PKPolitics Discuss » Current Issues

The Arab Turmoil

(906 posts)
  1. bsobaid
    Member

    So Yemenis generals join their voices with protestors.

    Did anyone notice why all of a sudden all generals in these arab kingdoms are suddenly in love with their awam?

    Think about it, it is a repetition of Pakistan model. Creation of establishment is in process in those countries and generals are loving it. In post-inquilaab middle east there will be generals running the show in the background and bloody civilians will be "assigned" tasks.

    The generals are beloved in awam and will be considered holy cow. Any party/individual talking against them will be called a "Security Risk". I guess it will take a couple of Bhuttos to wake these losers up.

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2011 15:29 #
  2. shirazi
    Member

    @bsobaid

    It won't take couple of Bhutto's. I don't know how even 20 Bhutto's can change this phenomena? Generals are calling the shots in Washington and you expect them not to in ME and 3rd world :)

    We still live in 'might is right' world.

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2011 15:48 #
  3. bsobaid
    Member

    @shirazi, the question is raising awareness and making awam realize of the problem. How they solve this problem is upto each nation. At this moment arabi awam dont even realize the problem and they dont even know if it exists.

    I dont thin kGenerals call the shots in Washington or in India or in China or in UK or France.

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2011 15:52 #
  4. bsobaid, sorry, but is that all you know about US or UK or France? Those who are calling the shots in those countries are all behind the scenes. Their faces are as hidden to their own people as they are to you or me. For US, however, we do know the Pentagon happens to be one of them. China is a mystery to me and about India I do not know either.

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2011 16:01 #
  5. bsobaid
    Member

    Indian mein generals jotay kee nokk pay rehtay hein aur yahee sahee maqam hai generals kaa. Quaid-e-Azam also taught us the same. US say pakki dosti kay baad Gen. Kapoor kay thoray parr nikalnay lagay thayy, I dont know what happened in the end.

    It is the white house and Defence Committee that makes the decision in US. Generals try their best and lobby but in the end it is political government that makes the decision and if a general crosses the line he is thrown out like McCrystal.

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2011 16:08 #
  6. shirazi
    Member

    @bsobaid

    "I dont thin kGenerals call the shots in Washington or in India or in China or in UK or France."

    Obama promised pull out from Afghanistan and Iraq and ended up opening up an other front Libya. Indian defense budget is increasing many folds. This all by keeping Generals under civilians boots -:)

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2011 18:15 #
  7. bsobaid
    Member

    Shira,

    Strategic decisions are still made by politicians in both those countries. Extension of Afghan operation is a tactical decision and there is no problem about that.

    Generals kay saath wohi sulook karnaa chahiyay jo Nehru ne apnay Chief of Army Staff se kiaa thaa. oss ko 2 hours office kay bahar wait karayaa tha milnay se pehlay to tell him who is the boss.

    Jurnails in India is largely a ceremonial post. Increase in Indian Defence budget is politician stupidity, not general's.

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2011 18:19 #
  8. shirazi
    Member

    @bsobaid

    I won't argue that things are much better in US and India than Pakistan. But they are not as rosy as you are portraying. Left was furious when Pentagon leaked the report that McCrystal demanded 40k more troops in surge. They said now there is no way Obama can say no to them. The way media is controlled by GHQ in Pakistan is very similar to how Pentagon controls in US. I am sure India won't be much different. No body knows the art of saying NO to the man who has arms.

    As long as US has more than 50% share of world's defense market they will control the globe, we like it or not.

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2011 21:03 #
  9. aftab arif
    Member

    The backing of the Arab League was crucial for getting the UN resolution on the Libya no-fly zone, but some Arab countries are watching developments with unease. Algeria's foreign minister says Western military intervention in Libya is "disproportionate" and must end immediately, Reuters reports, quoting the Algerian state news agency. Algeria has seen small-scale protests since the wave of uprisings in the Arab world began three months ago but the demonstrations have usually been broken up by the security forces.

    Posted 1 year ago on 22 Mar 2011 14:39 #
  10. Any surprise?
    Pakistani workers seek escape after Bahrain attacks

    Bahraini youths broke into the homes of Pakistani workers brandishing swords, hammers and steel rods....
    ...
    “They started beating us after they found out we were Pakistanis,” said Eqbal, despite telling them that they were labourers, not police.

    “They said: ‘You people are here to kill us’,” he said, quoting a youth who left him with injuries to the head, chest and feet, before they torched the place.
    ...
    “The problem is that Pakistani policemen are put on the front lines” of riot police in clashes with Shia demonstrators.
    ...
    There are reportedly more than 50,000 Pakistanis in Bahrain, many in the police and security services.
    ...
    “The Pakistani community has suffered more than any other foreign community,” said Fiaz, allegedly at the hands of Shia who spearheaded a month-long pro-democracy protest that was quashed on Wednesday by security forces.
    ...
    “They want us to leave Bahrain. Pakistani people have jobs in government that they (Bahrainis) think should be theirs,” he said.
    ...
    Injured workers alleged that they were also denied treatment at Salmaniya central hospital, and that they were beaten by some medical staff who sympathised with protesters.

    “They kicked us out because we are Pakistanis. Some hospital staff beat us,” Eqbal charged.
    ...
    He also said that although many Pakistanis and other foreigners are believed to have obtained Bahraini nationality ahead of time by joining the military, “many have been naturalised for spending the legally required period in Bahrain, and many have made valuable services to Bahrain.”

    So again I ask: Is anyone surprised? After reading this I no longer feel sorry for the expats for I feel they deserve what they are getting. With another 1000 Pakistanis going to Bahrain to suppress the locals, will anyone be surprised the things are going to get much worse (as I suggested...Forgot who was on my case on this and said something was wrong with me for talking against 1000 Pakistanis getting jobs)

    Posted 1 year ago on 22 Mar 2011 18:24 #
  11. aftab arif
    Member

    Syria: Two people have been killed and two wounded by unidentified snipers in the coastal town of Latakia, an official tells AFP. No details on who the victims might be.

    President Saleh is saying he's ready to leave power "with dignity", even within hours, Al-Arabiya reports. Not clear what the "with dignity" condition means.

    Posted 1 year ago on 26 Mar 2011 16:43 #
  12. aftab arif
    Member

    Pakistan ready for Middle East role

    With a broad Sunni Muslim bloc of countries lining up against an emerging Shi'ite crescent in the Middle East, Sunni-majority and nuclear-armed Pakistan could play an important - albeit somewhat reluctant - role.

    A step in this direction is Pakistan's decision to keep two army divisions on standby for deployment to Saudi Arabia in the event of trouble there. This followed a visit by Saudi Prince and secretary general of the National Security Council Prince Bandar Bin Sultan to Pakistan.

    Earlier, Pakistan's Fauji Foundation, an armed forces entity, organized the recruitment of over 1,000 ex-army personnel for service in Bahrain's National Guard. The small Persian Gulf state, which is headquarters to the United States 5th Fleet, is Pakistan ready for Middle East role
    By Syed Saleem Shahzad

    ISLAMABAD - With a broad Sunni Muslim bloc of countries lining up against an emerging Shi'ite crescent in the Middle East, Sunni-majority and nuclear-armed Pakistan could play an important - albeit somewhat reluctant - role.

    A step in this direction is Pakistan's decision to keep two army divisions on standby for deployment to Saudi Arabia in the event of trouble there. This followed a visit by Saudi Prince and secretary general of the National Security Council Prince Bandar Bin Sultan to Pakistan.

