Ibid, p. 20-21.
    [5] Ibid, p. 22.
    [6] Ibid, p. 22-23

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:57 #
  14. Revivalist
    member

    "The rapid success of the Arab invaders was largely due to the welcome they received from the native Christians, who hated the Byzantine rule not only for its oppressive administration, but also - and chiefly - on account of the bitterness of theological rancour. The Jacobites, who formed the majority of the Christian population, had been very roughly handled by the Orthodox adherents of the courts and subjected to indignities that have not been forgotten by their children even to the present day. Some were tortured and then thrown into the sea; many followed their Patriarch into exile to escape from the hands of their persecutors, while a large number disguised their opinions under a pretended acceptance of the Council of Chalcedon."

    The Spread of Islam in the World - A History of Peaceful Preaching. Prof . Thomas Arnold. 2nd Edition. Goodword Books, 2002. p102

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:58 #
  15. Red-Scorpion
    Blocked

    @Revivalist

    Read carefully what B. Russel says about Islam

    Mahommedanism and Bolshevism are practical, social, unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of this world ... What Mahommedanism did for the Arabs, Bolshevism may do for the Russians.
    (Bertrand Russell Memorial Volume, Allen and Unwin, London, 1979, pp. 428-454.)

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:59 #
  16. Revivalist
    member

    The Travelling Poet in 1844: Richard Monckton Milnes on the Qur'an

    "For this purpose, let him first read perseveringly through the Kuran, in any of the good translations Europe possesses, assisting himself by such illustrations and commentaries as may fall in his way. He is not likely to find the occupation attractive first, and he must be content to share the feeling of Goethe, the universal critic, who, after recounting the fabulous stories of Christian and Jewish religion, the amplifications of every kind, the boundless tautologies and repetitions that compose the body of this holy book, describes it as repelling you every time you approach it, then attracting you as you advance, then impressing you with a feeling of astonishment, and at last forcing from you a sense of respect and admiration."

    Richard Monckton Milnes. Palm Leaves. London: Edward Moxon, Dover Street. 1844, p. xii - xiii

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 13:59 #
  17. Revivalist
    member

    Preferring Muslim Rule

    "...Christians preferred Muslim rule to Christian."

    Source: Caliph and their non-Muslim subjects: A critical study of the covenant of Umar. A. S. Tritton. Routledge Library Editions: Islam. 2008, p. 153

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:00 #
  18. Revivalist
    member

    Christian Evidence of the Caliph's Treatment

    "In his [Umar, the 2nd Caliph of Islam] dying charge to his successor he said, 'I charge the Caliph after me to be kind to the Dhimmis [non-Muslims under Islamic protection], to keep their covenant, to protect them, and not to burden them above their strength.'

    There is Christian evidence to support this view. Ishoyabth, who was patriarch from AD 647 to 657, writes, 'The Arabs, to who God gave the dominion over the world, behave to us as you know. They are not hostile to Christianity, but praise our religion, honour priests and saints, and help the Churches and Monastries.'"

    Source: Caliph and their non-Muslim subjects: A critical study of the covenant of Umar. A. S. Tritton. Routledge Library Editions: Islam. 2008, p. 138-139

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:02 #
  19. chechen
    Member

    Revivalist,

    The first point in your post about De Lacy O'Leary can be proven easily by reference to Indonesia, an archipelago of over 5000 islands. During the 12th century few hundred Muslim traders landed on the coastal areas and within few decades the overwhelming population embraced Islam. Not a single Muslim soldier ever went to Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand or Phillipines and yet the largest Muslim country today in population is Indonesia.

    Those traders settled in coastal areas and interacted with the indigenous peoples. Their character and morals were impeccable.They first build the Masjid which became nucleous of their communities unlike the modern dollar or pound hunting immigrants who flock to West and are scatttered in isolated communities far from the masjids and do not present Islam to the locals as it should have been done.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:02 #
  20. Revivalist
    member

    Hugh Blair (1718 - 1800) on Eloquence & the Persuasive Power of the Qur'an

    Hugh Blair, in his Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, considered one of the first great theorists of written discourse gave the following desription of Eloquence:

    "To be truly eloquent, is to speak to the purpose. For the best definition which, I think, can be given to Eloquence, is the Art of Speaking in such a manner as to attain the end for which we speak. Whenever a man speaks or writes, he is supposed, as a rational being, to have some end in view; either to inform, or to amuse, or to persuade, or, in some way or other, to act upon his fellow creatures. He who speaks, or writes, in such a manner as to adapt all his words most effectually to that end, is the most eloquent man. Whatever then the subject be, there is room for Eloquence; in history, or even in Philosophy, as well as orations. The definition which I have given of Eloquence, comprehends all the different kinds to it; whether calculated to instruct, to persuade, or to pleade. But, as the most important subject of discourse is Action, or Conduct, the power of Eloquence chiefly appears when it is employed to influence Conduct, and persuade to Action. As it is principally with reference to this end, that it becomes the object of Art, Eloquence may, under this view of it, be defined, The Art of Persuasion." [1]

