"If someone wants to learn from history, try this “Punjab aur Beruni Hamlah Awar [Urdu]”
-See what inclusion brings to art, poetry and harmony vs.
-Will history repeat by people of north by looting their fellow Muslims in south"
I haven't read this book So cant blame or claim anything. But By reading these and other points in that post I would like to share my take on this.
To me its a comparison to show that East and South was always tending towards 'inclusion','poetry',harmony', 'peace' and 'sharing' while the North West was always 'barbaric' ,'looter','murderer','seclusive' and 'en-slaver'
Is that really so? Whats the background of Bullay Shah? Where Ali Hajvairi came from (famous for "Daata ki nagri")? Who called Ahmed shah Abdali from North and was it for "looting their fellow Muslims" in East and south? Why not talk about Kashmir just next to south and in East? Were they the looters from the North and West who looted their fellow muslims in there? What about the mughals? Were they the looters too? How about the same North and West when the russians were marching towards East and South? Would you still call the North West of "Looter",Barbaric and "cruel" in Origin?
My Dear You can write as many books as you want but its not gonna change the Facts!!!!!!
This attempt to re-write or revise history gonna be failed!
Cause People know what happend and you are not the only one of those people.
:)
ps.Qoutes are from
http://pkpolitics.com/discuss/topic/pkpolitics-book-club
ps1.The money we are getting from west is not that much to re-write and change everything that could be called our Heritage as a nation.And if you talk about regional History then why have a take in that fashion? Why not be 'harmonious' and 'peace lover' and try to express it in a positive way?
ps2. In ten years time they(Northern) became looters and barbarians while for a thousand years they were Liberators?
