PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Racism

(17 posts)
  1. Shock
    Members

    The New Face of Racism
    By: Nadeem Fareed Paracha

    The common typecast of a racist is a fat, white man hurling abuses at ‘niggers,’ ‘Pakis,’ Jews, and gay people. Whereas once communists too figured on the hate list of white supremacists, they have now largely been replaced with Arabs. By Arabs, of course, these racists mean Muslims.

    Thanks to organisations like the Ku Klux Klan, the British National Party and groups associated with what is called neo-Nazism, such racists are now sitting ducks. In fact, if one sees a parade of neo-Nazis or a Ku Klux Klan member today, these groups, with their silly looking hoods, costumes, and salutes, look no more than parodies and caricatures of the stereotypical racist.

    Theirs is a racism that has become a costume drama, largely harmless. This is especially due to the way western security agencies have dealt with these organisations and also because of the evolving success of the civil rights movement and its many revolutionary initiatives since the 1950s.

    However, political, economic and cultural disturbances perpetuated by neo-liberal economics and politics in the last many years are now dragging out a form of racism that has absolutely nothing to do with white power as such. It is not coming from loud white folks. On the contrary, and ironically, it is mostly coming from some of the races and creeds that have historically been under the hammer of white man’s racism: Jews, Muslims, and Asians.

    One must also remember that this racism is not really a new invention. It’s been there, strongly engrained in the minds and sociology of its perpetuators for many years. However, it is only now that we have started seeing it raising its ugly head from the depths and cultural undercurrents that it has been brewing in, unchallenged and unquestioned.

    The most obvious has been the anti-Arab racism practiced as a state policy by Israel. Its political make-up has always been starkly evident, but it is the way this political policy has gradually shaped the social and psychological mindset of the Jews living in Israel that is worrying. Israeli politicians are very conscious of this mindset and the hold it now has over the majority of Jews living in Israel and elsewhere. That’s why every time an opportunity is afoot for a peaceful settlement between Israel and the Palestinians, this anti-Arab mindset deforms the Israeli response.

    It is also this mindset that makes a majority of Israelis vote for men and women who want to continue with Israel’s barbaric raids and incursions into poverty-stricken lands populated by dispossessed Palestinians, and then look towards rigid political myopia and the construction of walls in the face of counterattacks by Palestinian insurgents. It was this mindset that violently ended the most promising deal between Israel and the Palestinians in 1995, when an incensed radical Jew assassinated former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin after he had signed a breakthrough deal with Yasser Arafat.

    Further down the undercurrent of this racism lies a form of bigotry that has been part of India and Pakistan’s sociology long before they were two separate countries. It is deeply rooted in India’s ancient caste system, part of which then influenced social relationships between native Hindus and Muslim settlers in the subcontinent. It is a racism exercised by not one perpetuator over the other, but by both. Now hundreds of years old, even to this day, many Hindus and Muslims living in India do not eat from the same plate or drink from the same glass. Both of them classify the other as sub-human.

    The most disturbing aspect of this form of racism is the way it is blindly accepted as a matter-of-fact social norm. For example, many offices in India still hire Muslims and the ‘untouchables’ to do the most demeaning chores, and it is an unwritten rule that these employees are not allowed to use cutlery that is being used by other office employees. In Pakistan, such treatment is meted out by Muslims to ‘underclass’ Hindus and Christians. It is an understood rule that they will not be allowed to share cutlery used by their Muslim counterparts and neither will they be allowed to prepare and serve tea or food to their Muslim co-workers.

    Even though due to the legacy of the caste system in India, a Hindu discriminating against another Hindu is a well-known social reality. But this nature of racism has not been alien to Pakistani Muslims either. It is as old as Muslim history in the subcontinent, and today it is still alive in even the most educated Muslim households in Pakistan as well.

