What i really don;t understand is how Mumtaz Qutta's supporters can draw a causal link between ST drinking and MQ's murder.
By that very logic somebody needs to put a bullet in zardari NS, SS, Altaaf, Chandhry bros, maulana diesel etc etc. These guys are just as fond of unislamic behavior as ST.
The only difference was that ST was irreverent about it whereas the other are huge hypocrites who clothe themselves in pious garb and hide their activities.
So question 1 to Mumtaz Qutta's supporters is this: Do you support the murder of all political figures in pakistan who have engaged in such activities?
Anyhow the mullahists also seem to have a very bad memory in terms of what ST ACTUALLY said. He termed the blasphemy law as a black law. He never mentioned the Quran nor did he mention the Prophet (pbuh). He criticized the MAN MADE LAW derived from the law of our colonial masters that exists in this form ONLY IN PAKISTAN.
I realize that plenty of mullahists would like to present his condemnation of the law as a criticism of the Prophet (pbuh) but of course even they know that is not the case. Many a devout muslim has also criticized the law and especially its current misuse against minorities. And those devout muslims criticize it IN THE NAME OF ISLAM and ISLAMIC PRINCIPLES.
In any case even if ST was guilty as sin, does the Quran encourage killing of a citizen without due process? Does the Quran allow an individual to act as judge jury and executioner?
And does the glorification of a sick murderer show islam in a good light or is it the ultimate humiliation and embarrassment.
I say it again. He is Mumtaz Qutta. And even that is an insult to dogs. And his followers i term as the Qutta Cadre, followers of a Dog.
Posted 4 months ago on 10 Jan 2012 13:26
# 