    Earlier, Pakistan's Fauji Foundation, an armed forces entity, organized the recruitment of over 1,000 ex-army personnel for service in Bahrain's National Guard. The small Persian Gulf state, which is headquarters to the United States 5th Fleet, is

    suppressing protests with the help of Saudi invasion forces. Bahrain's ruling elite is Sunni, although about 70% of the population is Shi'ite.

    The advertisement for Pakistanis to join Bahrain's National Guard was published about three weeks ago in a mass-circulation Urdu-language newspaper. Since then, the process of recruitment has continued unabated.

    According to investigations by Asia Times Online, the recruits have been promised 100,000 Pakistani rupees (US$1,174) a month, beside other perks including free medical and accommodation. People with names that have a traditional Shi'ite ring - such as Syed, Abbas, Ali and Hussain - are being overlooked.

    Iranian media have broadcast stories predicting a strong Pakistani role in the Gulf region; this resulted in Iranian-sponsored agitators in Bahrain killing several Pakistani workers for "collaborating with the Sunni rulers of Bahrain".

    A calibrated response
    A senior Pakistani politician and a former member of the senate who is known for his closeness to the military establishment told Asia Times Online on the condition of anonymity that immediately after the Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings earlier this year, Pakistan carefully positioned itself both domestically and at the diplomatic level to act as a "frontline state" for Sunni Islam.

    In another sense, Pakistan has been a frontline state in the "war on terror" ever since the invasion of Afghanistan and the ouster of the Taliban in 2001 - an uneasy role at the best of times.

    In backroom moves, the military briefed rightwing political parties - including the Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan, the Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam, the Pakistan Muslim League Q, Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf and the Jamaatut Dawa - on what is believed will be a showdown within the Muslim world.

    Exactly at this time, Pakistan's powerful foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, from the spiritual Qureshi family of Multan - the all-season favorite of the Pakistani military establishment whose changing political allegiances have always directed the course of Pakistan's political history - suddenly resigned.

    He then began a powerful campaign against his own leaders in the ruling Pakistan People's Party. After a long break, Pakistan's military establishment and the old bloc of pro-establishment political parties were on the same page.

    This time, though, the aim was not a military takeover but a future positioning for Pakistan.

    This development had a trickle-down effect in the insurgent-hit tribal areas, where militants held their fire against the Pakistan army (a partial ceasefire agreement was already in place).

    In this whole situation, restive Balochistan province, where a separatist movement festers, remains the only problem if Pakistan becomes involved in the Middle East crisis. The province is adjacent to Iran and has always been amenable to Iranian intervention.

    Diplomatic moves
    Backchannel talks on Turkey's position are the most important component before Pakistan jumps into the Middle East crisis. Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party had been in favor of the Arab uprisings, but the Libyan crisis has forced Ankara to think again.

    Libya is now a haven for militancy in North Africa and the Middle East. Like all Sunni Muslim states, Turkey is dedicated to working for the supremacy of the Sunni orthodoxy that ensures the maintenance of the current regime.

    The Muslim Brotherhood, which had been suppressed in Libya, has sprung up as a strong and organized political force and is actively collaborating with the Jamiat al-Muqatala, an armed opposition group that is not shy to show its affiliation with al-Qaeda.

    Strengthened with looted weapons of the Libyan armed forces, these Islamists have apparently smuggled a large cache of weapons to Tunisia and Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood and its sympathizers of armed groups have also re-emerged.

    Recently, former military intelligence colonel Abdul al-Zamar and a relative, former major Tariq al-Zamar, who were arrested in September 1981 over a failed coup against the regime of president Anwar Sadat, only 10 days before his assassination, were released along with several top leaders of the Jamaat al-Jihad (led by al-Qaeda deputy Dr Ayman al-Zawahiri) after strong popular demand on the streets of Cairo and other cities.

    In this quagmire, Iranian-influenced Shi'ite Islam will play a big part. Significantly, it could influence Turkey's Nusayri population (self-proclaimed Shi'ites), who, according to some estimates, make of 18% of the population. Along with Iranian-sponsored Kurdish rebels in Turkey, the Nusayri have always been a potential threat for Turkey. The Turkish army, a flagbearer for Sunni Islam, has built many Sunni mosques in far-flung villages in an attempt to drown out the Nusayris.

    Following the Saudi-supported agitation in Syria, the Iranian-sponsored proxy war in the Middle East is likely to gather speed, and first Pakistan and then Turkey are likely to play a proactive role on the side of Saudi Arabia to retain the supremacy of Sunni Islam in the Arab world.

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/MD02Df01.html

    Posted 1 year ago on 01 Apr 2011 13:50 #
  13. @aftab
    "Pakistan ready for Middle East role"

    Hardly news....
    "Pakistan (army) always ready to be be the Middle East wh*re"

    But this article is typical bvll, it's value only in what the west wishes -- get the Sunni and Shias to kill each other.

    Posted 1 year ago on 01 Apr 2011 13:53 #
  14. aftab arif
    Member

    @ Nota

    I am sure the West are happy in this division but we are always ready to oblige in one form or another for they games. If the majority want Shia rulers then so be it, the best way to go about it is a referendum for the people to decide one way or the other.

    Posted 1 year ago on 01 Apr 2011 14:38 #
  15. aftab arif
    Member

    Bahrain agrees to augment defence ties with Pakistan

    Diplomatic sources say despite a general consensus on bolstering defence cooperation, specifics were not discussed.

    “Prime Minister Gilani had a proposal ready with him to offer the Bahraini foreign minister recruitment of retired Pakistani military personnel in Bahraini defence forces, but such an opportunity did not arise as talks primarily focused on the larger picture and not the details,” said a senior official, who had been briefed on the discussions at Mr Khalifa`s meetings with Pakistani leadership.

    Pak-Bahrain defence cooperation is already in a very good shape. Pakistan had helped Bahrain set up its naval forces and 18 per cent of the Gulf state`s air force comprises Pakistani personnel. It is estimated that almost 10,000 Pakistanis are serving in security services of Bahrain and one of the key demands of protesters seeking an end to the monarchy has been the removal of Pakistanis from Bahraini forces.

    Bahrain had in recent past expressed interest in procuring defence equipment from Pakistan and its (Bahrains) National Guards are currently recruiting security personnel through Pakistani militarys welfare wings Fauji Foundation and Bahria Foundation.

    Mr Khalifa was quoted in a statement issued by the Prime Minister`s House as having expressed satisfaction over the state of defence cooperation.

    Pakistani leaders in their meetings continued praising King Hamad Bin Isa Al-Khalifas national reconciliation efforts. However, they were told that constitutional reforms for pacifying protesters was not Bahrains priority, Manama instead first wants to address the security and law and order situation to reconsolidate its authority.

    The Bahraini foreign minister assured Pakistan of Manama`s help in starting strategic dialogue with the Gulf Cooperation Council and pushing for a free trade agreement with the GCC.

    http://www.dawn.com/2011/03/30/bahrain-agrees-to-augment-defence-ties-with-pakistan.html

    Posted 1 year ago on 02 Apr 2011 16:31 #
  16. aftab arif
    Member

    Egypt: 'Two killed' in Cairo's Tahrir Square

    Two people have been killed and at least 15 wounded during protests in Tahrir Square in the centre of the Egyptian capital, Cairo, doctors said.

    The violence occurred overnight as the army tried to clear protesters calling for ex-President Hosni Mubarak and his family to be tried for corruption.

    The injured suffered gunshot wounds but the army denies using live rounds.