    Domestic servants in Pakistan, even if they are Muslims, will always have separate cutlery. They will have a separate glass, plate, spoons and are always required to sit on the floor. Some believe such actions are mainly due to the ‘unhygienic’ make-up of the class of people who become servants. This may have a grain of truth, but it is obvious that basically this bigotry is yet another expression of the historical racism practiced between Muslims and Hindus of the subcontinent. It has more to do with a deeply engrained and inherent racist mindset that many Muslims and Hindus of the region, sometimes instinctively, have carried into the modern age.

    Recently out of such inherent cultural and social racist tendencies, a more conventional form of racism has emerged in India and Pakistan as well. In 2007, Australian cricket captain, Ricky Ponting, complained about some Indian spectators who let out monkey noises at the Australian team’s only aborigine player, Andrew Symonds. If this wasn’t bad enough, the very next day, the South African cricket captain, Gerham Smith, accused a bunch of Pakistani spectators of making ape sounds at some of the South African squad’s black players.

    Can you imagine ‘brown’ Asians hurling trashy racist taunts at blacks? This may seem outlandish, but if one closely looks at the class make-up of the racist pretenders, one understands their stupidity. A bulk of them (both the Indian and Pakistani batches), were from well-to-do, middle-class backgrounds. It is this section of the bourgeoisie that has benefited the most from the no-holds-barred, neo-liberal capitalist initiatives in both countries. They are a warped cross between social liberalism and orthodox religious and political conservatism. Perhaps this is why, this class is also known to back quasi-fascist parties like the BJP in India, and the prejudiced nouveau-rich setups in urban Pakistan, most of whom are known to support equally warped conservative characters which we can now see so often on popular television.

    In this day and age when material wealth is the main indicator of cultural and social trends (through advertising and the eventual ‘dumbing down’ of trendsetting cultural pursuits), this is a worrying matter. Many will conveniently miss the irony and the self-inflicting comedy associated with the act of Indians and Pakistanis being racist towards blacks. Instead, they will think of it as something to do with ‘patriotism’ or worse, Islam and/or Hinduism.

    It needs to be stubbed out at once, before this too becomes part of the contradictory set of racist mindsets already deeply embedded in the people of the subcontinent. It is a case of victims of racism not only becoming racist themselves, but becoming something even worse by cleverly decorating this nauseous frame of mind with distorted religious declarations sometimes in the name of Hindutva and sometimes Ghazwa-ul-Hind.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 19:06 #
  2. Shock
    Members

    We don't like India not because of its treatment to Kashmir, but because it is a Hindu country. Same goes for Israel as it is a Jewish country. Otherwise we can find examples of theses attrocities around the world, and even within our own country.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 19:11 #
  3. netengr
    blocked

    why I am not able to post?

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 20:48 #
  4. It is like second nature in our society. We tease people who have dark complexions even in Pakistan. We spend money on products which will make one less darker or fairer. Our mothers and sisters want a "gori chitti" bahu or bhabhi. Who is going to address them?

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 21:56 #
  5. Shock
    Members

    @Jalali

    Racism exist everywhere with all kinds of people. Skin color is one aspect of racism. We just love demonizing west for being racist without even looking within ourselves.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Dec 2009 22:51 #
  6. Racial prejudice is a hidden disease.

    The Western Civilized Fabric has successfully controlled this social problem through Legislation at internal level and through economic competition at International level as a Nation.
    To ridicule, humiliate or discriminate a person or a class on the bases of race, religion, caste, creed, sex, ethnicity and disability is a crime.
    Unfortunately, in Pakistan, we were never educated to practice the virtue of tolerance, to avoid loose talk and racial remarks.

    Posted 2 years ago on 25 Dec 2009 0:06 #
  7. toamin
    member

    It is quite strange to see Nadeem EFFF Paracha writing about racism against Muslims!

    wow, what has happened to this guy?

    Posted 2 years ago on 25 Dec 2009 3:35 #
  8. Shock
    Members

    @JJ khan

    I was surprised too. But that is not the only kind of racism that he touched upon. The point that he was trying to convey is that west is less racist compared to people living in South Asia.

