PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Ron Paul Attacks “Regime Change” Bill

(9 posts)
  1. Statement on H.R. 515, the Belarus Democracy Reauthorization Act of 2011
    Ron Paul
    July 8, 2011
    Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the “Belarus Democracy Act” reauthorization. This title of this bill would have amused George Orwell, as it is in fact a US regime-change bill. Where does the United States Congress derive the moral or legal authority to determine which political parties or organizations in Belarus — or anywhere else — are to be US-funded and which are to be destabilized? How can anyone argue that US support for regime-change in Belarus is somehow “promoting democracy”? We pick the parties who are to be supported and funded and somehow this is supposed to reflect the will of the Belarusian people? How would Americans feel if the tables were turned and a powerful foreign country demanded that only a political party it selected and funded could legitimately reflect the will of the American people?

    I would like to know how many millions of taxpayer dollars the US government has wasted trying to overthrow the government in Belarus. I would like to know how much money has been squandered by US government-funded front organizations like the National Endowment for Democracy, the International Republican Institute, Freedom House, and others meddling like the old Soviet Union in the internal politics of a country that has neither threatened nor attacked the United States. It is the arrogance of our foreign policy establishment that leads to this kind of schizophrenic legislation, where we demand that the rest of the world bend to the will of US foreign policy and we call it “democracy.” We wonder why we are no longer loved and admired overseas.

    Finally, I strongly object to the sanctions that this legislation imposes on Belarus. We must keep in mind that sanctions and blockades of foreign countries are considered acts of war. Do we need to continue war-like actions against yet another country? Can we afford it?

    I wish to emphasize that I take this position not because I am in support of the regime in Belarus, or anywhere else. I take this position because it is dangerous folly to be the nation that arrogates to itself the right to determine the leadership of the rest of the world. As we teeter closer to bankruptcy, it should be more obvious that we need to change our foreign policy to one of constructive engagement rather than hostile interventionism.

    And though it scarcely should need to be said, I must remind my colleagues today that we are the U.S. House of Representatives, and not some sort of world congress. We have no constitutional authority to intervene in the wholly domestic affairs of Belarus or any other sovereign nation.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-attacks-regime-change-bill.html

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 7:57 #
  2. Ron Paul, one of the rare voices of sanity in a US overtaken by lunacy. This short speech of his has extensive dimensions. It will enter the history books and be quoted on many an occasion in years to come.

    If anyone has given "democracy" a bad name, it is indeed US and its allies. But then the west has turned into a vast lunatic asylum. It has killed so many Muslims of late on the basis of lie after lie, it no longer knows what reality means. It has swallowed its own lies.

    If Ron Paul ever did become the next president of the US, a remote possibility, but wonders do occur at times, overnight the world would turn into a better place. The US army would cease to be the policemen of the world, the US House of Representatives, the World Congress and the US currency the fictive reserve currency used in country-to-country dealings. In a word, peace might well return to nations bleeding and bowed under the weight of unending war.

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 8:36 #
  3. He is in fact a sane voice and his speech above will be remembered and quoted from the history books. Wish we had some like him from our side to stand up bold against tyranny going on strong within Pakistan.

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 8:50 #
  4. We may well do, Mirza Sahib, only we haven't yet learnt to recognise them at their true worth. I'm thinking of Imran Khan or then Shah Mahmood Qureshi. And there are others as well. The time of the honest and the bold in Pakistani politics is approaching with greater speed than many of us realise at the moment.

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 9:25 #
  5. sadaekashmir
    Member

    A bit confused over here. Two Mirza Sahabs is a good omen. SEmirza sounds a patriot and Mirza Ghalib Sahib is all the same.
    Three are the most prominent for a new leadership. Imran, Marvi and Shah Mahmood Qureshi. Lets hope they get together on one platform to lead us.

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 9:35 #
  6. naseemkhanan
    Member

    Imran Khan and Marwi Memon merger is possible. SMQ is a hardcored PPP.

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 9:50 #
  7. Ron Paul brought up something very interesting as affirmative.
    USA is deeply involved in destablization of or at least blackmailing governments, all over the world.

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 10:19 #
  8. Ron Paul committed the ultimate crime for a NWO politician (include our own in this group): He dared to speak the truth. We poor benighted bloggers have been murmuring this for years now: the west (US is not alone involved in this story. All west allies are): Yes, the west is out to get the entire world, destabilising where they can, blackmailing if that fails and, if both fail, outright war.

    I agree with Sada-e-Kashmir above. The three names he mentions are definitely going to figure in the forthcoming government of Pakistan. Quereshi was PPP. I think he's now been driven too far to return to the fold.

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 12:03 #
  9. Just_one
    Member

    There is absolutely no comparison between Imran Khan and the rest of two mentioned.

    This is not the thread to go into detail.

    Yes here, Imran Khan is the voice of sanity very similar to people like Ron Paul and Chomsky.

    I have always though of Imran's views as very much similar to that Chomsky, minus the intellectual tag.

    One thing is to be kept in mind that statements from men like Ron Paul and others are appealing to people here because they are criticizing themselves and seeing their own faults.

    Here in Pakistan, we need to encourage the same. Thus I admired Imran Khan because he talked bravely against attacks in tribal areas by our own forces, amendments in blasphemy laws, supported official apology to Bangladesh for crimes in East Pakistan committed by our army, have vowed to reverse our foreign policy of supporting militants in Kashmir or Afghanistan, etc. This is in addition to his usual stance on corruption and other internal issues.

    Posted 10 months ago on 09 Jul 2011 12:21 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.