    Tahrir Square became the symbolic centre of protests that led to Mr Mubarak stepping down in February.

    The army had maintained a generally neutral role in the earlier mass demonstrations.

    But about 300 troops moved into the square at about 0300 local time (GMT) on Saturday to break up a camp in the centre.

    Protesters say they were beaten with clubs and shots were fired.

    An army spokesman told Reuters news agency that only blanks were used.

    The military issued a statement blaming "outlaws" for rioting and violating a curfew but said no-one was hurt.

    "The armed forces stress that they will not tolerate any acts of rioting or any act that harms the interest of the country and the people," it said.

    The protesters were demanding a number of measures, including the resignation of the man who has replaced Mr Mubarak as interim leader, Field Marshal Mohammed Hussein Tantawi.

    "Tantawi is Mubarak and Mubarak is Tantawi," they chanted.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13023948

    Posted 1 year ago on 09 Apr 2011 11:52 #
  17. aftab arif
    Member

    Asif Ali Zardari, who had been trying since he was elected president in 2008 to secure Saudi oil on sweetheart terms. He had been unsuccessful in his efforts because the Sunni Saudis view his leadership with some degree of skepticism. It also doesn’t help that Zardari, a Shia, is big on improving relations with Shia Tehran. Riyadh now appears inclined to export oil on terms that better suit cash-strapped Islamabad. Manama, too, wants to play ball. It wants increased defense cooperation and has pledged to prioritize Pakistan’s hopes for a free-trade agreement with the GCC in return.

    Islamabad’s support to the tottering regime in Manama is not ideal. “It’s like our version of Blackwater,” says Talat Masood, a former Pakistan Army general, referring to Bahrain’s recruitment drive in Pakistan. “We’re doing [in Bahrain] exactly what we have been opposing here,” he says. Pakistan, he maintains, has no business in trying to suppress a democratic, people’s movement in another country. Short-term economic gains cannot be the only prism through which Pakistan views its national interests, he says.

    Some Bahraini opposition groups have called on the U.S. to intervene to get the GCC troops out of their country, fearing it could become a battleground in a Saudi-Iranian battle for regional supremacy. They stress that they share no real affinity with the theocratic regime in Shia-majority Iran, while noting that a number of Bahraini Sunni Muslims have also come out in the streets to call for greater reforms. Pakistani involvement, therefore, could result in it being embroiled in a proxy war, with serious implications for its own security interests.

    The issue of Iran is important, but there’s a deeper issue, according to author Noam Chomsky. “By historical and geographical accident, the main concentration of global energy resources is in the northern Gulf region, which is predominantly Shia,” he told Newsweek Pakistan. Bahrain, he points out, neighbors eastern Saudi Arabia, where most of the latter’s oil is. “Western planners have long been concerned that a tacit Shia alliance might take shape with enormous control over the world’s energy resources, and perhaps not be reliably obedient to the U.S.”

    Bahrain, which like Pakistan was designated a major non-NATO ally by the George W. Bush presidency, is home to the Fifth Fleet. It is the primary U.S. base in the region and allows Washington to ensure the free flow of oil through the Gulf, while keeping checks on Iran. Chomsky believes that Pakistani presence in Bahrain can be seen as part of a U.S.-backed alliance to safeguard Western access to the region’s oil.

    “The U.S. has counted on Pakistan to help control the Arab world and safeguard Arab rulers from their own populations,” says Chomsky. “Pakistan was one of the ‘cops on the beat’ that the Nixon administration had in mind when outlining their doctrine for controlling the Arab world,” he says. Pakistan has such “severe internal problems” that it may not be able to play this role even if asked to. But the real reason that Pakistan should avoid this role is so that it can stand on the right side of history, alongside those who are fighting for democracy.

    http://www.newsweekpakistan.com/the-take/287

    Posted 1 year ago on 09 Apr 2011 12:05 #
  18. aftab arif
    Member

    A military court in Egypt has sentenced an internet activist to three years in jail for criticising the armed forces.

    Maikel Nabil was arrested last month for blogs that criticised the army's role during anti-government protests.

    The 26-year-old is thought to be the first blogger jailed in Egypt since the ousting of President Hosni Mubarak.

    Activists said the trial set a dangerous precedent at a time when Egypt was trying to move away from the alleged abuses of the Mubarak era.

    Lawyers representing Maikel Nabil have criticised the conduct of the military court.

    "We are in a state of shock because [on Sunday] they told us the decision would be on Tuesday, so the family and lawyer left. Afterwards the court announced its decision," said Gamal Eid, a lawyer who heads the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information.

    Mr Eid said the trial was unfair because the court did not even consider the content of Mr Nabil's blog posts.

    He said he would petition the head of the court to reverse its decision and free Mr Nabil.

    Last week, Human Rights Watch called for the charges against Mr Nabil to be dropped.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13038937

    So much for the new found freedoms, old habits dies hard i guess.

    Posted 1 year ago on 11 Apr 2011 18:31 #
  19. aftab arif
    Member

    UAE arrests democracy activists

    They include outspoken economics professor Nasser bin Ghaith, said a lawyer and fellow activist on Sunday.

    Also detained were Fahad Salem al-Shehhi and Ahmed Mansour, who took part in an online pro-democracy forum.

    Mr Mansour was arrested on Friday in Dubai after he signed a petition in favour of an elected parliament.

    Emirati intellectuals and activists, inspired by popular uprisings sweeping the Arab world, petitioned the UAE president on 9 March to introduce direct elections and invest parliament with legislative powers.

    The UAE is an alliance of seven sheikdoms run by ruling families. The parliament, based in the capital Abu Dhabi, serves as an advisory body.

    Its 40 members are either directly appointed by the ruling sheikhs or elected by citizens hand-picked by the rulers to vote.

    There are no official opposition groups and political parties are banned.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13043270

    Posted 1 year ago on 12 Apr 2011 13:16 #
  20. shriq
    Member

    FYI

    http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2011041598318

    Things HAVE BEEN cooled down (at least for the time being).

    Posted 1 year ago on 15 Apr 2011 11:40 #
  21. aftab arif
    Member

    Egypt urges US to back Palestinian state declaration

    The Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabil al-Araby has urged the United States to support the declaration of an independent Palestinian state.

    The call comes after the reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah brokered last week by Egypt.

    Both Israel and the US have said they will not deal with Hamas, and have until now opposed a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood.

    The statement marks yet another big shift in Egypt's foreign policy.

    The new call marks a move away from Egypt's past compliance with the United States and Israel, which have strongly opposed the Palestinian authority's campaign to win backing for a unilateral declaration of statehood.

    Mr Araby says Egypt now fully supports the Palestinian plan, and has urged the US to do the same.

    He said the US should view a re-united Palestinian movement, including Hamas, as a positive development, and that it should persuade Israel to negotiate with it.

    Both Israel and the US have insisted they will not deal with any side that includes Hamas, which they regard as a terrorist group.

    Under President Hosni Mubarak Egypt used to take the same view, but the new government has moved quickly to distance itself from Israel, helping broker the Palestinian reconciliation deal last week.

    Financial needs

    This policy change is popular in Egypt, but it is not without risks.

    It will be very unpopular in the US Congress, where the substantial annual aid package to Egypt must be approved.

    Egypt is also seeking additional financial support from western and Gulf states, to help cover the immense cost to its economy of this year's upheavals.

    It must weigh up the benefits of a more populist foreign policy against those very real and immediate needs.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13256587

    I wonder if Saudi Arabia and other well of middle eastern countries will help they brothers economically in Egypt so that they do not rely on Western AIDS!

