PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Soldiers on Sale... Who’s In Charge of These Hired Killers?

(21 posts)
  1. Migel9
    Member

    fascinating scandal has erupted in Washington over the use of mercenaries (‘private contractors’ in US terminology) that is exposing the dark underbelly of America’s foreign wars. It has been that the Pentagon and other US intelligence agencies secretly fielded mercenaries in Afghanistan, Pakistan (aka “Af-Pak”), and Iraq to assassinate tribal militants.

    US law forbids murder or using mercenaries. But, as the Roman jurist Cicero said, “laws are silent in times of war.”

    A former senior Pentagon official specialising in clandestine operations, Mike Furlong, set up a shell company, International Media Ventures (IMV), to supposedly provide the US military with “cultural information” about Afghanistan’s Pashtun tribes. Two obscure Pentagon outfits, the “Cultural Engineering Group” in Florida, and “Counter-Narco-terrorism Technology Programme” of Virginia funded Furlong with $24.6 million. Furlong hired a bunch of former Special Forces types and assorted thugs. These rent-a-Rambos’s real mission was to assassinate Pashtun leaders in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and target tribal compounds for strikes by US Predator drones. Welcome to the modern version of the Mafia’s infamous contract killers, “Murder Inc.”

    Thickening this plot, retired CIA types, including the flamboyant Dewey Clarridge, whom I well recall from the 1980’s Afghan war, were involved. So were other would-be bounty-hunters, eager to cash in one the Pentagon’s cash bonanza. It is uncertain if Furlong’s Murder Inc had time to go operational. But its exposure is causing uproar. In best US government tradition, the Pentagon denied backing Furlong and cut him adrift. He is now under criminal investigation. Shades of former CIA agent Edwin Wilson, whose frightful case I long followed. Wilson was set up as a deniable “independent” by CIA to supply arms and explosives to Libya and Angola in the 1980’s. When this intrigue blew wide open, Wilson was kidnapped by US agents and buried alive in federal prison for 27 years.

    The Furlong scandal comes at a time of growing criticism of the US government’s use of over 275,000 mercenaries in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. These hired gunmen and logistics personnel operate without any accountability, legal structure, or oversight. Lack of command and control of such free-lancers infuriates traditional military men, who detest US Special Forces and these hired gunmen as ‘cowboys.’

    It certainly is no way to win over Muslim hearts and minds.

    Private mercenary firms like Xe (formerly Blackwater) and DynCorp have raked in fortunes running private armies for the US. They are major donors to the far right of the Republican Party. Deeply worried civil libertarians call these private armies potential Brownshirts, after the Nazi Party’s private army in the late 1920’s.

    Amazingly, US Special Forces in Af-Pak have not until this month been under the control of supreme commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal. They apparently reported to his rival, Central Command chief Gen. David Petraeus in Tampa, Florida.

    To the Pentagons’s anger, CIA runs its own killer paramilitary units and drone assassination operations, 90 per cent of whose victims are civilians, according to Pakistani media investigations. CIA’s paramilitaries report only to HQ in Langley —which does not talk to the Pentagon. Pakistan’s feeble government is not even informed in advance of Predator strikes and assassinations on its own territory. How many of the 15 other US intelligence agencies and NATO forces are running their own little illegal private armies? US mercenaries are responsible for a growing number of civilian deaths. It’s only a matter of time before all these cowboys begin shooting at one another. Reliable sources in Pakistan report that US-paid mercenaries are staging bombings there and in Afghanistan in an attempt to incite popular anger against Islamic or tribal militants, and draw Pakistan’s army deep into the fray.

    Washington brands all Al Qaeda and Taleban “illegal combatants,” denying them due process of law and the Geneva Convention’s prisoner protections. Murdering or torturing such “terrorists,” says Washington, is lawful. So what about all the US mercenary Rambos running amok, who wear no uniform, kill at will, and have no legal oversight and, as we saw in Iraq, get away with murder?

    Eric Margolis

    Posted 2 years ago on 23 Mar 2010 20:07 #
  2. Hello, there Miguel. Welcome back. Good article by Margolis.

    Posted 2 years ago on 23 Mar 2010 20:15 #
  3. Migel9
    Member

    Thanks..you I make people nervous.lol

    People with an higher IQ can understand the situation in all
    Muslim countries.Brown Dallal guarding resources of muslims for their white jewish chritians masters from the west. Making idiotic speeches from their london flats with bad english.lol..

    Posted 2 years ago on 23 Mar 2010 20:28 #
  4. aftab arif
    Member

    Mercenaries who operate covertly are a problem no doubt but what of US Air force who bomb weddings in broad day light and kill dozens at a time but we don't see any accountability and it happens over and over again.

    The moral(or not so moral)of the story is that might is right.

    Posted 2 years ago on 23 Mar 2010 20:31 #
  5. Migel9
    Member

    The moral(or not so moral)of the story is that might is right.

    Above statement applies to brown slaves.On the other hand
    Afghan mujahids are teaching these coward rapist american
    british soldiers a great lesson, in how to fight.