    If someone was to take the above, three centuries old, definition of Eloquence, then it can only be concluded that the Qur'an has had an unparalleled history of persuading mankind into action; and therefore must be the most eloquent. This persuasive power of the Qur'an was changing the hearts and minds of many Arabs at the time of revelation, and still does to people of all backrgounds today. Non-Muslim Arabs at that time had realized its power and some had tried to lessen the effect by shouting, clapping, singing and loud chatter while it was recited. Abu-Zahra comments on this reality,

    "The greatest among Muhammad's enemies feared that the Qur'an would have a strong effect on them, while they preferred lack of faith to faith and aberration to right guidance. Thus, they agreed not to listen to this Qur'an. They knew that everyone listening was moved by its solemn expressive force that exceeded human strength. They saw that the people – even great personalities, the notables and mighty - one after another believed it, that Islam grew stronger, that the faithful became more numerous, polytheism became weaker, and their supporters became less." [2]

    [1] Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Letters. Hugh Blair. Vol II, 3rd Edition. London. 1787, p 172-173
    [2] N. Kermani. 2000.The Aesthetic Reception of the Quran as Reflected in Early Muslim History. Curzon Press.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:03 #
  21. Revivalist
    member

    Advice to those Visiting the 'Khaliphate of the West'

    Donald Mackenzie in his book "The Khaliphate of the West", which is a general description of Morocco in the late 19th and early 20th Century, gives the following advice for those who wish to travel to that part of the Muslim world.

    "And on no account should any one disguise himself in Mohammedan clothing or deny being a Christian. The Mohammedans have respect for real Christians, and believe their word...The Arabs estimate the character of strangers by their acts, which they closely watch, and not by their speech, which seldom reveals the real character of man."

    Donald Mackenzie. The Khaliphate of the West. London. 1911, p 53

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:04 #
  22. Revivalist
    member

    A Brief History Of Hadīth Collection And Criticism: A Lecture By Dr. Jonathan Brown

    “I have never been more impressed with anybody in history in my life than with Muslim hadīth scholars. I mean, when I first started studying hadīth I was very skeptical, I though it was all made-up and bogus but the more you study it the more you just appreciate the intense brain power of these people. I mean they memorized thousands and thousands of books and then they were able to recall all the different versions of hadīth from these books, and then they were able to analyze them and put them all together and figure-out where they all connect and make judgments about the authenticity of these hadīth. I mean even nowadays with electronic databases, and computers and word processing, I have hard time following even their discussions of the hadīth - let alone their original mastering that they were drawing on. It's almost unbelievable... It's almost unbelievable, and if you didn't have the books in front of you that they wrote, I wouldn't believe it personally....”

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:06 #
  23. Revivalist
    member

    Due to Total Ignorance

    A French writer, Count Henri Decastri, wrote a book in 1896 entitled ‘Islam' in which he stated:

    ‘I cannot imagine what the Muslims would say if they heard the tales of the mediaeval ages and understood what the Christian orators used to say in their hymns; all our hymns even those which emerged before the 12th century emanated from one concept which was the cause of the crusades, these hymns were filled with hatred towards the Muslims due to the total ignorance of their religion. As a result of those hymns and songs, hatred against that religion became fixed in people's minds, and the erroneous ideas deeply rooted, some of which are still carried nowadays. Everyone used to regard the Muslims as polytheists, disbelievers, idol worshippers and apostates.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:07 #
  24. Revivalist
    member

    Being Honest

    "Every honest Jew who knows the history of his people cannot but feel a deep sense of gratitude to Islam, which has protected the Jews for 50 generations, while the Christian world persecuted the Jews and tried many times 'by the sword' to get them to abandon their faith."

    Uri Avnery, September 27, 2006. An Israeli journalist, who was originally a member of the right wing Revisionist Zionist movement.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:07 #
  25. Revivalist
    member

    Now I want RS etc to refute all these confessions by these none Muslims scholars one by one!!!

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:09 #
  26. amin1924
    member

    Revivalist,

    Dear, he will now use google and paste all anti-islam propaganda here

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:10 #
  27. Red-Scorpion
    Blocked

    @shikra

    """Did these Great personalities embrace Islam?
    It was their greatness to appreciate and give a message of mutual Tolerance.
    Did ever any Muslim scholar acknowledged and expressed any good about other Religions?
    Did any good Muslim ever requested the Imam Sahib not to curse and wish 'Death to Infidels' after every Jumma Prayers? """

    >>>

    Pls let them enjoy praises by Westerners, however it's an irony that when someone quotes western thinkers' comments criticising Islam, these fellows just refuse to digest them :)))

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:11 #
  28. Revivalist
    member

    RS,

    Read both these comments and tell me about your conclusion???