    Posted 1 year ago on 02 May 2011 15:56 #
  22. aftab arif
    Member

    Egypt shakes up Middle Eastern order

    Riyadh and Washington didn't factor in that in the shadows of the Egyptian pyramids the Sphinx was bestirring, expounding visions of the shaking up of the established order in the Middle East. The interim agreement between the Palestinian groups brokered by the ''new Egypt'' in tacit collaboration with Iran and Syria threatens to become the leitmotif of the Arab spring.

    Saudi Arabia in principle ought to be celebrating that its Palestinian brothers are forging unity at a historic moment, but are instead stunned into silence. President Obama quickly postponed his ''historic'' Middle East policy speech, originally scheduled for this week, in order to read the tea leaves.

    As things stand, the rival Palestinian factions Fatah and Hamas will sign an agreement in Cairo on Wednesday to form an interim government leading to fresh elections in a reconciliation deal brokered by the Egyptian military leadership. The deal provides for an interim government of ''neutrals'' approved by the rival factions, which will set the stage for elections within a year to form a ''unity'' government.

    The agreement apparently finds a way around the five sticking points that have so far thwarted political unity between Gaza and the West Bank - a date for elections, an acceptable supervisory body for overseeing polls, formation of a unity government, resuming talks on reforming the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and security issues. The presidential and parliamentary elections will be held simultaneously and Fatah and Hamas would form a committee to oversee them.

    The unity government would comprise technocrats and will be headed by a prime minister acceptable to both Fatah and Hamas. The political prisoners in Gaza and the West Bank will be released and a ''social reconciliation'' programme initiated. Reform of the PLO has been a key demand by Hamas, which Fatah now accepts. An interim committee will lead the PLO until it is ''reformed'' and its decisions will be binding. Security issues, another tricky item, are also sought to be resolved by a joint committee of Fatah and Hamas.

    Needless to say, it is too early to express optimism. But, as Massimo Calabresi of Time Magazine wrote, ''The most important marriage of the week was in Palestine, not London. True, the odds of a lasting relationship between the internationally recognized leaders of the Palestinians, Fatah, and the internationally designated terrorist group, Hamas, aren't great - it's not clear whether the union will actually be consummated. But even a short fling has the potential to upturn Arab-Israeli affairs, shift US interests in the Middle East and play a role in the 2012 [US presidential] election.''

    The Sphinx is stirring
    The upheaval in the Middle East provided the backdrop for this reconciliation and, evidently, something has changed in the scheme of things. Both Fatah and Hamas understood the need to be responsive to popular opinion that favors Palestinian unity. The Palestinian National Authority (PNA) President Mahmoud Abbas, in particular, saw the writing on the wall as throngs of young people in the West Bank borrowed the chants of the Egyptian revolution to demand Palestinian unity.

    On February 17, Obama strongly pressed Abbas during a 55-minute phone call to withdraw the resolution in the United Nations General Assembly demanding that Israel stop its settlement activities. Obama said the move jeopardized America's US$475 million assistance for the PNA. But Abbas was undeterred and in a subsequent interview with Newsweek slammed the vulnerability and impotence of Obama's policy.

    As for Hamas, put simply, developments in Syria are extremely worrisome. At the same time, it places trust in the ''new Egypt''. A top Hamas leader Ezzat al-Rashq told the German news agency Deutsche Presse-Agentur, ''The collapse of Mubarak's regime restored Egypt to its place in the heart of the region and revived the regional spirit which is helping the Palestinian reconciliation take place.''

    In a gesture that was much more than symbolic, the Hamas leaders were received in the Egyptian foreign ministry rather than in the ''safe houses'' of the intelligence - as used to be the case during the Hosni Mubarak regime. The Egyptian interim head of state Field Marshal Mohamed Tantawi (who is also the leader of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces) received the Hamas leaders. The Hamas leader Taher Nounou was quoted as saying, ''When I was invited to the meeting in the Foreign Ministry, that was something different, and this is what the agreement grew out of.''

    Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabil el-Araby told the visiting Palestinian leaders that he didn't want to talk about the ''peace process'' but wanted instead to talk ''about the peace''. Quite obviously, the revisionist thesis about the ultimate legacy - or the ''new great game'' - of the Arab spring being a Sunni-Shi'ite war doesn't apply to Egypt. Egypt's warming at the same time to (Shi'ite) Iran and (Sunni) Hamas represents a tectonic shift that is undeniably ''secular''; it traverses the great sectarian schism in the world of Islam; and it is leagues away from the archaic geopolitics built around ''isolating'' Iran in the region that Saudi Arabia and the US were hoping to perpetuate.

    No more a poodle…
    What is becoming apparent is that Egypt is reclaiming the regional influence it abjectly surrendered when it became a poodle of the US and a collaborator of Israel following the 1979 peace treaty. The spokesperson of the Egyptian foreign ministry told the New York Times, ''We are opening a new page. Egypt is resuming its role that was once abdicated.''

    The profundity of the shift in the Egyptian policies is that the military is spearheading the process with the full realization that this is also the collective wish of Egyptian society, its elites and professionals as well as the working class, and the secular-minded as well as the observant Muslim masses. Even the strategic community, as practitioners of realpolitik, feel enthralled that an independent path bestows flexibility to Egypt's policies and earns respect for the country as a regional power when Cairo speaks or acts.

    The New York Times noted, ''Egypt's shifts are likely to alter the balance of power in the region, allowing Iran new access to a previously implacable foe and creating distance between itself and Israel.'' No sooner than the news appeared about the Fatah-Hamas accord, Tehran scrambled to welcome it. Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said the agreement is the ''first great achievement of the great Egyptian nation on the international scene''.

    Tehran estimates that the Egyptian leadership is seeking to gain leverage over Israel. Egypt appears to have coordinated with Iran in efforts to bring reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas. According to the Middle East analyst of the US think tank Stratfor, Tehran's backing for the deal and the fact that Hamas is headquartered in Damascus imply that ''Syria also decided to allow the reconciliation to go through''.

    The Egypt-Iran rapprochement has indeed gained traction. Starting with the granting of permission (disregarding US and Israeli protests) for the unprecedented passage of two Iranian warships through the Suez Canal in February, Cairo moved purposively and by the beginning of April, Egyptian Foreign Minister was already reaching out for closer diplomatic ties with Iran.

    Israel's worst fears about the meaning of the Egyptian revolution seem to be coming true.

    The latest Egyptian announcement in the wake of the Fatah-Hamas accord, that it will reopen the Rafah crossing with Gaza permanently, has set alarm bells ringing in Israel. (An Egyptian security team is preparing to visit Gaza). An unnamed senior Israeli official told Wall Street Journal on Friday that recent developments in Egypt could affect Israel's ''security at a strategic level''. The chief of staff of the Egyptian armed forces General Sami Anan promptly warned Israel against interfering with Cairo's plan to open the Rafah border crossing with Gaza, saying it was not a matter of concern for Israel.

    Again, the Egyptian military leadership's decision on Rafah reflects a collective wish of the domestic public opinion which empathizes with the sufferings and hardships of the people of Gaza. (A recent poll by US-based Pew Research Center found that 54% of Egyptians want Egypt's peace treaty with Israel to be annulled.) In the circumstances, what will worry Israel (and the US) most is whether the surprise Fatah-Hamas agreement brokered by Egypt is linked in some way to the Palestinian plan to push at the General Assembly session in New York in September for UN recognition for a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza.

