PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Rethinking Afghanistan

(20 posts)
  1. The Islamic Emirate Of Afghanistan:

    Rethinking Afghanistan

    Shaaban 25, 1432 A.H, Thursday, July 28, 2011

    In the Name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful

    According to the official figures of Pentagon, 1680 American soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan so far. Other Allied invading forces have lost 928 soldiers. However, unofficial estimate is manifold higher than these. Furthermore, America spends $100 billion in Afghanistan annually, to continue the war against the Mujahideen.

    The total cost of the war in the past decade in Iraq and Afghanistan, including the loans taken by Washington and the interests incurred, come to the tune of $5 trillion. The American headlong descent into the financial melt-down does not stop here. It is still exacerbating as the time goes by. But the question remains, is America more powerful than when she was in 2001, at the time of invasion of Afghanistan? Is she enjoys the same status and respect at world level as advocate of human rights as she enjoyed a decade ago, in 2001? Obviously, after the gross human rights violations by American interrogators in Abu Gharib, Guan Tanamo and Bagram jails against miserable and defenseless detainees; the drone attacks and the nights raids by the invading American troops in which thousands of innocent men and women have lost their lives, no one will be ready to call America as protector of human rights and other precious values of civilization. Then what America has gained from her adventure of invading Afghanistan? The pundits in Washington must re-consider this point. Furthermore, they have imposed a corrupt government on the people of Afghanistan. The former warlords who have hold on the government, grip billions of dollars in corruption annually and send the bucks abroad through the Kabul airport and other clandestine bank accounts.

    Common people are not able to get their legal grievance redressed. Instead, they take their cases to courts set up by the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan parallel to those of the Kabul Administration. There, they get justice in a few days rather than waiting for years. That too without losing time and money in form of corruption. Still another question arises, are the neighboring countries of Afghanistan more secure and stable today than they were in 2001, at the time of the reign of the Islamic Emirate? Certainly not. The ground realities are before all. The American invasion of Afghanistan has foisted its portion of anarchy and blight on every neighbor. The more this war continues, the more every one will suffer; the invaders presence in Afghanistan will add to chaos, uprisings and disintegration in some regional countries. Likewise, the more the Americans are intent on denying the Afghans their right of independence, the more their debts and casualties will keep spiraling up.

    So is there any eagerness to solve these problems?

    Surely, if there is willingness, the Afghan imbroglio will come to an end but:

    -- First of all, the main actors should stop the blame-game of calling the Mujahideen as terrorists. The so-called war on terrorism should not be used as a clout for colonialist expansionism in Afghanistan or in the region.

    -- The Afghans should be given their right of independence as enshrined in the UN Charter.

    -- The Islamic Emirate should be recognized as a political and military power as it has already proved in the past ten years. It should be provided conducive and normal scope to play its role in peace and stability of Afghanistan, the region and the world.

    -- The Afghans should be given their right of self-determination to form an Islamic government as per the aspirations of the people of Afghanistan.

    -- The Americans and all foreign invading forces should seek a face-saving exit from Afghanistan in understanding with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

    -- The regional countries should create an environment of cooperation and trust with the Islamic Emirate based on common grounds of national interests of all neighbors.

    -- As a responsible party and as a proven military and political force, the Islamic Emirate will abide by its commitments to stability of the region following the withdrawal of foreign forces from Afghanistan.

    The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

    http://theunjustmedia.com/Afghanistan/Statements/July11/Rethinking%20Afghanistan.htm

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 9:21 #
  2. gv
    Member

    does anyone here what an emirate is??????

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 9:29 #
  3. shafiq12
    member

    The war which american and its allies has invaded against muslims/islam, Will Soon Be at an End at their blood--

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 10:07 #
  4. gv, could you be a bit more explicit, please? What should be heard? I mainly hear the voice of reason in the AR's statement. So what struck you as so outlandish? Or did you perhaps mean: the voice of the coming government of Afghanistan?

    oblivion, absolutely. I agree with you.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 10:20 #
  5. gv, and a request to you, please, as well. There's a thread here beginning with the word Wikileaks. If you have a minute, would you read through it and tell us what you think of it? Thanks in advance,

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 10:25 #
  6. Mirza Ghalib, Sir have no fears

    Insha’Allah, Afghans first fighting against the colonials, then communists and now the neocons will have their wish fulfilled as Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 10:27 #
  7. Mirza Sahib, thanks. You have summed up the essence of recent Afghan history in just one sentence.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 11:24 #
  8. scandinavian
    Member

    @S.E.M. & MG

    And we want a friendly Afghanistan who takes care of it's own people and take dictation from nobody i.e. an INDEPENDENT country!