    Posted 2 years ago on 25 Dec 2009 21:37 #
  9. Migel9
    Member

    Latest racism by the tiny colonialist terror entity.
    Brutalities of Jewish Zionists continue against Palestinian Muslims while the Muslim Ummah is silent.We want beace as priscribed by our LORD AMERICA MUSLIM DALAL SLAVE AGENT RULERS.

    “Israeli soldiers have shot dead six Palestinians and left a seventh one wounded in separate incidents in the West Bank and the north of the Gaza Strip. According to a Palestinian medical source, three Palestinians were killed in northern Gaza as they were on their way to cross over a wall to work in Israel on Saturday.”West supplied 39 billion
    in weaponery to the savages of South Asia in the name of jesus and rascism..Lol what a joke by these brown slave writers with their masters accents.

    Posted 2 years ago on 27 Dec 2009 14:16 #
  10. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    @Shock: Bring back Pakistan's money from abroad, spend it on Pakistani people and then we'll see, what nation is racist.

    Posted 2 years ago on 27 Dec 2009 14:23 #
  11. Debates over the origins of racism often suffer from a lack of clarity over the term. Many conflate recent forms of racism with earlier forms of ethnic and national conflict.

    In most cases ethno-national conflict seems to owe to conflict over land and strategic resources. In some cases ethnicity and nationalism were harnessed to wars between great religious empires (for example, the Muslim Turks and the Catholic Austro-Hungarians). As Benedict Anderson has suggested in Imagined Communities, ethnic identity and ethno-nationalism became a source of conflict within such empires with the rise of print-capitalism.

    In its modern form, racism evolved in tandem with European exploration and conquest of much of the rest of the world, and especially after Christopher Columbus reached the Americas. As new peoples were encountered, fought, and ultimately subdued, theories about “race” began to develop, and these helped many to justify the differences in position and treatment of people whom they categorized as belonging to different races (see Eric Wolf’s Europe and the People Without History).

    Another possible source of racism is the misunderstanding of Charles Darwin’s theories of evolution. Some took Darwin’s theories to imply that since some “races” were more civilized, there must be a biological basis for the difference. At the same time they appealed to biological theories of moral and intellectual traits to justify racial oppression. There is a great deal of controversy about race and intelligence, in part because the concepts of both race and IQ are themselves controversial.

    — Racism, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, May 1, 2004

    Above was what the West describes as racism. Nonsense!

    Now what Mr Paracha has highlighted, has more to do with occupational discrimination and inherited caste system as a gift from living alongside Hindus from a very long time.

    Posted 2 years ago on 27 Dec 2009 22:26 #
  12. sasherwani
    Members

    I have travelled a lot and from my own personal experience and interaction with different cultures, the world's most racist people are:

    1. GCC Arabs (specifically the Saudis and Kuwaitis)
    2. Indians
    3. Pakistanis
    4. Palestinians
    5. Israelis

    Posted 2 years ago on 28 Dec 2009 4:53 #
  13. Adonis
    Member

    Debating seriously, something written by Nadeem Farooq Paracha?

    Funny !!!!!

    Most of the time the **** is so stoned he can hardly tell his *** from his head.

    Posted 2 years ago on 28 Dec 2009 8:50 #
  14. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    I agree with Adonis here. Looking at writings of Nadeem Farooq Paracha, I can tell his childish behavior, his lack of knowledge, lack of grasp on issues.

    Posted 2 years ago on 28 Dec 2009 8:52 #
  15. BaliMA
    Member

    wah bhie wah yahan per tu saab literary critic jama ho gaie hain aur review pass kar rehain hain. Jisay baat karna nahie atie woh books review kar reha haie.

    Posted 2 years ago on 28 Dec 2009 10:51 #
  16. sasherwani
    Members

    @ Adonis,

    NFP is a bozo but this was a good article by the stonner.

    Posted 2 years ago on 28 Dec 2009 10:58 #
  17. jaypk
    Member

    @balima...you got me there mate....ritely so.....none of us has even written and published a small level book fr that matter..and look at the critiques...!!

    Posted 2 years ago on 07 Jan 2010 16:00 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.