    Read carefully what B. Russel says about Islam
    Mahommedanism and Bolshevism are practical, social, unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of this world ... What Mahommedanism did for the Arabs, Bolshevism may do for the Russians.
    (Bertrand Russell Memorial Volume, Allen and Unwin, London, 1979, pp. 428-454.)

    “Our use of phrase ‘The Dark ages’ to cover the period from 699 to 1,000 marks our undue concentration on Western Europe... From India to Spain, the brilliant civilization of Islam flourished…To us it seems that West-European civilization is civilization, but this is a narrow view.” [Bertrand Russel in ‘History of Western Philosophy,’ London, 1948, p. 419]

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:11 #
  29. Red-Scorpion
    Blocked

    @Revivalist

    """Now I want RS etc to refute all these confessions by these none Muslims scholars one by one!!! """

    >>>

    I'm not going to waste my time in google-search as I know for sure that my comments will be deleted :))

    If you guys are really looking for those 'nice' comments then just google-search and see what you find !

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:14 #
  30. Red-Scorpion
    Blocked

    @Revivalist

    Do you know about 'Bolshevism' ??
    Check and then read again Russel's comments !

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:15 #
  31. shikra
    Blocked

    Dear JJ Khan, DeadlyHonest, Msohail83,

    Revivalist, Chechan and Red-Scorpion are involved in a very positive, literary and intellectual debate.
    Just look at the books quoted and references which shows their intellectual capability.
    Please let the debate continue and let them discuss without any interruption if you don't want to contribute with references.
    Proposition should be killed with arguments and not through a negative weapon of threats.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:20 #
  32. Revivalist
    member

    RS,

    You always contradict your self! You were the person who asked me what benefit Islam brought to this world and you also said that what you are quoting may not be acceptable for other. In response to this I have quoted all these none Muslim scholars to prove my point, that even the none Muslim scholars have accepted the contribution of Islam to the humanity, but you guys are not ready to digest it!!!!

    Besides, there are many people who know the reality and the truth but there are many things that stops him from accepting it, and you guys know it better!!!!

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:20 #
  33. Revivalist
    member

    A poem of the past

    The Famous Medieval Jewish Sage and Poet Abraham Ibn Ezra wrote:

    The Muslims sing of love and of passion
    The Christians of war and revenge
    The Greeks of wisdom and devices
    The Indians of parables and riddles
    And the Israelites - songs and praises to the Lord of the Hosts

    Trans. B. Lewis, Music of a Distant Drum (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), p. 193

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:25 #
  34. Revivalist
    member

    American Gangster

    "We have 50% of the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of its population. In this situation, our real job in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which permit us to maintain this position of disparity. To do so, we have to dispense with all sentimentality...we should cease thinking about human rights, the raising of living standards and democratisation."

    George Kennan, US Cold War Planner, 1948

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:30 #
  35. Revivalist
    member

    History Repeats Itself?

    "Of all the world's greatest men none has been so much maligned as Muhammad. It is easy to see how this has come about. For centuries Islam was the great enemy of Christendom, for Christendom was in direct contact with no other organized states comparable in power to the Muslims. The Byzantine empire, after losing its provinces in Syria and Egypt, was being attacked in Asia Minor, while Western Europe was threatened through Spain and Sicily. Even before the Crusades focused attention on the expulsion of the Sarcens from the Holy Land, medieval war-propaganda, free from the restraints of factuality was building up a conception of 'the great enemy'. At one point Muhammad was transformed into Mahound, the prince of darkness. By the eleventh century the idea about Islam and Muslims current in the crusading armies were such travesties that they had a bad effect on morale. The crusaders had been led to expect the worst of their enemies, and, when they found many chivalrous knights among them, they were filled with distrust for the authorities of their own religion."*

    Orientalist W Montgomery Watt

    * W Montgomery Watt, Muhammad At Medina, 1956, Oxford At The Clarendon Press, p. 324.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:34 #
  36. Revivalist
    member

    Placing Reason Above Blind Faith

    "Since arriving at an age of discretion, the beauty and the simple purity of Islam have always appealed to me. I could never, though born and brought up as a Christian, believe in the dogmatic aspect of the Church, and have always placed reason and commonsense above blind faith."

    Sir Abdullah Archibald Hamilton Bart, formerly Sir Charles Edward Archibald Watkins Hamilton, embraced Islam on 20th December 1923. A well-known English statesman, fifth baronet of the first (1770) and third baronet of the second creation (1819) Sir Abdullah was born on 10th December 1876. He was a Lieutinent in the Royal Defence Corp. and was also the President of the Selsy Conservative Association.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 14:35 #
  37. shahzad1924
    member

    PEOPLE !!!!!!

    why are you wasting time on RS??

    he is a time waster.

    just ignore him.

    Posted 2 years ago on 18 Aug 2009 23:23 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.