    I ssociate MIGHT WITH ALLAH NOT WITH AMREEKAA OR THE DEPUTY POODLE COLONIALIST PIG UK.Lol

    Posted 2 years ago on 23 Mar 2010 20:50 #
  6. Migel, let's go and irritate the Brown Dallal every chance we get. As for their Jewish Christian masters, their days are numbered too, guaranteed.

    aftab - alas! might is right. And accountability is one of those words the West is so fond of using to impress us lower people (human rights is another one of those). Simply a catchphrase, nothing more.

    Posted 2 years ago on 23 Mar 2010 20:53 #
  7. Lol, indeed, Migel, Lol. Great that you don't mince your words when talking about the West and the cowards that serve them as mercenaries. Long live the Afghan mujahids. Hum dekhenge!

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Mar 2010 0:09 #
  8. welcome back migel9

    Blackwater and their use mainly in Iraq, Afghanistan and in Pakistan is an open secret. Unfortunately our media who initially took up this story has become gone cold as usual. Even the extension of American Embassy in Islamabad, posting of Hundreds of Marines in Islamabad and the newly under construction embassy in Karachi with evacuation of locals from that area (with force buying of houses and land) has never gain much importance in our media!

    You can't America for using these BW agents! If I was an american, I would do anything to protect my country and will have an insight for any future enemies but because we are Pakistanis (media, Govt, politicians and the general public) we can just use pakistan as a toilet paper and Blame USA for all crimes! My Question is, why should we expect "Khair" from USA,UK,India,Israel???? Do you really think that they consider Pakistan as a friend or do they really care if Muslims get killed in any part of the world?

    We can deal with all the enemies if we can find the enemies within us... The Thugs, slaves and secret admirers of the western dominance! They all have to go before a revolution can make any difference! Change of Heart is important before a forced movement! Are we ready?

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Mar 2010 0:22 #
  9. Migel9
    Member

    This is for Khan Sahib And Ghalib..

    It is a case of the dog biting the hand that feeds it. After years of protection by Big Brother USA, covering up for its having nuclear warheads when Iran cannot even have a nuclear program, looking the other way when shocking war crimes and massacres of civilians are committed, when pregnant Palestinian mothers are left to die in the streets, Israel sticks up the middle finger in a classic display of pig-headed arrogance by Netanyahu at AIPAC.

    It is a case of the dog biting the hand that feeds it. After years of protection by Big Brother USA, covering up for its having nuclear warheads when Iran cannot even have a nuclear program, looking the other way when shocking war crimes and massacres of civilians are committed, when pregnant Palestinian mothers are left to die in the streets, Israel sticks up the middle finger in a classic display of pig-headed arrogance by Netanyahu at AIPAC. The territory of Israel and of the Palestinian Territories was drawn up upon the founding of the State of Israel under international law and recognised by the international community in May 1948. Annexation of the Palestinian Territories (now Illegally Occupied Territories) and the subsequent seizure of lands and destruction of homes from Palestinian civilians are a violation of international law and are prohibited by each and every fibre of customary and conventional law. Israel stands alone.

    Today, the Palestinian Authority controls just 17 per cent of its territory. Is this acceptable? To cap it all with ever-increasing displays of pig-headed arrogance, East Jerusalem was annexed by Israel arbitrarily in 1980 and today Israel continues to build settlements there in contradiction of the UNSC Resolution 478, claiming that Israel respects and follows the Resolutions it feels like respecting and ignores the others, just as Israel sits on 200 nuclear warheads in the Negev Desert in total contradiction to all the norms of non-proliferation. Israel behaves like Hitler In short, as with Hitler’s Aryans, Israel declares to all that its people are special, being above the legal parameters governing everyone else and Israel follows the arrogant precept that as a State it does not have to behave as a responsible member of the international community because basically it does as it pleases, adopting policies such as lebensraum (living room), treatment of Palestinians as untermenschen (sub-humans), occupation of territory,arbitrary murder, destruction of property. AIPAC: Patriots or Traitors? Immediately after the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared that Israel had to stop building illegal settlements (far from stopping, they should be either handed over to the Palestinians whose lands were stolen together with a hefty reparations payment or else demolished), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded with the most shocking display of pig-headed arrogance in his address to a cheering AIPAC, claiming that Israelis were building in Jerusalem 3,000 years ago and continue to do so now.

    So to whom do the members of AIPAC owe their allegiance? To Tel Aviv or to Washington? They cheer the Prime Minister of Israel who comes to the United States of America to defy and spit in the face of its Secretary of State? These AIPAC members are patriots, or traitors? Israel check-mates Washington On the chess board which constitutes the Middle East game, Washington plays by the rules, promising to guarantee the territorial integrity of Israel (ostensibly, we imagine, within the frontiers recognised under international law, not including one centimetre of the Occupied Territories). Nothing wrong with that (although the USA uses and abuses a cowardly and cynical gimmick of looking the other way when Israel starts committing acts of mass murder, massacres and war crimes). Yet on the other side of the board, while Washington politely turns away smiling wanly, Israel plays with two Queens, ten rooks and as many knights as it feels fit to employ.

