HK
Again we return to a very basic problem in your reasoning.
You are quite right that there is only ONE Islam. This is neither a revolutionary thought nor one that has escaped the world.
People DO agree that there is only one islam. What people DON'T agree on is what that ONE Islam IS.
And that is where we have the issue. WHO decides who is following the ONE islam?? From barely a few decades after the death of the Prophet (pbuh) muslims have been embroiled in this conflict and it has resulted in greater and greater schisms.
The problem arises when somebody WITHIN the croup insists on EXCLUDING certain members of the group by arbitrarily declaring them non-muslims. ALL of the sects of islam are the result of certain people within the Ummah excluding others. These people took upon themselves God's exclusive right to decide who is muslim and who is not.
So pray tell.. who is a part of the ummah? Who makes that judgement? Who has the authority to do so?
You are merely repeating what everybody agrees on already, but you are not explaining how such unity is possible. Such unity is only possible when the self-appointed leaders of the ummah accept the diversity of perception about Islam that exists among the believers.
There are a myriad of beautiful implementations of islamic philosophy in the world and it is only when this diversity is accepted that unity is possible.
It is when our self-appointed "muslim leaders" assume that UNITY is the same as UNIFORMITY that they take the first step towards complete fragmentation. Faith is individual and will NEVER be uniform for ANYBODY. Faith can only look uniform on the SURFACE, but the reality is that there are as many different interpretations as there are people in the world.
your assumption is that everybody reads the Quran in the same way, that everybody can ONLY come to ONE conclusion and that there is no possiblity of multiple interpretations. This is of course completely untrue (as 1400 years of division quite adequately proves)
Btw it is patently false to blame this fragmentation of the ummah on outsiders (jews, christians, americans etc). While they do take advantage of these internal schisms, the fragmentation is wholly self-inflicted. If certain members of the ummah weren't so gung-ho about exclusing those who arrived at a different understanding from the same text, this fragmentation would not even be an issue.
Posted 1 year ago on 22 Nov 2010 8:47
#