    Such an apprehension is not unwarranted. The Wall Street Journal commented last week, ''In the more than two months since … Mubarak abdicated … Egypt has reached out to Iran, questioned the price on a contract to export natural gas that is crucial to Israel's energy needs, and won major diplomatic victories with Hamas.''

    To be sure, the Israeli reaction to the Fatah-Hamas accord has been predictably harsh. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, ''The Palestinian Authority must choose either peace with Israel or peace with Hamas. It cannot have both, because Hamas aims to destroy the state of Israel and says so openly.'' A group of American congressmen also warned against the reconciliation plan. The US House of Representatives foreign affairs committee's chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen said in a statement that US taxpayers' money cannot be spent on terrorists who threaten the US and its ally Israel. Netanyahu reportedly endorses that view.

    ... no more backroom deals
    However, Obama is keeping his thoughts to himself. It is apparent that while the Arab spring shows no traces of ''anti-Americanism'' as such, the new successor regimes are almost certain to be responsive to popular wishes and aspirations and that is going to debilitate the US regional strategies.

    At the very least, as Helena Cobban, a long-time expert on the region and author, blogged, ''What is true as a general rule in the region is that the kind of sordid backroom deals that regimes like Mubarak's, that of successive Jordanian monarchs, or others have struck with Israel in the past - that is, arrangements to quash Palestinian movements that go far beyond the formal requirements of the peace treaties - have become considerably harder for these Arab parties to uphold, given the long overdue and very welcome emergence of strong movements calling for transparency and accountability from Arab governments.''

    That is to say, any digressions in the nature of stoking the fires of Sunni-Shi'ite sectarian passions may work only momentarily in the developing regional milieu. This became amply clear when Egyptian Prime Minister Essam Abdulaziz Sharaf chose the occasion of a meeting last week with the Kuwaiti Amir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jabir al-Sabah to shrug off the paranoia about Iran whipped up by Saudi Arabia and firmly asserted Cairo's resolve to expand ties with Iran. He said, ''Egypt is trying to begin a new chapter in ties with Iran, which is one of the world's important countries.''

    Simultaneously, Egyptian government spokesman Ahmed al-Saman said Cairo is determined to resume relations with Iran and no third party can pressure Cairo into changing the decision. A visit by the Egyptian foreign minister to Tehran could be on cards.

    The Saudis resurrected the specter of a Shi'ite crescent under Iran's leadership. But it takes two to tango. Iran prefers to set its eyes on far higher goals than the leadership of a Shi'ite world. Damascus, Cairo and Baghdad - the heart, brain and soul of Arab politics - aren't falling for the Saudi clarion call, either, that Salafism is in mortal danger from militant Shi'ism.

    Meanwhile, not only for the Saudis but for all Arab governments, the crunch time comes if and when they are called upon to recognize a unified Palestinian state under a ''unity'' government, which would mean a number of things - recognition of Hamas; adjusting to a major Israeli-Egyptian rift and the new Egyptian-Iranian-Syrian proximity; and daring a strategic defiance of the US. The stunning geopolitical reality of the ''new Middle East'' is that the Egyptian intelligence brokered the Palestinian reconciliation without consulting the US and Israel - or Saudi Arabia.

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/ME03Ak01.html

    Posted 1 year ago on 02 May 2011 17:09 #
  23. aftab arif
    Member

    Egyptian former Interior Minister Habib al-Adly has been sentenced to 12 years in jail for money-laundering.

    Mr Adly - who was in charge of the country's feared security services - was a key part of former president Hosni Mubarak's regime.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13292322

    Posted 1 year ago on 05 May 2011 11:04 #
  24. aftab arif
    Member

    Is the world too big to fail?

    By Noam Chomsky

    There are sure to be far-reaching consequences of what is taking place both in the decaying industrial heartland of the richest and most powerful country in human history, and in what president Dwight Eisenhower called "the most strategically important area in the world" - "a stupendous source of strategic power" and "probably the richest economic prize in the world in the field of foreign investment," in the words of the State Department in the 1940s, a prize that the US intended to keep for itself and its allies in the unfolding New World Order of that day.

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/ME13Ak01.html

    Posted 1 year ago on 12 May 2011 10:51 #
  25. Secret UAE desert force set up by Blackwater’s founder.

    Documents show 800-strong mercenary force is aimed at UAE's external — and internal — foes.

    Posted 1 year ago on 15 May 2011 14:06 #
  26. bsobaid
    Member

  27. aftab arif
    Member

    Mrs Mubarak, aged 70, pledged on Monday to hand over the money and the villa.

    By relinquishing her claims, she would be benefiting from articles in Egyptian law which allow those accused of making illegal gains to give them up in exchange for dropping the investigation, lawyer Nasser Amin was quoted as saying by the Associated Press news agency.

    "The decision may not be accepted by society, who after a revolution, side with the idea of revenge. But from the legal point of view, this is in line," the lawyer added.

    The former first lady is recovering after falling ill when told she was being detained. Initial reports said she suffered a heart attack but some officials say it was a "panic attack".

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13420327

    I wish this happens to our cruel and oppressive rulers.

    Posted 1 year ago on 17 May 2011 11:21 #
  28. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    Video: Modern Slavery in Gulf Countries

    14-May-2011
    --------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Source: Youtube Channel: TheRealNews

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 May 2011 12:18 #
  29. sipahi
    Member


    Posted 12 months ago on 28 May 2011 1:59 #
  30. aftab arif
    Member

    The cold hard cash counter-revolution

    The counter-revolution, paraphrasing the late, great soul jazz poet Gil Scott-Heron, will not be televised; it will float downstream flush with hard cash. Take Egypt. The House of Saud has just given Supreme Military Council leader Field Marshall Tantawi US$4 billion in cold hard cash - although not even the Sphinx knows for sure how much power Tantawi, 75, deposed tyrant Hosni Mubarak's former minister of defense, really wields.

    Washington extended Cairo $1 billion in "debt forgiveness" and another $1 billion in loan guarantees. Not much - compared to what Washington extends to Israel, but still a signal. And then the International Monetary Fund extended an extra $3 billion in loans. The "new" Egypt will start to do business already bound in unforgiving chains.

    This goes a long way to explain how the "opening" of Rafah - the border with Gaza - was not really an opening. The quota of free-moving Gazans is a maximum of 400 a day; and no less than 5,000 Gazans remain blacklisted. So essentially the gulag situation remains similar to Mubarak-sanctioned levels.

    This also goes a long way to explain why now you see it/now you don't tentative Egyptian presidential candidate Mohamed ElBaradei is now on an overdrive charm offensive on Saudi media - singing the praises of King Abdullah while performing the contortionism of ignoring frenetic Saudi support for Mubarak until (and beyond) the last minute.

    In Yemen, the House of Saud is - what else - buying Yemeni tribes with cold hard cash, in the name of "stability in the region". Even though it is living up to its reputation of prime asylum for fleeing Arab dictators, the House of Saud officially is in favor of President Abdullah Saleh stepping down in the name of "less bloodshed and less unpredictability".

    The House of Saud insists - no irony intended - Saleh is being hosted for "humanitarian motives". Officially, the House of Saud also abhors a "power vacuum". Said vacuum nonetheless remains quite persistent, now coupled with fears of "rising chaos". Washington, meanwhile, scans the horizon frantically trying to spot any dronable al-Qaeda in the Arabic Peninsula (AQAP) "targets".