    Why people get so worried, when the counter an Islamic term?

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 11:28 #
  9. zahid.ali
    Member

    The website also contains dead images of Pakistan soldiers why don't you post that Ghalib Shahib

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 11:30 #
  10. shafiq12
    member

    Zahid

    Mirza Ghalib tried to neglect those images in the name of his patriotism.......

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 11:43 #
  11. @Scandinavian
    Sure, we do want a friendly Afghanistan who takes care of it's own people and hopefully refuses to take dictation from any other nation against the Muslim world. Just what it did by providing an assassin to CIA for the murder of Liaqat Ali Khan.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 11:58 #
  12. No, neither, dear Oblivion, dear Zahid. At the speed at which I work, I had no time to look at "images" nor the know-how to post them. Patriotic, I may be. Dishonest as a rule, no.

    So who says Afghanistan is not going to be friendly to Pakistan? Is that how the AR text was interpreted? OK, you recognise us, west, and we in return will break up Pakistan for you? If that is the deal they are proposing, which I doubt very much, it will come to naught, according to me. I don't see Pakistan breaking up and neither do I see the west installed comfortably next door for the rest of their days. The AR is simply a size too big for the west to handle. I suppose, in the final analysis, it's something to do with their God-given role in this world.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 12:03 #
  13. scandinavian
    Member

    @S.E.M

    "Just what it did by providing an assassin to CIA for the murder of Liaqat Ali Khan."

    I had no idea it was Afghans who did this. Any reference?

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 12:04 #
  14. The assassin of the Liaquat Ali Khan was identified as Saed Akbar, son of Babrak, caste Aparkhel Jadran, an Afghan national of Khost in Afghanistan..- Statement issued by the Pakistani government on October 17th, 1951

    There is a lot more including declassfied corresspondence among American Embassies from India, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 12:16 #
  15. gv
    Member

    @mg
    An emir-ate is the domain of an emir - a king-dom

    Seems a bit foolish to be fighting to exchange one yoke for another

    @scandi

    emirate is not an islamic term - it is an arabic term - genius

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 12:25 #
  16. The term democracy was trimmed, polished and introduced in the Muslim world by the colonials, after fall of Turkey when kamal attaturk was favoured to rule. Much of Europe was known as kingdoms including the british, portugese, spaniards and others who had ruled americas, australia, newzeland, India, Africa and the Middle East as their colonies.
    This was done on purpose cuz democracy is flawed and easy to manipulate by former kingdoms/colonials.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 12:35 #
  17. gv, thanks. Put that way, I see your point. Indeed it would be foolish to exchange one yoke for another. Except that, I don't know why I'm the only one to see it this way, "democracy" is not the answer either. For me, it exists nowhere in the world today, if it ever existed at all in the annals of history. And it's the most manipulative of systems. So that would be as much of a yoke as an emirate in my eyes. We humans must give up on "freedom" for the moment and accept relatively good governance, if at all possible, instead.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 12:55 #
  18. gv
    Member

    @mg

    i am all for good governance.. 'freedom' is not the operative word here... sustainability is...

    hereditary rule is not sustainable... history has proven that..

    Neither is oligarchic rule where a tiny coterie of the power elite select the rulers.. i.e. Russia/China

    So you tell me what is the way forward?

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 14:18 #
  19. I agree sustainibility is always best in any walk of life. gv. if only I knew what the ideal system was. I have no idea. Except that, whatever the system, full justice must reign. And that, alas, is nowhere the case at the present time. So, to sum up my meaning, monarchy is not my favourite system by any means but oligarchy which passes itself off as a democracy - the case in all existing democratic states - is no answer to the problem either. So, as things stand, I feel Afghanistan should go ahead and experiment with their system of government. I doubt they'll manage much worse than what we have aleady seen elsewhere.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 16:53 #
  20. @Mirza Ghalib

    whatever the system, full justice must reign

    Very well said brother.

    Posted 10 months ago on 29 Jul 2011 22:25 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.