PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

Terrorists 'have attacked Pakistan nuclear sites three times'

(16 posts)

  1. shahzad1924
    member

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6792397.ece

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 8:46 #

  2. msohail83
    Member

    Ye nai story hai ASLI attack to justify karnay ke liye. Marines are coming to 'secure' the nukes!

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 8:48 #

  3. shahzad1924
    member

    i agree with your analysis.

    one day they say that there is a threat, and the other day they say that the threat has been neutralized. the reality is that the Americans control our nuclear arsenal.

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 8:49 #

  4. msohail83
    Member

    They were also predicting balkanization of Pakistan within SIX months!

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 8:53 #

  5. AsifK
    Members

    Btw , what these nukes have delieved to masses ?

    Got them out of poverty ? Gave their children clean drinking water ? Education ? Health ?

    But these nukes have given BRAVE ARMY , dha , Fauji Foundation and all other stuff so the BRAVE ARMY is largest industrial group , land owner , real estate owner in your pakistan , in my pakistan , in our children's pakistan.

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 8:53 #

  6. msohail83
    Member

    Why do you think Indians went to the White House to resolve Kargil?

    It was cuz Pakistan possessed nuclear weapons. They mobilized their Army after the attack on Indian parliament but didn't have the courage to invade Pakistan.

      Why?
    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 8:57 #

  7. shahzad1924
    member

    AsifK, you are confusing two things. poverty, drinking water, education and health are separate from having a nuclear arsenal.

    you are right that the government didnt provide all these facilities, and we should account the government for it. but a nuclear arsenal serves another very important purpose.

    and our nuclear arsenal in the hands of US should not be acceptable to us.

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 9:01 #

  8. Beenai
    Moderator

    this news piece
    and Khan of Kalat statement at todays DAWN front page.

    one can easily do two plus two...

    our enemies are after us to break us apart .
    take the hold of our nuclear arms .....

    and our Govt is busy making tall n false claims about its success.

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 9:11 #

  9. amin1924
    member

    Beenai

    I think the baluchistan issue is actually a war of ego between baloch sardars who want to keep sardari system and the military who don't want to give them sardari system.

    Civilian government can't do much, there is military vs baloch sardars problem

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 9:26 #

  10. Red-Scorpion
    Blocked

    @JJ Khan

    I don't think that you've ever been to Baluchistan otherwise you would not have over-simplified Balochistan issue !
    BTW there is no Sardari System in Makran belt which includes Ormara, Pasni, Gwadar !!!!

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 11:56 #

  11. Adonis
    Member

    An indian newspaper quoting a little known british "expert" saying that terrorists attacked Pakistan's nuclear sites. That proves it is a fact !!!!

    Blah ... Blah .... Blah

    And today is not even April 01.

    I think we should do something better than discussing such ridiculous stories.

    Posted 2 years ago on 12 Aug 2009 19:26 #

  12. AsifK
    Members

    msohail83

    Why do you think Indians went to the White House to resolve Kargil?

    Posted 2 years ago on 13 Aug 2009 10:34 #

  13. AsifK
    Members

    shahzad1924

    I m not confusing 2 issues. My point is very simple.

    WE have been wasting our national exchequer on defence for last 62 years and have failed miserably.

    Had this money been spent on the Human Development , the masses would have been in a lot better position.

    Right now , we spent some 80% of budget on defence and debt servicing. Why Debt Servicing . Becaz 20-30 years ago , we borrowed to buy F-16's or to buy tanks or to buy submarines or to build DHA. So , this debt servicing is also defence expenditure.

    If u dont' believe , just pick pakistan budget of early 80's and see how much we were spending on defence on how much debt servicing. Gradully , the defence has become debt servicing.

    My whole point is instead of wasting money in this useless exerciese, we can help our massess. U see, this BRAVE ARMY is only good in capturing Islamabad. In real , they are even worse than heejaras. 91000 tu heejray hooon to woh taaali baja bajaa kar pagal kar deetay haain, yeh surrender kar kaay aa gaey thay :)

    Posted 2 years ago on 13 Aug 2009 10:39 #

  14. shahzad1924
    member

    yes, i agree but my point is that this does not mean that we shouldn't be spending on defense. what you are saying is correct in its own right; money should have been spent on development for the benefit of the masses but spending on defense is an equally important thing to do.

    Posted 2 years ago on 13 Aug 2009 23:58 #

  15. IJay
    member

    All offensive posts using abusive language will be edited.
    This post was totally abusive and therefore deleted (Moderator)

    Posted 2 years ago on 14 Aug 2009 1:31 #

  16. shahzad1924
    member

    Pakistan denies al-Qaida targeting nuclear facilities

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/12/pakistan-nuclear-al-qaida

    Posted 2 years ago on 14 Aug 2009 2:14 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.