    If Saleh ships himself back to Yemen that could only happen because the House of Saud said so. So we have a situation where Saleh's son Ali is commanding the elite Republican Guard - from inside the presidential palace - and his four cousins are also in control of key military units. The current "acting" leader, Vice President Abdu-Rabo Mansur Hadi, is a figurehead.

    Saudi Arabia seems to condone, for now, this theoretically vacuum-cleaned power arrangement. As for the wide-ranging Yemeni protest movement, their only shot now would be to force Hadi to hang on, push for a transitional government, and try to quell the counter-revolution, directed by Saleh's family, with people power. If that's the case, the House of Saud will brutally - and directly - step in.

    In Bahrain, the House of Saud explicitly supports the National Human Rights Organization; no wonder, its head was appointed by King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa last year, so the organization must support the ruling dynasty - yet not as much as the Saudi masters. Bahrain's really independent human-rights organizations, meanwhile, have had their leading activists arrested and facing military trials.

    And just like a thief in the dead of night, who sneaked into Washington to be received at the White House by US President Barack Obama this past Tuesday? No one else than Bahrain's Crown Prince Salman al-Khalifa.

    There was no press conference. There were no pictures. It's like this conversation would self-destruct in five seconds - but it did take place, between a drone-heavy Nobel Peace Prize and the head of the military of a Persian Gulf American satrapy which is busy toppling its own people. No amount of rhetoric will alter the math: Washington fully backs outright repression all across the Persian Gulf - to the extreme delight of the House of Saud.

    He is heavy, he's no brother

    Then there's the Muslim Brotherhood question - essential in the context of the carefully orchestrated US/Saudi counter-revolution.

    The Muslim Brotherhood is being instrumentalized by the House of Saud all across the board, from Syria to Egypt. In Egypt, the reactionary old guard Brotherhood is working very close with the Military Council; "rewards" for good behavior by both Washington and Riyadh should be in the works.

    Clearly this won't translate as an endorsement of ElBaradei - whose appeal is towards disenfranchised young people, liberals, a few leftists and a smatter of progressive Islamists who defected from the "traditional" Muslim Brotherhood.

    As for the even more reactionary Salafis, they are now getting into Facebook groups, in a public relations offensive to try to improve their dreadful image and sort of mingle with "other intellectual and political currents".

    Saudi media meanwhile is awash with their own public relations extolling the merits of the kingdom and denigrating the "corruption of the ruling family and its cronies" in selected Arab republics such as Syria and Libya. According to the official platform of the Gulf Counter-Revolution Club, also known as Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), all Arab monarchies are as virtuous as virgins in paradise.

    As the cold hard cash counter-revolution goes on, the future of the great 2011 Arab revolt looks grimmer and grimmer. It all depends on how forcefully the Tahrir Square spirit will keep the Military Council in Egypt in check. And how progressive forces in Egypt, Yemen and beyond find ways to counterpunch the relentless impact of the House of Saud oil wealth.

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MF10Ak04.html

    Posted 11 months ago on 09 Jun 2011 13:34 #
  31. aftab arif
    Member

    I was so wrong about Saudi Arabia, because from the above article and the historical perspective it seems the Saudis have always danced too the American tune.

    Posted 11 months ago on 09 Jun 2011 14:47 #
  32. bsobaid
    Member

    I have a feeling the idea of action against Libya, Yemen etc can be extended against Pakistan if Pakistan refuses to comply allied forces demands in the context of WoT.

    I also have a feeling this will be done in the pretext of securing nuclear assets.

    Posted 11 months ago on 09 Jun 2011 15:04 #
  33. bsobaid
    Member

  34. aftab arif
    Member

    Did Egypt really open Rafah crossing?

    For most Palestinians, leaving Gaza through Egypt is as exasperating a process as entering it. Governed by political and cultural sensitivities, most Palestinian officials and public figures refrain from criticizing the way Palestinians are treated at the Rafah border.

    However, there is really no diplomatic language to describe the relationship between desperate Palestinians - some literally fighting for their lives - and Egyptian officials at the crossing which separates Gaza from Egypt.

    "Gazans are treated like animals at the border," a friend of mine told me. She was afraid that her fiance would not be allowed to leave Gaza, despite the fact that his papers were in order. Having crossed the border myself just a few days ago, I could not disagree with her statement.

    The New York Times reported on June 8: "After days of acrimony between Hamas and Egypt over limitations on who could pass through the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt, Hamas said Egypt had agreed to allow 550 people a day to leave Gaza and to lengthen the operating hours of the crossing."

    And so the saga continues.

    A few weeks after an official Egyptian announcement to "permanently" open the border - thus extending a lifeline for trapped Palestinians under siege in Gaza - the Rafah border was opened for two days of conditional operation in late May, and then closed again for four days. Now it has once more "reopened".

    All the announcements are proving to be no more than rhetoric. The latest "permanent" reopening has come with its own conditions and limitations, involving such factors as gender, age, purpose of visit, and so on.

    “Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country,” states Article 13 (2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This universal principle, however, continues to evade most Palestinians in Gaza.

    I was one of the very first Palestinians who stood at Rafah following the announcement of a "permanent" opening. Our bus waited at the gate for a long time. I watched a father repeatedly try to reassure his crying six-year-old child, who displayed obvious signs of a terrible bone disease.

    "Get the children out or they will die," shouted an older passenger as he gasped for air. The heat in the bus, combined with the smell of trapped sweat was unbearable.

    Passengers took it upon themselves to leave the bus and stand outside, enduring disapproving looks from the Egyptian officials. Our next task was finding clean water and a shady spot in the arid zone separating the Egypt and Palestinian sides. There were no restrooms.

    A tangible feeling of despair and humiliation could be read on the faces of the Gaza passengers.

    No one seemed to be in the mood to speak of the Egyptian revolution, a favorite topic of conversation among most Palestinians. This zone is governed by an odd relationship, one that goes back many years - well before Egypt, under Hosni Mubarak, decided to shut down the border in 2006 in order to aid in the political demise of Hamas.

    The issue actually has nothing to do with gender, age or logistics. All Palestinians are treated very poorly at the Rafah crossing, and they continue to endure even after the toppling of Mubarak, his family and the dismissal of the corrupt security apparatus. The Egyptian revolution is yet to reach Gaza.

    When the bus was finally allowed to enter about five hours later, Palestinians dashed into the gate, desperately hoping to be among the lucky ones allowed to go in. The anxiety of the travelers usually makes them vulnerable to workers at the border who promise them help in exchange for negotiated amounts of money. All of this is actually a con, as the decision is made by a single man, referred to as al-Mukhabarat, the "intelligence".

    Some are sent back while others are allowed entry. Everyone is forced to wait for many hours - sometimes even days - with no clear explanation as to what they are waiting for, or why they are being sent back.

    The very ill six-year-old held on his dad's jacket as they walked about, frantically trying to fulfill all the requirements. Both seemed like they were about to collapse.

    The Mukhabarat determined that three Gazan students on their way to their universities in Russia were to be sent back. They had jumped through many hoops already to make it so far. Their hearts sank when they heard the verdict. I protested on their behalf, and the decision was as arbitrarily reversed as it was originally made.

    Those who are sent back to Gaza are escorted by unsympathetic officers to the same open spot, to wait for the same haggard bus. Some of those who are allowed entry are escorted by security personnel across the Sinai desert, all the way to Cairo International Airport to be "deported" to their final destinations. They are all treated like common criminals.