    While Washington claims Israel must stop building illegal settlements, the Israeli PM is in the USA being cheered by AIPAC claiming this is precisely what he intends to continue doing. The way forward For any sane, clear-thinking citizen of the international community, there is one very simple way forward. First, Israel has to leave all the territory is occupies illegally (possibly paying for the rent of the territories in a phased withdrawal).

    The question of reparations for the occupation of this land is up to the Palestinians to claim as they see fit. Simultaneously, all parties have to recognise Israel’s right to exist and thirdly, if the non-proliferation treaties are to be respected, then nobody can have nuclear weapons in the Middle east, and that includes Israel. Three simple and easy steps which include nothing other than respect for the terms of international law.

    Is this so unreasonable to expect, or demand? Next step, engage Hamas, for it was democratically elected. Until then all talk of peace and children growing up together and happy smiling families living side by side exchanging presents is utter claptrap, nonsensical whimsical fairy-tales by politicians who are acting like clowns. Who is going to extend the hand of friendship to a murderous thug who invades their house, steals their land, deports their family, kills their women, and shoots their kids in the eyes with rubber bullets? Or did the citizens of the USA not know any of this was going on?

    One more..
    Do free some time to view this video..
    http://www.nuoviso.com/index.php?option ... &Itemid=66

    The real enemy of US.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Mar 2010 0:54 #
  10. migel9
    YOur link is not working!

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Mar 2010 1:09 #
  11. Kind to post this piece specifically for us, Migel, but actually it should be compulsary reading for each and every blogger on this site, many of whom seem to believe Palestine has nothing to do with Pakistan, the Jews are all good and fine people and only by sucking up to the USans (and the rest of the diseased West) will we as Pakistanis be able to fulfil our destiny.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Mar 2010 1:20 #
  12. Migel9
    Member

    http://www.nuoviso.com/index.php?option &Itemid=66 google it,all of it Khan worked fine for me...

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Mar 2010 2:16 #
  13. In Ancient Rome, "laws" may have been "silent in times of war" (Cicero). In the US, laws have never opened their mouth to speak, whether peacetime or times of bringing war to the rest of the world, as now.

    Posted 2 years ago on 24 Mar 2010 19:30 #
  14. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    Soldiers on sale? Is this about taliban and pakistan army for they are indeed for sale?

    Posted 2 years ago on 25 Mar 2010 1:20 #
  15. Wahid Doyum, hello. We stopped talking after some early interaction.

    Would you be so good as to tell me, for the sake of my own knowledge, what exactly you mean when you say taliban is for sale. Are we talking Afghan Taliban here or something else? Your point about the Pak army has been taken and is not necessarily disputed.

    Posted 2 years ago on 25 Mar 2010 8:44 #
  16. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    All taliban is the same. Some fake British drawn border cannot divided them just as it cannot diivide Pukhtun tribals. Once you understand this, you will understand a lot more.

    Posted 2 years ago on 26 Mar 2010 6:32 #
  17. Thanks for above. I'll think it over. Of course, the British drawn border was wholly arbitrary. But I still have the feeling our Pathans are better off within Pakistan than they would be if they suddenly upped and joined Afghanistan.

    Or do you imagine a new Afghanistan as well, without the Northern areas there? Just Pathans or Pukhtun as it seems fashionable to call them these days all living together under one - what? Would you like to have Karzai for your President? Any information you might care to pass on would interest me greatly.

    Posted 2 years ago on 26 Mar 2010 6:48 #
  18. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    It's not "fashionable" to be called Pukhtun. We always use this word among ourselves, just you people took 60 years to catch up to it, but even now are afraid of renaming "NWFP".

    I imagine Pukhtun unity, as there is strength in unity and only then we can stop being used as pawns in the great games of agencies. The supporters of talibs are well known to be from east of abaseen and they are the ones who have bought foreigners to our lands to get us killed.

    I will take even Karzai over what your people have to offer: Musharraf, Zardari, Nawaz, Hakeemullah Mehsud.

    Posted 2 years ago on 26 Mar 2010 6:54 #
  19. Again, my thanks. You stated all that very clearly and I'm grateful. As you can imagine, I personally despise Hamid Karzai but, even if I wanted to, I could hardly begin to defend Musharraf, Zardari and company. They are execrable too. One last question, then: You find the West war against Afghanistan a good thing?

    Posted 2 years ago on 26 Mar 2010 7:58 #
  20. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    West war is neither good or bad in the larger context, as Afghans/Pukhtuns have become slaves to ISI trickery since Soviet invasion.

    If anything, it is the Western war and Pakistan's u-turn on some of it's taliban agents, that has woken Pukhtuns up and may be beneficial for future of Pukhtuns.

    Posted 2 years ago on 27 Mar 2010 6:54 #
  21. So, even out of the worst things some good may eventually come. WD, we stand at different ends of the political spectrum, but I do wish you well for the future. Perhaps a hitherto unthought of compromise might be found in all this madness, God willing, which will make you happy for the Pukhtuns, while I, and others like me, will be able to rejoice for a Pakistan returned to its senses.

    Posted 2 years ago on 27 Mar 2010 8:14 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.