    "I can't watch my son die in front of my eyes," screamed the father of 11-year-old Mohammed Ali Saleh, according to Mohammed Omer for Inter Press Service (June 10). He was addressing Egyptian troops days after the border was supposedly "permanently" reopened - for the second time in less than a week.
    Such compelling needs as medical treatment, education and freedom keep bringing Palestinians back. The Israeli siege has choked Gaza to the point of near complete strangulation. Egypt is Gaza's only hope.

    "I beg you to open the crossing ... You brothers of Egypt have humiliated us for so long. Isn't it time we had our dignity back?” said Naziha Al-Sebakhi, 63, one of the many distressed faces at the Rafah border, according to Mohammed Omer.

    As they crossed into Egypt, some of the passengers seemed euphoric. The three students and I shared a taxi to Cairo. A tape of Umm Kulthum's Amal Hyati - Hope of my Life - played over and over again. Despite everything, the young men seemed to hold no resentment whatsoever towards Egypt.

    "I just love Egypt ...I don't know why," said Majid pensively, before falling asleep from sheer exhaustion.

    I thought of the six-year-old boy and his dad. I wonder if they made it to the hospital on time.

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MF18Ak02.html

    It seems that the Mubarak Bakiyat and pro Israel agents are deeply entrenched and will "not" be dislodged or swayed by Palestinian desperation.

    Posted 11 months ago on 20 Jun 2011 12:34 #
  35. aftab arif
    Member

    In March, as a government crackdown on pro-democracy protestors intensified in Bahrain, curious advertisements started appearing in Pakistani media.

    "Urgent requirement - manpower for Bahrain National Guard," said one.

    "For service in Bahrain National Guard, the following categories of people with previous army and police experience are urgently needed," said another, with "previous experience" and "urgent need" underscored.

    The categories included: former army drill instructors, anti-riot instructors, retired military police, and former army cooks.

    In the following two months, on the back of visits to Islamabad by senior Saudi and Bahraini officials, sources say at least 2,500 former servicemen were recruited by Bahrainis and brought to Manama, increasing the size of their national guard and riot police by as much as 50 per cent.

    "We know that continued airplanes are coming to Bahrain and bringing soldiers from Pakistan," Nabeel Rajab, president of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights, told Al Jazeera.

    "We do not know the exact number, but we know that it is much more than 1,500 or 2,000 people."

    Recruited into the special forces, the national guard, and the riot police, the Pakistani citizens are tasked with suppressing Shia protesters that are reportedly demanding equal rights after years of alleged oppression at the hands of the royal family, part of Bahrain's Sunni minority.

    "Our own Shia cannot join the security forces, but the government recruits from abroad," said Rajab.

    On the ground in Pakistan, the recruitments were handled by the Fauji Foundation, one of the largest conglomerates in the country with close ties to the Pakistani military. In addition to the Overseas Employment Services, which is tasked with providing job opportunities for retired military personnel, the foundation owns large cereal and gas companies, sugar mills, security firms, as well as hospitals and universities.

    Advertisement placed in Pakistani papers, reading: 'Urgent Need for Bahrain National Guard'
    The Fauji Foundation did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for comment.

    "Pakistanis, particularly Baluchs, make up a large part of the Bahraini force," said Fahad Desmukh, a former resident of Bahrain who now lives in Pakistan.

    "They are extremely visible on the streets - so visible that the protestors were recently responding to the police in Urdu, knowing they did not speak Arabic." [Watch the video of protesters chanting 'police are crazy' in Urdu here.]

    A small country of roughly 800,000 people (including about 235,000 non-nationals), Bahrain has a Defence Force of about 12,000 and a National Guard of 1,200, according to the US State Department.

    The National Guard, which is in the foreront of the crackdown, seems to have been more than doubled by the recent recruitments of mostly Baluch servicemen.

    "What it shows is that the Bahraini government has little trust in its own citizens to conduct security operations," Michael Stephens, a Qatar-based Bahrain specialist at the Royal United Services Institute, told Al Jazeera.

    "So they rely on foreign recruits to unquestioningly carry out orders of violently suppressing protests."

    While Arab nations have a long history of leaning on Pakistan for military expertise as well as foot soldiers, the recent increase in recruitments come at a tricky time. Pakistan has struggled to quell widespread ethnic violence and a robust insurgency on its own streets.

    In the region, too, the country faces tremendous challenges.

    "It has certainly put Pakistan in a very awkward position, where it has to balance its relationship with Iran on the one side and Saudi Arabia and Bahrain on the other," Stephens said.

    Iran, a leading Shia country, has repeatedly denounced the Bahraini government's crackdown on the Shia - while Saudi Arabia has remained Bahrain's closest ally.

    Inside Bahrain, the recruitments have brought dangers to the South Asian diaspora, where ill-feeling towards Pakistanis has increased, reportedly because they are seen as the main vehicle in the crackdown.

    The influx of Sunni mercenaries has also increased fears that the government might be naturalising the new recruits in its efforts to change the country's Shia-majority demographic.

    Importing expertise

    Video footage of Bahraini protesters chanting: 'Our police are Pakistani'. Al Jazeera cannot be held responsible for content hosted on third party sites [YouTube]

    "In the 1970s and 80s, many Arab countries flushed with oil money bought state of the art equipment, but [the] local population lacked technical skills," said Hamid Hussain, a long time analyst and historian of the Pakistani military.

    "A number of Pakistan army and air force personnel were deputed to several countries including Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan, Syria and Iraq. "

    The recruitments varied from a dozen advisors to thousands of trainers and operators of complicated equipment.

    The most prominent cases of such partnership was in 1970, when then Brigadier Zia ul Haq helped the Jordanian forces suppress Palestinians in what became known as "Black September".

    Zia ul Haq, in one of the interesting paradoxes of the Pakistani military, later became a feared dictator who introduced a swift process of "Islamisation".

    Pakistan's security relationship with Saudi Arabia, in particular, has put it at odds with Iran, its neighbour to the west. The two nations have been stuck in a Shia-Sunni rivalry for decades and have battled proxy wars across the region.

    During the 1991 Gulf war, much to Saudi Arabia's apparent dismay, Pakistan turned down their request for preemptive help, in case Saddam Hussain launched attacks.

    Reviving the relationship since has taken a long time, but when the uprising in Bahrain brought fears of unrest knocking on Saudi doors, the chairman of the Saudi National Security Council, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, made two quiet trips to Pakistan to seek their support in case protests erupted at home.

    "Potential need for foreign troops in case protests spiral out of control has forced Saudis to work with current Pakistani civilian government for whom they have nothing but utter contempt," said Hussain.

    Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Reza Gilani told Prince Bandar that his country supported the Saudi stance in the Gulf and the Middle East and would stand by Riyadh for regional peace, according to Pakistani media.

    Al Jazeera's Fault Lines examines why the US supports protests in Libya - but not in Bahrain

    "The president and prime minister of Pakistan, faced with grim economic situation of the country and army brass uncertain about continued US funding, are delighted at the potential of a cash windfall from Saudi patrons," said Hussain.

    Also on Prince Bandar's agenda was gaining Pakistan's support for the Saudi-led Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) force that deployed to Bahrain for helping the Kingdom.

    The trip was followed by visits from the Bahraini foreign minister and the commander of their national guard.

    Then, recruitment adverts appeared in Pakistani media.

    Baluchistan, where most of the recruits come from, is a province of six million in Pakistan's southwest. For decades, an armed movement for self-determination there has been met with a severe government crackdown.

    Baluch nationalist fighters expressed their dismay at the recruitment long before the recent escalation.

    "We call upon the Baluch nation not to become part of any tyrant or oppressive army, at a time when the Baluch nation is living in a state of war … and are struggling against the tyrants ourselves," Basham Baluch, a spokesman for Baluch Liberation Front said in a 2009 statement.

    "Instead of turning the young Baluch into hired killers, they should join the national armies [Baluch Liberation Front, Baluchistan Liberation Army] to make the independence of their homeland a reality.

    "We do not want the Baluch people to be used and turned into mercenaries."

    The backlash

    Bahrain is home to a large population of foreign labourers. The majority of the work forces there comprises South Asian migrants, particularly Pakistanis.

    "Our country has a history of appreciation for the help Pakistanis have provided in development. But more recently we have seen crimes directed at Pakistanis, and that is worrying," said Rajab, the human rights activist.

    He points to the fact that thousands of people have been arrested and hundreds of houses have been looted by government forces. Since Pakistanis make up at least 30 per cent of the security forces, he says, when people think of the crackdown they think of Pakistanis.

    "The poor Pakistani labourer who has nothing do with security forces suffers from all this."

    Human rights activists and analysts also fear that the government is swiftly increasing the rate of naturalisation for Sunni immigrants in recent months in order to tip the ethnic balance of the country.

    With a clear Shia majority, the country has been ruled by a royal family from the Sunni minority.

    "What needs to be closely watched is the number of these recruits who will be naturalised in the coming months and years ahead," said RUSI's Stephens.

    "Many will not return home to Pakistan, and recent statistics show that South Asians make up a big majority of the foreign citizens naturalised in Bahrain."

    While many believe Pakistan is providing workers and soldiers to Bahrain in return for much needed economic aid, activists such as Rajab remain perplexed by the decision.

    "What I wonder is how the Pakistani government allows this many people to be brought here and used as mercenaries," said Rajab.

    "We know that many of these recruits are poor, uneducated, and are just looking for a job. They don't know what they are signing up for. But the Pakistan government certainly knows, so why are they allowing this?"

    http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/features/2011/07/2011725145048574888.html

    There is also a interesting video to watch when clicking the link.

    Bye

    Posted 10 months ago on 30 Jul 2011 20:26 #
  36. aftab arif
    Member

    The director of the Canadian-based Center for Research on Globalization, Michel Chossudovsky, says much of the hype around the Syrian crisis originates from abroad.

    “I think this is really part of the public relations campaign to demonize the Syrian government without addressing the fundamental causes of the crisis,” he stated. “This is not a peaceful protest movement. It is an armed insurrection by gunmen, well-organized mercenaries and it is confirmed not only by government sources. Let’s examine: Israeli and Lebanese sources say the protesters have heavy machine guns…Since when are peaceful civilian protesters armed with heavy machine guns?… And I think the United Nations decided to remove its non-essential staff essentially as a prelude to tomorrow’s [August 18] session at the UN Security Council.”

    Chossudovsky says he spent a couple of months in Syria earlier this year and left the country shortly before the violence started in mid-March. He is sure the insurgency there is part of an intelligence operation.

    “The question we have to ask ourselves: Who are the sources of this killing, what are the underlying causes of this insurrection?” he said. “We are dealing with a big lie as far as the media information is concerned. The media doesn’t even have access to Syria. They are drumming up the whole series of interpretations which are, from my point, totally biased.”

    http://rt.com/news/un-syria-withdrawal/

    Posted 9 months ago on 19 Aug 2011 4:26 #
  37. aftab arif
    Member

    Egyptians are gathering in Cairo's Tahrir Square for a mass protest to put pressure on the military to speed up the transfer of power.

    There have been more violent clashes around the square, and footage of protesters being beaten and injured by security forces has brought more people onto the streets.

    Meanwhile a report from Amnesty International says Egypt's military rulers have "completely failed to live up their promises to Egyptians to improve human rights".

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15831686

    Posted 6 months ago on 22 Nov 2011 18:02 #
  38. Abdul Rahman
    Member

    Aftab,

    Your posting about Syria was not right. After you posted that article 3 months back there is still dailymassacres of innocent civilians and thiusands have been killed. The West is enjoying this rather than support to resistance as in case of Liby because Assad is eventually their man.

    The criminal Assad is same like Saddam. He adheres to Baath party that preaches extreme Arab nationalism. Millions of Kurds were not given Syrian nationality because they are not "Arabs". Israel has made it clear that it supports these Alawite Baathist thugs. They are allies of Alawites. I can post several articles that support this.

    Assad's power base comes from Alawites who came to power after the French colonialists elevated and patronized them just like Qadianis in Pakistan were patronized by British.

    Posted 6 months ago on 22 Nov 2011 18:13 #
  39. aftab arif
    Member

    @ Abdul Rahman

    Israel bombed the Syrian Nuclear facility, so some collusion this is.

    Posted 6 months ago on 22 Nov 2011 18:17 #
  40. Abdul Rahman
    Member

    It was drama. It was nothing like bombing Iraq'a facility that was in much advanced stage. It will be another drama if they bomb Iran's facility which I seriously doubt they would. Same drama of occuying South Lebanon and giving victory to Hezbollah on a silver plate. The Israeli thrust was aimed at Palestiian camps and not Hezbollah. The same drama when Israel withdrew from Golan heights making a hero out of Hafez Assad.

    See this statement from Assad.

    On April 27, 2008 Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, making his first public comments about the raid, dismissed the allegations that it was a nuclear site which was attacked as false: "Is it logical? A nuclear site did not have protection with surface to air defenses? A nuclear site within the footprint of satellites in the middle of Syria in an open area in the desert?" Independent experts, however, suggested that Syria did not fortify its suspected reactor in order to avoid drawing attention and because the building was not yet operational.

    Posted 6 months ago on 22 Nov 2011 18:39 #
  41. aftab arif
    Member

    I have not reached a definite conclusion, but it could be entirely possible that Western Intelligence Agencies are destabilising Syria but at the same time he Assad is also killing many innocents too.

    Posted 6 months ago on 22 Nov 2011 19:02 #
  42. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    Video: Egyptian Women Demand Justice, Denounce Military

    08-Feb-2012
    --------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Source: Youtube Channel: TheRealNews

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 2:44 #
  43. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    Video: US, Saudis and Russia Vie for Influence in Post-Assad Syria

    07-Feb-2012
    --------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Source: Youtube Channel: TheRealNews

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 2:48 #
  44. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    Video: US Arms Deal with Bahrain as Crackdown Continues

    07-Feb-2012
    --------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Source: Youtube Channel: TheRealNews

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 2:50 #
  45. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    Video: Doha Debates: Is Turkey a Bad Model for the New Arab States?

    04-Feb-2012
    --------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Source: Youtube Channel: TheRealNews

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 2:56 #
  46. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    Video: A Short History of Modern Syria

    01-Feb-2012
    --------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Source: Youtube Channel: TheRealNews

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 2:58 #
  47. bsobaid
    Member

    I really need to understand what is preventing nato and amreeka to attack syria and its not about shia sunni only and its not china and russia,s veto either...

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 3:01 #
  48. Respect
    Member

    ^^^^^^^^^^^

    It's convincing there people, they have already wars at many other fronts. For them to get into another one especially after the IRAQ mishap, and the failures in Afghanistan.

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 3:19 #
  49. Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    Video: Israel and the American Elections

    01-Feb-2012
    --------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Source: Youtube Channel: TheRealNews

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 3:20 #
  50. bsobaid
    Member

    Respect, but they dont have to go all out war with them...
    Some Libya type action...

    Posted 3 months ago on 10 Feb 2012 3:32 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.